newland developers pty ltd level 1 inspection and testing,...

Newland Developers Pty Ltd

Level 1 Inspection and Testing, Warralily Armstrong Creek Development

Stage 29 - GEOTABTF08569AE-BO

11 February 2015

This page has been left intentionally blank

ii

Coffey Geotechnics Pty Ltd ABN: 93 056 929 483

Table of contents

1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Project Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 3. Specification/work instructions .................................................................................................... 1 4. Fill Material .................................................................................................................................. 2 5. Earthworks ................................................................................................................................... 2

5.1. Subgrade assessment ...................................................................................................... 2 5.2. Fill construction ................................................................................................................. 2 5.3. Survey data and fill thickness ............................................................................................ 3

5.3.1. Eastern Fill Pad .................................................................................................... 3 5.3.2. Central Fill Pad ..................................................................................................... 3 5.3.3. Western Fill Pad ................................................................................................... 3 5.3.4. Southern Fill Pad .................................................................................................. 4

6. Testing and results ...................................................................................................................... 4 6.1. Field Density Tests ............................................................................................................ 4 6.2. Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) tests ........................................................................ 4

7. Exclusions ................................................................................................................................... 5 8. Statement of compliance ............................................................................................................. 5

Figures

Figure 1 – Fill areas & Exclusion Zones

Figure 1a, 1b & 1c - Field Density Test Locations

Figure 2 - Summary of Field Density Test Results

Figure 3 – Field Photos

Figure 4 – DCP Test Locations

Appendices

Appendix A - Laboratory Test Results (33 Pages) Appendix B – Survey W29 Fill Details, Rev B Appendix C – Extract from specification by SMEC, ref 0557esb-24

Level 1 Inspection and Testing, Stage 29, Warralily Armstrong Creek Development

Coffey GEOTABTF08569AE-BO 11 February 2015

1

1. Introduction This report presents the results of the Level 1 Inspection and Testing for fill placement within Stage 29 of Warralily Estate Armstrong Creek Development.

The works were commissioned by Martin O’Hanlon of Newland Developers Pty Ltd (Newland).

2. Project Summary We understand that Newland requires fill placement within Stage 29 of the Warralily Armstrong Creek Development in the areas as shown in Figure 1, to be constructed under Level 1 Inspection and Testing undertaken by a Geotechnical Inspection and Testing Authority (GITA).

Level 1 Inspection and Testing, as defined in AS3798-2007 “Guidelines on Earthworks for Commercial and Residential Development,” provides for full time inspection of the construction of controlled fill and field and laboratory testing in accordance with AS1289 “Methods of Testing Soils for Engineering Purposes”.

The Level 1 Inspection was undertaken by geotechnical professionals from Coffey for a total of 30 working days over 4 periods between 28 August to 4 September 2013, 29 July to 12 August 2014, 3 to 30 September 2014 and 28 November to 4 December 2014.

The earthworks contractor for the project was Winslow. Coffey Testing and Ground Science undertook the compaction control testing in their NATA accredited laboratories, as part of the Level 1 Inspection and Testing process.

This report is applicable to fill placed by Winslow within Stage 29 of the Warralily Development in the areas shown in Figure 1. The filling area encompasses four fill pads as listed below:

Eastern Fill Pad - Inclusive of the area within lots 933 to 955; Central Fill Pad - Inclusive of the area within lots 920 to 932; Western Fill Pad - Inclusive of the area within lots 915 to 919; Southern Fill Pad - Inclusive of the area within lots 901 to 914.

This report does not include fill other than where mentioned in this report or any other fill that may be placed during this period or subsequent periods at or surrounding the subject site. Excluded works such as trench backfill, foot paths, landscaping fill or topsoil are noted in section 7 of this report.

3. Specification/work instructions The specification for the project was prepared by SMEC Australia Pty Ltd (SMEC) for Armstrong Creek Development Corporation Pty Ltd under reference number 0557ESB-24. An extract from the specification was provided to Coffey in an email sent by Shane McGlynn from SMEC on 5 October 2012. This extract is provided in Appendix C and a short summary is provided below:

All filling in excess of 300mm depth within the building envelope of allotments shall be undertaken to specifications satisfying the requirements of AS 3798-1996 “Guidelines on Earthworks for Commercial and Residential Development”.



2

All such filling works shall be undertaken with supervision to the standard detailed as “Level 1 Inspection and Testing” in AS 3798-2007, such that the supervisor will issue a notice detailing that the works comply with the specifications and drawings.

Material to be used for fill construction shall satisfy the requirements of AS 3798-2007

Fill to be compacted in near horizontal layers not exceeding 250mm loose thickness

Compaction to achieve a dry density ratio of at least 95% Standard; and

Moisture content of the fill material is to be within ±3% of the Standard Optimum Moisture Content (SOMC).

4. Fill Material Fill used for the construction of Stage 29 comprised locally sourced clay from boxing of the roads within Stage 29 and stockpiled soils sourced from other stages within the Armstrong Creek Development.

5. Earthworks The earthworks for this project included stripping of topsoil, assessment, remediation and proof rolling the subgrade, and, placement and compaction of fill to construct engineered fill platforms.

5.1. Subgrade assessment The subgrade assessment of each fill pad was undertaken on the following dates:

- 28 August 2013 and 5 August 2014 for the Eastern Fill Pad;

- 18 September 2014 for the Western Fill Pad;

- 18 September 2014 for the Central Fill Pad;

- 28 August 2014 for the Southern Fill Pad.

Subgrade assessment was undertaken by Coffey following the removal of topsoil and before any fill was placed. In these areas the subgrade comprised of natural clay. No soft spots were observed during the subgrade proof rolling.

5.2. Fill construction Fill material was placed generally in loose layers varying in thickness from 200mm to 250mm. Compacted layers were approximately 150mm to 250mm thick.

Locally sourced fill from other stages of the Armstrong Creek Development was trucked in and spread with a bulldozer. A water cart and an 18 tonne pad foot roller were present onsite during works for conditioning and compacting. A bulldozer and a grader were used for stripping of topsoil and placement of fill. Excavators were used for some works such as clearing the swale drains.



3

Coffey’s Level 1 Inspector was on site on a full time basis during the placement, compaction and testing of the fill on the dates noted in Section 1 of this report. Coffey was not present on site over prolonged periods between the commencement and the completion of the earthworks (5 September 2013 to 28 July 2014 and 1 October 2014 to 27 November 2014). Coffey understands that Winslow did not place any fill within the four construction areas during the period when Coffey was absent from the site.

5.3. Survey data and fill thickness Winslow’s appointed surveyor Survey Management Solutions (SMS) conducted a survey of the site in two stages as follows:

- At subgrade level on the pads following the topsoil removal;

- At finished fill level, prior to placement of topsoil;

SMS’s survey plan is provided in Appendix B of this report under reference number W29 Fill Details rev B, dated 11 December 2014.

