navigating oregon's new assessment options
DESCRIPTION
Navigating Oregon's New Assessment Options. October 2006 ODE/COSA Fall Conference Dianna Carrizales. The state of assessment in Oregon today. Objectives: What’s gone? What’s changed? What’s new? What’s left? What are the implications?. Who was reviewed? Criteria Content standards - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Navigating Oregon's New Navigating Oregon's New Assessment Options Assessment Options
October 2006October 2006
ODE/COSA Fall ConferenceODE/COSA Fall Conference
Dianna CarrizalesDianna Carrizales
The state of assessment in The state of assessment in Oregon today Oregon today
• Objectives:Objectives:– What’s gone? What’s gone? – What’s changed? What’s changed? – What’s new?What’s new?– What’s left? What’s left? – What are the implications?What are the implications?
Peer ReviewPeer Review
• Who was reviewed?Who was reviewed?
• CriteriaCriteria– Content standardsContent standards– Achievement standardsAchievement standards– Full assessment systemFull assessment system– Technical qualityTechnical quality– AlignmentAlignment– InclusionInclusion– ReportingReporting
• Rating StatusRating Status– Full approvalFull approval– Full approval with Full approval with
recommendationsrecommendations– Approval expectedApproval expected– Approval pendingApproval pending– Non-approvedNon-approved
The future of assessment in The future of assessment in OregonOregon
• Achieve peer review compliance Achieve peer review compliance
• Statewide assessment literacyStatewide assessment literacy
• Progress monitoring and RTI Progress monitoring and RTI approachesapproaches
• Universal designUniversal design
• Achieve alignment between Achieve alignment between accountability assessment and accountability assessment and instructional assessmentsinstructional assessments
What’s gone?What’s gone?
Four options are no longer included in Four options are no longer included in district counts of participation and district counts of participation and performanceperformance
• Targeted Targeted Assessments Assessments (challenge down, (challenge down, off-grade off-grade assessment)assessment)
• Modified Modified AssessmentsAssessments
• Career and Life Career and Life Role Assessment Role Assessment System (CLRAS)System (CLRAS)
• Juried AssessmentJuried Assessment
What’s changed?What’s changed?
Some assessment options have a Some assessment options have a performance and participation caveatperformance and participation caveat
• Partial Assessment Partial Assessment – Item formulaItem formula
• Extended AssessmentExtended Assessment– Based on grade level standardsBased on grade level standards– Two grade-levelsTwo grade-levels– Additional administration optionAdditional administration option
What’s new?What’s new?
Scaffolded Administration of Scaffolded Administration of the Extended Assessmentsthe Extended Assessments
• Separate administration manualSeparate administration manual
• Reduced complexity itemsReduced complexity items
• Item level adaptations to the Item level adaptations to the assessmentsassessments
• Additional supports for students with Additional supports for students with significant mobility and significant mobility and communication needscommunication needs
What’s left?What’s left?
Assessment Options Then and Assessment Options Then and Now: What’s left?Now: What’s left?• 2001-20052001-2005 • 2006-20072006-2007
10 CIM
8
7
6
5
4
3
10 CIM
8
7
6
5
4
3
Extended CLRAS
Exte
nd
ed
A
ssessm
en
t
Scaff
old
ed
A
dm
inis
trati
on
Accom
mod
ate
d A
ssessm
en
t
Gen
era
l A
ssessm
en
t
Targ
ete
d A
ssessm
en
t
Juri
ed
Assessm
en
t
Accom
mod
ate
d A
ssessm
en
t
Mod
ified
Assessm
en
t
Extended K - 2
What are the implications?What are the implications?
Implications for students with Implications for students with disabilitiesdisabilities
• IEP decision makingIEP decision making– IEP team decision-making for newly IEP team decision-making for newly
eligible students and new move-ins eligible students and new move-ins •““Assessment pending” with a deadlineAssessment pending” with a deadline
– IEP team decision-making for students IEP team decision-making for students with current IEPs that are now with current IEPs that are now inaccurateinaccurate•Does the IEP team need to reconvene?Does the IEP team need to reconvene?
•What paperwork, if any, is necessary?What paperwork, if any, is necessary?
Implications (continued)Implications (continued)
• Training issuesTraining issues– No statewide trainersNo statewide trainers– Upcoming trainingsUpcoming trainings– Statewide zone training Statewide zone training
and streamed trainings and streamed trainings scheduled for Januaryscheduled for January
– Proficiency audits at a Proficiency audits at a state levelstate level
– Grants available to Grants available to offset travel and offset travel and substitute needssubstitute needs
• District roleDistrict role– Participation in Participation in
prioritization of prioritization of human resourceshuman resources
– Participation in Participation in streamlining the streamlining the system for future system for future needsneeds
– Participation in Participation in maintaining the maintaining the integrity of the new integrity of the new systemsystem
What’s positive?What’s positive?
Legacy of ResilienceLegacy of Resilience
• Passionate special educatorsPassionate special educators
• Conscientious educatorsConscientious educators
• Versatile administratorsVersatile administrators
For maintaining fluency in the For maintaining fluency in the new systemnew system• Links to information: Links to information:
http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/results/?id=178http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/results/?id=178• http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?=554http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?=554
• Contact: Contact: Dianna CarrizalesDianna Carrizales(503) 947-5634(503) [email protected]@state.or.us