network structure in swing mode bifurcations u motivation & background –practical goal:...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations
Motivation & Background– Practical Goal: examine loss of stability
mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded transmission corridors.
– Expect presence of low frequency, interarea swing modes across transmission corridor.
– Can bifurcation tools developed for voltage analysis be adapted to this scenario (are voltage & angle instabilities really that different)?
![Page 2: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Key Ideas Voltage methods typically assume one degree of
freedom path in “parameter space” (e.g. load), or seek “closest” point in parameter space at which bifurcations occur
Alternative: leave larger # of degrees of freedom in parameter space, but constrain structure of eigenvector at bifurcation.
![Page 3: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Key Questions
Is there a priori knowledge of form of eigenvector of interest for “mode” of instability we’re after?
Precisely what formulation for matrix who’s eigenvector/eigenvalue is constrained (e.g., what generator model, what load model, how is DAE structure treated, etc.)
![Page 4: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Caveats (at present...)
Development to date uses only very simple, classical model for generators.
Previous work in voltage stability shows examples in which “earlier” loss of stability missed by such a simple model (e.g. Rajagopalan et al, Trans. on P.S. ‘92).
![Page 5: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Review - Relation of PF Jacobian and Linearized Dynamic Model
This issue well treated in existing literature, but still useful to develop notation suited to generalized eigenvalue problem.
Structure in linearization easiest to see if we keep all phase angles as variables; neglect damping/governor; assume lossless transmission & symmetric PF Jac. Relax many of these assumptions in computations.
![Page 6: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Review - Relation of PF Jacobian and Linearized Dynamic Model
Form of nonlinear DAE model
M• = L1(P
I - PN(, V))L1
• =
0 = L2(PI - PN(, V))
0 = (QI(V) - QN(, V))
![Page 7: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Review - Relation of PF Jacobian and Linearized Dynamic Model
Requisite variable/function definitions:V n, V := vector of bus voltage magnitudes; n, := vector of bus voltage phase angles
relative to an arbitrary synchronousreference frame of frequency 0 (noreference angle is deleted);
m, := vector of generator frequencydeviations, relative to synchronousfrequency 0;
RIRI
RI
![Page 8: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Review - Relation of PF Jacobian and Linearized Dynamic Model
variable/function definitions:
M mxm, M := diagonal matrix of normalizedgenerator inertias;
PI n, PI:= vector of net active power injection ateach bus; assumed constant;
QI: n-m n-m, QI(V) := vector valued function ofnet reactive power injection at load buses,normalized by voltage magnitude;
RI
RI
RI RI
![Page 9: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Review - Relation of PF Jacobian and Linearized Dynamic Model
variable/function definitions:
L1 := rows 1 through m of an nxn identity matrix;L2 := rows m+1 through n of an nxn identity matrix;
PN(, V) := vector-valued function of active powerabsorbed by network at each bus
QN(, V) := vector-valued function of reactivepower absorbed by network at load buses,normalized by voltage magnitude
![Page 10: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Linearized DAE/”Singular System” Form
Write linearization as:
~E •
x = ~Rx
![Page 11: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Component Definitions where:
Mmxm 0 0
0 I mxm 0
0 0 02(n-m)x2(n-m)
E~
=
0 -Imxm 0
Imxm 0 0
0 0 I2(n-m)x2(n-m)
SR~
=
![Page 12: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Component Definitions
and:
J: nx n-m (2n-m)x(2n-m), J =
Imxm 0 0
0 J11 J12
0 J21 J22
S =
RI RI RI
P
N
V P
N
Q
N
V {Q
N - Q
I}
L
L
![Page 13: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Relation to Reduced Dimension Symmetric Problem
Consider reduced dimension, symmetric generalized eigenvalue problem defined by pair (E, J), where:
M 0
0 02(n-m)x2(n-m)
E =
![Page 14: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Relation to Reduced Dimension Symmetric Problem
FACT: Finite generalized eigenvalues of (E, J) completely determine finite generalized eigenvalues of (
~E ~R)
![Page 15: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Relation to Reduced Dimension Symmetric Problem
In particular,
(E, J ) has a finite generalized eigenvalue
(~E,
~R), has finite generalized eigenvalue
with = j .