5.3.1. Eastern Fill Pad Based on the survey data, the fill thickness within the Eastern Pad ranged from 0.1m and up to maximum of 1m. The average fill thickness is assessed to be about 0.7m. This pad was filled with up to 4 layers which provides a total layer thickness consistent with the project specification.

5.3.2. Central Fill Pad

Based on the survey data, the fill thickness within the Lots 920, 921, 931 and 932 where a swale drain was present, ranged from 0.32m to 1.23m. Including the backfilling of the swale drain, this area was filled with up to 9 layers. This is consistent with the project layer thickness specification.

The fill thickness within Lots 922 to 930 ranged from 0.27m to 0.54m which was filled in with up to 3 layers. This is consistent with the project layer thickness specification.

We note that three survey spot levels indicate fill of 0.81m, 0.91m and 0.97m thickness that was placed within Lots 922, 929 and 930 respectively. Coffey has observed 3 layers of engineered fill being constructed in these three areas which should have resulted in a maximum thickness of 0.75m compacted thickness based on a compacted layer thickness of 0.25m.

To confirm the condition of the fill in the areas of these three surveyed spots, Coffey carried out an assessment of the consistency of the fill by conducting Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) tests in the area. The DCP tests were conducted to determine if any inconsistences within the fill compaction are present. The DCP testing of this area is discussed in Section 6.2 of this report.

5.3.3. Western Fill Pad

Based on the survey data, the fill thickness within the Western Pad ranged from 0.25m to 0.57m in the area encompassing Lots 915 to 917 which was filled with up to 3 layers. This is consistent with the project layer thickness specification.

The area encompassing Lots 918 and 919 contained a swale drain. Based on the survey data, a fill thickness of up to 1.1m is present in these areas. Including the backfilling of the swale drain, this area was filled with up to 7 layers. The fill layer thickness throughout the Western Pad is consistent with the project layer thickness specification.



4

5.3.4. Southern Fill Pad

Based on the survey data, the fill thickness within the Southern Pad ranged from 0.2m to 0.5m, this pad was filled with up to 2 layers.

We note that up to fifteen survey spot levels indicate fill in excess of 0.5m and of up to 0.79m thickness that was placed within Lots 901, 902, 904, 906 to 908 and 910 to 914. Coffey has observed 2 layers of engineered fill being constructed in these areas which should have resulted in a maximum thickness of 0.5m compacted thickness based on a compacted layer thickness of 0.25m.

To confirm the condition of the fill in the areas of these fifteen surveyed spots, Coffey carried out an assessment of the consistency of the fill by conducting Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) tests in the area. The DCP tests were conducted to determine if any inconsistences within the fill compaction are present. The DCP testing of this area is discussed in Section 6.2 of this report.

6. Testing and results 6.1. Field Density Tests Field density testing was undertaken progressively on the compacted fill. Testing was undertaken under Type 1 Earthworks (large scale operations) as defined in Table 8.1 of the AS 3798-2007. The testing frequency specified 1 test per material type per layer per 2500m2 or 1 test per 500m3 or 3 tests per working lot.

An alternate testing frequency specified under Type 4 (Confined operations) as defined in Table 8.1 of the AS 3798 -2007, of 1 test per 2 layers per 50m2 was adopted where appropriate, mainly during backfilling of the swale drains.

The field density testing was conducted by Coffey Testing and Ground Science and all laboratory testing was performed in their NATA accredited laboratories. A Hilf compaction test was performed for each field density test.

A total of 95 field density tests were performed during the earthworks. Ten of the 95 tests did not meet the specified criteria and these areas were subsequently re-worked and re-tested with the exception of test number #33. Test #33 failed due to excessive moisture content and the area was ripped up and allowed to dry before additional work in that area was allowed to continue. The remaining tests results met the specified dry density ratio criteria of 95% Standard and moisture variation of ±3% of the Optimum Moisture Content (OMC).

A summary of the test results obtained from the field density testing within Stage 29 fill platforms is provided in a table presented as Figure 2. The laboratory test reports of the field density tests are presented in Appendix A.

6.2. Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) tests As discussed in Sections 5.3.2 & 5.3.4, to assist in determining the uniformity and consistency of the fill within the Central Pad and Southern Pad where the survey spot levels indicated fill to exceed the expected thicknesses of 0.75m and 0.5m respectively, Coffey’s personnel conducted 12 Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) tests from the finished fill surface on 19 December 2014.



5

Tests DCP1 to DCP3 were conducted in the Central Pad between within Lots 922, 929 and 930. The DCP tests returned results ranging from 3 to 28 blow counts per 0.1m penetration within the uppermost 0.8m below the surface level.

Tests DCP4 to DCP12 were conducted in the Southern Pad on Lots 901, 902, 904, 906 to 908 and 910 to 914. The DCP tests returned results ranging from 2 to 35 blow counts per 0.1m penetration within the uppermost 0.8m below the surface level.

Based on the DCP test results as shown below in Table 1 and on the observations conducted under the Level 1 monitoring in these two areas, it is considered that the fill has been adequately compacted resulting in suitably engineered fill platforms. The locations of the individual DCP tests are shown in Figure 4.

Table 1 - Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Test Results

DCP Test # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Location/Lot # 922 929 930 901 902 904 905 907 910 912 913 914

Depth below surface (m) Blow counts per 0.1m depth penetration

0.1 19 2 23 35 5 11 16 9 25 20 5 24

0.2 19 10 11 9 4 13 9 7 10 8 6 11

0.3 14 5 7 8 6 5 3 3 3 5 8 9

0.4 5 3 7 6 9 7 2 5 6 5 14 5

0.5 6 18 7 5 7 6 3 5 7 28 6 4

0.6 5 18 6 8 4 9 9 6 11 6 9 5

0.7 7 7 7 6 6 7 11 5 15 4 7 5

0.8 9 9 8 5 8 9 11 10 13 6 24 7

7. Exclusions Trenches were excavated and backfilled on site for the installation of underground services such as sewers, electrical conduits, water mains etc. Footpaths in the front of the lots were also observed to be excavated and the adjacent areas filled during and after the Level 1 GITA services conducted by Coffey. Uncontrolled fill and topsoil may have been placed as part of the landscaping of the site following the completion of the engineered fill construction.

Coffey was not involved in monitoring and testing these works and as such are not included in the Level 1 report. The excluded areas are shown in Figure 1.

8. Statement of compliance Coffey personnel have provided Level 1 Inspection and Testing services during the construction of the four engineered fill areas within Stage 29 as shown in Figure 1. A geotechnical professional from Coffey (Level 1 Inspector) was on site on a full time basis during subgrade preparation and fill placement, and observed the construction techniques adopted.

