new mathematics sol and assessments and their impact on instruction and assessment march 26, 2012...

53
New Mathematics SOL and Assessments and their Impact on Instruction and Assessment March 26, 2012 Michael Bolling, Mathematics Coordinator

Upload: kimberly-casey

Post on 30-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

New Mathematics SOL and Assessments and their Impact on Instruction and Assessment

March 26, 2012Michael Bolling, Mathematics Coordinator

2009 Mathematics Standards of Learning• New Standards

– Increased rigor– New content

• Curriculum Framework• New Assessments

– Increased rigor– New content– Technology Enhanced Items (TEI)

2

A New Trend Line in Student Achievement

3

“Virginia's public schools are beginning a new trend line with the implementation of more challenging standards and assessments. The goal is to build on the progress already made under the Standards of Learning program and ensure that all graduates possess the knowledge and skills needed for success in college and the workplace.”

- Dr. Patricia I. Wright Superintendent of Public Instruction

A New Trend Line in Student Achievement

4

“…this will be an indication that we are now expecting more of students, not that they are learning less.”

- Dr. Patricia I. Wright Superintendent of Public Instruction

Curve of Change Implementation

5

Past PracticeDenial

Anger

Fear

Depression

Understanding

Acceptance

Progress

We all have a role in a quality implementation of new standards

6

Virginia Department of Education• Standards of Learning• Curriculum Framework• Testing blueprints• SOL Institutes (2009, 2010, 2011)• Instructional Videos• ESS Sample Lesson Plans• Technical assistance documents• SOL Practice Items and Tools Practice• Vocabulary resources 7

Mathematics Supervisors and Central Office• Curriculum guide updates• Resources realignment• Communication of changes and countywide

PD efforts/emphasis• Collaboration

– Within the division– Among divisions

• Professional development

8

Professional Development• Use data to determine areas of limited

content knowledge (students) • Use surveys to determine areas of lower

confidence levels with instruction (teachers)• Collaborate on providing PD with emphasis on

– Process goals for students– Vertical articulation of content – Instructional strategies– Development of quality assessments– Effective use of data 9

Mathematics Supervisors and Central Office• Assist school-level administrators by providing

“look-fors” to support and monitor countywide PD efforts and initiatives (not many)

• Communicate to find out what they are observing and adjust future resource development and PD

10

School-level Administrators• When observing, notice who is doing the most

thinking – teachers or students• Communicate with the mathematics supervisor

and/or central office staff about what is being observed

• Facilitate common planning periods for teachers (general and special education) of the same subjects – when possible

• Provide guidelines and expectations for planning (learning community) meetings

11

Learning Community Meetings• Long-term and short-term planning/pacing• Instruction – What’s being taught?• Instruction – How’s it being taught?• Creation/review of common assessment items• Review/analysis of data/student performance• Review and analysis of student work

12

Building-level Mathematics Leaders• Lobby the administration for needs – support,

leadership, and professional development• Support new teachers• Provide a source of expertise or conduit to

find answers• Encourage and facilitate collaboration• Plan with groups of teachers

13

Teachers• Engage students in the learning, providing

relevant and rigorous activities and tasks• Ask high-leverage questions – make students

work harder than you• Require students to communicate their

thinking and listen carefully to them• Make students justify their thinking• Use multiple models

14

Proce

ss G

oals!

Teachers• Use formative assessments to learn about the

level of student understanding and reflect on your own teaching

• Know what needs to be taught and to what extent

15

16

What did we learn about assessments in college?

2 minute group discussion

How should we assess students?

Types of Assessment – Informal and Formal• Formative

– Checking in on the formation of learning– Diagnostic in nature – should lead to changes

in instruction– Assessment for learning– Questions (verbal), homework, classwork,

quizzes, benchmark tests– Includes a lot of student feedback

Types of Assessment• Summative

– Assessment of learning– Provides a numeric evaluation– Tests, projects, simulation tests– Less feedback

Types of Assessment Items• Multiple choice• Open response

– Short response• fill in the blank• solve/simplify/select/sort/compare• create/describe/shade• explain why/justify

– Open-ended • no predefined answer• synthesizes multiple concepts

20

Benchmark Testing

What are the positives? negatives?

2 minute group discussion

Benchmark Testing• Summative or Formative?• How often? How many problems?• Predictive or not?• Should I give a grade?• How do I use them?