![Page 16: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Key Observation
In seeking bifurcation in full linearized dynamics, we may work with reduced dimension, symmetric generalized eigenvalue problem whose structure is determined by PF Jacobian & inertias.
When computation (sparsity) not a concern, equivalent to e.v.’s of M-1[J
11 - J
12J
22-1
J21
]
![Page 17: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Role of Network Structure
Question: what is a mechanism by which might drop rank?
First, observe that under lossless network approximation, the reduced Jacobian has admittance matrix structure; i.e. diagonal elements equal to – {sum of off-diagonal elements}.
[J11
- J12
J22-1
J21
]
![Page 18: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Role of Network Structure
Given this admittance matrix structure, reduced PF Jacobianhas associated network graph.
A mechanism for loss of rank can then be identified: branches forming a cutset all have weights of zero.
[J11
- J12
J22-1
J21
]
![Page 19: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Role of Network Structure
Eigenvector associated with new zero eigenvalue is identifiable by inspection:
where is a positive real constant, and partition of eigenvector is across the cutset.
J11
- J12
J22-1
J21
1-1
= 0
![Page 20: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Role of Network Structure
Returning to associated generalized eigenvalue problem, to preserve sparsity, one would have:
J11
J12
J21
J22
1–1 w
= 0
![Page 21: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Role of Network Structure
Finally, in original generalized eigenvalue problem for full dynamics, the new eigenvector has structure [ 1 , – 1 ] in components associated with generator phase angles.
Strongly suggests an inter area swing mode, with gens on one side of cutset 180º out of phase with those on other side.
![Page 22: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Summary so far...
Exploiting on a number of simplifying assumptions (lossless network, symmetric PF Jacobian, classical gen model...), identify candidate structure for eigenvector associated with a “new” eigenvalue at zero.
Look for limiting operating conditions that yield J realizing this bifurcation & e-vector.
![Page 23: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Computational Formulation Very analogous to early “direct” methods of finding
loading levels associated with Jacobian singularity in voltage collapse literature (e.g., Alvarado/Jung, 88).
But instead of leaving eigenvector components associated with zero eigenvalue as free variables, we constrain components associated with gen angles.
![Page 24: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Computational Formulation
Must compensate with “extra” degrees of freedom.
For example to follow, generation dispatch selected as new variables. Clearly, many other possible choices...
![Page 25: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Computational Formulation
Final observation: while it is convenient to keep all angles as variables in original analysis, in computation we select a reference angle and eliminate that variable.
Resulting structure of gen angle e-vector components becomes [ 0 , 1 ]
![Page 26: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Computational Formulation
Simultaneous equations to be solved:
Note that f tilde terms are power balance equations, deleting gen buses. Once angles & voltages solved, gen dispatch is output.
0 = f~
(~
, V)
0 = J~
((~
, V)[0, 1T, w~T]T
![Page 27: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Computational Formulation
Solution method is full Newton Raphson.
Aside: the Jacobian of these constraint equations involves 2nd order derivative of PF equations. Solutions routines developed offer very compact & efficient vector evaluations of higher order PF derivative.
![Page 28: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Case Study
Based on modified form of IEEE 14 bus test system.
![Page 29: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
10
11
12
13
14
1
2
3
45
6
7
8
9
G
G
GG
G
1
#
2
3
4
5
6
7 8
910
1112
13
1415
16
17
18
19 20 - Transmission Line #'s# - Bus #'s
14 Bus Test System
10
11
12
13
14
1
2
3
45
6
7
8
9
G
G
GG
G
1
#
2
3
4
5
6
7 8
910
1112
13
1415
16
17
18
19 20 - Transmission Line #'s# - Bus #'s
14 Bus Test System
Cutset Here
![Page 30: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Case Study
N-R Initialization: initial operating point selected heuristically at present. Simply begin from op. pnt. that loads up a transmission corridor, with gens each side.
