new treatment approaches in hepatocellular carcinoma dr. francesco caponigro istituto tumori napoli
TRANSCRIPT
New treatment New treatment approachesapproaches
in in HepatocellularHepatocellular
CarcinomaCarcinoma
Dr. Francesco CaponigroDr. Francesco CaponigroIstituto Tumori NapoliIstituto Tumori Napoli
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related third leading cause of cancer-related death and the fifth most prevalent death and the fifth most prevalent cancer worldwide with cancer worldwide with > 80% of patients presenting with > 80% of patients presenting with advanced disease.advanced disease.
Late diagnosis and the frequent Late diagnosis and the frequent coexistence of cirrhosis result in a poor coexistence of cirrhosis result in a poor prognosis for patients with HCCprognosis for patients with HCC
Drug-resistance genes such as Drug-resistance genes such as multidrug resistance-1 are common in multidrug resistance-1 are common in liver cells, causing HCC tumors to be liver cells, causing HCC tumors to be inherently chemoresistantinherently chemoresistant
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Phase II/III Studies of Systemic Phase II/III Studies of Systemic Treatments in Advanced HCCTreatments in Advanced HCC
TreatmentTreatment Phase of Phase of StudyStudy
Number of Number of PatientsPatients
Overall Overall Response RateResponse Rate
Systemic Systemic ChemotherapyChemotherapy
Doxorubicin as a Doxorubicin as a single agentsingle agent
II/IIIII/III > 1000> 1000 10%-18%10%-18%
Doxorubicin in Doxorubicin in combinationcombination
II/IIIII/III 144144 26%26%
CisplatinCisplatin IIII 4848 10%10%
EpirubicinEpirubicin IIII 6262 11%11%
MitoxantroneMitoxantrone IIII 118118 16%16%
5-FU/paclitaxel/5-FU/paclitaxel/irinotecanirinotecan
II/IIIII/III -- < 10%< 10%
AntiandrogenAntiandrogen IIIIII 376376 < 10%< 10%
InterferonInterferon IIIIII 6060 < 10%< 10%
OctreotideOctreotide IIIIII 6060 < 5%< 5%
SeocalcitolSeocalcitol IIIIII 746746 < 5%< 5%
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006, Nexavar): a multikinase inhibitor with activity against Raf,
VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, PDGFR, c-Kit
The turning-point in the The turning-point in the management of management of advancedadvanced HCC HCC
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Signaling pathways in HCCSignaling pathways in HCC
Villanueva A et al, Semin Liver Dis 2007
VEGF
EGFR 1.
2.
5.
3.
4.
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
SORAFENIBSORAFENIBFarmacokineticsFarmacokinetics
Low absorption
T1/2: 24-36 h
Steady state: after 7 days
Time of assumption: 1-2 hours before or after meals
Elimination: mainly as glucuronate
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
SORAFENIBSORAFENIBSafetySafety Data Data
Sorafenib is well tolerated and grade 3-4 adverse events have been reported in 30%
of cases in phase I studies. The main side effects are:
Skin rash Hand and foot syndrome Diarrhea - nausea Fatigue Hypertension
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
SORAFENIBClinical studies in HCC
Phase II Study of Sorafenib in non resectable HCC
Abou-Alfa GK, et al. J Clin Oncol 2006
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
SORAFENIBClinical studies in HCC
Phase II Study of Sorafenib in non resectable HCC
