network of executive women annual leadership conference “nals” september 29, 2004 don testa...

32
Network of Executive Women Annual Leadership Conference “NALS” September 29, 2004 www.hoytnet.com Don Testa Wilton, CT 203.762.7092 [email protected] Luci Sheehan St. Petersburg, FL 727.360.4466 [email protected] Nancy Swift Scottsdale, AZ 480.513.0547 [email protected] Is Anybody Listening?

Upload: cory-fields

Post on 25-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Network of Executive Women Annual Leadership Conference “NALS”

September 29, 2004

www.hoytnet.comDon TestaWilton, [email protected]

Luci SheehanSt. Petersburg, FL

[email protected]

Nancy SwiftScottsdale, AZ480.513.0547

[email protected]

Is Anybody Listening?

2NEWSeminarR7.ppt

Today

The Consumer Landscape

How In Touch Are We?

Q&A

3NEWSeminarR7.ppt

To understand current consumer purchasing behavior, a good starting point is to look at U.S. population income trends over the past 35 years:

Mean Income Trends By Population Fifths, 1967 – 2003(2003 CPI Adjusted Dollars – Per Household)

$10.0

$25.6

$43.5

$68.9

$147.1

$7.6$20.7$33.0

$46.2

$83.8

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

160.0

1967 2003

5th 20%

4th 20%

3th 20%

2nd 20%

Top 20%

(+31.6%)

(+24.1%)

(+31.9%)

(+49.2%)

(+75.6%)

Source: US Census, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2003. All data adjusted for inflation.

4NEWSeminarR7.ppt

Today, the U.S. population appears to be segmenting into “haves” and “have-nots” as the upper two quintiles continue to gain faster than the others

2003 Distribution of Total U.S. Income By Population Fifths

Quintile % Distribution of Income Mean Income

I 20%40%

49.8%73.2%

$147.1

II 20% 23.4% $68.9

III 20%

60%

14.8%

26.8%

$43.5

IV 20% 8.7% $25.6

V 20% 3.4% $10.0

Total U.S. Mean $43.3

Source: US Census Bureau. 2003; Dept. of Commerce. Figures do not add to 100 due to rounding.

5NEWSeminarR7.ppt

The fact is, however, that since 1970 general prosperity has risen significantly, thereby opening-up opportunities to market higher priced “Mass Affluence” products such as White Strips, Swiffer, MP3s and DVD Players

Source: Selling To The Monied Masses, HBS Review, July - Aug 2004, Page 97

Mass Affluence – Marketing’s New Opportunity, 1970 - 2000

6NEWSeminarR7.ppt

Nonetheless, the result of continuing economic pressure for the majority of consumers is that Value Shopping has become a national obsession, leading to escalating disloyalty as consumers switch back and forth among different channels for low prices and best values

61

47

41

26

28

32

26

29

26

24

20

25

20

17

12

36

39

39

45

42

38

42

39

44

39

40

42

41

34

33

3

12

17

23

24

22

26

25

24

27

31

26

29

31

35

2

3

5

6

8

6

7

6

9

9

7

10

18

20

Fzn Prepared Foods

Coffee

Cereal

Disp. Diapers

Vitamins

SS Juices/Drinks

Cough & Cold

Cookies

Pet Food

Carb Beverages

Hair Care

Detergents

Oral Hygiene

Snacks

Paper Products

Exclusive 2 Channels 3 Channels 4+ Channels

Total US. – 52 w/e 12/28/02 – upc-coded products; Grocery w/SC, Mass, Drug, Club & Dollar Store channels only

% of Category Dollars

Source: ACNielsen, Total U.S.

