napier stunt and smut resistance project in kenya: achievements and outcomes
DESCRIPTION
A presentation prepared by M. Mulaa, C. Lusweti, B. Awalla, C. Kute, D. Asena, S. Rono, F. Muyekho, J. Hanson and J. Proud for the ASARECA/ILRI Workshop on Mitigating the Impact of Napier Grass Smut and Stunt Diseases, Addis Ababa, June 2-3, 2010.TRANSCRIPT
NAPIER STUNT AND SMUT RESISTANCE PROJECT IN KENYA
Achievements and OutcomesM. Mulaa1, C. Lusweti1, B. Awalla1, C. Kute, D. Asena1 S.
Rono 1 , F. Muyekho2 , J. Hanson 3 and J. Proud 3
1KARI Kitale, 2KARI Kakamega, 3ILRI Ethiopia
Presented at the ASARECA/ILRI Workshop on Mitigating the Impact of Napier Grass Smut and Stunt Diseases, Addis
Ababa, June 2-3, 2010
IntroductionKARI Vision
KARI envisions “a vibrant commercially-oriented and competitive agricultural sector propelled by science, technology and innovation”.
Introduction
KARI Mission
To contribute to increased productivity, commercialization and competitiveness of the agricultural sector through generation and promotion of knowledge, information and technologies that respond to clients’ demands and opportunities.
Opportunities
Napier is a major livestock feed in Kenya with several uses
-Stem borer and Striga control (Push-pull)
-Augementation of natural enemies
-Soil conservation
-Sold for cash
Introduction
Introduction …….
Napier potential yields 50-100 tons green matter per hectare
Margaret Mulaa CRAC Presentation 7- April- 2009
6
Stunt and Smut major diseases of Napier
Napier Stunt and Smut Resistant Clones and effective Napier Stunt and Smut Resistant Clones and effective Management strategies demanded by farmersManagement strategies demanded by farmers
Problem statementMost Napier varieties are susceptible to stunt and smut
Decline in biomass due to stunt leads to Loss of farmer income from sale of milk
High prices of Napier
Farmers selling their diary cows
Graze dairy cattle on sparse communal pastures
East Coast Fever
High costs of livestock production
Launch of the project
11 July 2008 at KARI Kakamega
150 stakeholders attended the Launch
KARI Director, ILRI Director Partnerships, Director Livestock Development, CD’s KARI Kitale&KARI Kakamega
PROJECT VISION
Farmers adoption of superior (resistant) clones and crop management practices that will mitigate the spread of smut and stunt, leading to increases in system productivity and sustainability
PROJECT MISSION
Sharing new information and knowledge to support practices that will prevent the diseases spread and allow farmers to make informed choices
AchievementsStunt and Smut Disease Incidence and Severity
mapped in Bungoma Mumias Butere Busia Kiambu Muranga
Global positioning system reading were takenfrom all house holds surveyed
Stunt and Smut incidence in Western Kenya mapped
Other Baseline Data on Napier Production Practices from survey• Area covered by Napier Grass per
household
• Number of Improved Diary Cattle
• Feeding systems practiced
• Alternative feeds
Baselines on disease incidence in Western and Central Kenya in 2008
District Stunt District
Stunt on farmers own fields
Smut District
Smut on farmers own fields
Bungoma 89.7 27.3 5.2 7.7
Mumias 96.4 21.0 4.8 5.1
Butere 98.0 26.0 1.0 1.3
Busia 87.3 18.1 2.5 2.6
Kiambu 20.7 4.7 37.9 42.3
Muranga 12.9 2.9 37.6 41.0
Biomass Studies
Morphological Characterization of 120 clones
Screening 120 clones for tolerance to StuntData on Incidence and Severity of stunt on Clones
available
1-Nil (No symptoms at all in stool)2- Mild (less than 25 % of tillers with symptoms)3- Moderate (25-50 tillers with symptoms)4- Severe- more than 50 tillers with symptoms)
Stunt Severity
Screen house trials under artificial Challenge
High yielding Clones tolerant to stunting Disease identified
Clone (Detail of clones with author)
Dry Matter Yields tons/Ha
1 12.76
2 12.43
3 11.04
4 10.06
5 8.09
6 7.64
7 7.55
8 6.03
•Collected 600 Clones•20 Clones tolerant•28 clones yielding more than Bana
Farmer evaluating and Ranking Napier Clones at Alupe
Clones Ranked a among the best by both farmers and Researchers
• Farmers preferred clones which were high yielding, disease tolerant, fast growing with more tillers, big stems, smooth and broad leaves.