3/137 pts (2.2%) partial response 8/137 pts (5.8%) minor response 46/137 (33.6%) long-term stable disease (> 16 weeks) Time to progression (TTP) 4.2 months Overall survival 9.2 monthsGrade ¾ toxicity: fatigue (9.5%), diarrhea (8.0%) hand and foot syndrome (5.1%)
Abou-Alfa GK, et al. J Clin Oncol 2006
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
SORAFENIBClinical studies in HCC
Pre-treatment pERK was correlated to TTP
Although Sorafenib activity was really modest, both the manageable toxicity profile and the peculiarity of its
mechanism of action support further trials
Abou-Alfa GK, et al. J Clin Oncol 2006
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
PhasePhase III SHARP Trial III SHARP Trial StudyStudy Design Design
Primary endpoints: overall survival, time to Primary endpoints: overall survival, time to symptomatic progression (FHSI8-TSP)symptomatic progression (FHSI8-TSP)
Secondary endpoint: time to progression Secondary endpoint: time to progression (independent review)(independent review)
Stratify by:• Macroscopic vascular invasion (portal vein) and/or extrahepatic spread•ECOG PS•Geographic region
Placebo 2 tablets p.o.b.i.d. continuous dosing
(n = 303)
Sorafenib 400 mg p.o.,b.i.d. continuous dosing
(n = 299)
RANDOMIZE
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Phase III SHARP TrialPhase III SHARP TrialBaseline characteristics of Baseline characteristics of
patients patients
CharacteristicsCharacteristics
SorafenSorafenibib
(n=299)(n=299)PlaceboPlacebo(n=303)(n=303)
Age (yr, median)Age (yr, median) 6565 6666
Male/Female (%)Male/Female (%) 87/1387/13 87/1387/13
Region (Europe/N. Region (Europe/N. America/other; %)America/other; %)
88/9/388/9/3 87/10/387/10/3
Etiology (%)Etiology (%)Viral hepatitis (HCV/HBV)Viral hepatitis (HCV/HBV)Alcohol/otherAlcohol/other
29/1929/1926/2626/26
27/1827/1826/2926/29
Llovet JM et al. Presented at: ECCO;September 23-27, 2007; Barcelona, Spain.
Phase III SHARP TrialPhase III SHARP Trial
Baseline characteristics of Baseline characteristics of patients patients
CharacteristicsCharacteristics
SorafenSorafenibib
(n=299(n=299))
PlacebPlaceboo
(n=303(n=303))
Child-Pugh (A/B; %)Child-Pugh (A/B; %) 95/595/5 98/298/2Prior therapies: Surgical Prior therapies: Surgical
resectionresectionLoco-regional therapiesLoco-regional therapies
19%19%39%39%
21%21%41%41%
ECOG PS (%)ECOG PS (%)ECOG 0ECOG 0ECOG 1ECOG 1ECOG 2ECOG 2
5454383888
5454393977
Vascular invasion / Vascular invasion / extrahepatic spreadextrahepatic spread
PresentPresentAbsentAbsent
70703030
70703030
Llovet JM et al. Presented at: ECCO; September 23-27, 2007; Barcelona, Spain.
Llovet JM and Bruix J, BCLC Group, Semin Liver Dis. 1999.
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Phase III SHARP TrialPhase III SHARP Trial Efficacy (Intent-to-Treat Efficacy (Intent-to-Treat
Population)Population)SorafenibSorafenib
(n = 299)(n = 299)PlaceboPlacebo
(n = 303)(n = 303)
Median Overall Survival Median Overall Survival (95% CI)(95% CI)
10.7 (9.4-13.3)months 7.9 (6.8-10.7 (9.4-13.3)months 7.9 (6.8-9.1)months9.1)months
HR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.88; P HR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.88; P = .00058= .00058
Median Time to Progression Median Time to Progression (95% CI)(95% CI)
5.5 (4.1-6.9)months 2.8 (2.7-5.5 (4.1-6.9)months 2.8 (2.7-3.9)months3.9)months