7NEWSeminarR7.ppt

One Result: Massive migration from Traditional to Value Discount channels

One Point = 109.3MM Trips

Source: AC Nielsen Homescan, 2003

Shopper Trips By Channel (1996 – 2004)(Avg. # Trips/Household/Channel/Year)

95

16

29

8 613

70

1521

11 13

26

0

10

2030

40

50

60

7080

90

100

Grocery Drug TraditionalDiscount

Clubs Dollar Stores Supercenters*

19962004

167156

Total TripsDown 2.7 Billion Trips in Eight Years

Traditional Value Discount

*Includes Target, Wal-Mart and Kmart Supercenters

8NEWSeminarR7.ppt

Another Result: Expert predictions that the defections will not only continue but accelerate over the next five years:

Projected CPG Volume and Share Changes By Channel: 2003 – 2008 ($B)2003 2008 ∆ 2003 – 2008

Channel $(B) Share $(B) Share Share Retail $ Gain/Loss ($B)

Value Discount

Supercenter $85.2 11.3% 152.6 17.0% +5.7 +$51.1

Clubs $51.9 6.9% $77.9 8.7% +1.8 +$16.2

Dollar Stores $10.7 1.4% $26.3 2.9% +1.5 +$13.5

Value Discount Total $147.8 19.6% $256.8 28.6% +9.0 $80.8Traditional

88%

Grocery $422.8 56.3% $433.9 48.3% -8.0 -$71.8

Mass $49.9 6.6% $47.6 5.3% -1.3 -$11.7

C-Stores $93.5 12.5% $107.8 12.0% -0.5 -$4.5

Drug Chains $33.2 4.4% $46.6 5.2% +0.8 +$7.2

Traditional Totals $599.4 79.8% $635.7 70.8% -9.0 -$80.8

Military $4.2 0.6% $5.1 0.6% – –

Totals $751.4 100.0% $897.6 100.0% – –

Source: Willard Bishop Consulting – Channel Blurring Redefines the Grocery Market, June 2004

9NEWSeminarR7.ppt

In addition to income considerations, it is clear that the days of “Ozzie & Harriet”, “Leave It To Beaver” and “Father Knows Best” are histoire:

In 2002, only 23.6% of U.S. households could be considered “traditional families” – that is, consisting of a married (male and female) couple with at least one child under 18 – versus 44.3% in 1960 – a decline of 39%.

60% of women 16 years and older are now in the workforce and unavailable for cooking leisurely meals at home – a 39% increase since 1970.

Singles in total now comprise 86MM souls or 41% of the adult population – and are the biggest eat-away-from-home consumers.

The percentage of women at age 44 with four children or more plummeted from 36.0% in 1970 to 11.0% in 2000.

10% of the adult population says it will never marry.

Unmarried adults now head nearly 50% of total American households and will soon constitute a new “unmarried majority”

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, August, 2004

10NEWSeminarR7.ppt

85.0%

68.0%

74.4%

51.9%

44.3%

23.6%

15.0%

32.0%

13.1%

26.3%

2.3%

9.9%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

Family HHs Married CouplesMarried Coupleswith Children

<18

Non-FamilyHouseholds

1 Person HHs 1 ParentFamilies

1960 (52.8MM) 2002 (109.3MM)

How traditional households have changed: 1960 – 2002

% of Total U.S. Households(2002 vs. 1960)

Note that the # of 1 person HHs now actually outnumbers the # of married

couples with children under 18

Note that the # of 1 person HHs now actually outnumbers the # of married

couples with children under 18

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, June 12, 2003

Traditional Non-TraditionalTV

advertiser’s traditional

target

TV advertiser’s traditional

target

11NEWSeminarR7.ppt

While the traditional family continues to fragment, growing ethnic segments each require specialized marketing and merchandising approaches

U.S. Ethnic Trends As a % of Total Population, 2000 – 2050

Segment 2000 2010 2020 2050 ∆ vs. 2000

White Alone, Non-Hispanic 68.7 64.3 60.4 48.9 7.4

Hispanic 12.5 15.2 13.5 23.8 187.9

Black 12.6 12.9 13.3 14.3 31.3

Asian 3.7 4.6 5.3 7.8 212.9

A/O (1) 2.5 3.0 3.5 5.2 217.1

TOTALS 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 50.9

BASE (MM) 284.9 312.8 340.9 430.1

(1) American Indian, Native Hawaiian, Alaskan Native and other Pacific IslandersSource: U.S. Census 3/18/2004

