neurology | the most widely read and highly cited peer ... · web view2016/06/29 · and the...
TRANSCRIPT
SUPPLEMENTAL METHODS
Exclusion of subjects
We excluded subjects with structural lesions in brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging such as territorial infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, brain tumor, hydrocephalus or severe white matter hyperintensities. We also excluded subjects with secondary causes of cognitive dysfunction assessed with laboratory tests including complete blood count, blood chemistry, vitamin B12, folate, syphilis serology, and thyroid function tests.
Neuropsychological tests
All patients underwent a standardized neuropsychological battery called the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery.1, 2 The battery includes tests for attention, language, praxis, four elements of Gerstmann syndrome, visuoconstructive function, verbal and visual memory, frontal/executive function, CDR-SB, and the MMSE. These cognitive tests were used because they were scorable and most patients had undertaken them The tests included the backward digit span,3 the Korean version of the Boston Naming Test,4 the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test including tests for copying and 20-minute delayed recall,1 the Seoul Verbal Learning Test (SVLT) including a 20-minute delayed recall trial of 12 items,1 and the semantic Controlled Oral Word Association Tests (COWAT).5
REFERENCES
1. Kang Y, Na DL. Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB). Incheon, South Korea: Human Brain Research & Consulting Co., 2003.
2. Ahn HJ, Chin J, Park A, et al. Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-dementia version (SNSB-D): a useful tool for assessing and monitoring cognitive impairments in dementia patients. J Korean Med Sci 2010;25:1071-1076.
3. Kang YW, Jin JH, Chin JH, Na DL. A Normative study of the digit span test for the elderly. Korean J Clin Psychology 2002;21:911-922.
4. Kim H, Na DL. BRIEF REPORT Normative Data on the Korean Version of the Boston Naming Test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1999;21:127-133.
5. Kang Y, Chin J-h, Na DL, Lee J, Park JS. A normative study of the Korean version of Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) in the elderly. Korean J Clin Psychology 2000;19:385-392.
Table e-1. Comparison of regional binding values corrected for partial volume effect in 18F-florbetaben and 18F- AV1451 PET scans
18F-florbetaben
SUVR
P-value
HC
MCI
AD
MCI > HC
AD > HC
AD > MCI
Global cortex
1.26
±
0.36
1.87
±
0.47
2.34
±
0.72
0.006
< 0.001
0.008
Prefrontal
1.39
±
0.47
2.09
±
0.61
2.70
±
0.84
0.010
< 0.001
0.004
Sensorimotor
1.32
±
0.26
1.82
±
0.40
2.24
±
0.69
0.019
< 0.001
0.011
Superior parietal
1.22
±
0.34
1.98
±
0.53
2.39
±
0.93
0.005
< 0.001
0.076
Inferior parietal
1.26
±
0.38
1.97
±
0.54
2.42
±
0.86
0.005
< 0.001
0.028
Precuneus
1.18
±
0.46
2.11
±
0.70
2.79
±
1.08
0.004
< 0.001
0.009
Occipital
1.10
±
0.33
1.60
±
0.37
1.97
±
0.65
0.018
< 0.001
0.050*
Superior temporal
1.17
±
0.36
1.71
±
0.48
2.12
±
0.66
0.010
< 0.001
0.018
Middle temporal
1.27
±
0.33
1.74
±
0.45
2.15
±
0.62
0.021
< 0.001
0.010
Inferior temporal
1.14
±
0.30
1.68
±
0.41
2.12
±
0.65
0.006
< 0.001
0.008
Hippocampus
1.08
±
0.09
1.16
±
0.10
1.20
±
0.11
0.149
< 0.001
0.358
Entorhinal
1.17
±
0.19
1.23
±
0.24
1.46
±
0.31
1.000
0.002
0.017
Parahippocampal
1.16
±
0.27
1.52
±
0.34
1.92
±
0.46
0.023
< 0.001
0.002
Anterior cingulate
1.48
±
0.51
2.15
±
0.62
