negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene...

19
Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats Liliana M. Dávalos, Elizabeth R. Dumont, Stephen Rossiter, Sharlene Santana, Karen Sears, & Laurel R. Yohe International Bat Research Congress, Durban 4 August 2016

Upload: liliana-davalos

Post on 21-Mar-2017

45 views

Category:

Science


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

Liliana M. Dávalos, Elizabeth R. Dumont, Stephen Rossiter, Sharlene Santana, Karen Sears, & Laurel R. Yohe

International Bat Research Congress, Durban4 August 2016

Page 2: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats
Page 3: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

Sensory tissues are expensive

• For neurons• Maintaining function,

even at rest, is energetically expensive

• Excess functional capacity has increased energetic costs

• Reduction may relate to high energetic costs

Niven & Laughlin 2008 J. Exp. Biol.

Page 4: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

Sensory exchange hypothesis Gilad et al. 2004 PLoS Biol.

Trichromatic visionExcess pseudogenes

Statement 2 V. Wiebe and S. Pääbo retract their names from the publication since they are of the opinion that the primary data do not support the conclusions presented.

Page 5: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

Comparative evidence for trade-off Hypothesis with sensory systems

Page 6: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

An alternative: grade shifts Garland 2014 Curr. Biol.

Page 7: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

The bat chemosensory system In a phyllostomid

Page 8: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

Chemosensory trade-off? Hayden et al. 2014 Mol. Biol. Evol.

Mo

lecular Biolo

gy and Evo

lution

Volum

e 31 • Num

ber 10 • October 2014

Published on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

Joshua Akey, University of Washington, USADoris Bachtrog, University of California, Berkeley, USAMiriam Barlow, University of California, Merced, USARobin Bush, University of California, Irvine, USADouglas L. Crawford, University of Miami, USACharles F. Delwiche, University of Maryland, College Park, USAJuliette de Meaux, Universität Münster, GermanyAnna Di Rienzo,* University of Chicago, USAJoel Dudley, Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, USADaniel Falush, Max Planck Evolutionary Anthropology, GermanyBrandon Gaut,* University of California, Irvine, USATakashi Gojobori, National Institute of Genetics, JapanManolo Gouy,* Université Lyon, FranceXun Gu, Iowa State University, USAMatthew Hahn, Indiana University, USAS. Blair Hedges,* The Pennsylvania State University, USARyan D. Hernandez, University of California, San Francisco, USAAsger Hobolth, University of Aarhus, DenmarkBarbara Holland,* University of Tasmania, AustraliaHideki Innan, School of Advanced Sciences, JapanDavid M. Irwin, University of Toronto, CanadaLars Jermiin, CSIRO, AustraliaYuseob Kim, Ewha Womans University, KoreaThomas Leitner,** Los Alamos National Laboratory, USAJohn Logsdon, University of Iowa, USAJohn H. McDonald, University of Delaware, USAJames McInerney, National University of Ireland, MaynoothAoife McLysaght, Trinity College, IrelandMichael Nachman, University of Arizona, USAStuart Newfeld, Arizona State University, USARasmus Nielsen, University of California, Berkeley, USAJohn Novembre, University of Chicago, Chicago, USAKatja Nowick, Universität Leipzig, GermanyTodd H. Oakley, University of California, Santa Barbara, USACsaba Pal, Institute of Biochemistry, HungaryJohn Parsch, University of Munich, Germany