HR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.74; P HR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.74; P = .000007= .000007
ResponseResponse
Complete responseComplete response 00 00
Partial responsePartial response 7 (2%)7 (2%) 2 (< 1%)2 (< 1%)
Stable DiseaseStable Disease 211 (71%)211 (71%) 204 (67%)204 (67%)
Progressive DiseaseProgressive Disease 54 (18%)54 (18%) 73 (24%)73 (24%)
Progression-Free Rate at 4 Progression-Free Rate at 4 MonthsMonths
62%62% 42%42%
Median Duration of Median Duration of TreatmentTreatment
5.3 months5.3 months 4.4 months4.4 months
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Su
rviv
al
Pro
bab
ilit
y
Weeks
Hazard ratio (S/P): 0.69 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.87)
P=0.00058*
SorafenibMedian: 46.3 weeks (10.7 mo)(95% CI: 40.9, 57.9)
PlaceboMedian: 34.4 weeks (7.9 mo)(95% CI: 29.4, 39.4)
1.00
0
0.75
0.50
0.25
0 808 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72
0274 241 205 161 108 67 38 12 0Patients at risk
Sorafenib:0276 224 179 126 78 47 25 7 2Placebo:
299303
Phase III SHARP TrialPhase III SHARP TrialOverall survival (Intention-to-Overall survival (Intention-to-
treat)treat)
*O’Brien-Fleming threshold for statistical significance was P=0.0077
Llovet JM et al. Presented at: ECCO;September 23-27, 2007; Barcelona, Spain
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
PlaceboMedian: 12.3 weeks (2.8 mo)(95% CI: 11.7, 17.1)
SorafenibMedian: 24.0 weeks (5.5 mo) (95% CI: 18.0, 30.0)
0196 126 80 50 28 14 8 20192 101 57 31 12 8 2 1
Pro
bab
ilit
y of
Pro
gre
ssio
n
Hazard ratio (S/P): 0.58 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.74) P=0.000007
546 12 18 24 30 36 42 480 Weeks
1.00
0
0.75
0.50
0.25
Patients at risk Sorafenib:Placebo:
299303
Phase III SHARP TrialPhase III SHARP TrialTime to progression (Independent Time to progression (Independent
central review)central review)
Llovet JM et al. Presented at: ECCO; September 23-27, 2007; Barcelona, Spain.
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Phase III SHARP TrialPhase III SHARP TrialExploratory subgroup survival analysisExploratory subgroup survival analysis
Sorafenib benefit
Placebo benefit
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
ECOG PS 0
ECOG PS 1 & 2
Macroscopic vascular invasionNo macroscopic vascular invasion
No macroscopic VI/extrahepatic spread
Macroscopic VI/extrahepatic spread
No extrahepatic spread
Extrahepatic spread
0.5 1.0 1.50.0
Llovet JM et al. Presented at: ECCO;September 23-27, 2007; Barcelona, Spain.
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Phase III SHARP TrialPhase III SHARP TrialAdverse Events (1/2)Adverse Events (1/2)
Sorafenib ( % )Sorafenib ( % )( n = 297 )( n = 297 )
Placebo ( % )Placebo ( % )( n = 302)( n = 302)
Drug-Related Drug-Related Treatment-Treatment-EmergentEmergentSerious Adverse Serious Adverse EventsEvents
13%13% 9%9%
Drug-Related Drug-Related Adverse EventsAdverse Events
AllAll Grade 3Grade 3 AllAll Grade Grade 33
DiarrheaDiarrhea 39%39% 8%8% 11%11% 2%2%
Pain (abdomen)Pain (abdomen) 8%8% 2%2% 3%3% < 1%< 1%
Weight lossWeight loss 9%9% 2%2% < 1%< 1% 0%0%
AnorexiaAnorexia 14%14% < 1%< 1% 3%3% < 1%< 1%
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Phase III SHARP TrialPhase III SHARP TrialAdverse Events (2/2)Adverse Events (2/2)