2.76
±
0.81
0.013
< 0.001
0.003
Posterior cingulate
1.27
±
0.43
2.07
±
0.64
2.65
±
0.84
0.003
< 0.001
0.006
Striatum
1.07
±
0.26
1.43
±
0.32
1.67
±
0.46
0.015
< 0.001
0.038
Thalamus
1.40
±
0.15
1.48
±
0.18
1.63
±
0.23
0.808
< 0.001
0.009
18F-AV-1451
SUVR
P-value
HC
MCI
AD
MCI > HC
AD > HC
AD > MCI
Global cortex
1.35
±
0.10
1.50
±
0.23
2.09
±
0.72
0.678
< 0.001
< 0.001
Prefrontal
1.45
±
0.12
1.49
±
0.20
2.13
±
0.83
1.000
< 0.001
< 0.001
Sensorimotor
1.29
±
0.11
1.33
±
0.18
1.60
±
0.43
1.000
< 0.001
0.004
Superior parietal
1.35
±
0.18
1.50
±
0.26
2.33
±
1.29
1.000
< 0.001
0.001
Inferior parietal
1.34
±
0.15
1.53
±
0.26
2.43
±
1.21
0.900
< 0.001
< 0.001
Precuneus
1.33
±
0.14
1.48
±
0.34
2.60
±
1.40
1.000
< 0.001
< 0.001
Occipital
1.28
±
0.16
1.47
±
0.27
1.92
±
0.71
0.552
< 0.001
0.013
Superior temporal
1.25
±
0.11
1.40
±
0.19
1.90
±
0.62
0.652
< 0.001
< 0.001
Middle temporal
1.37
±
0.10
1.71
±
0.39
2.37
±
0.89
0.189
< 0.001
< 0.001
Inferior temporal
1.33
±
0.10
1.68
±
0.42
2.54
±
1.04
0.248
< 0.001
< 0.001
Hippocampus
1.18
±
0.18
1.53
±
0.37
1.64
±
0.27
0.003
< 0.001
0.703
Entorhinal
1.46
±
0.25
2.32
±
0.86
2.65
±
0.58
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.291
Parahippocampal
1.35
±
0.15
1.79
±
0.60
2.33
±
0.53
0.020*
< 0.001
0.002
Anterior cingulate
1.38
±
0.14
1.40
±
0.21
1.68
±
0.52
1.000
0.010
0.027
Posterior cingulate
1.32
±
0.12
1.50
±
0.39
2.25
±
0.94
0.785
< 0.001
< 0.001
Striatum
1.50
±
0.21
1.43
±
0.23
1.63
±
0.22
0.797
0.355
0.037
Thalamus
1.17
±
0.10
1.16
±
0.16
1.20
±
0.11
1.000
1.000
0.991
*Regions did not survive region-wise correction for multiple comparisons.
Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Abbreviations: AD = Alzheimer’s disease; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; HC = healthy controls; SUVR = standardized uptake value ratio
Table e-2. Comparison of regional binding values in 18F-florbetaben and 18F- AV1451 PET scans between the amyloid-negative controls and amyloid-positive MCI and AD.
18F-florbetaben
SUVR
P-value
HC
MCI
AD
MCI > HC
AD > HC
AD > MCI
Global cortex
1.22
±
0.06
1.75
±
0.17
1.90
±
0.29
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.008
Prefrontal
1.25
±
0.06
1.89
±
0.21
2.11
±
0.32
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
Sensorimotor
1.25
±
0.06
1.64
±
0.19
1.82
±
0.33
0.003
< 0.001
0.008
Superior parietal
1.17
±
0.07
1.75
±
0.19
1.82
±
0.38
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.275
Inferior parietal
1.20
±
0.08
1.81
±
0.22
1.93
±
0.36
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.078
Precuneus
1.22
±
0.07
2.00
±
0.23
2.16
±
0.46
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.034*
Occipital
1.19
±
0.05
1.57
±
0.13
1.67
±
0.28
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.202
Superior temporal
1.17
±
0.06
1.66
±
0.21
1.78
±
0.27
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.089
Middle temporal
1.14
±
0.06
1.64
±
0.21
1.77
±
0.25
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.031*
Inferior temporal
1.17
±
0.05
1.67
±
0.17
1.81
±
0.26
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.028*
Hippocampus
1.27
±
0.07
1.29
±
0.13
1.24
±
0.15
1.000
1.000
1.000
Entorhinal
1.07
±
0.06
1.23
±
0.17
1.28
±
0.15
0.117
< 0.001
0.149
Parahippocampal
1.15
±
0.05
1.46
±
0.14
1.56
±
0.21
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.040*
Anterior cingulate
1.33
±
0.10
1.97
±
0.25
2.24
±
0.31
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
Posterior cingulate
1.31
±
0.08
2.02