Based on observations made by Coffey’s Level 1 Inspector and the results of field and laboratory tests, Coffey consider that the engineered fill areas within Stage 29 constructed by Winslow to the



6

levels indicated in Section 5, as far as we have been able to determine, has been placed in general accordance with the intent of the specification.

Figures Figure 1 – Fill areas & Exclusion Zones

Figure 1a, 1b & 1c - Field Density Test Locations

Figure 2 - Summary of Field Density Test Results

Figure 3 – Field Photos

Figure 4 – DCP Test Locations

drawn

approved

date

scale

original size

client:

project:

title:

project no: figure no: A4

II

SS

24/12/2014

NTS

NEWLAND DEVELOPERS PTY. LTD.

Stage 29 WARRALILY ARMSTRONG CREEK DEVELOPMENT

FILL PAD & EXCLUSION ZONE LOCATION PLAN

GEOTABTF08569AE-BO

FIGURE 1

LEGEND

Western Pad

Southern Pad

Eastern Pad

Central Pad

Exclusion Zones

drawn

approved

date

scale

original size

client:

project:

title:


II

SS

23/12/2014

NTS



FIELD DENSITY TEST LOCATION PLAN

GEOTABTF08569AE-BO

FIGURE 1a

LEGEND

Approximate Location of Layer 2 tests




Eastern Pad

Swale drain

drawn

approved

date

scale

original size

client:

project:

title:


II

SS

23/12/2014

NTS




GEOTABTF08569AE-BO

FIGURE 1b

LEGEND




Central Pad




Swale Drain

drawn

approved

date

scale

original size

client:

project:

title:


II/MB

SS

22/12/2014

NTS




GEOTABTF08569AE-BO

FIGURE 1c

LEGEND





Southern Pad


Swale Drain

Western Pad


FIGURE 2 SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS AT STAGE 29Project Number: GEOTABTF08569AE Client Newland Developers Specified requirements

Project name: Warralily Armstrong Creek Development Contractor Winslow Density Ratio ≥ 95% of Max Dry Density