12NEWSeminarR7.ppt

It is estimated that Hispanic buying power will exceed $1 trillion by 2010 and $2 trillion by 2020:

344 377 416 444 481 523 569 618 672 731 794 860 929 1,004

2,155

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2020

Hispanic Buying Power (1997 - 2020)(in billions)

Source: The Hispanic Consumer Market in 1999 and Forecasts to 2020, Standard & Poor’s DRI, 1999

13NEWSeminarR7.ppt

But there is not much time to think about this: Hispanic shoppers already make more trips to Target, SAM’s and Costco than non-Hispanics and just as many trips to Wal-Mart

Trips Per Shopper Per Year: Hispanics vs. All Shoppers, Leading Accounts, Summer, 2003

(Average # Trips/HH/Year: All Shoppers)

13.3

6.6 7.2

19.3

5.5

8.2

10.5

8.2

4.6

8.5

11.6

19.3

5.8

12.7

0

5

10

15

20

25

Wal-MartTraditional

KmartTraditional

Target Wal-MartSupercenter

KmartSupercenter

SAM's Costco

Total Hispanic

Source: IRI InfoScan

14NEWSeminarR7.ppt

America’s Aging Population and the Rapidity With Which This Is Growing Also Require Different Marketing and Merchandising Approaches:

Between now and 2010, a baby boomer will turn 50 every 7 seconds.

Between 1990 and 2010, the number of Americans 55 years and older will jump from 52.4MM to 81.1MM – an increase of approximately 29MM souls or 55%.

• This is over twice the rate of the growth of the total population in general during this period which will increase only 21% or about 1% per year

By 2025, the 55+ group will comprise the largest single segment of the U.S. population at 32.7% and those 65+ will comprise 20.8% (vs. 13.9% in 2000 and 9.8% in 1960)

Life expectancy in this country is now 76.4 years for those born in 1998 vs 68.2 years for those born in 1950 and 70.8 years for those born in 1970

By 2010, 45 - 64 year olds will outnumber 25-44 year olds and comprise the largest single segment of the U.S. population

15NEWSeminarR7.ppt

Ask yourselves: How does the following profile change your marketing or merchandising approaches, if at all?

% Population By Age Group: 2000 – 2050

2000 2010 2025 2050

Under 5 6.8 6.7 6.7 6.7

5 – 14 14.6 13.1 13.2 13.1

15 – 24 13.9 14.3 12.9 13.1

25 – 34

35 – 44

14.2

16.0

13.0

13.2

12.7

12.8

12.5

12.3

45 – 54

55 – 64

13.4

8.6

14.7

11.8

11.3

11.9

11.3

10.8

65+ 12.4 13.2 18.5 20.3

85+ 1.5 1.9 2.2 4.8

100+ N/A 0.0 0.1 0.3

Base (MM) 281.4 289.9 337.8 403.7

Source: U.S. Census, Department of Commerce, From the 2004 World Almanac, Pg. 379

30.2

22.0

26.2

26.5

25.5

23.2

24.8

22.1

16NEWSeminarR7.ppt

Source: GMA, Opinion ‘98; U.S.B.L.S. 2000; Beverage Marketing, 1999

Underpinning These Trends Is a Feeling That There Isn’t Enough Time In The Day To Get Everything Done, Especially Cooking Family-centered Home-style Meals:

The number of families with both parents working has grown from 50-77% of the population since 1970.

The average family spends less than 20 minutes per day in meal preparation:

• More than 33% of shoppers bring home ready-to-eat dinners at least twice a week

• 35% of shoppers say they “use a microwave almost all the time”

• 47% of shoppers say they “only cook because they have to”

By 2005, many Americans will never have cooked a meal from scratch.

65% of Americans say that they are time pressured and that this feeling is growing stronger while another 45% say they have less leisure time than they did two years ago.