±
0.23
2.18
±
0.35
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.012
Striatum
1.38
±
0.06
1.78
±
0.17
1.93
±
0.28
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.011
Thalamus
1.51
±
0.10
1.64
±
0.16
1.73
±
0.20
0.733
< 0.001
0.037*
18F-AV-1451
SUVR
P-value
HC
MCI
AD
MCI > HC
AD > HC
AD > MCI
Global cortex
1.12
±
0.09
1.28
±
0.16
1.57
±
0.36
0.097
< 0.001
0.015*
Prefrontal
1.15
±
0.09
1.22
±
0.14
1.58
±
0.44
1.000
< 0.001
0.013*
Sensorimotor
1.04
±
0.09
1.09
±
0.14
1.25
±
0.23
0.501
< 0.001
0.156
Superior parietal
1.05
±
0.11
1.21
±
0.19
1.55
±
0.54
0.248
< 0.001
0.117
Inferior parietal
1.11
±
0.12
1.29
±
0.17
1.74
±
0.59
0.240
< 0.001
0.019*
Precuneus
1.13
±
0.10
1.30
±
0.22
1.81
±
0.62
0.270
< 0.001
0.013*
Occipital
1.08
±
0.10
1.23
±
0.18
1.44
±
0.33
0.079
< 0.001
0.250
Superior temporal
1.07
±
0.09
1.22
±
0.13
1.47
±
0.35
0.210
< 0.001
0.028*
Middle temporal
1.15
±
0.08
1.48
±
0.25
1.82
±
0.47
0.021*
< 0.001
0.035*
Inferior temporal
1.17
±
0.08
1.53
±
0.26
1.94
±
0.51
0.019*
< 0.001
0.019*
Hippocampus
1.27
±
0.19
1.57
±
0.24
1.51
±
0.23
0.002
0.007
0.786
Entorhinal
1.22
±
0.17
1.84
±
0.45
1.87
±
0.29
< 0.001
< 0.001
1.000
Parahippocampal
1.14
±
0.11
1.57
±
0.32
1.72
±
0.31
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.829
Anterior cingulate
1.17
±
0.10
1.23
±
0.14
1.40
±
0.32
1.000
0.008
0.235
Posterior cingulate
1.15
±
0.10
1.36
±
0.25
1.72
±
0.48
0.112
< 0.001
0.048*
Striatum
1.53
±
0.19
1.56
±
0.19
1.63
±
0.20
1.000
0.521
0.950
Thalamus
1.31
±
0.11
1.36
±
0.17
1.31
±
0.09
0.921
1.000
0.917
*Regions did not survive region-wise correction for multiple comparisons.
Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Abbreviations: AD = Alzheimer’s disease; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; HC = healthy controls; SUVR = standardized uptake value ratio
Table e-3. Comparison of regional binding values in 18F-florbetaben and 18F- AV1451 PET scans corrected for partial volume effect between the amyloid-negative controls and amyloid-positive MCI and AD.
18F-florbetaben
SUVR
P-value
HC
MCI
AD
MCI > HC
AD > HC
AD > MCI
Global cortex
1.17
±
0.08
2.14
±
0.26
2.54
±
0.57
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.002
Prefrontal
1.28
±
0.12
2.45
±
0.35
2.94
±
0.64
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
Sensorimotor
1.26
±
0.07
2.01
±
0.28
2.41
±
0.59
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.003
Superior parietal
1.14
±
0.10
2.25
±
0.34
2.63
±
0.80
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.059
Inferior parietal
1.17
±
0.10
2.26
±
0.35
2.66
±
0.68
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.014
Precuneus
1.07
±
0.11
2.52
±
0.40
3.08
±
0.88
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.004
Occipital
1.03
±
0.12
1.79
±
0.26
2.11
±
0.61
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.108
Superior temporal
1.09
±
0.07
1.98
±
0.32
2.30
±
0.52
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.023
Middle temporal
1.19
±
0.09
1.99
±
0.32
2.32
±
0.49
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.015
Inferior temporal
1.06
±
0.08
1.91
±
0.27
2.29
±
0.53
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.007
Hippocampus
1.06
±
0.07
1.19
±
0.09
1.21
±
0.11
0.003
< 0.001
1.000
Entorhinal
1.13
±
0.13
1.26
±
0.28
1.52
±
0.29
1.000
< 0.001
0.002
Parahippocampal
1.08
±
0.09
1.69
±
0.29
2.05
±
0.37
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
Anterior cingulate
1.37
±
0.18
2.47
±
0.46
3.00
±
0.61
