new develop coalitions – applying teamwork to develop patient...

2
Develop Coalions – Applying teamwork to develop paent centred coalions Authors: G. Dickson, D. Dath, D. Blumenthal, J. Adolphe, J. Van Aerde, S. Tsuei, J. Pickard, D. Ko, L. Loh Advisory Panel: J Tepper, J Karpinski, K Stobart BACKGROUND Coalion A group of people or organizaons outside of the direct care team that share a common goal and pool their capabilies to achieve that goal. Coalions are built on relaonships. Applying teamwork to coalion building Integrated with competency of listening to paent voice. Coalions must be deliberately constructed to ensure all providers involved in paent’s care create a seamless pathway so that quality improvement informs pracce. INSTRUCTIONAL METHODS Case and situaon (i.e., real) based learning Interacve workshop Self-study—readings, assignments, porolio Online learning—chat groups, online assignments On-site learning (e.g., hospital rounds, teaching sessions by staff physicians, and/or peer teaching). Program that integrates above methods ASSESSMENT METHODS Emphasis on formave vs summave assessment Applied assignments instructor reviewed— think pieces re case; applicaon of content to real scenarios Observaon—discussion parcipaon; 360; online chats; peer /colleague interacons, Peer assessments—feedback on situaons in which resident demonstrates evidence of learning Self assessment—reecon on experiences, and plans to improve subsequent situaons INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES Beginning - The resident will: Develop an awareness of the need to build coalions to maximize the quality of individual paent care. Know the importance of understanding and clarifying roles, responsibilies of various coalion partners. Seek to engender and maintain trust in coalions. Demonstrate trust-building factors in classroom acvies, on the job, or while interacng with individuals from potenal coalions. Advanced - The senior resident will demonstrate: The knowledge to build coalions to maximize the quality of populaon-based paent care. The skills to seek out such knowledge; and the ability to ulize it as appropriate for collecve paent care. The ability to explain and demonstrate factors that engender and maintain trust in paent-centered coalions. TEACHER’S GUIDE Beginning and advanced learning outcomes for progression of learning. Face-to-face, self study and online methods. Teaching at point-of-care is vitally important; can be augmented with small group discussions, didacc sessions and online modules. Link teaching to assessment for feedback and to summave assessments in the program. Share content re roles and responsibilies for building coalions and how to build trust. Story-telling : examples of coalions built. Descripon of workshops, acvies, and methods to apply and pracce knowledge and skills of coalion building in case and real-life scenarios experienced in the clinic/hospital/ organizaon. OTHER RESOURCES Lawrence, P. R., Lynch, R. P. (2011) Leadership and the Structure of Trust. Coalions work. Coalions Work Tools. hp://coalionswork.com/resources/tools / CASE Quesons for discussion: 1. What elements of this case suggest that the coalions that should exist between providers did not--or if they did, were not working well? 2. What are the appropriate roles/ responsibilies of dierent partners (e.g. surgeon, ER doctor, nurse, sta, paent) in: (a) the design of a well-understood paent pathway for recovery; (b) when unancipated consequences are experienced by the paent? 3. What factors would build trust amongst providers and Frank to facilitate beer communicaon, informaon sharing, and Frank’s condence in following an appropriate recovery process? OBJECTIVES To show how the discipline of developing coalions is key to seamless paent care and quality improvement. To outline how important dening roles & responsibilies a creang trust are to an eecve coalion. Frank is a 38 year old, healthy man who underwent surgery for obstrucve sleep apnea; he was discharged the next day. Over the next 3 weeks, Frank visited the ER 4 mes and a community clinic once, each me with a high fever spike, general malaise and rigors. The acuity of symptoms had mostly disappeared by the me he arrived at the ER and was seen, each me 4-6 hours aſter the onset of the symptoms. Aſter 5 such episodes, he was admied and treated with IV anbiocs.

Upload: others

Post on 17-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: New Develop Coalitions – Applying teamwork to develop patient …tislep.pgme.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/6-D... · 2016. 9. 27. · Develop Coalitions – Applying teamwork

Develop Coalitions – Applying teamwork to develop patient centred coalitions Authors: G. Dickson, D. Dath, D. Blumenthal, J. Adolphe, J. Van Aerde, S. Tsuei, J. Pickard, D. Koff , L. Loh Advisory Panel: J Tepper, J Karpinski, K Stobart

BACKGROUND Coalition • A group of people or organizations outside of the direct

care team that share a common goal and pool theircapabilities to achieve that goal.

• Coalitions are built on relationships.Applying teamwork to coalition building � Integrated with competency of listening to patient voice.� Coalitions must be deliberately constructed to ensure all

providers involved in patient’s care create a seamlesspathway so that quality improvement informs practice.

