new zealand information systems doctoral conference 2010

Upload: max-erik-rohde

Post on 29-May-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 New Zealand Information Systems Doctoral Conference 2010

    1/10

    Knowledge Between Context and Capability:Towards Seamless Knowledge Management

    Max Erik Rohde

    Supervision Committee

    Dr. David Sundaram (Primary Supervisor),

    Dr. Ami Peiris, Dr. Brent Gallupe

    New Zealand Information Systems Doctoral Conference 2010

    Department of Information Systems and

    Operations Management

    30th of July 2010

  • 8/9/2019 New Zealand Information Systems Doctoral Conference 2010

    2/10

    Agenda

    Motivation Theoretical Background Research Framework Reserch Design Preliminary Results

  • 8/9/2019 New Zealand Information Systems Doctoral Conference 2010

    3/10

    Motivation

    Working as: software tester, ERP programmer, project managerand student

    Information is not documented, not used and/or withoutvalue.

    There is no time Few sources exist where complex unstructured information can be

    accessed quickly and effortlessly

    Great amounts of recorded information are without sustainablevalue

    How can we design systems to create and access knowledge inalignment with natural ways of conducting routines?

  • 8/9/2019 New Zealand Information Systems Doctoral Conference 2010

    4/10

    Theoretical Background

    Conceptualisation of organisational routines (Feldman andPentland, 2003)

    Bridging the ostensive and performative is a way to toenable context-informed organisational decisions,

    flexibility, and learning (Weick and Sutcliffe, 2006; Levinthal

    and Rerup, 2006)

    Organisational routines can be formalized using am ITsupported grammar representations (Lee, Wyner and

    Pentland, 2008)

    Ostensive Performative

    Structure or pattern of a

    routine

    Specific actions performed in a

    specific situation

  • 8/9/2019 New Zealand Information Systems Doctoral Conference 2010

    5/10

    Theoretical Background

    Ostensive dimension of knowledge Knowledge as strategic capability (Kogut & Zander, 1992) Pattern of individual skills and experiences, routines, encoded

    information and encultured values (Blackler, 1995)

    Performative dimension of knowledge Knowledge as context dependent (Orlikowski, 2002) Individuals fuse individual components of knowledge in a context-

    dependent situational application (Thompson & Walsham, 2004).

    Knowing emerges from applying and fusing the individual parts ofthe pattern of knowledge while performing routines. A soundconceptualisation of the ostensive dimension of knowledge in a

    flexible grammar representation could greatly increaseorganizations ability to leverage the potentials of the knowledgeapplied in routines.

  • 8/9/2019 New Zealand Information Systems Doctoral Conference 2010

    6/10

    Theoretical Background

    A critical view on information technology If encoded information makes up only some part of the knowledge

    pattern, can it be captured using an explicit grammar and can IT

    support this ostensive dimension of knowledge?

    ICT mechanisms are strong for working with information beingrestricted by an explicit grammar but weak at flexibly meeting

    situational requirements. If knowing emerges from the actions of

    individuals while performing routines, can rigid information

    technology support this process?

    Research Problem: Both grammar and IT are by their nature restrictive and

    therewith interfering with the natural conduction of routines.

  • 8/9/2019 New Zealand Information Systems Doctoral Conference 2010

    7/10

    Research Objectives

    Explore, synthesize and integrate knowledge managementand organisational literature to investigate therelationship between ICT mechanisms, restrictiveness andsustainable and actionable knowledge.

    Explore the ability of ICT mechanisms to facilitateactionable and sustainable knowledge for and fromperforming routines and balance these routines withvarying degrees of restrictiveness.

    Design, implement and evaluate ICT mechanisms, whichcan support the emergence of knowledge from

    performing routines while minimizing the interferencewith these routines.

  • 8/9/2019 New Zealand Information Systems Doctoral Conference 2010

    8/10

    Research Design

    Bridging social and technological world using a multi-methodological approach (Nunamaker, Chen and Purdin, 1991)and by applying the principles:

    Coherence: close alignment of artifacts on different semioticlevels (Purao,2002; Sheffield, 2005)

    Traceability: well-reasoned and well-documented designprocess (Hevner et al., 2004; D'Souza and Wills, 1998)

    Ostensive/performative

    System implementation

  • 8/9/2019 New Zealand Information Systems Doctoral Conference 2010

    9/10

    Artifacts Iteration 1

    Theory

    Ar

    chitecture

    Framework

    Design

    Discover DisseminateImpl

    ementation

  • 8/9/2019 New Zealand Information Systems Doctoral Conference 2010

    10/10

    Conclusion

    Research aims to address a complex and long prevailingpractical and research problem. Will not find the answer

    but seeks to achieve improvement.

    Discover through design (Baskerville, 2008) Research designed modularand iterative Emphasis on coherence between social, conceptual, and

    technological artifacts and on traceabilityof design process