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
Posterior cingulate
1.16
±
0.12
2.44
±
0.37
2.89
±
0.64
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.001
Striatum
1.01
±
0.09
1.57
±
0.22
1.79
±
0.40
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.017
Thalamus
1.36
±
0.12
1.55
±
0.18
1.67
±
0.22
0.247
< 0.001
0.017
18F-AV-1451
SUVR
P-value
HC
MCI
AD
MCI > HC
AD > HC
AD > MCI
Global cortex
1.35
±
0.11
1.61
±
0.20
2.21
±
0.72
0.158
< 0.001
0.007
Prefrontal
1.44
±
0.12
1.57
±
0.19
2.25
±
0.86
1.000
< 0.001
0.010
Sensorimotor
1.29
±
0.11
1.39
±
0.19
1.65
±
0.44
0.617
< 0.001
0.151
Superior parietal
1.36
±
0.16
1.61
±
0.26
2.50
±
1.33
0.529
< 0.001
0.056
Inferior parietal
1.35
±
0.14
1.65
±
0.24
2.61
±
1.23
0.351
< 0.001
0.009
Precuneus
1.32
±
0.13
1.61
±
0.34
2.81
±
1.42
0.426
< 0.001
0.007
Occipital
1.30
±
0.16
1.57
±
0.28
2.01
±
0.73
0.226
< 0.001
0.231
Superior temporal
1.26
±
0.11
1.50
±
0.14
1.98
±
0.64
0.258
< 0.001
0.012
Middle temporal
1.37
±
0.10
1.89
±
0.34
2.53
±
0.88
0.041*
< 0.001
0.020
Inferior temporal
1.32
±
0.10
1.88
±
0.36
2.74
±
1.01
0.061
< 0.001
0.008
Hippocampus
1.18
±
0.19
1.69
±
0.33
1.66
±
0.30
< 0.001
< 0.001
1.000
Entorhinal
1.45
±
0.26
2.73
±
0.77
2.77
±
0.54
< 0.001
< 0.001
1.000
Parahippocampal
1.35
±
0.16
2.08
±
0.53
2.44
±
0.49
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.182
Anterior cingulate
1.37
±
0.15
1.46
±
0.21
1.73
±
0.54
1.000
0.013
0.205
Posterior cingulate
1.30
±
0.12
1.65
±
0.39
2.40
±
0.94
0.157
< 0.001
0.018
Striatum
1.51
±
0.22
1.52
±
0.22
1.62
±
0.23
1.000
0.432
0.616
Thalamus
1.15
±
0.09
1.21
±
0.17
1.19
±
0.11
0.755
1.000
1.000
*Regions did not survive region-wise correction for multiple comparisons.
Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Abbreviations: AD = Alzheimer’s disease; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; HC = healthy controls; SUVR = standardized uptake value ratio
Table e-4. Comparison of regional binding values in 18F-florbetaben and 18F- AV1451 PET scans between the early- and late-onset AD patients
18F-florbetaben
18F-AV-1451
SUVR
P-value
SUVR
P-value
EOAD
LOAD
EOAD > LOAD
EOAD
LOAD
EOAD > LOAD
Global cortex
1.92
±
0.24
1.74
±
0.42
0.830
1.92
±
0.24
1.33
±
0.25
0.002
Prefrontal
2.11
±
0.24
1.92
±
0.50
0.707
1.91
±
0.33
1.35
±
0.37
0.034*
Sensorimotor
1.80
±
0.27
1.70
±
0.42
0.547
1.49
±
0.19
1.10
±
0.12
< 0.001
Superior parietal
1.78
±
0.33
1.68
±
0.49
0.552
2.16
±
0.44
1.18
±
0.21
< 0.001
Inferior parietal
1.94
±
0.33
1.75
±
0.49
0.962
2.36
±
0.48
1.34
±
0.29
< 0.001
Precuneus
2.09
±
0.41
1.99
±
0.62
0.494
2.43
±
0.42
1.39
±
0.39
< 0.001
Occipital
1.75
±
0.27
1.54
±
0.31
0.640
1.79
±
0.14
1.21
±
0.20
< 0.001
Superior temporal
1.84
±
0.22
1.61
±
0.37
0.615
1.73
±
0.37
1.29
±
0.25
0.028*
Middle temporal
1.81
±
0.18
1.61
±
0.37
0.854
2.12
±
0.37
1.56
±
0.44
0.069
Inferior temporal
1.86
±
0.21
1.65
±
0.37
0.843
2.31
±
0.42
1.62
±
0.45
0.039*
Hippocampus
1.24
±
0.22
1.22
±
0.12
0.121
1.52
±
0.20
1.48
±
0.23
0.684
Entorhinal
1.25
±
0.13
1.23
±
0.20
0.704
1.91
±
0.23
1.75
±
0.36
0.329
Parahippocampal
1.55
±
0.22
1.47
±
0.27
0.985
1.81
±
0.27
1.58
±
0.34
0.207
Anterior cingulate
2.25
±
0.27
2.04
±
0.49
0.847
1.46
±
0.25
1.32
±
0.34
0.557
Posterior cingulate
2.13
±
0.30
2.01
±
0.52
0.506
2.10
±
0.29
1.43
±
0.41
0.015
Striatum
1.97
±
0.27
1.78
±
0.34
0.824
1.57
±
0.20
1.65
±
0.19
0.992
Thalamus
1.69
±
0.22
1.71
±
0.19
0.470
1.31
±
0.07
1.33
±
0.11
0.685
Two AD groups were compared after adjusting the years of education and MMSE scores.