Sorafenib ( % )Sorafenib ( % )( n = 297 )( n = 297 )
Placebo ( % )Placebo ( % )( n = 302)( n = 302)
Drug-Related Drug-Related Adverse EventsAdverse Events
AllAll Grade 3Grade 3 AllAll Grade 3Grade 3
NauseaNausea 11%11% < 1%< 1% 8%8% 1%1%
Hand-foot skin Hand-foot skin reactionreaction
21%21% 8%8% 3%3% < 1%< 1%
VomitingVomiting 5%5% 1%1% 3%3% < 1%< 1%
AlopeciaAlopecia 14%14% 0%0% 2%2% 0%0%
Liver dysfunctionLiver dysfunction < 1%< 1% < 1%< 1% 0%0% 0%0%
BleedingBleeding 7%7% < 1%< 1% 4%4% <1%*<1%*
* Less than 1 % of patients also experienced grade 4 bleeding
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Phase III SHARP TrialPhase III SHARP TrialConclusionsConclusions
Sorafenib prolonged median overall survival Sorafenib prolonged median overall survival compared to placebo in patients with advanced compared to placebo in patients with advanced HCC:HCC: Median overall survival: 10.7 months vs. 7.9 monthsMedian overall survival: 10.7 months vs. 7.9 months Hazard ratio 0.69; Hazard ratio 0.69; P = .00058P = .00058 44% increase in median overall survival44% increase in median overall survival
Sorafenib prolonged median time to progression Sorafenib prolonged median time to progression compared to placebo in patients with advanced compared to placebo in patients with advanced HCC: HCC: Median time to progression: 5.5 months vs. 2.8 monthsMedian time to progression: 5.5 months vs. 2.8 months Hazard ratio 0.58; Hazard ratio 0.58; P = .000007P = .000007 73% prolongation in median time to progression73% prolongation in median time to progression
Sorafenib was tolerable, with manageable side effectsSorafenib was tolerable, with manageable side effects Sorafenib is the first systemic therapy to prolong Sorafenib is the first systemic therapy to prolong
survival in patients with HCCsurvival in patients with HCC
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Sorafenib + Dox
Placebo + Dox
PRIMARY ENDPOINT Time to Progression (TTP)
SECONDARY ENDPOINT■ Overall Survival (OS)■Time To Symptom Progression (TTSP)■ Quality of life (QoL)
~ 90 pts with advanced HCC
ECOG PS: 0,1,2
Phase II randomized study of Sorafenib + Doxorubicin
versus Doxorubicin + Placebo in HCC
Phase II randomized study of Sorafenib + Doxorubicin
versus Doxorubicin + Placebo in HCC
Randomization 1:1
Abou-Alfa GK et al. Presented at: ECCO; September 23-27, 2007; Barcelona, Spain
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Demographics (n=96)Demographics (n=96)DXR/DXR/
sorafenib sorafenib (n=47)(n=47)
DXR/placebo DXR/placebo (n=49)(n=49)
Gender n(%)Gender n(%) MaleMale 31 (66)31 (66) 42 (86)42 (86)
FemaleFemale 16 (34)16 (34) 7 (14)7 (14)
Age (years)Age (years) MeanMean 6363 6262
ECOG n(%) n(%)ECOG n(%) n(%) 00 22 (47)22 (47) 16 (33)16 (33)
11 18 (38)18 (38) 25 (51)25 (51)
2/32/3 4 (8.5)4 (8.5) 4 (8)4 (8)
MissingMissing 4 (8.5)4 (8.5) 4 (8)4 (8)
Child’s Pugh n(%)Child’s Pugh n(%) AA 47 (100)47 (100) 48 (98)48 (98)
BB 0 (0)0 (0) 1 (2)1 (2)
Extrahepatic disease n(%)Extrahepatic disease n(%) YesYes 24(51)24(51) 32 (65)32 (65)
NoNo 23 (49)23 (49) 17 (35)17 (35)
Macroscopic Vascular Macroscopic Vascular Invasion n(%)Invasion n(%)
YesYes 13 (28)13 (28) 16 (33)16 (33)
NoNo 33 (70)33 (70) 32 (65)32 (65)
MissingMissing 1 (2)1 (2) 1 (2)1 (2)DXR=Doxorubicin
Abou-Alfa GK et al. Presented at: ECCO; September 23-27, 2007; Barcelona, Spain.
