neutrino novelties: pointers to new physics? dae golden jubilee colloquium institute of mathematical...
TRANSCRIPT
Neutrino Novelties:Pointers to new physics?
DAE Golden Jubilee ColloquiumInstitute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai
May 19, 2004
Amitava RaychaudhuriUniversity of Calcutta
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 2 of 28
Neutrino Novelties
• Experimental results: solar and atmospheric neutrinos
• Neutrino oscillations, neutrino mass and mixing
• Massive fermions
c ? (Majorana neutrino)
• Standard model
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 3 of 28
Neutrino Novelties (contd)
• India-based neutrino observatory (INO)
• See-saw models, Left-right symmetry
• Extra dimensions
• Supersymmetry
• Looking ahead
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 4 of 28
Neutrino properties
• Three types: e , µ, (sterile ?)• Mass limits:m(e) < 2.5 eV (Tritium beta decay) m(µ) < 0.19 MeV (Pion decay) m() < 18.2 MeV ( decay)
• From cosmology: ∑ m < 24 eV (Energy Density of the Universe) ∑ m < 0.71 eV (WMAP Satellite: CMBR anisotropy)
• Majorana neutrino( =c)? 02β <m> 0.39+0.27
-0.28 eV
(76Ge Heidelberg Moscow)
• Neutrino interactions: Only weak interactions (CC and NC) (e +e e +e ) ~ 10-43 cm2 c.f. ~ 10-27 cm2 (em), ~10-23 cm2 (strong) • Sterile : No weak interactions
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 5 of 28
Solar and Atmospheric Neutrinos
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 6 of 28
Solar neutrinos
• Sun generates heat and light through fusion reactions4p 4He + 2 e+ + 2 e + 25 MeV (i)
• Just like sunlight, solar neutrinos are reaching us (day & night!)
• Reaction (i) does not take place in one go. Rather, it is the consequence of a cycle of reactions, e.g. p + p 2H + e+ + e pp neutrinos
The e energy spectra from these reactions are well-known.
• Robust prediction of the number of solar neutrinos as a function of energy is possible. These have been detected by several expts. • But …
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 7 of 28
Solar neutrino results
Expt Obsvd/Predn Eth (MeV) Type
Homestake 0.335 ± 0.029 0.8 Radiochemical
e + 37Cl 37Ar + e_ (CC)
GNO, SAGE, 0.584 ± 0.039 0.233 Radiochemical
Gallex e + 71Ga 71Ge + e_ (CC)
SuperK 0.459 ± 0.017 5.0 Water Cerenkov
e + e e + e (CC + NC)
SNO CC 0.347 ± 0.027 6.75 Cerenkov
e + d p + p + e_ (CC)
SNO NC 0.894 ± 0.004 + d n + p + (NC)
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 8 of 28
Neutrino interactions
Neutrinos have two kinds of weak interactions
CC (Radiochemical, SK, SNO), NC (SK, SNO)
e e, p e, n
e, n e e, n W Z
Charged Current (CC) Neutral Current (NC)
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 9 of 28
Atmospheric neutrinos
Neutrinos are produced in the atmospherefrom cosmic ray pion and kaon decayse.g. (- µ- + µ), (µ
- e- + e + µ)and the charge conjugate processesTypical energy ~ 1 GeV
Expectation: R =(# µ+ µ)/(# e+e) ≈ 2
SuperK: Robs/Rmc =0.635±0.035±0.083 (sub-GeV) = 0.604±0.065±0.065 (multi-GeV)
No. of µ depends on zenith angle (up-down asymmetry)No such effect for e
up
down
detector
Earth
atmosphere
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 10 of 28
Neutrino Oscillations
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 11 of 28
Neutrino oscillations
• A quantum mechanical phenomenon relying on the superposition principle.
• In the oscillation of a pendulum, the bob alternately reaches the left and right end-points of the trajectory.
• During travel, a e becomes a µ and then back again to a e. This oscillation process continues.
Prob(e µ, L) = 4 c2 s2 sin2(L/ λ) where λ = 4 E/ ∆, ∆ = (m1
2 – m22), s = sinθ, c = cosθ.