*Regions did not survive region-wise correction for multiple comparisons.
Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Abbreviations: AD = Alzheimer’s disease; EOAD = early-onset Alzheimer’s disease; LOAD = late-onset Alzheimer’s disease; SUVR = standardized uptake value ratio
Table e-5. Comparison of regional binding values in 18F-florbetaben and 18F- AV1451 PET scans between the patients with and without Apo ε4 genotype
18F-florbetaben
18F-AV-1451
SUVR
P-value
SUVR
P-value
ε4 -
ε4 +
ε4 + > ε4 -
ε4 -
ε4 +
ε4 + > ε4 -
Global cortex
1.62
±
0.38
1.79
±
0.29
0.196
1.31
±
0.33
1.44
±
0.33
0.441
Prefrontal
1.74
±
0.45
1.96
±
0.36
0.152
1.30
±
0.33
1.44
±
0.43
0.456
Sensorimotor
1.58
±
0.33
1.70
±
0.33
0.379
1.13
±
0.21
1.17
±
0.21
0.884
Superior parietal
1.56
±
0.41
1.75
±
0.34
0.169
1.31
±
0.50
1.35
±
0.42
0.779
Inferior parietal
1.61
±
0.43
1.84
±
0.32
0.114
1.38
±
0.51
1.55
±
0.52
0.592
Precuneus
1.76
±
0.51
2.06
±
0.44
0.091
1.42
±
0.52
1.60
±
0.57
0.550
Occipital
1.52
±
0.31
1.56
±
0.21
0.810
1.30
±
0.34
1.27
±
0.22
0.455
Superior temporal
1.51
±
0.36
1.69
±
0.26
0.162
1.22
±
0.27
1.40
±
0.33
0.146
Middle temporal
1.49
±
0.36
1.68
±
0.27
0.136
1.45
±
0.43
1.70
±
0.45
0.181
Inferior temporal
1.55
±
0.36
1.70
±
0.22
0.228
1.54
±
0.54
1.72
±
0.43
0.461
Hippocampus
1.21
±
0.14
1.27
±
0.12
0.272
1.37
±
0.23
1.57
±
0.20
0.020*
Entorhinal
1.19
±
0.19
1.23
±
0.15
0.553
1.57
±
0.39
1.86
±
0.36
0.045*
Parahippocampal
1.38
±
0.25
1.48
±
0.19
0.267
1.40
±
0.34
1.67
±
0.32
0.046*
Anterior cingulate
1.87
±
0.48
2.06
±
0.37
0.272
1.21
±
0.19
1.36
±
0.32
0.172
Posterior cingulate
1.84
±
0.47
2.04
±
0.37
0.201
1.37
±
0.37
1.59
±
0.49
0.247
Striatum
1.73
±
0.35
1.80
±
0.25
0.692
1.55
±
0.20
1.57
±
0.20
0.770
Thalamus
1.62
±
0.18
1.69
±
0.19
0.361
1.31
±
0.15
1.33
±
0.10
0.622
In 34 MCI and AD patients whose ApoE genotypes were available, 17 patients had ApoE ε4 and the other 17 patients did not. We compared 17 ApoE ε4 positive and 17 negative patients after controlling for age and years of education.
*Regions did not survive region-wise correction for multiple comparisons.
Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Abbreviations: AD = Alzheimer’s disease; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; HC = healthy controls; SUVR = standardized uptake value ratio
Table e-6. Voxel-based comparison results
Cluster-level
Peak-level
Pcorrcected
KE
Puncorrected
T-value
MNI coordinates
Regions
MCI > HC in 18F-florbetaben PET
< 0.001
39991
< 0.001
4.66
50, -65, -13
right middle occipital
< 0.001
56417
< 0.001
4.56
-29, -68, 51
left superior parietal
0.006
13816
< 0.001
4.13
43, 19, 49
right middle frontal
0.022
10337
< 0.001
3.92
-49, -65, -9
left inferior temporal
AD > HC in 18F-florbetaben PET
< 0.001
1105992
< 0.001
7.80
32, -46, -24
right fusiform
AD > HC in 18F-AV-1451 PET
< 0.001
1040297
< 0.001
7.52
-63, -53, -2
left middle temporal
PET images normalized to 1mm MNI space were used for voxel-based comparison analysis.