– Future warm-ups– Class discussion– Reteaching– Remediation/small group work

21

22

It is time to upgrade

• Our knowledge• Our instruction• Our assessments

Are you preparing your students?

23

OLD

NEW

24

Technology Enhanced Items (TEI)

Format of Questions:• Fill in the blank• Drag and drop• Hot-spot: Select one or more “spots” to

respond to a test item, i.e. select answer option(s), shade region(s), place a point on a grid

• Creation of graphs

Technology Enhanced Items (TEI)Spring 2012 Test AdministrationFor online tests that assess 2009 Mathematics SOL:• Grades 3-5: TEI will be field test items

(approximately 1-3 field test items per test form)

• Grade 6 through End-of-Course (EOC): TEI will be operational (approximately 15% of the test form)

25

26

Sample TEI – Fill in the Blank

27

Sample TEI – Drag and Drop

Sample TEI – Create Graphs

29

30

Understanding the “increased rigor” of the new SOL comes

through analysis of the SOL and the Curriculum Framework

31

Exercise #1

Instruction, Assessment, and Backwards DesignSTEPS1. Analyze an SOL and Curriculum Framework

- what students should be able to do

2. Brainstorm ways to assess the SOL3. Develop an assessment4. Brainstorm instructional strategies 5. Develop instructional resources/lesson plans

32

Analysis - What should students be able to do?• Read the SOL and Curriculum Framework for

SOL 6.13 found on the next slide.• List 5 different things that students should be

able to do, given different information.

33

Analyze an SOL and Curriculum FrameworkSOL 6.13 The student will describe and identify properties of quadrilaterals• Sort and classify polygons as quadrilaterals,

parallelograms, rectangles, trapezoids, kites, rhombi, and squares based on their properties. Properties include number of parallel sides, angle measures, and number of congruent sides.

• Identify the sum of the measures of the angles of a quadrilateral as 360°.

34

Developing Assessments and Appropriate Instruction – Backwards Design

1. Analyze an SOL and Curriculum Framework- what students should be able to do

2. Brainstorm ways to assess the SOL3. Develop assessment items4. Brainstorm instructional strategies 5. Develop instructional resources

35

Developing Assessments and Appropriate Instruction – Backwards Design

1. Analyze an SOL and Curriculum Framework- what students should be able to do

2. Brainstorm ways to assess the SOL3. Develop assessment items4. Brainstorm instructional strategies 5. Develop instructional resources

36

37

Exercise #2

Compare the 2001 SOL 7.22 with 2009 SOL 7.14 on next two slides

How has rigor has been increased?

group discussion

Comparing the 2001 SOL to the 2009 SOL2001 SOL 7.22 The student will• a) solve one-step linear equations and

inequalities in one variable with strategies involving inverse operations and integers, using concrete materials, pictorial representations, and paper and pencil; and

2009 SOL 7.14 The student will• a) solve one- and two-step linear equations

in one variable; and (details in bold black moved to CF)

38

Comparing the 2001 SOL to the 2009 SOL2001 SOL 7.22 The student will• b) solve practical problems requiring the

solution of a one-step linear equation. 2009 SOL 7.14 The student will• b) solve practical problems requiring the

solution of one- and two-step linear equations.

39

Modifying Assessment Items• How could a test item writer ask this in a TEI

format?• What types of classroom activities or

assessments could I use to prepare students?

40

ESS Sample Lesson Plans – now available K-12

47

Practice SOL Items• Practice SOL Items have been updated to include

additional items in 3-8 and will be updated for high school courses very soon.

• TestNav 7.5 practice tools will provide additional practice problems.

• REMEMBER: ePATs are a concentration of examples showing increased rigor, technology enhanced items, and how new content may be tested.

50

Practice SOL Items• It is essential that students have experiences with the

Practice SOL Items prior to testing. http://www.doe.virginia.gov/testing/sol/practice_items/index.shtml

• Use of the Practice Item Guides is STRONGLY recommended.

• Practice Item Guides provide:– Guided practice with tools– Information specific to TEI functionality– Information on item format

51

• Currently being developed• Grades K-5, 6-8, Algebra, and Geometry• Anticipated release by summer 2012

52

Vocabulary Word Wall Cards

No Pain, No Gain• If you are more tired than the kids, it’s not

because you are old• Make kids estimate/predict and think before

calculating • Don’t ask questions that solicit one word

answers• Let kids struggle to make sense of the

mathematics

53