Here choice has gens 1, 2, 3 on one side, gens 6, 8 on other side.
Model has rotational damping added as rough approximation to governor action.
![Page 31: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Table 1: Original & Critical Operating Pnts.Original Op. Point Critical Op. Point
Bus # Voltage/Phase(degrees) Voltage/Phase(degrees)1 1.0600 0 1.0600 02 1.0450 -4.7545 1.0450 -3.32843 1.0800 -2.8056 1.0800 -6.45224 0.9196 -25.1819 0.8351 -28.92825 0.9476 -23.6900 0.8733 -26.85316 1.0200 -70.0082 1.0200 -84.26107 0.9514 -62.1503 0.8663 -79.58708 1.0400 -58.2712 1.0400 -79.41649 0.9407 -76.0226 0.8562 -94.589010 0.9426 -83.9820 0.8702 -103.014811 0.9852 -87.8051 0.9412 -105.105212 0.9478 -90.6433 0.9385 -105.525113 1.0056 -82.1261 0.9884 -97.341214 0.9960 -89.9647 0.9410 -108.4568
![Page 32: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Selected Generalized Eigenvectors of the Full Dynamic ModelState deviation described bycomponent
Original Op. Pnt;Evector for lambda =-0.0189 + 3.6342i
Critical Op. Pnt;Evector for lambda =
0.0000 (original)
Critical Op. Pnt;Evector for lambda =
0.0000 (newly created)Freq@Bus 1 -0.4033-0.0048i 0.0000-0.0000i -0.0000-0.0000i
Freq@Bus 2 -0.3917-0.0047i 0.0000+0.0000i -0.0000-0.0000i
Freq@Bus 3 -0.4287-0.0051i 0.0000-0.0000i -0.0000+0.0000i
Freq@Bus 6 0.3068+0.0026i 0.0000-0.0000i 0.0000-0.0000i
Freq@Bus 8 0.4964+0.0054i 0.0000+0.0000i 0.0000+0.0000i
Angle@Bus 1 -0.0007+0.1110i 0.2675-0.0000i -0.2019+0.0000i
Angle@Bus 2 -0.0007+0.1078i 0.2675+0.0000i -0.2019-0.0000i
Angle@Bus 3 -0.0008+0.1180i 0.2675+0.0000i -0.2019-0.0000i
Angle@Bus 6 0.0003-0.0844i 0.2672-0.0000i 0.2359+0.0000i
Angle@Bus 8 0.0008-0.1366i 0.2672+0.0000i 0.2359-0.0000i
Angle@Bus 4 -0.0005+0.0625i 0.2674+0.0000i -0.1326-0.0000i
Angle@Bus 5 -0.0005+0.0639i 0.2674+0.0000i -0.1295-0.0000i
Angle@Bus 7 0.0004-0.0868i 0.2672-0.0000i 0.2364+0.0000i
Angle@Bus 9 0.0005-0.1030i 0.2671-0.0000i 0.3156+0.0000i
Angle@Bus 10 0.0005-0.1130i 0.2671-0.0000i 0.3448+0.0000i
Angle@Bus 11 0.0004-0.1060i 0.2671-0.0000i 0.3103+0.0000i
Angle@Bus 12 0.0003-0.0895i 0.2672+0.0000i 0.2517-0.0000i
Angle@Bus 13 0.0003-0.0912i 0.2672+0.0000i 0.2576-0.0000i
Angle@Bus 14 0.0005-0.1136i 0.2671-0.0000i 0.3388+0.0000i
![Page 33: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
State deviationdescribed bycomponent
Original Op. Pnt;Evector for lambda =-0.0189 + 3.6342i
Critical Op. Pnt;Evector for lambda =
0.0000 (original)
Critical Op. Pnt;Evector for lambda =
0.0000 (newly created)Voltage(pu)@Bus 40.0003-0.0569i -0.0001-0.0000i 0.1399+0.0000i
Voltage(pu)@Bus 50.0003-0.0502i -0.0001-0.0000i 0.1249+0.0000i
Voltage(pu)@Bus 70.0003-0.0548i -0.0001-0.0000i 0.1490+0.0000i
Voltage(pu)@Bus 90.0003-0.0564i -0.0001-0.0000i 0.1546+0.0000i
Voltage(pu)@Bus 100.0003-0.0483i -0.0001-0.0000i 0.1339+0.0000i