Abbreviations: AD = Alzheimer’s disease; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; HC = healthy controls; KE = number of voxels in cluster; MNI = Montreal Neurological Institute
1
Table e-7. Correlation between the regional binding values and cognition in 35 patients with MCI and AD
18F-florbetaben
CDR-SB
MMSE
DS-B
BNT
RCFT
SVLT-DR
RCFT-DR
COWAT-S
Global cortex
0.286
-0.459a
0.176
-0.255
0.187
-0.402a
-0.290
-0.042
Prefrontal
0.354a*
-0.506b
0.147
-0.202
0.201
-0.424a
-0.339
-0.099
Superior parietal
0.129
-0.337a*
0.045
-0.228
0.155
-0.357a*
-0.256
-0.025
Inferior parietal
0.140
-0.327
0.182
-0.249
0.177
-0.418a
-0.299
-0.016
Precuneus
0.184
-0.368a
0.154
-0.249
0.120
-0.422a
-0.299
-0.040
Occipital
0.227
-0.399a
0.150
-0.338
0.016
-0.230
-0.113
0.013
Superior temporal
0.206
-0.367a
0.263
-0.230
0.163
-0.423a
-0.300
0.019
Middle temporal
0.299
-0.417a
0.256
-0.246
0.229
-0.471a
-0.327
-0.038
Inferior temporal
0.286
-0.437a
0.227
-0.330
0.250
-0.418a
-0.293
-0.026
Hippocampus
-0.577b
0.472b
0.004
-0.084
-0.101
-0.208
-0.213
-0.083
Entorhinal
0.039
-0.248
-0.089
0.016
0.277
-0.189
-0.191
0.077
Parahippocampal
0.130
-0.273
0.208
-0.271
0.236
-0.341
-0.217
0.036
Anterior cingulate
0.379a*
-0.507b
0.163
-0.142
0.178
-0.408a
-0.319
-0.056
Posterior cingulate
0.297
-0.443a
0.193
-0.210
0.199
-0.422a
-0.312
-0.050
18F-AV-1451
CDR-SB
MMSE
DS-B
BNT
RCFT
SVLT-DR
RCFT-DR
COWAT-S
Global cortex
0.550b
-0.563b
0.074
-0.006
-0.094
-0.427a
-0.490b
-0.264
Prefrontal
0.555b
-0.499b
0.177
-0.013
-0.015
-0.322
-0.300
-0.192
Superior parietal
0.484b
-0.545b
-0.289
0.172
-0.380a*
-0.242
-0.463a
-0.288
Inferior parietal
0.478b
-0.537b
-0.078
0.107
-0.321
-0.365a*
-0.476a
-0.196
Precuneus
0.512b
-0.548b
-0.031
0.089
-0.257
-0.362a*
-0.403a
-0.263
Occipital
0.679b
-0.724b
0.009
0.023
-0.022
-0.288
-0.444a
-0.334
Superior temporal
0.433a
-0.439a
0.108
-0.028
-0.125
-0.468a
-0.482b
-0.167
Middle temporal
0.418a
-0.427a
0.180
-0.162
0.044
-0.523b
-0.448a
-0.278
Inferior temporal
0.422a
-0.501b
0.121
-0.210
0.017
-0.433a
-0.406a
-0.254
Hippocampus
0.020
-0.136
0.272
-0.097
0.214
-0.431a
-0.649b
-0.068
Entorhinal
0.185
-0.226
0.191
-0.092
0.333
-0.527b
-0.634b
-0.126
Parahippocampal
0.233
-0.289
0.177
-0.176
0.123
-0.524b
-0.586b
-0.173
Anterior cingulate
0.298
-0.239
0.255
-0.123
0.126
-0.334
-0.278
-0.206
Posterior cingulate
0.488b
-0.486b
0.124
0.016
-0.066
-0.451a
-0.450a
-0.272
aP < 0.05, bP < 0.005; *Region did not survive region-wise correction for multiple comparisons.
Correlation analyses between the binding values and the global cognitive scales (CDR-SB and MMSE scores) were performed in 35 patients with MCI and AD after controlling for age and education. The correlation analyses of the tests for each cognitive domain were performed after controlling for age and years of education and global cognitive scale (MMSE score) as well. Data are presented with correlation coefficients.
