ndc household survey 2006 an overview rachel williams, jessica vince and leon page
Post on 19-Dec-2015
214 views
TRANSCRIPT
NDC Household Survey 2006
An overview
Rachel Williams, Jessica Vince and Leon Page
2
Session objectives
Background information about this year’s household survey
Review data outputs available and give practical tips on reading and interpreting data
The Extranet (www.ipsos-mori.com/ndc)
Sources of help at Ipsos MORI
3
Background to the household survey
4
Overview
Survey aims to provide information on the key outcomes from the NDC programme and to show change over time
Third survey in the series
initial survey in 2002
2004 and 2006 surveys are longitudinal – going back to as many of the original 2002/4 respondents as possible plus a cross-sectional top-up sample
Ipsos MORI/GfK NOP conducted 15,792 interviews between May and October 2006 – c.400 in each NDC area
National benchmarks - from existing surveys and new Omnibus survey – are NDC areas ‘catching up’?
5
Changes for 2006
Sample size reduced to 400 interviews
Longitudinal and top-up addresses issued in the same proportion
as 2004
Questionnaire length reduced:
25 minute core questionnaire
Partnership specific questions optional
No research among movers, beneficiaries or business
6
Questionnaire
7
Core questionnaire – asked in all NDC areas
Core questionnaire covers each “theme” in national evaluation
Housing and the local environment
Crime
Worklessness
Education
Health
Plus profile information, basic income questions and general
perceptions of area/community
8
Core questionnaire – 2
Wherever possible questionnaire kept identical to 2002/04 to allow
changes in views to be compared
Designed with NET – following outcome review and review following each
wave
Full pilot in similar regeneration areas each wave
Some questions ‘follow-up’ answers given by respondents in 2004 e.g. Last
time you were very worried about being burgled now you are not very
worried – why have your views changed?
Includes national benchmarks to compare against the country as a whole
This year each partnership could add 5 minutes worth of their own
questions
9
Sampling
10
Why do we sample?
Not feasible to question all residents of a particular area – e.g. 17,000 residents in the East Brighton NDC area alone
Interview a smaller number on the basis that they share the same characteristics as the population generally
Population…
Sampling is making an inference about a…
…from a… …Sample
Works but relies on strict procedures
11
Bigger is better…but size isn’t everything
S o u rc e : M O R I
Bigger samples are better - but not proportionately
0
5
10
15
20
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100Sample size
12
Household survey – two samples
Return to respondents interviewed in 2004
Longitudinal sample
New addresses selected at random to top up to 400 per area
Top-up sample
13
Longitudinal sample
Longitudinal
Return to individuals interviewed in 2004 and attempt to interview them
If named respondent has moved or died then randomly select a substitute
10,770 successful interviews at original addresses
14
Top–up sample
Random selection of addresses from within each of the NDC partnerships
Random selection of one property/dwelling or household unit at each sampled address
Random selection of one adult within each selected household (5,022 successful interviews)
Top-up sampling involves a number of steps…
Means every person has an equal chance of being interviewed
15
Sample structure - example
EXAMPLE – Salford NDC
400 original 2004
addresses sent out
Interviewed 283 people at these
addresses
238 original respondents
45 new respondents
Select 237 new addresses
- 124 new respondents
407 interviews in total – 238 longitudinal and 169 top-up
16
Fieldwork
17
Fieldwork
Fieldwork May - October 2006
Full briefings for all interviewers (28 sessions) dummy interviews before starting work where possible using the same interviewers as 2002/4
Advance letter and FAQ sheet sent to respondents
Interviews conducted using Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI)
Minimum of 6 calls, including two at weekend or evenings, plus further re-issues.
Quality control - back-checking and accompaniment
Over 370 interviews conducted in other languages
Response rates improved on 2002 and 2004
18
Household survey outputs
19
Household survey outputs
Range of outputs provided by Ipsos MORI team Key indicators (most accessible) Topline questionnaires Computer tabulations (simple sub-group analysis) SPSS dataset (most ‘technical’)
Will suggest how and when you might want to use these
Extranet
20
What are key indicators?
Show summaries of some key questions from the survey
Easy to read if showing to non-researchers in your NDC
Useful if you want a quick overview of the results and change over time
Can be used to create a summary of findings for internal use e.g. Board meetings etc.
Cover all the theme areas (Crime, Housing etc)
21
What are key indicators?
Columns giving partnership and aggregate data for all three waves, and national benchmark
Summary of all those very/fairly satisfied with accommodation. Does not show % dissatisfied
Theme heading
22
What are toplines?
Show all of the questions from the survey in the order these were asked on the questionnaire
All responses to each question are shown (e.g. very and fairly satisfied/dissatisfied) not just summaries
Questions are grouped by theme to make them easier to find – e.g. CR questions (CR1, CR2 etc) are from the Crime theme
Use the marked-up questionnaire if you want overall results but do not want to analyse by sub-groups e.g. men vs. women
Fairly easy to read for those not experienced in research
23
What are toplines?
Theme heading and question number Full question text
List of all responses to the question
24
What are toplines?
Filter – an indication of who is asked the question
Base – a definition of who was asked the question and how many people this includes
National source – most recent benchmarking figures available (mostly for England)
25
Toplines - Interpretation
Number of pitfalls to be aware of when reading and interpreting toplines:
Check the bases underneath the question – is everyone being asked or not?
Some demographic questions are based on all household members rather than all respondents. Gives more accurate information on age, gender and work status
Read the introductory page!