Location: Mt Duneed, VIC Engineer SMEC Moisture content within ± 3% of OMC

Test Retest Day - Date Layer Lot HILF MoistureMoisture Pass Retest

of test Density Ratio Variation / Comment

Ratio of OMC Fail

# # # # % % %

1 Thursday, 29 August 2013 1 955 98.5 101.5 0.5 Pass

2 Thursday, 29 August 2013 1 952 98.5 108.5 3.5 Fail 3

3 2 Friday, 30 August 2013 1 952 98.5 108 2 Pass

4 Monday, 2 September 2013 2 995 96 112 2.5 Pass

5 Tuesday, 3 September 2013 2 952 100.5 -2.5 Pass

6 Wednesday, 4 September 2013 3 953 99.5 -2.5 Pass

7 Tuesday, 5 August 2014 1 949 95 84.4 -2.5 Pass

8 Tuesday, 5 August 2014 2 949 101.5 83 -2.5 Pass

9 Tuesday, 5 August 2014 1 945 98.5 85 -2.5 Pass

10 Wednesday, 6 August 2014 1 942 92 102.5 0.5 Fail 12 & 13

11 Wednesday, 6 August 2014 1 938 86.5 108 1 Fail 12 & 13

12 10 & 11 Thursday, 7 August 2014 1 936 102.5 87 -2.5 Pass

13 10 & 11 Thursday, 7 August 2014 1 941 96 98 -0.5 Pass

14 Thursday, 7 August 2014 2 947 103 96.5 -0.5 Pass

15 Thursday, 7 August 2014 2 944 98 99.5 0 Pass

16 Friday, 8 August 2014 3 949 108 90.5 -1.5 Pass

17 Monday, 11 August 2014 1 934 97 114 3 Pass

18 Monday, 11 August 2014 2 937 99 85 -2.5 Pass

19 Monday, 11 August 2014 4 949 99.5 99 0 Pass

GEOTABTF08569AE-BO FIGURE 2 10.02.2015

20 Monday, 11 August 2014 3 946 102.5 98.5 -0.5 Pass

21 Tuesday, 12 August 2014 2 934 101 97 -0.5 Pass

22 Wednesday, 3 september 2014 4 945 97.5 109 2 Pass

23 Wednesday, 3 september 2014 4 944 95 85 -2.5 Pass

24 Wednesday, 3 september 2014 3 942 99 111 2 Pass

25 Wednesday, 3 september 2014 3 934 102 110.5 2 Pass

26 Wednesday, 3 september 2014 3 936 103 110 2 Pass

27 Wednesday, 3 september 2014 3 938 102.5 110 2 Pass

28 Tuesday, 9 September 2014 1 902 98 103 0.5 Pass

29 Tuesday, 9 September 2014 1 904 97 100 0 Pass

30 Tuesday, 9 September 2014 1 906 99 100 0 Pass

31 Tuesday, 9 September 2014 1 910 96.5 100 0 Pass

32 Tuesday, 9 September 2014 1 913 99.5 102 0.5 Pass

33 Tuesday, 9 September 2014 1 940 97.5 120 4.5 Fail

34 Wednesday, 10 September 2014 1 934 97.5 108.5 1.5 Pass

35 Wednesday, 10 September 2014 2 907 95 107 1.5 Pass

36 Wednesday, 10 September 2014 2 912 99 110.5 2.5 Pass

37 Wednesday, 10 September 2014 2 939 100.5 108 1.5 Pass

38 Thursday, 4 December 2014 2 903 98 103 0.5 Pass

39 Thursday, 4 December 2014 2 906 95 100.5 0 Pass

40 Wednesday, 17 September 2014 1 912 96.5 101 0 Pass

41 Wednesday, 17 September 2014 1 910 99.5 101 0 Pass

42 Wednesday, 17 September 2014 1 921 103.5 99.5 0 Pass

43 Wednesday, 17 September 2014 1 905 101 100.5 0 Pass

44 Wednesday, 17 September 2014 1 903 100 101 0 Pass

45 Thursday, 18 September 2014 2 921 102.5 102 -0.5 Pass

46 Thursday, 18 September 2014 1 924 93.5 102.5 0.5 Fail 49

47 Thursday, 18 September 2014 1 928 93 101.5 0 Fail 48

48 47 Thursday, 18 September 2014 1 928 98.5 100 0 Pass

49 46 Thursday, 18 September 2014 1 924 97 99.5 0 Pass


50 Thursday, 18 September 2014 1 915 96.5 85.5 -2.5 Pass

51 Thursday, 18 September 2014 1 916 101 100.5 0 Pass

52 Friday, 19 September 2014 1 944 95.5 115 3 Pass

53 Friday, 19 September 2014 1 946 98.5 102.5 0.5 Pass

54 Friday, 19 September 2014 1 944 98.5 103 0.5 Pass

55 Friday, 19 September 2014 2 947 100 99 0 Pass

56 Friday, 19 September 2014 2 929 95 98 -0.5 Pass


58 Friday, 19 September 2014 2 924 97.5 100.5 0 Pass


60 Friday, 19 September 2014 1 915 93.5 99.5 0 Fail 64

61 Friday, 19 September 2014 1 918 93 98.5 -0.5 Fail 62

62 61 Monday, 22 September 2014 1 918 97 86 -2.5 Pass

63 Monday, 22 September 2014 3 945 97.5 85 -2.5 Pass

64 60 Tuesday, 23 September 2014 1 915 96.5 88 -2 Pass

65 Tuesday, 23 September 2014 1 918 101.5 88.5 -2 Pass

66 Wednesday, 24 September 2014 2 917 100.5 98.5 -0.5 Pass

67 Wednesday, 24 September 2014 2 915 97 108 1.5 Pass

68 Thursday, 25 September 2014 1 921 97.5 107.5 1.5 Pass

69 Thursday, 25 September 2014 3 915 99 100 0 Pass

70 Thursday, 25 September 2014 3 918 98.5 104 1 Pass

71 Thursday, 25 September 2014 2 921 97.5 87.5 -2.5 Pass

72 Friday, 26 September 2014 4 916 103.5 89 -2 Pass

73 Friday, 26 September 2014 4 919 101 90.5 -1.5 Pass

74 Tuesday, 30 September 2014 3 921 102 89.5 -1.5 Pass

75 Tuesday, 30 September 2014 3 931 98.5 101.5 0.5 Pass

76 Monday, 1 December 2014 1 919 101 89 -1.5 Pass

77 Monday, 1 December 2014 1 West of 918 97.5 83 -3 Pass

78 Monday, 1 December 2014 1 920 92.5 86 -2 Fail

79 Monday, 1 December 2014 1 931 94 84 -2 Fail

No retests, area reworked back

from subgrade


80 Monday, 1 December 2014 3 920 95 100 0 Pass

81 Monday, 1 December 2014 4 920 97 97 -0.5 Pass

82 Tuesday, 2 December 2014 3 West of 918 100 82 -3 Pass

83 Tuesday, 2 December 2014 3 919 96.5 94 -1 Pass

84 Tuesday, 2 December 2014 1 920 101 102 0.5 Pass

85 Tuesday, 2 December 2014 1 931 96 100 0 Pass

86 Tuesday, 2 December 2014 5 918 99 87 -2.5 Pass

87 Tuesday, 2 December 2014 3 931 99 91 -1.5 Pass

88 Tuesday, 2 December 2014 3 920 100.5 84 -3 Pass

89 Wednesday, 3 December 2014 7 918 100 91 -1.5 Pass

90 Wednesday, 3 December 2014 5 931 99.5 103 0.5 Pass

91 Wednesday, 3 December 2014 7 West of 918 98 84 -2.5 Pass

92 Wednesday, 3 December 2014 515m West of

91898 85 -2.5 Pass

93 Wednesday, 3 December 2014 7 920 100.5 100 0 Pass

94 Thursday, 4 December 2014 8 931 97 88 -2 Pass

95 Thursday, 4 December 2014 9 920 96.5 88 -2 Pass


drawn

approved

date

scale

original size

client:

project:

title:




FIELD PHOTOS

FIGURE 3 GEOTABTF08569AE-BO

NTS

23/12/2014

SS

II

30 August 2013

30 August 2013

31 July 2014

31 July 2014

drawn

approved

date

scale

original size

client:

project:

title:




FIELD PHOTOS


NTS

23/12/2014

SS

II

05 August 2014

05 August 2014

05 August 2014

05 August 2014

drawn

approved

date

scale

original size

client:

project:

title:




FIELD PHOTOS


NTS

23/12/2014

SS

II

06 August 2014

06 August 2014

07 August 2014

07 August 2014

drawn

approved

date

scale

original size

client:

project:

title:




FIELD PHOTOS


NTS

23/12/2014

SS

II

08 August 2014

08 August 2014

28 August 2014

28 August 2014

drawn

approved

date

scale

original size

client:

project:

title:




FIELD PHOTOS


NTS

23/12/2014

SS

II

09 September 2014

09 September 2014

16 September 2014

16 September 2014

drawn

approved

date

scale

original size

client:

project:

title:




FIELD PHOTOS


NTS

23/12/2014

SS

II

18 September 2014

18 September 2014

24 September 2014

24 September 2014

drawn

approved

date

scale

original size

client:

project:

title:




FIELD PHOTOS


NTS

23/12/2014

SS

II

30 September 2014 30 September 2014

28 November 2014 28 November 2014

drawn

approved

date

scale

original size

client:

project:

title:




FIELD PHOTOS


NTS

23/12/2014

SS

II

28 November 2014

28 November 2014

02 December 2014

02 December 2014

drawn

approved

date

scale

original size

client:

project:

title:




FIELD PHOTOS


NTS

23/12/2014

SS

II

03 December 2014

03 December 2014

04 December 2014

04 December 2014

drawn

approved

date

scale

original size

client:

project:

title:


MB/II

SS

23/12/2014

NTS



DCP TEST LOCATION PLAN

GEOTABTF08569AE

FIGURE 4

LEGEND

Southern Pad

Central Pad

Approximate DCP

Locations

Appendix A - Laboratory Test Results (33 Pages)

Sample DetailsLocation:

Client Request ID:

Specification Requirements: MINIMUM HILF DENSITY RATIO OF 95% of Standard Compaction + or - 3% omc (as advised byclient)

Field Test procedures: AS 1289.5.8.1

Laboratory Test procedures: AS 1289.5.7.1, AS 1289.2.1.1

Sampling Method: AS1289.1.2.1 Clause 6.4 (b)

Source: On Site

Material: General Fill

Sample DataSample ID ABTM13S-01172

Field Sample ID Test 1

Date Tested 29/08/2013

Time Tested 15:00

Location Lot 955

Layer 1

Field and Laboratory DataDepth of Test (mm) 225

Field Moisture Content (%) 22.0

Field Wet Density (t/m³) 2.08

Field Dry Density (t/m³) 1.71

Peak Converted Wet Density* (t/m³) 2.12

Optimum Moisture Content (%) 21.5

Compactive Effort Standard

Moisture Ratio (%) 101.5

Moisture Variation (%) 0.5 wet

Hilf Density Ratio (%) 98.5legend * adjusted for oversize material .


