nadcap subscriber tutorial jon steffey program manager informatics solutions, research and...

Nadcap SUBSCRIBER TUTORIAL

Jon SteffeyProgram ManagerInformatics Solutions, Research and Development

2 March 2015


Nadcap Overview

• Organizational Structure of Nadcap

• Nadcap Process / eAuditNet

AGENDA


• PRI:

DEFINITIONS – PRI

The Performance Review Institute is a not-for-profit affiliate of SAE whose

mission is to: Provide global, unbiased, independent manufacturing process and

product assessments and certification services to the mobility industry for the

purpose of adding value, reducing total cost and facilitating teaming between

primes & suppliers. PRI administers Nadcap.


• Nadcap:

– Special Processes: are those processes where the parameters are directly influenced by component

geometry and/or the results cannot be confirmed by inspection, e.g., NDT, Plating, Heat Treating.

– Products: are the manufacturing output of the combination of distinct materials, parts and/or processes which forms a whole, e.g., Composites, Elastomer Seals, Electronics.

DEFINITIONS – Nadcap

The leading worldwide co-operative program

of major companies designed to manage a cost effective consensus approach to

special processes and products

and provide continuous improvement within the aerospace

and automotive industries.


• eAuditNet:

DEFINITIONS – eAuditNet

Audit software used to document audit results, attachments,

letters, notes, schedules audits, supplier advisories, etc. with

the ability to produce reports based on multiple criteria.


• November 1985: Government/Industry Equal Partners Conference recommends consensus solution to duplication of supplier quality assurance systems

• July 1990: PRI incorporated as a Not-For-Profit Trade Association. Launch Nadcap for Aerospace

• July 2000: Roll-out of Nadcap Europe

• November 2002: Full Launch of eAuditNet

• October 2003: Roll-out of Nadcap Asia

• April 2008: Roll-out of eQuaLearn

• May 2009: Full Launch of eAuditNet 2.0

• February 2012: PRI begins conducting audits for Transportation & Power Generation (2012) and Medical Devices (2014) industries

HISTORY OF THE PERFORMANCE REVIEW INSTITUTE (PRI)


• Nadcap Subscriber Tutorial

• Attendees Guide – Antitrust (page 7)– Nadcap Personal Code of Ethics and Conflict of Interest

(page 7)

• PRI Website: www.p-r-i.org

• eAuditNet Guides: www.eAuditNet.com

KEY REFERENCES FOR NEW ATTENDEES

http://www.p-r-i.org/

http://www.eauditnet.com/


• Attend Task Group mini-orientation at the beginning of each meeting

• Introduce yourself to the Task Group Chair and Staff Engineer

• Become active in your Task Group; your comments are very important

• Provide your feedback from the meeting through the on-line survey

SUGGESTIONS FOR NEW ATTENDEES


• Subscriber members are required to attend Nadcap meetings. If the member is unable to attend, an alternate shall be designated.

• Reply to surveys, questionnaires and ballots that are circulated to members.

• Carry through sponsorship and coordination of individual projects as assigned.

• Prepare checklists for auditing and continuing surveillance.

• Review resumes and interview auditors.• Review audit reports.• Comply with the Nadcap Personal Code of Ethics and Conflict

of Interest Policy.• Safeguard the confidentiality of information that you're

exposed to through the Nadcap program.

MEMBERSHIP RESPONSIBILITIES


Nadcap MEMBERS

• 309th Maintenance Wing-Hill AFB

• AgustaWestland• Airbus Group

– Aerolia– Airbus– Airbus Defence and Space– Airbus Helicopters– Premium Aerotech GmbH

• Alenia Aermacchi SpA• BAE Systems – Military Air

Solutions (MAS)• BAE Systems• Ball Aerospace & Technology

Corporation• The Boeing Company• Bombardier Inc.• COMAC• Defense Contract

Management Agency (DCMA)• Eaton, Aerospace Group• Embraer SA

• GE Aviation– GE Avio S.r.l.

• General Dynamics– Gulfstream

• GKN Aerospace• GKN Aerospace Sweden AB• Heroux Devtek Inc. (Landing

Gear Division)• Honeywell Aerospace• Israel Aerospace Industries• Latecoere• Liebherr-Aerospace SAS• Lockheed Martin Corporation• Mitsubishi Aircraft

Corporation / Mitsubishi Heavy Industries LTD

• MTU Aero Engines AG• Northrop Grumman

Corporation• Parker Aerospace Group• Raytheon Company• Rockwell Collins, Inc.

• Rolls-Royce• SAFRAN Group• Sonaca• Spirit AeroSystems• Textron Inc.

– Beechcraft– Bell Helicopter– Cessna Aircraft

Company– Textron Systems

• Thales• Triumph Group Inc.• United Technologies

Corporation– Goodrich (UTAS)– Hamilton Sundstrand

(UTAS)– Pratt & Whitney– Pratt & Whitney Canada– Sikorsky Aircraft

TIMELINE OF PRIMES

1990 1991 1992 1994 1995 1998 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 20140

10

20

30

40

50

60

15 6 6 7

10 1014

1719

21

2630

32 3330 31 30 31

29 29

12

2 3

3

3

5

12

16

1818

19

2020

2021

21 21

11 2

11

1

South America

Asia

Europe

North America


GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND CONTRACTOR POSITIONS ON PRIQUALIFICATION PROGRAMS

Special Process and

Product mandates to the

supplier base in that

region

KEY: R = Accreditation Required by Prime Letter sent to Suppliers; M = Nadcap Member; A = Accepts Nadcap Accreditation

Note: Not all Subscribers included above; visit eAuditNet for full list. Programs listed as of July 2011.

