nature & scope : industrial relation · environment. explain 2. the term industrial relation...

15
NATURE & SCOPE : INDUSTRIAL RELATION By CA Anushri Agrawal [email protected] www.anushriagrawal.com

Upload: others

Post on 10-Apr-2020

23 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

NATURE & SCOPE :INDUSTRIAL RELATION

By CA Anushri [email protected]

SYSTEM MODEL BY DUNLOP

INPUT PROCESSING OUTPUT

• Actors (workers ,managers)•Environment ( socio,economic)•Ideology

• Bargaining•Conciliation• Arbitration• Law making etc

Web of rules by :• managers•Collective bargaining•State•Trade union

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

• Actors (workers ,managers)•Environment ( socio,economic)•Ideology

• Bargaining•Conciliation• Arbitration• Law making etc

Web of rules by :• managers•Collective bargaining•State•Trade union

FEEDBACK

2

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

3

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

Focused more on control of conflict throughrulemaking rather than examining how conflictis generated.

It ignores external factors like consumers and community which playdominant role in worker-manager relationships CA AN

USH

RI AGRAW

AL

4

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

GANDHIAN APPROACH

Both labour and capital are complementary , notcontradictory

Three principles:i. Trusteeshipii. Truth leading to satyagrahaiii. Non-violence

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

Both labour and capital are complementary , notcontradictory

Three principles:i. Trusteeshipii. Truth leading to satyagrahaiii. Non-violence

5

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

SOCIO –ETHICAL APPROACH

Organization is a society. Good IRs can be maintained onlywhen both the parties realized their morale responsibilitiesbesides the mutual co-operation & greater understandingof each other problem

In this approach needs of both management & workersshould be fulfilled by each other such as productivity,carrier, better standard of living & growth prospects.

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

Organization is a society. Good IRs can be maintained onlywhen both the parties realized their morale responsibilitiesbesides the mutual co-operation & greater understandingof each other problem

In this approach needs of both management & workersshould be fulfilled by each other such as productivity,carrier, better standard of living & growth prospects.

6

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

V.V.GIRI APPROACH

Opined for bi- partism Advocated mutual co-operation and decision participation. Unionism and collective bargaining for deciding terms of

employment Against the role of state in Irs Equated state intervention as policeman role which cant

bring harmony State should intervene as a tool of last resort only.

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

Opined for bi- partism Advocated mutual co-operation and decision participation. Unionism and collective bargaining for deciding terms of

employment Against the role of state in Irs Equated state intervention as policeman role which cant

bring harmony State should intervene as a tool of last resort only.

7

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

IMPACT OF SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT

Spread of wealth (even or uneven) Social values and norms ( care for humanity) Level of education ( workers participation,

bargaining, justice and fair play ) Caste and community consciousness ( level of

cooperation)

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

Spread of wealth (even or uneven) Social values and norms ( care for humanity) Level of education ( workers participation,

bargaining, justice and fair play ) Caste and community consciousness ( level of

cooperation)

8

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

IMPACT OF ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

Type of economy Type of organization Economic cycle

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

Type of economy Type of organization Economic cycle

9

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

CHALLENGES TO IR TODAY!! Impact of liberalization (efficiency and profitability are main drivers, (disturbing impact on PSUs) Increasing temporaries Reducing state patronage Increasing managerial militancy Diversity of work force Increasing uncertainties and complexities

ECONOMIC Or SOCIAL Or TECHNOLOGICAL

• New technology e.g.mails, automatedmachines•Global operations•Global competition•Global workforce•Global customer•Reducing product lifecycle

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

Impact of liberalization (efficiency and profitability are main drivers, (disturbing impact on PSUs) Increasing temporaries Reducing state patronage Increasing managerial militancy Diversity of work force Increasing uncertainties and complexities

• New technology e.g.mails, automatedmachines•Global operations•Global competition•Global workforce•Global customer•Reducing product lifecycle

10

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

Dynamic approach to work & innovstion Economic security & employability rather than job security Partnership rather than subordination Long term interests rather than short term focus (ESOP) Thinking big ( gain creation rather than gain sharing) “we-ness rather than my-ness”or “ we v/s problem” rather than

“management v/s union” CSR rather than responsibility towards shareholder HRM approach rather tha reactive approach to manage relations “melting pot” approach rather than “meeting pot” approach

(GOOGLE) Customer is the king

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

Dynamic approach to work & innovstion Economic security & employability rather than job security Partnership rather than subordination Long term interests rather than short term focus (ESOP) Thinking big ( gain creation rather than gain sharing) “we-ness rather than my-ness”or “ we v/s problem” rather than

“management v/s union” CSR rather than responsibility towards shareholder HRM approach rather tha reactive approach to manage relations “melting pot” approach rather than “meeting pot” approach

(GOOGLE) Customer is the king

Emphasisng retention rather than hiring and firing

“business is people” rather than “capital & technology”

Even judiciary has changed its stancefrom pro labour to pro productivity.

Better employability besides quality of work life

11

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

HRM AND IRCA AN

USH

RI AGRAW

AL

12

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

HRM IR

Bipartant Tripartant

No role of union Generally role of union

Individual focus Collective focus

Emphasis upon training anddevelopment to avoid conflict

Emphasis upon collectivebargaining & negotiation tomanage conflict

Focus upon common interestand productivity

Clash of interests

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

Focus upon common interestand productivity

Clash of interests

Business is people People is cost

Generally at plant or unitlevel

Macro level

13

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

SCOPE OF IR IS EXPANDING TO HRM Redesigning jobs and responsibilities to

shoot new competition Better use of skills and building of

career on account of demographicchanges

Greater emphasis upon economicsecurity and employability due toincreasing professionalism

Increasing work force diversity Workers becoming more participative

and creative Increasing acceptance of conflicts rather

than disputes Increasing emphasis on fighting

together and voluntarism rather thanfighting within and autocracy

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

Redesigning jobs and responsibilities toshoot new competition

Better use of skills and building ofcareer on account of demographicchanges

Greater emphasis upon economicsecurity and employability due toincreasing professionalism

Increasing work force diversity Workers becoming more participative

and creative Increasing acceptance of conflicts rather

than disputes Increasing emphasis on fighting

together and voluntarism rather thanfighting within and autocracy

14

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

QUESTIONS:1. IRs are designed by socio- economic

environment. Explain2. The term Industrial Relation mean different to

different people. In context of your organizationhow would you like to define it?

3. The human being has come a long way frombeing a mere factor of production to a resourceand now a generator. How IR contributed tothis?

4. Compare HRm with IR. What conflict andharmony we see among the two?

5. Explain the constitutional and legal frameworkof industrial Relations.

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL

1. IRs are designed by socio- economicenvironment. Explain

2. The term Industrial Relation mean different todifferent people. In context of your organizationhow would you like to define it?

3. The human being has come a long way frombeing a mere factor of production to a resourceand now a generator. How IR contributed tothis?

4. Compare HRm with IR. What conflict andharmony we see among the two?

5. Explain the constitutional and legal frameworkof industrial Relations. 15

CA ANU

SHRI AG

RAWAL