Field Sample ID Test 2

Date Tested 29/08/2013

Time Tested 15:30

Location Lot 952

Layer 1

Field and Laboratory DataDepth of Test (mm) 225

Field Moisture Content (%) 56.5

Field Wet Density (t/m³) 2.08

Field Dry Density (t/m³) 1.33

Peak Converted Wet Density* (t/m³) 2.11

Optimum Moisture Content (%) 52.0

Compactive Effort Standard

Moisture Ratio (%) 108.5

Moisture Variation (%) 3.5 wet

Hilf Density Ratio (%) 98.5legend * adjusted for oversize material .

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. The results of the tests, calibrations and/ormeasurements included in this document are traceableto Australian/national standards.

11/09/2013

HILF Density Ratio Report

Report No: HDR:ABTM13W00309Issue No: 3

Client:

Date of Issue:

NATA Accredited Laboratory Number:431

Approved Signatory: G. Samaradiwakara

(Associate Engineering Technician)

This report replaces all previous issues of report no 'HDR:ABTM13W00309'.

Project Name: GEOTABTF08569AE - Warralily - Stage 29

ABN 92 114 364 046

Abbotsford, Melbourne Laboratory

Coffey Testing Pty Ltd3G Marine ParadeAbbotsford VIC 3067

Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999

Project No.: INFOABTM00034AAPrincipal: Newland Developers Pty Ltd

Lot No.: TRN:

Preliminary Report Issued - Issue No.:1

P.O. Box 40Kew VIC 3101

Coffey Geotechnics Pty Ltd (Abbotsford)

Page 1 of 1Form No: 18996, Report No: HDR:ABTM13W00309 © 2000-2013 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com

Comments

Sample DetailsLocation:Client Request ID:Specification Requirements: MINIMUM HILF DENSITY RATIO OF 95% of Standard Compaction + or - 3% omc (as advised by

client)Field Test procedures: AS 1289.5.8.1Laboratory Test procedures: AS 1289.5.7.1, AS 1289.2.1.1Sampling Method: AS1289.1.2.1 Clause 6.4 (b)Source: On SiteMaterial: Insitu


Field Sample ID Test 3Date Tested 30/08/2013Time Tested 14:30

Location Lot 952

Layer 1

Retest of test 2.

Soil Description Silty Clay

Field and Laboratory DataDepth of Test (mm) 225AS Sieve Size (mm) 19.0Field Moisture Content (%) 24.5Field Wet Density (t/m³) 2.02Field Dry Density (t/m³) 1.62Peak Converted Wet Density* (t/m³) 2.05Optimum Moisture Content (%) 23.0Compactive Effort StandardMoisture Ratio (%) 108.0Moisture Variation (%) 2.0 wetHilf Density Ratio (%) 98.5legend * adjusted for oversize material .


11/09/2013

HILF Density Ratio ReportReport No: HDR:ABTM13W00311

Issue No: 3

Client:

Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number:431

Approved Signatory: G. Samaradiwakara(Associate Engineering Technician)



ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Site lcoations selected by site engineer, soil description as supplied by site engineer.Comments

Sample DetailsLocation:Client Request ID:Specification Requirements: MINIMUM HILF DENSITY RATIO OF 95% of Standard Compaction + or -3% OMC (as advised by




Location Lot 995

Layer 2


Field and Laboratory DataDepth of Test (mm) 225Depth of Layer (mm) 250Field Moisture Content (%) 22.0Field Wet Density (t/m³) 2.01Field Dry Density (t/m³) 1.65Peak Converted Wet Density* (t/m³) 2.09Optimum Moisture Content (%) 19.5Compactive Effort StandardMoisture Ratio (%) 112.0Moisture Variation (%) 2.5 wetHilf Density Ratio (%) 96.0legend * adjusted for oversize material .


9/09/2013


Issue No: 1

Client:


Approved Signatory: Owen Clapton(Geotechnician)Project Name: GEOTABTF08569AE - Warralily - Stage 29

ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:




Comments

Sample DetailsLocation:Client Request ID:Specification Requirements: MINIMUM HILF DENSITY RATIO OF 95% of Standard Compaction + or -3% OMC (as advised by




Location Lot 952

Layer 2

Soil Description Clay

Field and Laboratory DataDepth of Test (mm) 225Depth of Layer (mm) 250AS Sieve Size (mm) 19.0Field Wet Density (t/m³) 2.01Peak Converted Wet Density* (t/m³) 2.00Compactive Effort StandardMoisture Variation (%) 2.5 dryHilf Density Ratio (%) 100.5legend * adjusted for oversize material .



Location Lot 953

Layer 3

Soil Description Clay

Field and Laboratory DataDepth of Test (mm) 225Depth of Layer (mm) 250AS Sieve Size (mm) 19.0Field Wet Density (t/m³) 2.01Peak Converted Wet Density* (t/m³) 2.02Compactive Effort StandardMoisture Variation (%) 2.5 dryHilf Density Ratio (%) 99.5legend * adjusted for oversize material .


9/09/2013


Issue No: 1

Client:


Approved Signatory: Owen Clapton(Geotechnician)Project Name: GEOTABTF08569AE - Warralily - Stage 29

ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:




Test locations selected by site engineer.Comments

Sample DetailsLocation: Mt DuneedClient Request ID:Specification Requirements: MINIMUM HILF DENSITY RATIO OF 95% of Standard Compaction + or -3% OMC (as advised by

client)Field Test procedures: AS 1289.5.8.1Laboratory Test procedures: AS 1289.5.7.1, AS 1289.2.1.1Sampling Method: AS1289.1.2.1 Clause 6.4 (b)Source: On SiteMaterial: Silty Clay



Location Lot 949

6m South

29m West

Nth Western

Layer 1


Field and Laboratory DataDepth of Test (mm) 200Field Moisture Content (%) 12.5Field Wet Density (t/m³) 1.92Field Dry Density (t/m³) 1.71Peak Converted Wet Density* (t/m³) 2.02Optimum Moisture Content (%) 15.0Compactive Effort StandardMoisture Ratio (%) 84.5Moisture Variation (%) 2.5 dryHilf Density Ratio (%) 95.0legend * adjusted for oversize material .

Sample DataABTM14S-02150

Test 85/08/2014

15:15

Lot 949

8m South

13m West

Nth Western

Layer 2

Silty Clay

Field and Laboratory Data20012.52.071.842.0415.5

Standard83.0

2.5 dry101.5

.



Location Lot 945

5m South

12m West

Nth Western

Layer 1




7/08/2014


Issue No: 2

Client:


Approved Signatory: Mitchell Hindmarsh(Senior Geotechnician)



ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Comments





Location Lot 942

12m North

Sth West Corner

Layer 1


Field and Laboratory DataDepth of Test (mm) 200Field Moisture Content (%) 16.0Field Wet Density (t/m³) 1.95Field Dry Density (t/m³) 1.68Peak Converted Wet Density* (t/m³) 2.12Optimum Moisture Content (%) 15.5Compactive Effort StandardMoisture Ratio (%) 102.5Moisture Variation (%) 0.5 wetHilf Density Ratio (%) 92.0legend * adjusted for oversize material .