Voltage(pu)@Bus 110.0002-0.0272i -0.0001-0.0000i 0.0791+0.0000i
Voltage(pu)@Bus 120.0000-0.0052i -0.0000-0.0000i 0.0159-0.0000i
Voltage(pu)@Bus 130.0001-0.0101i -0.0000-0.0000i 0.0302-0.0000i
Voltage(pu)@Bus 140.0002-0.0364i -0.0001-0.0000i 0.1020+0.0000i
![Page 34: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
More Eigenvectors of the Full Dynamic ModelState deviationdescribed byeigenvectorcomponent
Critical Op. Pnt;Evector for lambda =
-0.3957
Critical Op. Pnt;Evector for lambda =
-0.2294
Freq@Bus 1 -0.0181+0.0000i -0.0000+0.0000iFreq@Bus 2 -0.0181+0.0000i -0.0000+0.0000iFreq@Bus 3 -0.0181-0.0000i -0.0000-0.0000iFreq@Bus 6 0.0000-0.0000i -0.0103-0.0000iFreq@Bus 8 0.0000+0.0000i -0.0103+0.0000iAngle@Bus 1 0.4384-0.0000i 0.0000+0.0000iAngle@Bus 2 0.4384+0.0000i 0.0000-0.0000iAngle@Bus 3 0.4384+0.0000i 0.0000-0.0000iAngle@Bus 6 -0.0000+0.0000i 0.2924-0.0000iAngle@Bus 8 -0.0000+0.0000i 0.2924+0.0000iAngle@Bus 4 0.3689+0.0000i 0.0463+0.0000iAngle@Bus 5 0.3659+0.0000i 0.0484+0.0000iAngle@Bus 7 -0.0005-0.0000i 0.2928-0.0000iAngle@Bus 9 -0.0799-0.0000i 0.3457+0.0000iAngle@Bus 10 -0.1091-0.0000i 0.3652-0.0000iAngle@Bus 11 -0.0745-0.0000i 0.3421+0.0000iAngle@Bus 12 -0.0159+0.0000i 0.3030+0.0000iAngle@Bus 13 -0.0218+0.0000i 0.3069-0.0000iAngle@Bus 14 -0.1031-0.0000i 0.3612-0.0000i
![Page 35: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Future Work
Key question 1: must systems inevitably encounter loss of stability via flux decay/voltage control mode (as identified in Rajagopalan et al) before this type of bifurcation?
Hypothesis: perhaps not if good reactive support throughout system as transmission corridor is loaded up.
![Page 36: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Future Work
Key question 2: possibility of same weakness as direct point of collapse calculations in voltage literature - many generators hitting reactive power limits along the loading path.
Answer will be closely related to that of question 1!
![Page 37: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Conclusions
Simple exercise to shift focus back from bifurcations primarily associated w/ voltage, to bifurcations primarily associated with swing mode.
Key idea: hypothesize a form for eigenvector, restrict search for bifurcation point to display that eigenvector.
![Page 38: Network Structure in Swing Mode Bifurcations u Motivation & Background –Practical Goal: examine loss of stability mechanisms associated w/ heavily loaded](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032723/56649d205503460f949f5488/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Conclusions
While further is clearly development needed, method here could provide simple computation to identify a stability constraint on ATC across a transmission corridor.