Abbreviations: AD = Alzheimer’s disease; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; CDR-SB = Clinical Dementia Rating sum-of-boxes; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; DS-B = Digit Span: Backward; BNT = Boston Naming Test; RCFT = Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test; SVLT-DR = Seoul Verbal Learning Test: Delayed Recall; RCFT-DR = Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test: Delayed Recall; COWAT-S = Controlled Oral Word Association Test: Semantics; r = correlation coefficient
Table e-8. Correlation between the regional binding values and cognition in 27 amyloid-positive patients with MCI and AD
18F-florbetaben
CDR-SB
MMSE
DS-B
BNT
RCFT
SVLT-DR
RCFT-DR
COWAT-S
Global cortex
0.237
-0.521a
0.195
-0.503a*
0.182
-0.350
-0.072
-0.007
Prefrontal
0.343
-0.583b
0.117
-0.446
0.186
-0.435a*
-0.165
-0.138
Superior parietal
0.028
-0.377
-0.026
-0.388a*
0.118
-0.213
-0.059
0.033
Inferior parietal
0.028
-0.326
0.207
-0.450a*
0.170
-0.356
-0.104
0.046
Precuneus
0.074
-0.368
0.138
-0.449a*
0.039
-0.379
-0.115
-0.004
Occipital
0.155
-0.424a
0.192
-0.437a*
-0.044
-0.020
0.154
0.111
Superior temporal
0.097
-0.330
0.313
-0.426a*
0.149
-0.390
-0.118
0.086
Middle temporal
0.235
-0.451a
0.376
-0.409a*
0.339
-0.458a*
-0.138
0.024
Inferior temporal
0.222
-0.499a
0.371
-0.452a*
0.425a*
-0.351
-0.051
0.070
Hippocampus
-0.605b
0.561b
-0.034
-0.152
-0.137
-0.271
-0.159
-0.063
Entorhinal
-0.024
-0.211
-0.259
-0.006
0.282
-0.065
-0.022
0.162
Parahippocampal
0.010
-0.229
0.234
-0.374
0.278
-0.238
0.028
0.111
Anterior cingulate
0.385a*
-0.564b
0.116
-0.355
0.079
-0.396
-0.144
-0.091
Posterior cingulate
0.259
-0.487a
0.189
-0.436a*
0.156
-0.408
-0.137
-0.047
18F-AV-1451
CDR-SB
MMSE
DS-B
BNT
RCFT
SVLT-DR
RCFT-DR
COWAT-S
Global cortex
0.502a
-0.506a
0.038
0.010
-0.119
-0.428a*
-0.442a*
-0.307
Prefrontal
0.510a
-0.429a*
0.172
-0.038
-0.006
-0.326
-0.253
-0.214
Superior parietal
0.414a*
-0.493a
-0.399a*
0.327
-0.487a*
-0.176
-0.430a*
-0.333
Inferior parietal
0.409a*
-0.481a
-0.132
0.205
-0.407a*
-0.330
-0.445a*
-0.221
Precuneus
0.444a*
-0.489a
-0.076
0.169
-0.311
-0.345
-0.366
-0.304
Occipital
0.675b
-0.716b
-0.039
0.111
-0.022
-0.231
-0.362
-0.378
Superior temporal
0.360
-0.353
0.091
-0.047
-0.150
-0.495a
-0.452a*
-0.181
Middle temporal
0.339
-0.346
0.174
-0.257
0.045
-0.530a
-0.383
-0.325
Inferior temporal
0.343
-0.445a
0.100
-0.300
0.005
-0.401a*
-0.308
-0.299
Hippocampus
-0.086
0.003
0.252
-0.090
0.249
-0.552b
-0.630b
-0.117
Entorhinal
0.034
-0.072
0.137
-0.171
0.403a*
-0.571b
-0.587b
-0.170
Parahippocampal
0.075
-0.145
0.148
-0.258
0.146
-0.578b
-0.534b
-0.213
Anterior cingulate
0.231
-0.139
0.248
-0.193
0.151
-0.380
-0.220
-0.227
Posterior cingulate
0.415a*
-0.406a*
0.106
0.045
-0.070
-0.475a
-0.411a*
-0.318
aP < 0.05, bP < 0.005; *Regions did not survive region-wise correction for multiple comparisons.
Correlation analyses between the binding values and the global cognitive scales (CDR-SB and MMSE scores) were performed in 27 amyloid-positive patients with MCI and AD after controlling for age and education. The correlation analyses of the tests for each cognitive domain were performed after controlling for age and years of education and global cognitive scale (MMSE score) as well. Data are presented with correlation coefficients.