Helen Piontkivska, Kent State University, USASergei Kosakovsky Pond,** University of California, San Diego, USATal Pupko, Tel Aviv University, IsraelMichael Purugganan, New York University, USAOliver Pybus, University of Oxford, UKSohini Ramachandran, Brown University, USAEduardo Rocha,* Institut Pasteur, FranceAndrew J. Roger,* Dalhousie University, CanadaClaudia Russo, Federal University of Rio De Janeiro, BrazilIlya Ruvinsky,** University of Chicago, USANaruya Saitou, National Institute of Genetics, JapanYoko Satta, Graduate University of Advanced Studies, JapanBeth Shapiro, The Pennsylvania State University, USAAnne C. Stone,* Arizona State University, USABing Su, Kunming Institute of Zoology, ChinaWillie J. Swanson, University of Washington, USANaoki Takebayashi, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, USANaoko Takezaki,* Kagawa University, JapanKoichiro Tamura, Tokyo Metropolitan University, JapanEmma Teeling, University College Dublin, IrelandJeffrey Thorne,* North Carolina State University, USASarah Tishkoff, University of Maryland, College Park, USAJohn True, Stony Brook University, USANicholas Vidal, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, FranceArndt von Haeseler,* Center for Integrative Bioinformatics, AustriaClaus Wilke,** University of Texas, USAPatricia Wittkopp, University of Michigan, USAGregory Wray, Duke University, USAStephen Wright, University of Toronto, CanadaShizhong Xu, University of California, Riverside, USAMeredith Yeager, National Cancer Institute, USAGeorge Zhang,* University of Michigan, USA

Cover Art Caption: Gain in olfactory receptor gene subfamilies is associated with adaptation to a frugivorous lifestyle. Image depicts a New World Watson’s fruit bat (Dermanura watsoni) and an OR phylogenetic tree

across bat species. Cover art provided by Liliana M. Dávalos and photo by Sébastien Puechmaille (Volume 31, pp. 917–927).

ASSOCIATE EDITORS

* Also a Senior Editor ** Guest Editor

Published by Oxford University Press 2014.

Volume 31 • Number 10 • October 2014

Print ISSN 0737-4038Online ISSN 1537-1719

www.mbe.oxfordjournals.org

Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

Molecular BBiology and EEvolution

• A tool for inferring large Bayesian phylogenies

• Experimental models fit the data much better

• Genetic diversity in captive giant pandas

• Mosses mitochondrial genomes are frozen in time

• P450 is a genetic component for termite societies

mbe_31_10_Cover.indd 1mbe_31_10_Cover.indd 1 16-09-2014 12:21:2016-09-2014 12:21:20

Page 9: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

Diet Echolocation MorpholologyVNO

Rousettus lanosusP. giganteusPteropus rayneriCynopterus sphinxNyctimene albiventerCraseonycteris thonglongyaiR. ferrumequinumRhinolophus hipposiderosEmballonura atrataThyroptera tricolorPteronotus parnelliiMacrotus californicusDesmodus rotundusCarollia perspicillataSturnira tildaeArtibeus jamaicensisPlatyrrhinus helleriVampyrodes caraccioliAnoura geoffroyiLeptonycteris curasoaeErophylla bombifronsPhyllonycteris poeyiVampyrum spectrumLophostoma silvicolaTrachops cirrhosusMyotis lucifugusEumops auripendulus Molossidae

Vespertilionidae

Phyllostomidae

MormoopidaeThyropteridaeEmballonuridae

RhinolophidaeCraseonycteridae

Pteropodidae

YangochiropteraYinpterochiroptera

●●●

●●●●

●●●●

AnimalivorousPlant-visitingFruit specialist

EcholocationNo echolocation

Has VNONo VNO

Figure 1

EauMluTciLsiVspPpoEboLcuAgeVcaPheAjaStiCpeDroMcaPpaTtrEatRhiRfeCthNalCspPraPgiRla

No chemosensory trade-off, Stenodermatinae special Hayden et al. 2014 Mol. Biol. Evol.

