new develop coalitions – applying teamwork to develop patient...
TRANSCRIPT
Develop Coalitions – Applying teamwork to develop patient centred coalitions Authors: G. Dickson, D. Dath, D. Blumenthal, J. Adolphe, J. Van Aerde, S. Tsuei, J. Pickard, D. Koff , L. Loh Advisory Panel: J Tepper, J Karpinski, K Stobart
BACKGROUND Coalition • A group of people or organizations outside of the direct
care team that share a common goal and pool theircapabilities to achieve that goal.
• Coalitions are built on relationships.Applying teamwork to coalition building � Integrated with competency of listening to patient voice.� Coalitions must be deliberately constructed to ensure all
providers involved in patient’s care create a seamlesspathway so that quality improvement informs practice.
INSTRUCTIONAL METHODS � Case and situation (i.e., real) based learning� Interactive workshop� Self-study—readings, assignments, portfolio� Online learning—chat groups, online assignments� On-site learning (e.g., hospital rounds, teaching sessions
by staff physicians, and/or peer teaching).� Program that integrates above methods
ASSESSMENT METHODS � Emphasis on formative vs summative
assessment� Applied assignments instructor reviewed—
think pieces re case; application of content toreal scenarios
� Observation—discussion participation; 360;online chats; peer /colleague interactions, Peerassessments—feedback on situations in whichresident demonstrates evidence of learning
� Self assessment—reflection on experiences,and plans to improve subsequent situations
INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES Beginning - The resident will: • Develop an awareness of the need to build coalitions to
maximize the quality of individual patient care.• Know the importance of understanding and clarifying
roles, responsibilities of various coalition partners.• Seek to engender and maintain trust in coalitions.• Demonstrate trust-building factors in classroom activities,
on the job, or while interacting with individuals frompotential coalitions.
Advanced - The senior resident will demonstrate: • The knowledge to build coalitions to maximize the quality
of population-based patient care.• The skills to seek out such knowledge; and the ability to
utilize it as appropriate for collective patient care.• The ability to explain and demonstrate factors that
engender and maintain trust in patient-centeredcoalitions.
TEACHER’S GUIDE • Beginning and advanced learning outcomes for
progression of learning.• Face-to-face, self study and online methods.• Teaching at point-of-care is vitally important;
can be augmented with small groupdiscussions, didactic sessions and onlinemodules.
• Link teaching to assessment for feedback andto summative assessments in the program.
• Share content re roles and responsibilities forbuilding coalitions and how to build trust.
• Story-telling : examples of coalitions built.• Description of workshops, activities, and
methods to apply and practice knowledge andskills of coalition building in case and real-lifescenarios experienced in the clinic/hospital/organization.
OTHER RESOURCES • Lawrence, P. R., Lynch, R. P. (2011)
Leadership and the Structure of Trust.• Coalitions work. Coalitions Work Tools.
http://coalitionswork.com/resources/tools/
CASE
Questions for Discussion
Questions for discussion: 1. What elements of this case suggest that the
coalitions that should exist between providers didnot--or if they did, were not working well?
2. What are the appropriate roles/ responsibilities ofdifferent partners (e.g. surgeon, ER doctor, nurse,staff, patient) in:
(a) the design of a well-understood patient pathway for recovery; (b) when unanticipated consequences are
experienced by the patient? 3. What factors would build trust amongst providers
and Frank to facilitate better communication,information sharing, and Frank’s confidence infollowing an appropriate recovery process?
OBJECTIVES � To show how the discipline of developing coalitions is
key to seamless patient care and quality improvement.� To outline how important defining roles &
responsibilities a creating trust are to an effectivecoalition.
Frank is a 38 year old, healthy man who underwent surgery for obstructive sleep apnea; he was discharged the next day. Over the next 3 weeks, Frank visited the ER 4 times and a community clinic once, each time with a high fever spike, general malaise and rigors. The acuity of symptoms had mostly disappeared by the time he arrived at the ER and was seen, each time 4-6 hours after the onset of the symptoms. After 5 such episodes, he wasadmitted and treated with IV antibiotics.
TEAM
WO
RK A
ND
CO
ALIT
ION
S: R
EFER
ENCE
S
Read
ings
: •
Chap
ter 8
: Dev
elop
Coa
litio
ns. I
n Di
ckso
n, G
. & T
holl,
B. (
2014
). B
ringi
ng L
eade
rshi
p to
Life
: LEA
DS in
a C
arin
gEn
viro
nmen
t - A
New
Per
spec
tive.
Spr
inge
r-Ve
rlag,
Lond
on.
•An
sari,
W. (
2011
). W
hen
mea
ning
s blu
r, do
diff
eren
ces m
atte
r? In
itiat
ives
for i
mpr
ovin
g th
e qu
ality
and
inte
grat
ion
of c
are:
con
cept
ual m
atrix
or m
easu
rem
ent m
aze?
Jour
nal o
f Int
egra
ted
Care
, 19(
3), 5
-21.