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
ResultsResultsDXR/sorafenibDXR/sorafenib
(n=47)(n=47)DXR/DXR/
placeboplacebo
(n=49)(n=49)
TTP (months)TTP (months) 8.68.6 4.84.8
OS (months)OS (months) 13.713.7 6.56.5
PFS (months)PFS (months) 6.96.9 2.82.8
ResponseResponse
(CR+PR) n(%)(CR+PR) n(%)2 (4)2 (4) 1 (2)1 (2)
Stable Disease Stable Disease
(SD) n (%)(SD) n (%)
36 (77)36 (77) 27 (55)27 (55)
Definitive analysis (data from March 2007 cutoff, independent assessment, TTP: 38 events, OS: 50 events, PFS: 70 events) Abou-Alfa GK et al. Presented at:
ECCO; September 23-27, 2007; Barcelona, Spain.
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
ToxicitiesToxicitiesDXR/sorafenib (n=47)DXR/sorafenib (n=47) DXR/placebo (n=49)DXR/placebo (n=49)
n(%)n(%) All grades All grades Grade 3-4 Grade 3-4 All gradesAll grades Grade 3-4Grade 3-4
FatigueFatigue 35 (75)35 (75) 7 (15)7 (15) 31 (65)31 (65) 7 (15)7 (15)
Abdominal painAbdominal pain 16 (34)16 (34) 5 (10)5 (10) 14 (29)14 (29) 4 (8)4 (8)
NeutropeniaNeutropenia 31 (66)31 (66) 25 (53)25 (53) 29 (60)29 (60) 22 (46)22 (46)
Febrile Febrile Neutropenia Neutropenia
2 (4)2 (4) 2 (4)2 (4) 7 (15)7 (15) 5 (10)5 (10)
DiarrheaDiarrhea 25 (51)25 (51) 5 (11)5 (11) 12 (25)12 (25) 5 (10)5 (10)
Bilirubin Bilirubin 16 (34)16 (34) 5 (11)5 (11) 15 (31)15 (31) 3 (6)3 (6)
Hand footHand foot 14 (30)14 (30) 4 (9)4 (9) 2 (4)2 (4) 0 (0)0 (0)
LV DysfunctionLV Dysfunction 9 (19)9 (19) 1 (2)1 (2) 1 (2)1 (2) 0 (0)0 (0)
HypertensionHypertension 8 (17)8 (17) 0 (0)0 (0) 0 (0)0 (0) 0 (0)0 (0)
NCI-CTC (version 3); NCI-CTC=National Cancer Institute–Common Toxicity Criteria
Abou-Alfa GK et al. Presented at: ECCO;September 23-27, 2007; Barcelona, Spain.
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
ConclusionsConclusions This randomized phase II study of Doxorubicin This randomized phase II study of Doxorubicin
plus Sorafenib and Doxorubicin plus placebo, plus Sorafenib and Doxorubicin plus placebo, showed encouraging TTP and OS outcome for showed encouraging TTP and OS outcome for the Doxorubicin plus Sorafenib the Doxorubicin plus Sorafenib
This trial supports the growing body of This trial supports the growing body of evidence of the activity of Sorafenib in HCCevidence of the activity of Sorafenib in HCC
Any synergistic role between Sorafenib plus Any synergistic role between Sorafenib plus doxorubicin in HCC needs to be further doxorubicin in HCC needs to be further defineddefined
Abou-Alfa GK et al. Presented at: ECCO; September 23-27, 2007; Barcelona, Spain.
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
A Phase II Study of Sorafenib Plus A Phase II Study of Sorafenib Plus Tegafur/Uracil for the Treatment of Tegafur/Uracil for the Treatment of
Advanced or Metastatic Advanced or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Hepatocellular Carcinoma NCT0046491
9
Ongoing
trial
Unresectable and/or metastatic HCC PS 0-2 ECOG No metastatic brain tumors Prior systemic treatment for HCC
Inclusion criteria
Primary end-point PFSSecondary end-points Toxicity, ORR,
SDR, OS
Tegafur/uracil, which has potential anti-HCC activity (ORR 0-18% ~, in phase II studies) and interesting anti-angiogenesis activity (in several preclinical models), is an ideal candidate drug to improve the efficacy of sorafenib in HCC
Rationale
EnrollmentEnrollment 5050
Start DateStart Date April 2007April 2007
Expected Expected Completion Completion DateDate
December December 20082008
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Signaling pathways in HCCSignaling pathways in HCC
Villanueva A et al, Semin Liver Dis 2007
VEGF
EGFR 1.