• The oscillation wavelength (and hence probability!) depends on the neutrino energy. Key combination: Δ . (L/E)
µ µ
µ
e
e
e
et
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 12 of 28
Neutrino oscillations (contd)How does this help?
• Solar detectors are sensitive primarily to e. Some (Cl, Ga and SNO CC) are totally insensitive to µ, τ while SK has a smaller sensitivity (about 1/6). Only SNO NC is equally sensitive to all. If some e have oscillated to µ when they reach the detector, then count will be less (except in SNO NC).
• Atmospheric e, µ are detected through the e-, µ- they produce. At their smaller (L/E), e oscillation hardly occurs, but the µ
oscillates to τ, which do not produce µ-. This reduces the measured ratio R. Also, the zenith angle dependence seen for µ is explained.
• Solar (atmospheric) results cross-checked by KAMLAND reactor (K2K long baseline) expt. LSND result awaiting confirmation.
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 13 of 28
Quantum Mechanics of neutrino oscillations
Neutrino stationary states: |1>, |2> mass m1, m2
Neutrino flavour eigenstates: |e>, | µ>
Two different bases: |e> = |1> cosθ + |2> sinθ
|µ> = -|1> sinθ + |2> cosθ
|e> produced at t = 0 |Ψ(0)> = |e> = |1> cos θ + |2> sinθ
At a later time: |Ψ(t)> = |1> cos θ e-iE1t + |2> sinθ e-iE2t
Prob(e µ, L) = |< µ |Ψ(t)>|2 = 4 c2 s2 |e-iE1t - e-iE2t|2
Neutrinos are ultra-relativistic: p >> m Ei = (p2 + mi2)½ ≈ p + mi
2/2p
(E1 - E2)t = (m12 – m2
2)t /2p ≡ (∆/2p)t = L ∆/2E
Prob(e µ, L) = 4 c2 s2 sin2(L/ λ) where λ = 4 E/ ∆
Survival Prob. = Prob(e e, L) = 1 - Prob(e µ, L)
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 14 of 28
More on oscillations
• Essential ingredients: (i) = m12 - m2
2 0, (ii) sin 2 0.
• Matter effect: Mass is a measure of inertia. In a medium, inertia (and hence mass) changes. Neutrino mass and mixing affected by medium (MSW effect)
• Solar neutrino problem: = 6.07 x 10-5 eV2 (ii) tan2 = 0.41 (Best fit -- MSW LMA)
e oscillates to another `active’ neutrino (SNO NC ≈ 1)
• Atmospheric neutrino anomaly: = 3 x 10-3 eV2 (ii) sin2 2 = 1 (Best fit)
µ oscillates to
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 15 of 28
India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO)• Neutrino detector being planned in India• Advantages: Good mountain coverage (reduce cosmic rays) Only low latitude neutrino detector site in the world.• Location: Pushep (Nilgiris, near Ooty) or Rammam (Near
Darjeeling)• Observatory will eventually house several experiments• ICAL Design: 32 kT magnetised (1 Tesla) Iron, Resistive Plate Chamber (RPC) detectors • R & D Work being pursued: a) Site survey, geological study, tunneling plans, cost estimate b) Prototype detector fabrication, magnet design, engineering c) Detector simulation• Physics goals: a) L/E dip -- a clinching oscillation signal -- in atmospheric b) End detector for neutrino factory: Longest baseline expt?
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 16 of 28
Neutrino Mass
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 17 of 28
Fermion mass
• Left- and right-handed fermions: = L+ R
• Fermion mass couples left to right:
m = m(R L + L R)
• Neutrinos only left-handed. If there is only left-handed (or right-handed) component then m=0.
• Caveat: presence of L (c)R , a right-handed field but of opposite charge. m L(c)R violates charge conservation. Majorana mass for neutrinos. (L = 2)
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 18 of 28
Standard Model
• The Standard Model describes strong and electroweak interactions.
• Mediated by gluons, W-boson, Z-boson, and photon.• Fermions: Left- and right-handed quarks, left- and right-
handed charged leptons, left-handed neutrino.