INSTRUCTIONAL METHODS � Case and situation (i.e., real) based learning� Interactive workshop� Self-study—readings, assignments, portfolio� Online learning—chat groups, online assignments� On-site learning (e.g., hospital rounds, teaching sessions

by staff physicians, and/or peer teaching).� Program that integrates above methods

ASSESSMENT METHODS � Emphasis on formative vs summative

assessment� Applied assignments instructor reviewed—

think pieces re case; application of content toreal scenarios

� Observation—discussion participation; 360;online chats; peer /colleague interactions, Peerassessments—feedback on situations in whichresident demonstrates evidence of learning

� Self assessment—reflection on experiences,and plans to improve subsequent situations

INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES Beginning - The resident will: • Develop an awareness of the need to build coalitions to

maximize the quality of individual patient care.• Know the importance of understanding and clarifying

roles, responsibilities of various coalition partners.• Seek to engender and maintain trust in coalitions.• Demonstrate trust-building factors in classroom activities,

on the job, or while interacting with individuals frompotential coalitions.

Advanced - The senior resident will demonstrate: • The knowledge to build coalitions to maximize the quality

of population-based patient care.• The skills to seek out such knowledge; and the ability to

utilize it as appropriate for collective patient care.• The ability to explain and demonstrate factors that

engender and maintain trust in patient-centeredcoalitions.

TEACHER’S GUIDE • Beginning and advanced learning outcomes for

progression of learning.• Face-to-face, self study and online methods.• Teaching at point-of-care is vitally important;

can be augmented with small groupdiscussions, didactic sessions and onlinemodules.

• Link teaching to assessment for feedback andto summative assessments in the program.

• Share content re roles and responsibilities forbuilding coalitions and how to build trust.

• Story-telling : examples of coalitions built.• Description of workshops, activities, and

methods to apply and practice knowledge andskills of coalition building in case and real-lifescenarios experienced in the clinic/hospital/organization.

OTHER RESOURCES • Lawrence, P. R., Lynch, R. P. (2011)

Leadership and the Structure of Trust.• Coalitions work. Coalitions Work Tools.

http://coalitionswork.com/resources/tools/

CASE

Questions for Discussion

Questions for discussion: 1. What elements of this case suggest that the

coalitions that should exist between providers didnot--or if they did, were not working well?

2. What are the appropriate roles/ responsibilities ofdifferent partners (e.g. surgeon, ER doctor, nurse,staff, patient) in:

(a) the design of a well-understood patient pathway for recovery; (b) when unanticipated consequences are

experienced by the patient? 3. What factors would build trust amongst providers

and Frank to facilitate better communication,information sharing, and Frank’s confidence infollowing an appropriate recovery process?

OBJECTIVES � To show how the discipline of developing coalitions is

key to seamless patient care and quality improvement.� To outline how important defining roles &

responsibilities a creating trust are to an effectivecoalition.

Frank is a 38 year old, healthy man who underwent surgery for obstructive sleep apnea; he was discharged the next day. Over the next 3 weeks, Frank visited the ER 4 times and a community clinic once, each time with a high fever spike, general malaise and rigors. The acuity of symptoms had mostly disappeared by the time he arrived at the ER and was seen, each time 4-6 hours after the onset of the symptoms. After 5 such episodes, he wasadmitted and treated with IV antibiotics.

Page 2: New Develop Coalitions – Applying teamwork to develop patient …tislep.pgme.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/6-D... · 2016. 9. 27. · Develop Coalitions – Applying teamwork

TEAM

WO

RK A

ND

CO

ALIT

ION

S: R

EFER

ENCE

S

Read

ings

: •

Chap

ter 8

: Dev

elop

Coa

litio

ns. I

n Di

ckso

n, G

. & T

holl,

B. (

2014

). B

ringi

ng L

eade

rshi

p to

Life

: LEA

DS in

a C

arin

gEn

viro

nmen

t - A

New

Per

spec

tive.

Spr

inge

r-Ve

rlag,

Lond

on.

•An

sari,

W. (

2011

). W

hen

mea

ning

s blu

r, do

diff

eren

ces m

atte

r? In

itiat

ives

for i

mpr

ovin

g th

e qu

ality

and

inte

grat

ion

of c

are:

con

cept

ual m

atrix

or m

easu

rem

ent m

aze?

Jour

nal o

f Int

egra

ted

Care

, 19(

3), 5

-21.

•Co

nklin

, J.,

Lusk

, E.,

Harr

is, M

., an

d St

olee

, P. (

2013

). Kn

owle

dge

brok

ers i

n a

know

ledg

e ne

twor

k: th

e ca

se o

fSe

nior

s Hea

lth R

esea

rch

Tran

sfer

Net

wor

k kn

owle

dge

brok

ers.