Location Lot 938

8m North & 21m East

Sth West Corner

Layer 1




8/08/2014


Issue No: 2

Client:





ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Comments





Location Lot 936

Retest of Test 10-11

Layer 1




Test 137/08/2014

10:15

Lot 941

Retest of Test 10-11

Layer 1

Silty Clay


Standard98.0

0.5 dry96.0

.


Test 147/08/2014

14:20

Lot 947

5m North 16m West

South East Corner

Layer 2

Silty Clay


Standard96.5

0.5 dry103.0

.



Location Lot 944

1m North 17m West

South East Corner

Layer 2


Field and Laboratory DataDepth of Test (mm) 225Field Moisture Content (%) 14.0Field Wet Density (t/m³) 2.02Field Dry Density (t/m³) 1.78Peak Converted Wet Density* (t/m³) 2.06Optimum Moisture Content (%) 14.0Compactive Effort StandardMoisture Ratio (%) 99.5Moisture Variation (%) 0.0Hilf Density Ratio (%) 98.0legend * adjusted for oversize material .


8/08/2014


Issue No: 1

Client:


Approved Signatory: Mitchell Hindmarsh(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: GEOTABTF08569AE - Warralily - Stage 29

ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:




Comments





Location Lot 949

18m West from South Eastern Corner

Layer 3




12/08/2014


Issue No: 2

Client:





ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Comments





Location Lot 934

24m South of Lot 933

North Prop Line




Test 1811/08/2014

13:35

Lot 937

19m East of Sand Hill

St Prop Line

Silty Clay


Standard85.0

2.5 dry99.0

.


Test 1911/08/2014

15:30

Lot 949

18m West From

Mandalay Ave Prop Line

Silty Clay


Standard99.00.0

99.5.



Location Lot 946

17m West From

Mandalay Ave Prop Line




13/08/2014


Issue No: 2

Client:





ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Comments




Field Sample ID Test 21Date Tested 12/08/2014

Location Lot 934

16m East of Sandhill St Prop Line

Layer 2




14/08/2014


Issue No: 2

Client:





ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Comments





Location Lot 945

11m West

Madalay Ave

Layer 4




Test 233/08/2014

13:45

Lot 944

12m West

Madalay Ave

Layer 4

Silty Clay


Standard85.0

2.5 dry95.0

.


Test 243/08/2014

14:00

Lot 942

12m West

Madalay Ave

Layer 3

Silty Clay


Standard111.0

2.0 wet99.0

.


Test 253/08/2014

14:20

Lot 934

19m East

Sandhill St

Layer 3

Silty Clay


Standard110.5

2.0 wet102.0

.


Test 263/08/2014

14:30

Lot 936

22m East

Sandhill St

Layer 3

Silty Clay


Standard110.0

2.0 wet103.0

.



Location Lot 938

18m East

Sandhill St

Layer 3




17/09/2014


Issue No: 2

Client:





ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Comments

field density test results

A C N 105 704 078

Unit 3/164 - 166 McClelland Ave, Lara, VIC 3212

client : COFFEY GEOTECHNICS PTY LTD (ABBOTSFORD) job No: L019

project : WARRALILY ESTATE - STAGE 29 report No. AH

location : MOUNT DUNEED test date: 9-Sep-14

Test Number 20 21 22 23 24 25

Test location

As advised by client

Coffey test number # 28 # 29 # 30 # 31 # 32 # 33

Lot No. 902 904 906 910 913 940

Layer Number 1 1 1 1 1 1

Time of tests - - - - - -

Depth of Test mm 175 175 175 175 175 175

Field Wet Density t/m3 2.001 1.966 2.064 1.924 1.994 1.942

*Field Moisture Content % 21.5 20.0 18.5 23.0 23.5 27.5

Oversize Material Wet % 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sieve Size mm 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0

Peak Converted Wet Density t/m3 2.041 2.032 2.089 1.998 2.006 1.990

*Optimum Moisture Content % 21.0 20.0 18.5 23.0 23.0 23.0

Compactive Effort Used std / mod std std std std std std

Moisture Ratio % 103 100 100 100 102 120

Moisture Variation % 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 4.5

Moisture Variation Wet - - - Wet Wet

Density Ratio % 98.0 97.0 99.0 96.5 99.5 97.5

Specification Requirements 95% Standard compaction & +/- 3% of Optimum moisture content

Notes: Moisture Variation: (-) indicates dry; (+) indicates wet

Material description CLAY (FILL)

Test Methods AS1289 5.8.1 5.7.1 2.1.1 1.2.1 (6.4)

Tim SenserrickApproved SignatoryDate 10-Sep-14

NATA Accredited Laboratory No. 15055Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements in this document are traceable to Australian/National Standards

GS001/R Aug 12Version 5 App EG





Location Lot 934

14m North 5m West Sth EastCorner

Layer 1




Test 3510/09/2014

14:45

Lot 907

4m South

Layer 2

Silty Clay


Standard107.0

1.5 wet95.0

.


Test 3610/09/2014

15:00

Lot 912

4m South

Layer 2

Silty Clay


Standard110.5

2.5 wet99.0

.



Location Lot 939

Layer 2




17/09/2014


Issue No: 2

Client:





ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Comments





Location Lot 903

Layer 2





Location Lot 906

Layer 2


Field and Laboratory DataDepth of Test (mm) 200Field Moisture Content (%) 22.5Field Wet Density (t/m³) 1.93Field Dry Density (t/m³) 1.58Peak Converted Wet Density* (t/m³) 2.04Optimum Moisture Content (%) 22.0Compactive Effort StandardMoisture Ratio (%) 100.5Moisture Variation (%) 0.0Hilf Density Ratio (%) 95.0legend * adjusted for oversize material .


17/09/2014


Issue No: 2

Client:





ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Comments

Sample DetailsLocation: Warralily Stage 29, VICClient Request ID:Specification Requirements: MINIMUM HILF DENSITY RATIO OF 95% of Standard Compaction (as advised by client)Field Test procedures: AS 1289.5.8.1Laboratory Test procedures: AS 1289.5.7.1, AS 1289.2.1.1Sampling Method: AS1289.1.2.1 Clause 6.4 (b)Source: On SiteMaterial: General Fill


Field Sample ID 40Date Tested 17/09/2014Time Tested 09:30

Location Lot 912

8m South of

Forresters Way

Layer 1

Field and Laboratory DataDepth of Test (mm) 150AS Sieve Size (mm) 19.0Oversize Wet (%) 0Field Moisture Content (%) 27.5Field Wet Density (t/m³) 1.92Field Dry Density (t/m³) 1.50Peak Converted Wet Density* (t/m³) 1.99Optimum Moisture Content (%) 27.5Compactive Effort StandardMoisture Ratio (%) 101.0Moisture Variation (%) 0.0Hilf Density Ratio (%) 96.5legend * adjusted for oversize material .