MMS 2A5 (11.04 tons/ha)
MMS 3A5 (8.56 tons/ha)
BGM 3A5 (8.09 tons/ha)
Information and Monitoring & Evaluation activities
• Assessing and responding to stakeholders information needs
• Documenting processes• Packaging and disseminating information• Maintaining relevance• Assessing lessons learnt• Monitoring impact against indicators
Stakeholder Identification
KARI
MediaPrivate Sector
Other Researchers
Schools
Universities
CBO’sLocal Leaders
NGO’s
Farmers
Extension System
Assessing and responding to stakeholders information needs
Focus group discussions (6)
Key informant meetings (6)
Stakeholder workshops (8)
Field days and Agricultural Shows (4)
Dissemination materials
- Posters (3)
- Leaflets(2)
Number of Farmers ReachedDistricts Field days Workshops
BungomaChoisianaKanduyi
5001060
10050
MumiasEast WangaMatungu
600260
8776
Kiambu
Kiamba
1500
870
195
400
Muranga 243 55
KitaleTotal
10536086
401003 (7089)
Reduction in Disease Incidence
• Bungoma 45% Management (Clinics)
• Mumias 60 % awareness Workshops/FD
• Butere 30% Tolerant Land Races
• Busia 70% No serious Management
• Central 15% More Aware of Tolerant Varieties KK1& KK2
Key Informant Meetings
Leaders of Community Based Organizations in Bungoma District
Documenting processes/ Synthesizing information for the Web
• Quarterly reports (4)
• Project Annual Reports (2)
• Project Semi-Annual Reports (6)
• Reports of stakeholders meetings (8)
• Centre Advisory Committee meetings reports (1)
• Back to office reports on field visits (30)
Packaging and disseminating Information
Awareness creation on management of the disease
– 3 Posters and 2 Leaflets
– 2 video’s ( Project launch & Field day)
– 5 news paper articles (Nation, Standard, Kenya times)
– TV news (KTN, Nation and KBC)
Packaging and disseminating information
• Production of good leaflets and posters• Collaboration with Ministry of Agriculture and
Livestock• Collaboration with projects dealing with
Livestock Technologies- IFAD- SNV Swedish Project- Small holders giving credit- USAID Kenya Dairy Sector project- Land O’Lakes International Development
Maintaining Relevance
• Farmer Group discussions (4)• Project Annual planning meeting (3)• Farmer to Farmer visits (3)• Farmer Field days in collaboration with
other stakeholders (4)
Stakeholder field day at Alupe
Stakeholder Workshops and meetings
Information Sharing Meeting with Policy makers
Assessing Lessons Learnt• Farmer Group discussions• Monitoring meetings held with farmers
- Munanda-ini - Thindigna- Kiamba settlement- Njiku development focal area- Kimoroni
- East Wanga - Matungu - Choisiana• Demonstrations (Bulking sites)
Assessing Lessons Learnt
Monitoring Meetings Demonstrations
Behavioral changes in partners
Key Boundary
Partner
Expected Key changes Actual changes observed during project implementation
Extension Staff -participatory extension methods-More technology demonstrations-More linkages
•Involved farmers in planning and information gathering•Used funds from other sources for field days•Stunting/smut disease made priority•Involved in participatory training
Farmers -Updated information on disease
-Demanding to technologies
-Participating in collection of resistant Germplasm
-Farmer-to-farmer technology transfer
-Adoption of improved disease free Napier clones
-Several farmers were interested and demanded for tolerant materials
-Made effort to gather information
-Demanded for leaflets and Posters-Very keen to attend field days- Adoption of Management of management technologies and reduction of incidence of stunting disease
Behavioral changes in partners (Contd.)Key Boundary
Partner
Expected Key changes Actual changes observed during project implementation
Researchers -Hold workshops/field days to disseminate information
-Provide guidelines on management of disease
-Develop more proposals
-More team work
-More collections of Clones
-Created networks
-Preparing posters
-Writing Papers
-Persuaded bosses to fund
KARI HQ -Promote and Coordinate linkages between related projects
-Director KARI attended the launch and field days
-Supported project with additional funding
-Participated in monitoring
Behavioral changes in partners (Contd.)
Key Boundary
Partner
Expected Key changes
Actual changes observed during project implementation
Media -Disseminating the correct information
•Project launch in the nation newspaper and on 3 T.V. channels•Radio interested in hosting the farmers
Policy makers
-Support the transformations
-Minister of Agriculture and other policy makers attended field days and supported the project
-Chiefs and village elders helped create awareness among communities
Linkages and collaboration
Collaborators/Donor Activities/Comments
•Ministry of Agriculture and Ministry of Livestock Extension (NALEP/Dutch Government
Covers over 20 districts in disseminating information and helping groups bulk clean planting materials
•East African Small holder Dairy Project (ASARECA/World bank)
Extending Technologies that will empower small holder farmers e.g. clean seed production, Conservation of fodders, crop/livestock integration
ICIPE Push Pull Project (Kilimo Trust)
Dissemination of Push Pull Habitat Management Strategies, disseminate information on management of stunting disease and smut.
Lessons learnt• Involvement of various stakeholders
increased awareness on disease and technology dissemination
• Linking with existing projects related to Napier production made the project sustainable
• Team work at KARI and at regional level improved performance and project implementation
Lessons learnt Cont.• Farmer workshops, Farmer visits and
field-days were the most effective means of disseminating information
• Media played a very big role in Awareness creation and dissemination of the technologies
• Farmers and other stakeholders should be trained in information gathering to help monitor impacts of the project
The way Forwards
• Evaluate identified tolerant clones in more sites and recommend to farmers
• Need to conduct further research to standardize screening methodologies using artificial Challenge
• Further evaluation of identified clones to develop resistant varieties to Napier Stunting disease
The way Forwards
• Introduction of resistant genes into the existing germplasm with desirable traits
• Identify partners who would assist in the sensitization and dissemination of management strategies
• Establishment of bulking sites to produce Clean planting materials for farmers
• Scale up other stunt and smut management practices such as use of Botanical extracts
AcknowledgementAcknowledgementDirector KARI and ASARECADirector KARI and ASARECA
C D’s KARI-Kitale and KARI- KakamegaC D’s KARI-Kitale and KARI- Kakamega
ILRIILRI
Plant Global Clinic, UKPlant Global Clinic, UK
Rothamsted Research InstituteRothamsted Research Institute
Ministry of Agriculture & Ministry of livestockMinistry of Agriculture & Ministry of livestock
Farmers and Other stakeholdersFarmers and Other stakeholders
Project PartnersProject Partners
Partners in Napier stunting Disease Research