• Masses of W, Z , quarks and leptons via Higgs mechanism.
• No R in SM Neutrino is massless. Chosen for consistency with information of that era.
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 19 of 28
Majorana Neutrino?
• Can the neutrino be its own anti-particle? ( ≡ c ?)
The photon is its own anti-particle. (Also 0)• In such an event, lepton number is not conserved!
• Consequence Neutrino-less double beta decay (02β process)
• Normal double beta decay (22β) : X Y + 2 e- + 2e
• Neutrino-less double beta decay (02β) : X Y + 2 e- (<m>2)
• Look for peak in 2e- invariant mass
• Current limit <m> < 0.2 eV.
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 20 of 28
How to get m 0?
• The mundane way is to add a R to the SM.
• This solves the problem but has no explanation of the smallness of m.
• This is the major hurdle in neutrino model building. To explain the smallness, one always needs new physics associated with some heavy scale, M. For Majorana mass, lepton number violation is also needed.
• Generic form of see-saw: m = (const)/M
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 21 of 28
New Physics
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 22 of 28
Simplest new physics
• Left-right symmetric model R required by symmetry.
• Nature is parity violating. Left-right symmetry is broken at a high energy scale, MR.
• Neutrino mass matrix: MR » m
• Two majorana neutrinos: L (mass m), R (mass MR)
• See-saw mass formula: m = (m2)/MR.
• Pati-Salam model and other grand unified theories contain left-right symmetry.
• How to test for MR?
RMm
m0
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 23 of 28
Extra Dimensional models (an example)
World is (4+d) dim (bulk) 4 dim branesSterile neutrino, N, (and gravity) in bulk, other particles in 4d
brane.
Consider d=1. Coordinates: (x,y)Extra dimension compactified (y coordinate a circle) y y + 2R
Either N(x,y) or n(x) with n = 0,±1,±2,……
Note m(n) = n/R (from y y piece in kinetic term)
])()([2
1),( // RinynRinyn exex
RyxN
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 24 of 28
Extra Dimensional models (contd.)
Instead of n (with n = 0,±1,±2,...) one often defines Mn = (n + -n)/2 and M’n = (n - -n)/2 with n = 1,2,...and masses (n/R).
Coupling of ordinary L with N only at y=0.
Effective coupling of L with an infinite number of sterile neutrinos. Infinite dimensional mass matrix.
Has been used to address the solar neutrino problem.
)2()(1
0
n
nLRL MMmyNm
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 25 of 28
Supersymmetry
Bosons Fermions
Supersymmetry puts bosons and fermions in a supermultiplet Superfield: L ≡ (l, Ĩ ), U = (u, ũ)
Many attractive features. Search is on for squarks and sleptons.
Interactions written as a superpotential in terms of superfields.
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 26 of 28
Supersymmetry (contd.)
Supersymmetric interactions can violate lepton and baryon number.
Baryon number violation implies proton decay. This is not seen!
Often, an additional symmetry, R-parity, was imposed on the superpotential to exclude all baryon number and lepton number violating terms. R-parity conservation requires SUSY particles to be produced in pairs.
Now it is realized that one can retain L-violating terms to generate a neutrino mass and yet maintain proton stability.
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 27 of 28
Supersymmetry (contd.)
One loop diagrams generate neutrino mass. e.g.,
Notice that Lepton number
is violated at each vertex
by one unit.
L = 2 (Majorana mass)
Here, the slepton mass is the heavy scale. Further suppression through loop factors.
Ĩ
e- X
X
May 19, 2004IMSC, Chennai
A. Raychaudhuri 28 of 28
Looking Ahead• Mixing between three neutrinos
• CP-violation in lepton sector• Majorana neutrinos• Sterile neutrinos• Neutrino factories: Long base-line, pure and intense beams• INO• Neutrino mass matrix• Large mixing vs. small quark mixing: RG effect? • New physics: new interactions, symmetries, etc.• Alternatives to massive neutrinos, e.g. VEP• Astroparticle physics: e.g. Supernova, Nucleosynthesis