4117/09/2014

09:50

Lot 910

8m South of

Forresters Way

Layer 1

Field and Laboratory Data15019.0

025.51.961.561.9825.5

Standard101.00.0

99.5.


4217/09/2014

10:00

Lot 921

10m East of

Milla Ave

Layer 1


016.52.061.771.9916.5

Standard99.50.0

103.5.


4317/09/2014

14:30

Lot 905

14m South of

Forresters Way

Layer 1


027.02.021.592.0027.0

Standard100.50.0

101.0.



Location 9m South of

Forresters Way

Layer 1



23/09/2014


Issue No: 2

Client:


Approved Signatory: Shaun Price(Laboratory Manager)



ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Comments

Sample DetailsLocation: Mt DuneedClient Request ID:Specification Requirements: MINIMUM HILF DENSITY RATIO OF 95% of Standard Compaction (as advised by client)Field Test procedures: AS 1289.5.8.1Laboratory Test procedures: AS 1289.5.7.1, AS 1289.2.1.1Sampling Method: AS1289.1.2.1 Clause 6.4 (b)Source: On SiteMaterial: General Fill



Location Lot 921

6m from Back of Lot

Layer 2

Field and Laboratory DataDepth of Test (mm) 150AS Sieve Size (mm) 19.0Oversize Wet (%) 0Field Moisture Content (%) 16.5Field Wet Density (t/m³) 2.10Field Dry Density (t/m³) 1.80Peak Converted Wet Density* (t/m³) 2.04Optimum Moisture Content (%) 16.0Compactive Effort StandardMoisture Ratio (%) 102.0Moisture Variation (%) 0.5 wetHilf Density Ratio (%) 102.5legend * adjusted for oversize material .


4618/09/2014

10:25

Lot 924

15m from Back of Lot

Layer 1


017.51.891.612.0317.0

Standard102.5

0.5 wet93.5

.


4718/09/2014

10:45

Lot 928

18m from Sand Hill St

Layer 1


011.51.881.692.0311.5

Standard101.50.0

93.0.


4818/09/2014

11:15

Lot 928

15m from Sandhill st

Retest of No 47

Layer 1


014.02.011.762.0514.0

Standard100.00.0

98.5.



Location Lot 924

18m from Milla Ave

Retest of No 46

Layer 1



20/09/2014


Issue No: 2

Client:





ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Comments




Location Lot 915

15m North of Forresters Way

Layer 1

Field and Laboratory DataDepth of Test (mm) 150AS Sieve Size (mm) 19.0Oversize Wet (%) 0Field Moisture Content (%) 13.5Field Wet Density (t/m³) 1.94Field Dry Density (t/m³) 1.71Peak Converted Wet Density* (t/m³) 2.01Optimum Moisture Content (%) 15.5Compactive Effort StandardMoisture Ratio (%) 85.5Moisture Variation (%) 2.5 dryHilf Density Ratio (%) 96.5legend * adjusted for oversize material .



Location Lot 916

3m West of Milla Ave

Layer 1



20/09/2014


Issue No: 2

Client:





ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Comments




Location Swell Drain

Mandalay Ave

East of Lot 944

Layer 1



5319/09/2014

10:30

Swell Drain

Mandalay Ave

East of Lot 946

Layer 1


020.02.121.772.1619.5

Standard102.5

0.5 wet98.5

.


5419/09/2014

13:00

Swell Drain

Mandalay Ave

East of Lot 944

Layer 2


020.02.121.772.1519.0

Standard103.0

0.5 wet98.5

.


5519/09/2014

13:15

Swell Drain

Mandalay Ave

East of Lot 947

Layer 2


021.02.121.762.1321.0

Standard99.00.0

100.0.


5619/09/2014

15:15

Lot 929

Layer 2


015.01.921.682.0315.0

Standard98.0

0.5 dry95.0

.



Location Lot 927

Layer 2



23/09/2014


Issue No: 2

Client:





ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Specification Requirement for Sample 54 and 55 are to 98%Comments




Location Lot 924

Layer 2



5919/09/2014

16:00

Lot 922

Layer 3


017.52.101.792.0717.5

Standard100.00.0

101.5.


6019/09/2014

16:10

Lot 915

Layer 1


016.01.921.652.0516.0

Standard99.50.0

93.5.



Location Lot 918

Layer 1



23/09/2014


Issue No: 2

Client:





ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Comments




Location Lot 918

Re-Test of Sample 61

Layer 1



25/09/2014


Issue No: 2

Client:





ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Comments




Location Swell Drain Front

Lot 945

Mandalay Ave

Layer 3



25/09/2014


Issue No: 3

Client:





ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Comments



Field Sample ID 00060Client Sample ID 64Date Tested 23/09/2014Time Tested 09:25

Location Lot 915

Layer 1



Field Sample ID 00061Client Sample ID 65Date Tested 23/09/2014Time Tested 09:40

Location Lot 918

Layer 1



25/09/2014


Issue No: 1

Client:


Approved Signatory: Shaun Price(Laboratory Manager)Project Name: GEOTABTF08569AE - Warralily - Stage 29

ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:




Comments




Location Lot 2917

Layer 2




Location Lot 2915

Layer 2



25/09/2014


Issue No: 1

Client:


Approved Signatory: Shaun Price(Laboratory Manager)Project Name: GEOTABTF08569AE - Warralily - Stage 29

ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:




Comments




Location Lot 921

Layer 1



6925/09/2014

11:20

Lot 915

Layer 3


016.52.051.762.0616.5

Standard100.00.0

99.0.


7025/09/2014

11:35

Lot 918

Layer 3


021.02.061.702.0920.5

Standard104.0

1.0 wet98.5

.



