ninth circuit court of appeal by:stephanie roberts

5
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal By:Stephanie Roberts

Upload: jarod-batchler

Post on 14-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal By:Stephanie Roberts

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal

By:Stephanie Roberts

Page 2: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal By:Stephanie Roberts

FACTS-Headquarter Located in San Francisco, California -Established December 10, 1869-Chief Judge : Alex Kozinski-Active Judges: 29-Senior Judges:16-Circuit Justice: Anthony Kennedy-Has 15 districts it appeals from-Is the largest of the 13 circuits -68% of the judges are democrats, so they're liberals-En Banco sessions

Page 3: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal By:Stephanie Roberts

Districts

District of Alaska

District of Arizona

Central District of California

Eastern District of California

Northern District of California

Southern District of California

District of Hawaii

District of Idaho

District of Montana

District of Nevada

District of Oregon

Eastern District of Washington

Western District of Washington

Page 4: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal By:Stephanie Roberts

CASES1979, THE NINTH CIRCUIT BECAME THE FIRST FEDERAL JUDICIAL CIRCUIT TO SET UP A BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL AS

AUTHORIZED BY THE BANKRUPTCY REFORM ACT IN OF 1978.

UNITED STATES V. COTTERMAN

A&M RECORDS INC V. NAPSTER INC

Page 5: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal By:Stephanie Roberts

Works cited

JUDGES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. (2013). Golden Gate University Law Review, 43(1), xv-xxix.

Hug Jr., P., & Tobias, C. (2000). A Preferable Approach for the Ninth Circuit. California Law Review, 88(5), 1657

CURRAN, B. C. (2014). THE "STATE" OF FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY LAW: THE NINTH CIRCUIT'S DEBT RECHARACTERIZATION ANALYSIS IN IN RE FITNESS HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL. Boston College Law Review, 55(6), 47-57

CRETA, M. (2014). A STEP IN THE WRONG DIRECTION: THE NINTH CIRCUIT REQUIRES REASONABLE SUSPICION FOR FORENSIC EXAMINATIONS OF ELECTRONIC STORAGE DEVICES DURING BORDER SEARCHES IN UNITED STATES v. COTTERMAN. Boston College Law Review, 55(6), 31-45.

Griffith, D., & McKinney, B. (2006). Supreme Court Finds Marketing Activity Creates Liability in Peer-to-Peer (P2P) File-Sharing Case. Journal Of The Academy Of Marketing Science, 34(2), 269-270.

Jogan, J. (2012). Fair Use in an Evolving Copyright Environment. Computer & Internet Lawyer, 29(11), 22-34.