17NEWSeminarR7.ppt

In addition to feeling constantly time-pressured, consumers are reeling from Information Overload, causing most to “blank-out” on all but the most personal or relevant messages:

1960 – Mass Media Matures 2004 – Mass Media, RIP

TV channels per home:

5.7

Magazine titles: 8,400

Radio stations:

4,400

TV channels per home:

82.4

Internet broadcast stations:25,000+

Radio stations:13,500

Magazine titles:

17,300

4.4 billion pages

indexed by Google

Media Proliferation 2004 vs. 1960

% of Email Identified as Spam

June, 2003

July, 2004

49%

65%Source: Brightmail.com Aug. 2004

18NEWSeminarR7.ppt

Even when consumers do focus on media, more than 70% use different types of media simultaneously

Multi-Tasking Measured Media – October, 2003

TelevisionWhile watching:

RadioWhile listening:

NewspapersWhile reading:

OnlineWhile connected:

74%Read the newspaper

57%Go online

52%Watch TV

62%Watch TV

66%Go online

47%Read the newspaper

50%Listen to the radio

52%Listen to the radio

18%Watch TV

20%Read the newspaper

Source: October 2003 BIGresearch SIMM survey

19NEWSeminarR7.ppt

While the foregoing presents numerous and often bewildering challenges to both CPG marketers and retailers, these challenges are now doubly difficult because food has deteriorated to such a relatively low involvement purchase

Food as a % of Personal Consumption $: 1960-2003

17.5

13.9 13.2

11.210.1

14.1

10.39.0

7.16.1

3.4 3.6 4.2 4.1 4.0

02468

101214161820

1960 1970 1980 1990 2003

Food Food at Home Purchased Meals & Beverages

Source: USDA, ERS, August, 2004

20NEWSeminarR7.ppt

Exacerbating all of these issues is media fragmentation which has forced both marketers and retailers to replace traditional advertising approaches with “touchpoints” and seek-out 360º strategies to envelope consumer targets

Media Fragmentation Update – 2004

In the 1960’s, an advertiser could reach 80% of U.S. women with a spot aired simultaneously on the three national TV networks but to duplicate this today would require 100 TV channels.

Prime time ratings of TV broadcast networks fell from approximately 51MM viewers in 1977 to 30MM today – a drop of 41.5%.

The average U.S. household now receives 100 TV channels compared with 27 in 1994.

Cable TV channels now command a 52% audience share in prime time or 8 share points greater than broadcast TV at 44%.

Digital video recorders will be in 20% of U.S. households by 2008 and in nearly 50% by 2009. Between 65 and 75% of current DVR households now fast forward through commercials.

Daily newspaper readership has fallen from 81% of households in 1964 to 55% in 2002.

And so on – you get the point.

Source: http://www.backchannelmedia.com/newsletter/20040728/04=print.html

21NEWSeminarR7.ppt

Touchpoints: Communicating Is No Longer a Clean Shot

Radio

Internet Ads

FSPs

Direct Mail

FSIs

In-Store TV

Network TV

Newspapers

DVD Trailers

High Impact Product PlacementsRetailtainment

Outdoor Signage

Coupons

Movie Theater Ads

Customer Service

Content Implants

In-Store Sampling

Mega-EventSponsorship

Cable TV

Print

Permission-Based E-mails

22NEWSeminarR7.ppt

The Good News: In spite of the changes – and the new and often unfamiliar approaches required to cope with them – some things remain the same

Women as primary shoppers America’s love of entertainment

23NEWSeminarR7.ppt

To confirm a fact you all know – women are the primary shoppers in all channels but Convenience and Gas which has always been male-dominated

64

36

74

26

72

28

67

33

4753

62

38

78

22

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Females Males

Grocery

Mass

Supers

Drug

Conv/Gas

WHC

Dollar

As males age, they handle increased share of trips

As males age, they handle increased share of trips

Share of Channel Trips By Gender, 2002

Source: ACNielsen Channel Blurring Study, 2002

24NEWSeminarR7.ppt

In addition to being primary shoppers, women consistently outspend men in all channels, including Convenience and Gas