Abbreviations: AD = Alzheimer’s disease; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; CDR-SB = Clinical Dementia Rating sum-of-boxes; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; DS-B = Digit Span: Backward; BNT = Boston Naming Test; RCFT = Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test; SVLT-DR = Seoul Verbal Learning Test: Delayed Recall; RCFT-DR = Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test: Delayed Recall; COWAT-S = Controlled Oral Word Association Test: Semantics; r = correlation coefficient
Table e-9. Correlation between the regional binding values and volumes
18F-florbetaben
18F-AV-1451
r
P-value
r
P-value
Global cortex
-0.312
0.068
-0.539
< 0.001
Prefrontal
-0.339
0.046*
-0.588
< 0.001
Sensorimotor
-0.104
0.553
-0.451
0.007
Superior parietal
-0.156
0.370
-0.587
< 0.001
Inferior parietal
-0.313
0.067
-0.635
< 0.001
Precuneus
-0.339
0.046*
-0.548
< 0.001
Occipital
-0.210
0.225
-0.582
< 0.001
Superior temporal
-0.143
0.411
-0.329
0.054
Middle temporal
-0.286
0.096
-0.384
0.023
Inferior temporal
-0.387
0.021*
-0.461
0.005
Hippocampus
0.555
< 0.001
-0.199
0.253
Entorhinal
0.041
0.814
-0.150
0.390
Parahippocampal
-0.140
0.423
-0.133
0.447
Anterior cingulate
-0.068
0.700
0.059
0.737
Posterior cingulate
-0.377
0.026*
-0.363
0.032*
Striatum
-0.021
0.903
-0.281
0.101
Thalamus
0.183
0.292
-0.171
0.327
*Region did not survive region-wise correction for multiple comparisons.
Correlation analysis was performed in 35 patients with MCI and AD after adjusting for age and education.
Abbreviations: AD = Alzheimer’s disease; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; r = correlation coefficient
Figure e-1. Averaged standardized uptake value ratio images of 18F-florbetaben and 18F- AV-1451 PET scans
Color bars represent SUVR values.
Abbreviations: Abbreviations: AD = Alzheimer’s disease; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; HC = healthy controls; SUVR = standardized uptake value ratio
Figure e-2. Demonstration of 18F-florbetaben PET images
The 18F-florbetaben PET images of the subjects shown in the Figure 2 are displayed. Cortical amyloid uptake does not clearly reflect the severity of cognition.
Color bar represents standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR).
Abbreviations: AD = Alzheimer’s disease; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; HC = healthy controls, CDR-SB = Clinical Dementia Rating, CDR-SB = Clinical Dementia Rating sum-of-boxes; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination score
1
SUPPLEMENTAL METHODS
Exclusion of s
ubjects
We excluded subjects with structural lesions
in
brain
magnetic resonance (MR) imaging
such as territorial infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, brain tumor, hydrocephalus or severe
white matter hyperintensities.
We
also excluded subjects with s
econdary causes of cognitive
d
ysfunction
assessed
with
laboratory tests including
complete blood count, blood chemistry,
vitamin B12, folate, syphilis serology, and thyroid function tests.
Neuropsychological tests
All patient
s underwent a standardized neuropsychological battery called the Seoul
Neuropsychological Screening Battery.
1
,
2
The b
attery
include
s
tests for attention, language,
praxis, four elements of Gerstmann syndrome, visuoconstructive function, verbal and visual
memory, frontal/executive function
, CDR
-
SB,
and the MMSE.
These
cognitive tests
were
used
because
they were scorable a
nd
most patients had
undertaken them
The tests
included
the
backward
d
igit
s
pan
,
3
the Korean version of the Boston Naming Test
,
4
the
Rey
-
Osterrieth
Complex Figure Test
including tests for
copying and 20
-
minute delayed recall
,
1
the Seoul Verbal
Learning Test (SVLT)
including
a 20
-
min
ute delayed recall trial of 12 items
,
1
and the
semantic
Controlled Oral Word Association Tests (COWAT)
.
5
REFERENCES
1.
Kang Y, Na DL. Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB). Incheon, South Korea:
Human Brain Research & Consulting Co., 2003.
1
SUPPLEMENTAL METHODS
Exclusion of subjects
We excluded subjects with structural lesions in brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging
such as territorial infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, brain tumor, hydrocephalus or severe
white matter hyperintensities. We also excluded subjects with secondary causes of cognitive
dysfunction assessed with laboratory tests including complete blood count, blood chemistry,
vitamin B12, folate, syphilis serology, and thyroid function tests.
Neuropsychological tests
All patients underwent a standardized neuropsychological battery called the Seoul
Neuropsychological Screening Battery.
1, 2
The battery includes tests for attention, language,
praxis, four elements of Gerstmann syndrome, visuoconstructive function, verbal and visual
memory, frontal/executive function, CDR-SB, and the MMSE. These cognitive tests were used
because they were scorable and most patients had undertaken them The tests included the
backward digit span,
3
the Korean version of the Boston Naming Test,
4
the Rey-Osterrieth
Complex Figure Test including tests for copying and 20-minute delayed recall,
1
the Seoul Verbal
Learning Test (SVLT) including a 20-minute delayed recall trial of 12 items,
1
and the semantic
Controlled Oral Word Association Tests (COWAT).
5
REFERENCES
1. Kang Y, Na DL. Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB). Incheon, South Korea:
Human Brain Research & Consulting Co., 2003.