Page 10: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats
Page 11: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

0

2

4

6

8

10

Artib

eus_

frate

rcul

us

Car

ollia

_per

spic

illata

Des

mod

us_r

otun

dus

Erop

hylla

_bom

bifro

ns

Lonc

hoph

ylla

_tho

mas

i

Mim

on_c

renu

latu

m

Mon

ophy

llus_

redm

ani

Phyl

lops

_fal

catu

s

Phyl

lost

omus

_elo

ngat

us

Pter

onot

us_p

arne

llii

Stur

nira

_liliu

m

Stur

nira

_lud

ovic

i

Uro

derm

a_bi

loba

tum

Species

No.

of v

omer

onas

al re

cept

ors

I (V1

Rs)

First functional V1Rs from bats Based on transcriptomes

Page 12: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

100

200

300

400

2 4 6 8 10No. of V1Rs

No.

of o

lfact

ory

rece

ptor

s

Olfactory receptors vs. vomeronasal receptors Both from transcriptomes

t = 0.06, P-value = 0.9513

Page 13: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

100

200

300

400

2 4 6 8 10No. of V1Rs

No.

of o

lfact

ory

rece

ptor

s

Olfactory receptors vs. vomeronasal receptors Both from transcriptomes

t = -0.07, P-value = 0.9445 t = 0.10, P-value = 0.9242

Page 14: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

Most previously known bat V1Rs are pseudogenes Including 2 Miniopterus V1Rs

Outgroup genes

Phyllostomid genesBat pseudogenes

Page 15: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

Phyllostomid V1Rs are conserved Including Equus, Canis, Miniopterus

Outgroup genes

Phyllostomid genesBat pseudogenes

Page 16: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

100

200

300

400

Other species StenodermatinaeGroup

No.