Location Lot 921

Layer 2



1/10/2014


Issue No: 2

Client:





ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Comments


client)Field Test procedures: AS 1289.5.8.1Laboratory Test procedures: AS 1289.2.1.1, AS 1289.5.7.1Sampling Method: AS1289.1.2.1 Clause 6.4 (b)Source: On SiteMaterial: General Fill



Location Lot 916

Layer 4




Location Lot 919

Layer 4



1/10/2014


Issue No: 2

Client:





ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:





Comments





Location Lot 921

Layer 3





Location Lot 931

Layer 3




1/10/2014


Issue No: 1

Client:


Approved Signatory: Mitchell Hindmarsh(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: GEOTABTF08569AE - Warralily - Stage 29

ABN 92 114 364 046



Phone: +61 3 8413 6900Fax: +61 3 8413 6999


Lot No.: TRN:




Comments

field density test resultsA C N 105 704 078Unit 3/164 - 166 McClelland Ave, Lara, VIC 3212 client : COFFEY GEOTECHNICS PTY LTD (ABBOTSFORD) job No: L019

project : WARRALILY ESTATE - STAGE 29 report No. AY

location : MOUNT DUNEED test date: 1-Dec-14

Test Number 73 74 75 76

Test location


Coffey test number 76 77 78 79

Lot No. 919 West of 918 920 931

Layer Number 1 1 1 1

Time of tests - - - -

Depth of Test mm 175 175 175 175

Field Wet Density t/m3 2.216 2.070 1.947 2.024

*Field Moisture Content % 11.5 14.0 12.5 10.5

Oversize Material Wet % 2 0 4 2

Sieve Size mm 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0

Peak Converted Wet Density t/m3 2.195 2.126 2.107 2.157

*Optimum Moisture Content % 13.0 17.0 14.5 12.5

Compactive Effort Used std / mod std std std std

Moisture Ratio % 89 83 86 84

Moisture Variation % -1.5 -3.0 -2.0 -2.0

Moisture Variation Dry Dry Dry Dry

Density Ratio % 101.0 97.5 92.5 94.0



Material description gravelly CLAY (FILL)

Test Methods AS1289 5.8.1 5.7.1 2.1.1 1.2.1 (6.4)

Chris MamalisApproved SignatoryDate 02-Dec-14

NATA Accredited Laboratory No. 15055Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements in this document are traceable to


field density test resultsA C N 105 704 078Unit 3/164 - 166 McClelland Ave, Lara, VIC 3212 client : COFFEY GEOTECHNICS PTY LTD (ABBOTSFORD) job No: L019

project : WARRALILY ESTATE - STAGE 29 report No. AZ


Test Number 77 78

Test location


Coffey test number 80 81

Lot No. 920 920

Layer Number 3 4

Time of tests - -

Depth of Test mm 175 175

Field Wet Density t/m3 1.994 2.031

*Field Moisture Content % 18.0 15.0

Oversize Material Wet % 0 0

Sieve Size mm 19.0 19.0

Peak Converted Wet Density t/m3 2.098 2.095

*Optimum Moisture Content % 18.0 15.5

Compactive Effort Used std / mod std std

Moisture Ratio % 100 97

Moisture Variation % 0.0 -0.5

Moisture Variation - Dry

Density Ratio % 95.0 97.0




Test Methods AS1289 5.8.1 5.7.1 2.1.1 1.2.1 (6.4)

Chris MamalisApproved SignatoryDate 02-Dec-14

NATA Accredited Laboratory No. 15055Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements in this document are traceable to



A C N 105 704 078



project : WARRALILY ESTATE - STAGE 29 report No. BB


Test Number 79 80 81 82

Test location


Coffey test number 82 83 84 85

Lot No. West of 918 919 920 931

Layer Number 3 3 1 1

Time of tests 9:30:00 9:30:00 9:30:00 9:30:00

Depth of Test mm 175 175 175 175

Field Wet Density t/m3 2.027 2.054 2.040 2.054

*Field Moisture Content % 13.5 15.5 24.0 15.5

Oversize Material Wet % 0 0 0 0

Sieve Size mm 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0

Peak Converted Wet Density t/m3 2.028 2.124 2.020 2.141

*Optimum Moisture Content % 16.5 16.5 23.5 15.5

Compactive Effort Used std / mod std std std std

Moisture Ratio % 82 94 102 100

Moisture Variation % -3.0 -1.0 0.5 0.0

Moisture Variation Dry Dry Wet -

Density Ratio % 100.0 96.5 101.0 96.0




Test Methods AS1289 5.8.1 5.7.1 2.1.1 1.2.1 (6.4)

Tim SenserrickApproved SignatoryDate 03-Dec-14




A C N 105 704 078



project : WARRALILY ESTATE - STAGE 29 report No. BC


Test Number 83 84 85

Test location


Coffey test number 86 87 88

Lot No. 918 931 920

Layer Number 5 3 3

Time of tests 13:00:00 13:00:00 13:00:00

Depth of Test mm 175 175 175

Field Wet Density t/m3 2.009 2.094 2.061

*Field Moisture Content % 16.5 15.5 15.5

Oversize Material Wet % 3 0 0

Sieve Size mm 19.0 19.0 19.0

Peak Converted Wet Density t/m3 2.027 2.112 2.052

*Optimum Moisture Content % 19.0 17.0 18.5

Compactive Effort Used std / mod std std std

Moisture Ratio % 87 91 84

Moisture Variation % -2.5 -1.5 -3.0

Moisture Variation Dry Dry Wet -

Density Ratio % 99.0 99.0 100.5




Test Methods AS1289 5.8.1 5.7.1 2.1.1 1.2.1 (6.4)





A C N 105 704 078



project : WARRALILY ESTATE - STAGE 29 report No. BD


Test Number 86 87

Test location



Lot No. 918 931

Layer Number 7 5

Time of tests 7:00:00 7:00:00










Moisture Variation % -1.5 0.5

Moisture Variation Dry Dry -





Test Methods AS1289 5.8.1 5.7.1 2.1.1 1.2.1 (6.4)





A C N 105 704 078



project : WARRALILY ESTATE - STAGE 29 report No. BE


Test Number 88 89 90

Test location


Coffey test number 91 92 93

Lot No. West of 918 15m West of 918 920

Layer Number 7 5 7

Time of tests 12:00:00 12:00:00 12:00:00

Depth of Test mm 175 175 175

Field Wet Density t/m3 2.052 2.027 2.192

*Field Moisture Content % 13.0 13.5 15.5

Oversize Material Wet % 0 0 0

Sieve Size mm 19.0 19.0 19.0

Peak Converted Wet Density t/m3 2.097 2.072 2.182

*Optimum Moisture Content % 15.5 16.0 15.5

Compactive Effort Used std / mod std std std

Moisture Ratio % 84 85 100

Moisture Variation % -2.5 -2.5 0.0

Moisture Variation Dry Dry -

Density Ratio % 98.0 98.0 100.5




Test Methods AS1289 5.8.1 5.7.1 2.1.1 1.2.1 (6.4)





A C N 105 704 078



project : WARRALILY ESTATE - STAGE 29 report No. BF- Revised


Test Number 91 92

Test location



Lot No. 931 920

Layer Number 8 9

Time of tests 2:00:00 2:00:00










Moisture Variation % -2.0 -2.0

Moisture Variation Dry Dry





This report replaces BF 4/5/14

Test Methods AS1289 5.8.1 5.7.1 2.1.1 1.2.1 (6.4)




Appendix B – Survey W29 Fill Details, Rev B

WARRALILY STAGE 29

FILL DETAILS

Appendix C – Extract from specification by SMEC, ref 0557esb-24

This page has been left intentionally blank

newland developers pty ltd level 1 inspection and testing,...

Documents