2.
5.
3.
4.
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
1. EGFR pathway
EGFR is overexpressed in HCC and is associated with increased cell proliferation and reduced apoptosis
Schmidt CM et al, Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997Ito Y et al, Br J Cancer 2001
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
In HepG2 cells, Gefitinib causes:
Inhibition of EGFR by gefitinib induces growth inhibition, apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in human HCC cell lines
Hopfner M et al, J Hepatol 2004
A) time- and dose-dependent growth inhibition
B) dose-dependent accumulation in the G0/G1-phase of the cell cycle.
C) dose-dependently induced caspase-3 activation
A
BC
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Phase II Study of Erlotinib in Patients With Advanced
Hepatocellular Cancer (N = 38)
Philip et al, JCO 2005
■ Patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC■ 47% of patients received prior chemotherapy■ Erlotinib given continuously at of 150 mg/day orally■ Primary end-point: proportion of patients progression-free at 6 months
PFS at 6 months: 32% (CI 95%, 18 to 49)
Median OS = 13 months
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Erlotinib in Combination With Docetaxel in Advanced
Hepatocellular and Biliary Tract Carcinomas
NCT00532441
Phase II ongoing study Inclusion criteria■ HCC or biliary tract carcinomas, not amenable to curative resection or transplantation■ ≤ 2 prior chemotherapy regimens■ PS 2 ECOG■ Child-Pugh A cirrhosis
Primary end-pointTreatment protocol■ Erlotinib: 150 mg p.o., days 2-7, 9-14,
16-28 q28■ Docetaxel: 30 mg/m2 iv d 1, 8, 15 q28
■ PFS rate at 16 weeks
Secondary end-points■ ORR; d RR; disease control; OS■ Safety and toxicity■ Correlation of response with biomarkers
Key regulator of cell proliferation
2. The mTOR pathway
Rapamycin inhibits HCC growth in vivo
tumor-bearing control animal
−Bjornsti MA et al, Nat Rev Cancer 2004
−Sahin F et al, Clin Cancer Res 2004
−Semela D et al,J Hepatol 2007
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
A Phase I/II Study of RAD001 in A Phase I/II Study of RAD001 in Advanced Hepatocellular Advanced Hepatocellular
CarcinomaCarcinomaNCT00516165
Ongoing study
Primary end-points■ To determine the maximum tolerated dose
of RAD001 ■ To determine PFS rate at 24 weeks
Inclusion criteria■ Unresectable of metastatic HCC ■ 0-2 prior systemic therapy for HCC■ PS 2 ECOG
RAD001 (Everolimus) is an oral kinase inhibitor that blocks the mTOR, a key component of PI3K/AKT pathway
Enrollment: Enrollment:
4040
Start Date: Start Date: August 2007August 2007
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Nuclear -catenin accumulation, a hallmark of the activeted Wnt signaling, has been observed in 33-67% of HCC.
3. The Wnt pathway In the absence of ligand, -catenin is degraded through ubiquitin-proteasome systems after phosphorylation by the APC/AXIN/GSK3b complex.Upon Wnt ligand stimulation, -catenin accumulates in the cytosol and translocates into the nucleus. Intranuclear b-catenin leads to modifications in expression of numerous genes related to cell proliferation, cell cycling, apoptosis, and differentiation (Survivin, c-myc, Cyclin D1, etc).