Impl

emen

tatio

n Sc

ienc

e 20

13, 8

(7),

1-10

.•

Com

ber,

S. &

Wils

on, L

. (20

16).

Deve

lopi

ng C

anad

ian

phys

icia

ns: T

he q

uest

for l

eade

rshi

p ef

fect

iven

ess.

Lead

ersh

ip in

Hea

lth S

ervi

ces (

spec

ial e

ditio

n). 2

9(3)

. doi

: 10.

1108

/LHS

-10-

2015

-003

2•

Gree

n, A

., Ed

mon

son,

C. (

2013

). An

opp

ortu

nity

to le

ad: S

tate

coa

litio

ns. N

urse

Lea

der,

Febr

uary

, 28-

39.

•He

arld

, L.,

Alex

ande

r, J.,

& M

ittle

r, J.

(201

2). F

oste

ring

chan

ge w

ithin

org

aniza

tiona

l par

ticip

ants

of m

ultis

ecto

ral

heal

thca

re a

llian

ces.

Hea

lth C

are

Man

agem

ent R

evie

w, 3

7(3)

, 267

-279

.•

Law

renc

e, P

. R.,

Lync

h, R

. P. (

2011

) Lea

ders

hip

and

the

Stru

ctur

e of

Tru

st. T

he E

urop

ean

Busin

ess R

evie

w. 1

7—27

.ww

w.e

urop

eanb

usin

essr

evie

w.c

om.

•Ra

derm

ache

r, H.

, Kar

unar

athn

a, Y

., Gr

ace,

N. &

Fel

dman

, S. (

2011

). Pa

rtne

r or p

erish

? Ex

plor

ing

inte

r-or

gani

satio

nal p

artn

ersh

ips i

n th

e m

ultic

ultu

ral c

omm

unity

age

d ca

re se

ctor

. Hea

lth a

nd S

ocia

l Car

e in

the

Com

mun

ity, 1

9(5)

, 550

–560

.•

Van

Aerd

e, J.

(201

5). O

pini

on: R

elat

ions

hip-

cent

red

care

: tow

ard

real

hea

lth sy

stem

refo

rm. C

anad

ian

Jour

nal o

fPh

ysic

ian

Lead

ersh

ip. (

Win

ter)

, 3-6

.

Onl

ine

reso

urce

s:

•Co

aliti

ons w

ork.

Coa

litio

ns W

ork

Tool

s. h

ttp:

//co

aliti

onsw

ork.

com

/res

ourc

es/t

ools/

•Th

e Co

mm

unity

Too

lbox

. Se

ctio

n 5.

Coa

litio

n Bu

ildin

g I:

Star

ting

a Co

aliti

on h

ttp:

//ct

b.ku

.edu

/en/

tabl

e-of

-co

nten

ts/a

sses

smen

t/pr

omot

ion-

stra

tegi

es/s

tart

-a-c

oalti

on/m

ain

•Do

mai

n 3

and

4. G

ood

Surg

ical

pra

ctic

e. T

he R

oyal

Col

lege

of S

urge

ons i

n En

glan

d.ht

tps:

//w

ww

.rcse

ng.a

c.uk

/sur

geon

s/su

rgic

al-s

tand

ards

/pro

fess

iona

lism

-sur

gery

/gsp

/doc

umen

ts/g

ood-

surg

ical-

prac

tice-

pdf

•Pa

rtne

ring

for p

atie

nts t

o m

ake

tran

sitio

ns se

amle

ss h

ttp:

//ho

spita

lnew

s.co

m/p

artn

erin

g-pa

tient

s-m

ake-

tran

sitio

ns/

•Se

amle

ss T

rans

ition

s: H

ospi

tal t

o Ho

me

– Gu

ideb

ook,

http

://h

ealth

care

atho

me.

ca/m

h/en

/Doc

umen

ts/S

eam

less

Tran

sitio

nsGu

ideb

ook.

pdf

•St

ephe

n Co

vey:

Lea

ding

at t

he S

peed

of T

rust

. htt

ps:/

/ww

w.y

outu

be.c

om/w

atch

?v=c

F2lb

yUaQ

_o

Oth

er re

sour

ces (

avai

labl

e up

on re

ques

t)

•Tr

ust a

nd A

ccou

ntab

ility

in th

e O

rgan

isatio

nal C

onte

xt:

A W

orks

hop

for M

edic

al L

eade

rs (G

. Dic

kson

)

This

lead

ersh

ip m

odul

e on

Con

flict

Man

agem

ent c

an b

e ac

cess

ed a

t ww

w.s

anok

ondu

.ca

Mor

e in

form

atio

n ab

out T

ISLE

P is

ava

ilabl

e at

htt

p://

tisle

p.pg

me.

utor

onto

.ca