Nationales System Emissionen

1TFEIP Meeting, 23.5. – 24.5.2007, Dessau Germany

Some Feedback and Suggestions for further

Development of the Review Tests

Ulrike Döring, Germany

Nationales System Emissionen

2TFEIP Meeting, 23.5. – 24.5.2007, Dessau Germany

Quality control (QC) is a procedure or set of procedures intended to ensure that a manufactured product or performed service adheres to a defined set of quality criteria or meets the requirements of the client or customer.

QC is similar to, but not identical with, quality assurance (QA).

QA is defined as a procedure or set of procedures intended to ensure that a product or service under development ... meets specified requirements.

1. QA/QC

Nationales System Emissionen

3TFEIP Meeting, 23.5. – 24.5.2007, Dessau Germany

Nationales System Emissionen

4TFEIP Meeting, 23.5. – 24.5.2007, Dessau Germany

The Review Development ISub year

2003 2004 2005 2006

Format word template word word

Source e-mail Repdab / download Repdab / download Repdab / download

Content Questionaire from IIASA

Checks of:1.Time series 2.Recalculation3.IEF

Checks of:1.Key Source Analysis (KSA)2.Compliance test (timeliness, format, completeness per pollutant, - and sector, consistency)3.Comparability Test (cross pollutant test, recalculation, time series, IEF)

Checks of:1.Key Source Analysis (KSA)2.Compliance test (timeliness, format, completeness per pollutant, - and sector, consistency)3.Comparability Test (cross pollutant test, recalculation, trends, inventory comparison, time series, IEF)

Comment

Helpful to find internal errors

Very helpful to find internal errors or inconsistencies, very short

Significance of:KSACross Pollutant Test??????

Improvement and some internal changes occur:- Cross Pollutant Test got more significance, - good overview of data gaps

Nationales System Emissionen

5TFEIP Meeting, 23.5. – 24.5.2007, Dessau Germany

The Review Development IISub year 2007

Format word

Source Repdab / download

Content Checks of:1.Key Source Analysis (KSA)2.Compliance test3. Comparability Test:

New: cross pollutant test4. Internal Consistency of gridded data

Comment Improvement and some internal changes occur:- Cross Pollutant Test got more significance

Nationales System Emissionen

6TFEIP Meeting, 23.5. – 24.5.2007, Dessau Germany

ProPro Comment Suggestion

Detailed checks of the inventory Further improvement of national inventories

Necessary, go on!

Completeness test per sector List of data gaps, very helpful Format should be Excel templates

IEF-Test Improvement of national inventories

IEF-Database and updated Corinair Guidebook are necessary!

Nationales System Emissionen

7TFEIP Meeting, 23.5. – 24.5.2007, Dessau Germany

ConsCons: Comment Suggestion

Completeness per pollutant For some sectors the entry of notation keys is not clear. Do specific and relevant pollutant emissions really occur???

Checking the cells of the last submission with the actual submission => could be an advice of inventory improvement!

The cross pollutant test is still not really significant!

The correlation of IEF (NOx/PM10) of the different sectors is already unclear due to the source of the EF (measured, estimated or calculated)

Leave it! The conclusion of the results are not obviously helpful.

Trends Good overview of the development of emissions

Consideration of emissions for the years before 1990 is critical. For some countries it is not possible to recalculate the emissions before 1990!!

Key Source Analysis   Higher aggregation would be sufficiently!

Format Use of templates are easier Excel templates

Nationales System Emissionen

8TFEIP Meeting, 23.5. – 24.5.2007, Dessau Germany

Thank you for your attention!