of o

lfact

ory

rece

ptor

s

Olfactory receptors No difference in raw numbers

F = 1.13, P-value = 0.4845

Page 17: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

Mc

Lsi

DroLcu

Vsp

Tci

Age

MreEbo

Ppo

Sli

Aja

VthPheDro

Mc

Lsi

Dro

Vsp

Tci

AgeMre

Ebo

Cpe

Sti

Vth

Vca

Phe

Dro

Pgi

DroDro

Dro

Dro

AgePgi Mre

Lcu

Ebo

Sli

Vth

Phe

AgeMre

DroMre

Lcu

Mc

DroVth

Dro

Vth

Dro

DroEbo

Mre

MreMre

EboEboVca

Mre CpeMreMre

MreMreMreMre

Mre

MreMreMre

MreMreMreMre

MreMreMre

Mre

PpoTci

Lcu

StiLsi

Phe

Vth

PpoMc

EboCpeLcu

Cpe

LsiSti

Tci

PheVca

Vth

MreLsiEbo

TciDro McMre

Mre

PgiVthVsp

Dro Mc

TciVspVca

SliEboLsiSti

EboDro DroMc

EboMreTci

Sli Lsi

EboMre

EboMre

MreTciPhe

DroEboMc

McAjaTci

TciMre

MreCpe

Mre

Mre

Ebo

Dro

Dro

MreMre

PheAjaSti

McVca

Phe

Lsi

Lsi LsiTci

Tci

TciTci

Vsp

Phe

Tci

Cpe

LcuCpe

Ebo

Cpe

PpoPpoAge

Age

Vsp

Lcu

Pgi

Vth

VspEboMrePhe

PgiPgi

PgiPgi

PgiPgi

Sli

PgiPgi

PgiPgi

Mre

LsiVsp

VspLsi Phe

AjaTci

Pgi DroDro

Dro Dro

Mc

Ebo

VcaLsi

VspTci

Ppo VspVsp

VthVth

Phe

MreEbo

VcaSti

Sti

Sti Phe

Mc

Dro

Dro

Pgi

Pgi

MreMre Phe

Mre

MreMre

DroEbo

CpeVspPhe

PhePhe

Vsp

PgiMre

MreMre

Mre

MreMreMreVca

Dro

MreMreMre

MreMre

MreMreMre

Sti

Sti

Aja

SliSli Sli

Aja

VcaPhe

AjaAjaAja

Vca

Aja

Aja

AjaAja

StiPhe PheSti

Aja StiSti

Aja

Sti

StiPheAjaPhe

PheSti

Sti

StiSti

Vca

StiStiVca

Aja

Phe

Vca

Aja

PgiPgi

PgiPgi

TciTciDro

LsiTci

TciTci

StiStiStiAjaPheAja

TciPpoTci

McVthVth

AjaPhe

MreMreSti

Ebo

Ebo

Vth Vth

Sli

Sli

Vth VthVth

Vth

Mre

VcaPheVcaVcaPhe

Vth

StiVth

Vca Sti

SliSli

SliSli

Sli

Mc

Lsi

DroLcu

Vsp

Tci

Age

MreEbo

Ppo

Cpe

Sli

Aja

VthPhe

Pgi

Dro

Mc

Lsi

Dro

Vsp

Tci

AgeMre

Ebo

Cpe

Sti

Vth

Vca

Phe

Dro

Pgi

DroDro

Dro

Dro

AgePgi Mre

Lcu

Ebo

Sli

Vth

Phe

AgeMre

Dro

Age

Mre

Lcu

Mc

DroVth

Dro

Vth

Dro

DroEbo

Ebo

TciTciAgePpo

MreMreMre

EboEboVca

Mre

CpeMreMreMreMreMreMreMre

MreMreMreMreMreMreMre

MreMreMreMrePpoTciLcuStiLsi

Phe

Vth

PpoMc

EboCpe

Lcu

Cpe

LsiSti

Tci

Phe

VcaVth

MreLsiEbo

TciDro Mc

MreMre

PgiVthVsp

Dro Mc

TciVspVca

SliEboLsiSti

EboDro DroMc

EboMreTci

Sli Lsi

EboMre

EboMre

MreTciPhe

DroEboMc

McAjaTci

TciMre

MreCpe

Mre

Mre

VcaPheLsi

PgiPgiVcaPhePhe

DroPheTci

Tci

PheTciVspVsp

Ebo

Dro

Dro

MreMre

PheAjaSti

McVca

Phe

Lsi

Lsi LsiTci

Tci

TciTci

Vsp

Phe

Tci

Cpe

LcuCpe

Ebo

Cpe

PpoPpoAge

Age

Vsp

Lcu

Pgi

Vth

VspEboMrePhe

PgiPgi

PgiPgi

PgiPgi

Sli

PgiPgi

PgiPgi

Mre

LsiVsp

VspLsi Phe

AjaTci

Pgi DroDro

Dro Dro

Mc

Ebo

VcaLsi

VspTci

Ppo VspVsp

VthVth

Phe

MreEbo

VcaSti

Sti

Sti Phe

Mc

Dro

Dro

Pgi

Pgi

MreMre Phe

Mre

Mre

Mre

DroEbo

CpeVspPhe

PhePhe

Vsp

PgiMre

MreMre

Mre

MreMreMreVca

Dro

MreMreMre

MreMre

MreMreMre

Sti

Sti

Aja

SliSli Sli

Aja

VcaPhe

AjaAjaAja

Vca

Aja

Aja

AjaAja

StiPhe PheSti

Aja StiSti

Aja

Sti

StiPheAjaPhe

PheSti

Sti

StiSti

Vca

StiStiVca

Aja

Phe

Vca

Aja

PgiPgi

PgiPgi

TciTciDro

LsiTci

TciTci

StiStiStiAjaPheAja

Tci

PpoTci

McVthVth

AjaPhe

MreMreSti

Ebo

Ebo

Vth Vth

Sli

Sli

Vth VthVth

Vth

Mre

VcaPhe

VcaVcaPhe

Vth

StiVth

Vca Sti

SliSli

SliSli

Sli

insects blood small verts nectar soft fruits figs Old World fruit

Page 18: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

Take-home

• Lots more work needed to get complete inventories

• Molecular evolution analyses show clear patterns• Conservation of

V1Rs• Expansion of certain

OR subfamiliesPhoto by S. Puechmaille

Page 19: Negative selection and adaptive duplication, not sensory exchange, explain chemosensory gene repertoires in noctilionoid bats

Thanks!