•Co
nklin
, J.,
Lusk
, E.,
Harr
is, M
., an
d St
olee
, P. (
2013
). Kn
owle
dge
brok
ers i
n a
know
ledg
e ne
twor
k: th
e ca
se o
fSe
nior
s Hea
lth R
esea
rch
Tran
sfer
Net
wor
k kn
owle
dge
brok
ers.
Impl
emen
tatio
n Sc
ienc
e 20
13, 8
(7),
1-10
.•
Com
ber,
S. &
Wils
on, L
. (20
16).
Deve
lopi
ng C
anad
ian
phys
icia
ns: T
he q
uest
for l
eade
rshi
p ef
fect
iven
ess.
Lead
ersh
ip in
Hea
lth S
ervi
ces (
spec
ial e
ditio
n). 2
9(3)
. doi
: 10.
1108
/LHS
-10-
2015
-003
2•
Gree
n, A
., Ed
mon
son,
C. (
2013
). An
opp
ortu
nity
to le
ad: S
tate
coa
litio
ns. N
urse
Lea
der,
Febr
uary
, 28-
39.
•He
arld
, L.,
Alex
ande
r, J.,
& M
ittle
r, J.
(201
2). F
oste
ring
chan
ge w
ithin
org
aniza
tiona
l par
ticip
ants
of m
ultis
ecto
ral
heal
thca
re a
llian
ces.
Hea
lth C
are
Man
agem
ent R
evie
w, 3
7(3)
, 267
-279
.•
Law
renc
e, P
. R.,
Lync
h, R
. P. (
2011
) Lea
ders
hip
and
the
Stru
ctur
e of
Tru
st. T
he E
urop
ean
Busin
ess R
evie
w. 1
7—27
.ww
w.e
urop
eanb
usin
essr
evie
w.c
om.
•Ra
derm
ache
r, H.
, Kar
unar
athn
a, Y
., Gr
ace,
N. &
Fel
dman
, S. (
2011
). Pa
rtne
r or p
erish
? Ex
plor
ing
inte
r-or
gani
satio
nal p
artn
ersh
ips i
n th
e m
ultic
ultu
ral c
omm
unity
age
d ca
re se
ctor
. Hea
lth a
nd S
ocia
l Car
e in
the
Com
mun
ity, 1
9(5)
, 550
–560
.•
Van
Aerd
e, J.
(201
5). O
pini
on: R
elat
ions
hip-
cent
red
care
: tow
ard
real
hea
lth sy
stem
refo
rm. C
anad
ian
Jour
nal o
fPh
ysic
ian
Lead
ersh
ip. (
Win
ter)
, 3-6
.
Onl
ine
reso
urce
s:
•Co
aliti
ons w
ork.
Coa
litio
ns W
ork
Tool
s. h
ttp:
//co
aliti
onsw
ork.
com
/res
ourc
es/t
ools/
•Th
e Co
mm
unity
Too
lbox
. Se
ctio
n 5.
Coa
litio
n Bu
ildin
g I:
Star
ting
a Co
aliti
on h
ttp:
//ct
b.ku
.edu
/en/
tabl
e-of
-co
nten
ts/a
sses
smen
t/pr
omot
ion-
stra
tegi
es/s
tart
-a-c
oalti
on/m
ain
•Do
mai
n 3
and
4. G
ood
Surg
ical
pra
ctic
e. T
he R
oyal
Col
lege
of S
urge
ons i
n En
glan
d.ht
tps:
//w
ww
.rcse
ng.a
c.uk
/sur
geon
s/su
rgic
al-s
tand
ards
/pro
fess
iona
lism
-sur
gery
/gsp
/doc
umen
ts/g
ood-
surg
ical-
prac
tice-
•Pa
rtne
ring
for p
atie
nts t
o m
ake
tran
sitio
ns se
amle
ss h
ttp:
//ho
spita
lnew
s.co
m/p
artn
erin
g-pa
tient
s-m
ake-
tran
sitio
ns/
•Se
amle
ss T
rans
ition
s: H
ospi
tal t
o Ho
me
– Gu
ideb
ook,
http
://h
ealth
care
atho
me.
ca/m
h/en
/Doc
umen
ts/S
eam
less
Tran
sitio
nsGu
ideb
ook.
•St
ephe
n Co
vey:
Lea
ding
at t
he S
peed
of T
rust
. htt
ps:/
/ww
w.y
outu
be.c
om/w
atch
?v=c
F2lb
yUaQ
_o
Oth
er re
sour
ces (
avai
labl
e up
on re
ques
t)
•Tr
ust a
nd A
ccou
ntab
ility
in th
e O
rgan
isatio
nal C
onte
xt:
A W
orks
hop
for M
edic
al L
eade
rs (G
. Dic
kson
)
This
lead
ersh
ip m
odul
e on
Con
flict
Man
agem
ent c
an b
e ac
cess
ed a
t ww
w.s
anok
ondu
.ca
Mor
e in
form
atio
n ab
out T
ISLE
P is
ava
ilabl
e at
htt
p://
tisle
p.pg
me.
utor
onto
.ca