26
Topline document is now in Excel rather than Word
Toplines - functionality
Advantages Display only question text Display only benchmarked questions Quickly calculate change between years using formulas
=IF(H17="*",0,H17) etc Run charts from the data
Will be available in PDF version
Working on formulas to produce automated significance testing (TBC)
27
Statistical reliability - 1
Not all differences between 2002, 2004 and 2006 data will be significant
E.g. if satisfaction with area has increased by 2 percentage points between 2004 and 2006 this will not mean that there has been a significant increase in satisfaction
Whether changes are significant also depends on how many people were asked a question
The fewer people asked a question, the greater the difference will have to be for this to be significant
E.g. more difficult to find significant difference where 50 respondents have been asked compared with where 400 have been asked
28
Statistical reliability - 2
Where all respondents have answered a question need differences of:
8 percentage points or more between 2002, 2004 and 2006 figures to be sure they represent actual change and are NOT due to chance
6-7 percentage points between individual NDCs and the aggregate or national benchmark figures
Can use our “ready reckoner” – available on the Extranet
An example…
29
Statistical reliability calculator
Testing change in proportion feeling unsafe between 2004 and 2006 for Partnership X
30
What are computer tabulations?
All responses to the survey are broken down by around 40 different sub-groups
Sub-groups are respondents who are grouped together in the data because they have something in common. This may be demographic (e.g. their age) or attitudinal (e.g. they want to move out of the area)
Examples of sub-groups are: Men (demographic) Those who earn less than £100 per month (demographic) Those who have heard of NDC (attitudinal)
31
What are computer tabulations?
Why would you want to use these?
You may want to see if all sections of the population are benefiting equally from NDC
E.g. fear of mugging may be going down overall, but are any groups being left behind?
Can compare 2006 results with 2004 results – young people may be 2% less likely to be mugged than in 2004 compared with a drop of 15% overall
Can also use for baseline/monitoring data – are Black residents more likely than average to be earning £100 a month or less?
32
What are computer tabulations?
Question on tenure – who are most likely to be private renters?
16-34 year olds significantly more likely to rent privately (text shown in bold)
33
What are computer tabulations?
BUT: Crucial not to compare sub-groups with small bases as these are unreliable
Only 13 people in overall base
Can’t compare refugee status of men vs. women
34
Computer tables - significance testing
Letters used to identify which results are significantly different from each other
“x” = total column
Results for male respondents are in column “a”, females in “b”
35
Computer tables - significance testing
Each column is tested against the total to see whether the differences in results are significantly different
a letter under a result indicates it is
Fewer in column “a” (men), column “e” (45-64 year olds) and column “f” (aged 65+) are lone parent families than average
More in column “b” (females) and column “d” (35-44 year olds) are lone parent families than average (i.e. column “x”)
36
A few things to watch…
Some tables run over two pages because the list of possible answers is so long – i.e. 4 pages per question (e.g. WO1)
As well as the actual answers that can be given, also include derived summaries at the end of the list (eg WO1 ILO Unemployed)
There may be tables for the same question but with different bases. E.g. at WO1 there are tables based on all respondents and also on all working age respondents
Sometimes have ‘summary tables’ where a battery of questions are asked
There are a few derived tables e.g. HO3 cross-tabulated by HO4
37
SPSS data
A software program that allows you to conduct your own analyses (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences)Allows you to do a wide range of analyses that are not included on the Computer TablesE.g. You could find out the characteristics of ‘Trapped residents’ – those who want to move but do not think they will, by cross-tabulating two survey questions against each otherEvery NDC has their own datasetFile contains some additional derived variables eg workless householdsBUT – your NDC may not have bought SPSS software so you may not be able to use this data (LA may have it though …)Ask the Ipsos MORI team if you need any help with using SPSS
38
A note on weighting
Two sets of weights applied to the survey data
Selection weighting to correct for unequal selection probabilities (every person should have equal chance of selection)
Profile weighting to ensure that survey is representative of the population as a whole (based on Census)
All data presented in the survey outputs is WEIGHTED
EXCEPT, the final column on the computer tables - this presents the raw data
Correct weights must also be applied to the SPSS data
NB weighted samples are less accurate – need to bear in mind when checking for significant differences
39
Extranet
40
Extranet - 1
You may have used this with the 2002 and 2004 data
Analysis tool taken off-line recently to add the new 2006 data
Can still access survey documentation
2006 data will be available in February next year
41
Extranet - 2
Extranet allows you some of the flexibility of an analysis programme like SPSS but easier to use
Can analyse your partnerships’ results by demographic factors such as age or gender
Can compare your results against those of other relevant partnerships and against the aggregate data set
Can filter results e.g. the findings just for women aged 16-24
Can compare change in data over time
42
Extranet - 3
An on-line resource containing all NDC data
Run your own tables on issues of interest
Download toplines, key findings and computer tables
Data available for all partnerships
Possible to compare yourself with other “local” NDCs or those with similar characteristics
Each partnership has their own log in
Benchmarking data and links to useful sites
Information about the household survey Background to each wave
Glossary of research terms and training slides
43
Some on-screen examples
44
Using the data
45
Using the data
Background information/reality check along with other sources of data
eg if feelings of safety have increased how does this relate to crime statistics/what the police are saying locally.
Partnership specific questions used to evaluate specific projects
Post coding data to provide neighbourhood level information
Wider area benchmark surveys
46
Thank youFor further information or help please contact:
[email protected] (020 7347 3148)
[email protected] (020 7347 3152)
[email protected] (020 7347 3252)