Avg. Expenditures Per Shopping Trip By Channel & Gender, 2002

$84.45

$42.62

$35.81

$21.24

$12.17

$11.63

$80.64

$34.42

$26.96

$18.18

$9.01

$9.40

Warehouse Clubs

Mass

Grocery

Drug

Dollar Store

Conv/GasMalesFemales

Average $ Basket Size

Total U.S. – 52 weeks ending 12/28/02

25NEWSeminarR7.ppt

The difference between women shoppers today and those of the 1960’s and 1970’s is that they are significantly better educated and better informed, thereby challenging both manufacturers and retailers to connect on deeper, more relevant and respectful levels

Educational Attainment By Gender: 1960 - 2003(% of Population 25 years or older)

High School Graduates Collage Graduates

Year Male Female Totals Male Female Totals% Woman To Total

1960 39.5 42.5 41.1 9.7 5.8 7.7 75.3

1970 55.0 55.4 55.2 14.1 8.2 11.0 74.5

1980 69.2 68.1 68.6 20.9 13.8 17.0 76.4

1990 77.7 77.5 77.8 24.4 18.4 21.3 86.4

2000 84.2 84.0 84.1 27.8 23.6 25.6 92.2

2003 84.1 85.0 84.6 28.9 25.7 27.2 94.4

Source: http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0779809.html

26NEWSeminarR7.ppt

Despite what Americans say about being time pressured, the fact is that Americans will make time to have fun and be entertained:

In 2002, Americans spent a total of $620 billions on “recreation” – videos, movies, amusement parks, spectator sports, rock concerts, wheel goods, boats and theater, etc.:

This $620B is almost 3 x’s more than Americans spent for education and research in 2002 ($186B) and 46% more than they spent for all clothing, accessories and jewelry combined

This $620B is 25% more than what the BLS says Americans spent on Food At Home in 2002 ($602B)

Americans spent an additional $415B on eating out in 2002 which is NOT included in the “recreation” numbers.

27NEWSeminarR7.ppt

In addition, if one uses spending growth rates to judge what is really important to Americans, having fun and being entertained is America’s #1 priority while eating at home is last

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 2004

U.S. Household Expenditures By Category (% Growth 1992 – 2002)

42.7 44.149.6

60.765.7

71.9

81.4 82.3 84.9

94.699.4 99.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Food At Home Personal Care Clothing/Jewelry

HouseholdOperations

Housing Transportation Food AwayFrom Home

Medical Care Religion &Welfare

PersonalBusiness

Education &Research

Recreation

28NEWSeminarR7.ppt

Net on the consumer landscape – the key issues as we perceive them:

Capturing share in an atomized consumer market that defies traditional approaches.

Communicating effectively with this market in an age of media fragmentation, information overload, time pressures, consumer indifference, multi-tasking and ad-blocking technology.

When to shift gears and reengineer to acknowledge that “niche” is now mainstream.

Insuring that one’s organization understands that diversity is no longer a diversity issue but a market-driven necessity.

29NEWSeminarR7.ppt

How In Touch Are We?

30NEWSeminarR7.ppt

On Making The Connection

“Everyone says they’re targeting women, yet most women don’t feel understood by marketers. According to the Yankelovich Monitor, 59% of women feel misunderstood by food marketers…”

Dori Molitor, from Marketing to Women by Martha Barletta, pg. 158. Dearborn Trade Publishing, 2003

“More than two thirds (69%) of consumers say they feel retailers do not put their needs first. There is a serious disconnect between what consumers need and how they want it, and what retailers offer.”

Kurt Salmon AssociatesConsumer Outlook, 4th Quarter, 2003

31NEWSeminarR7.ppt

Q&A

Thank YouWe have enjoyed our time with you and hope that this has been both informative and fun.

www.hoytnet.comDon TestaWilton, [email protected]

Luci SheehanSt. Petersburg, FL

[email protected]

Nancy SwiftScottsdale, AZ480.513.0547

[email protected]