Moreover, mutations of components of the Wnt pathway ( -catenin, AXIN 1, AXIN 2) have been described in HCC
Breuhahn K et al, Oncogene 2006Miyoshi Y et al, cancer Res 1998Lee HC et al, Front Biosci 2006
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
4. VEGF Pathway (angiogenesis)
Microvessels stained by anti-CD34 in a tumor section of HCC, with almost no staining in the adjacent non-tumorous liver
DFS after hepatic resection in pts withHCC ≤5 cm stratified into low and high MVD by CD34 immunostaining (P=0.002)
HCCs are highly vascularized tumors and increased levels of VEGF and microvessel density (MVD) have been observed.High VEGF expression has been associated with inferior survival
Poon RT et al, J Clin Oncol 2002
Yamaguchi R et al, Hepatology 1998
Chao Y et al, Ann Surg Oncol 2003
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab in HCCin HCCNumber of PatientsNumber of Patients
( n = 33)( n = 33)
Patient CharacteristicsPatient Characteristics
AgeAge 31-81 years31-81 years
Gender ( M/F )Gender ( M/F ) 28/528/5
Child-Pugh ( A/B )Child-Pugh ( A/B ) 26/726/7
Tumor stage ( Tumor stage ( uninodular/multinodular )uninodular/multinodular )
5/285/28
Segmental vein invasionSegmental vein invasion 55
Adverse EventsAdverse Events
Transient ischemic accidentTransient ischemic accident 11
Arterial hypertensionArterial hypertension 11
Hepatic arterial thrombosisHepatic arterial thrombosis 11
Gastrointestinal bleedingGastrointestinal bleeding 2*2*
Clinical OutcomeClinical Outcome
ResponseResponse 1 CR, 2 PR1 CR, 2 PR
Stable disease ( 4-24 months )Stable disease ( 4-24 months ) 2121
Median TTPMedian TTP 6.5 months6.5 months* Including 1 death
ASCO Chicago 2007
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin in
Combination With Bevacizumab in Patients With Advanced
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Zhu AX et al, J Clin Oncol 2006
■ 33 pts, PS 0-1, with unresectable or metastatic HCC were enrolled■ Treatment Protocol: Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg d1 q14
Gemcitabine 100 mg/mq (10 mg/mq/min) d2, d16 q28
Oxaliplatin 85 mg/mq d2, d16 q28Median OS = 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.0 to NA)Median PFS = 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 8.7)The most common treatment-related G3-G4 toxicities
included leukopenia/neutropenia, transient elevation of aminotransferases, hypertension, and fatigue.
ORR = 20%SD = 27% of pts
GEMOX-B could be safely administered and had moderate antitumor activity for patients with advanced HCC
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
Bevacizumab and Erlotinib in Inoperable and Metastatic Hepatocellular CarcinomaNCT00287222
Phase II ongoing study
Primary endpointproportion of subjects that remain free of progression at the 27th week following the onset of treatment
Enrollment: Enrollment:
2121
Start Date: Start Date: February February 20062006
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
General Conclusions (1/2)
1)A majority of HCC patients (>80%) presents with advanced disease and is inelegible for surgical or locoregional therapies
2)At this moment, there is not effective systemic chemotherapy for HCC
3)Understanding the molecular pathway of HCC is crucial to the development of novel therapies
4)The relevant molecular signaling in HCC are: EGFR, VEGFR, AKT/mTOR, Raf/MEK/ERK pathways
F. Caponigro - Istituto Tumori Napoli
5) Sorafenib, inhibiting both cell growth and angiogenesis, is the first agent to improve survival of patients with advanced HCC. This effect establishes Sorafenib as first-line treatment for these pts
6) The next steps include testing Sorafenib earlier in the disease and eventually in combination with other targeted therapies (Bevacizumab, Erlotinib, Sunitinib have all been tested for liver cancer in phase II studies)
7) Until now, experimental therapies for HCC have been compared with placebo. Many patients are reluctant to join clinical trials if they have a 50% chance of receiving a sugar pill. Participation in trials may now increase, with Sorafenib replacing placebo as the standard control
General Conclusions (2/2)