SUBSCRIBER FOR PRI USE AMERICAS EUROPE ASIA

309th MAINTENANCE WING-HILL AFBHill AFB, UT

A(CP, CT, HT, MTL, NMSE, NDT, WLD)

AGUSTAWESTLANDCascina Costa, Italy

R(NDT)

R(NDT)

R(NDT)

AIR FORCEWPAFB, OH

R(Seals, SLT)

ALENIA AERONAUTICA SPANaples, Italy

U12R(CP, COMP, HT, MTL, NDT, SE, WLD)

R(CP, COMP, HT, MTL, NDT, SE, WLD)

R(CP, COMP, HT, MTL, NDT, SE, WLD)

AVIO S.p.AItaly

R(CP, CT, HT, MTL, NDT, NMSE, WLD)



BAE SYSTEMS MILITARY AIR SOLUTIONS (MAS)UK

U15R(COMP, CP, HT, MTL, NDT, NMSE, WLD)

BAE SYSTEMSNashua, NH

A(CP,CT,WLD)

BALL AEROSPACE & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATIONBoulder, CO

A(CP,ETG,WLD)

THE BOEING COMPANY(Commercial Airplanes, Intergrated Defense Systems)

U11R(COMP,CP,HT,MTL-Ind.Test labs only, NDT, NMSE-SE only,WLD)

R(COMP,CP,HT,MTL-Ind.Test labs only, NDT, NMSE-SE only,WLD)

R(COMP,CP,HT,MTL-Ind.Test labs only, NDT, NMSE-SE only,WLD)

BOMBARDIER, INC.Dorval, Canada

U13R(COMP, CP, CT, HT, MTL, NDT, NMSE, WLD)

R(COMP, CP, CT, HT, MTL, NDT, NMSE, WLD)

R(COMP, CP, CT, HT, MTL, NDT, NMSE, WLD)

Defense Contact Management Agency (DCMA)(DOD) Alexandrta, VA

M(ALL, COMP, ETG, FLU, SEAL, SLT)

Airbus U8R(COMP, CP, ETG, HT, MTL, NDT, NMM, SE, WLD)

R(COMP, CP, ETG, HT, MTL, NDT, NMM, SE, WLD)

R(COMP, CP, ETG, HT, MTL, NDT, NMM, SE, WLD)

Name of Nadcap

Subscribing Prime

Contractor


INDUSTRY-MANAGED ACTIVE CUSTOMER AUDITS

12081466

24372852

3295367838704015

4389440647914919498950745175

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000


Plan Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

AQS 252 196 232 239 229 239Conv Machining 56 67 75 61 40 10Composites 189 186 156 153 153 131CP 997 1007 934 952 893 857CT 135 131 133 126 124 113ETG 105 104 103 84 76 66Fluids 35 36 26 26 26 32HT 935 907 855 877 833 786M&I 60 1MTL 201 198 223 193 209 178NDT 1121 1077 1006 1009 1011 973NM 220 216 202 224 228 178NMMM 15 15 13 8 2NMMT 31 30 34 25 24 20SE 173 158 160 140 156 129Seals 13 10 8 12 10 8Sealants 21 11 21 15 12 17WLD 488 491 477 436 456 411NUCAP 243 201 222 256 224 71Other Industries - TPG 99 74 52 29Other Industries - MedAccred 40 1Preassessments - Aerospace 37 32 57 54 87 187Preassessments - Non-Aerospace 0 6Total 5,466 5,155 4,989 4,919 4,791 4,406

STATUS REPORT – SUPPLIER AUDITS


AuditorsAudits

STATUS OF AUDITS/AUDITORS (FULL TIME EQUIVALENT)

20022004

20062008

20102012

20140

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Americas Europe Asia

20022004

20062008

20102012

20140

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Americas Europe Asia


• Special Processes – Nondestructive Testing (NDT)– Materials Testing (MTL)– Heat Treating (HT)– Coatings (CT)– Chemical Processing (CP)– Welding (WLD)– Nonconventional Machining & Surface Enhancement (NMSE)– Non Metallic Materials Manufacturing (NMMM)– Non Metallic Materials Testing (NMMT)– Conventional Machining as a Special Process (CMSP)– Measurement and Inspection (MI)– Metallic Materials Manufacturing (MMM)

• Systems & Products– Aerospace Quality Systems (AQS): AC7004– Fluid Distribution Standards (FLU)– Elastomer Seals (SEALS)– Sealants (SLT)– Composites (COMP)– Electronics (ETG)

NADCAP PROGRAMS


• Nadcap Overview

Organizational Structure

• Nadcap Process / eAuditNet

AGENDA


PRI/Nadcap ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Policy Board of Directors

Executive Leaders•

Legal entity

•Fiduciary responsibility

•Set policy

•Provide the vision


BOARD OF DIRECTORS Stan Adachi

Divisional Director, Supplier Quality, Defense, Space & Security The Boeing Company

Severin Drogoul Vice President – Business Improvement & Quality Airbus Group

Etienne Galan Vice President Purchasing Snecma (Safran Group)

Michael Hayward Sector Director International & Logistics Excellence Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems

Erik Kunkle Sourcing Quality Leader GE Aviation

Mario Langlois (Chairperson) Director, Quality Engineering & Safety Office Bombardier Aerospace

Tony Maguire Head of Quality, Hawk Aircraft Programmes BAE Systems PLC

Ron Meester

Vice President, Global Quality

Honeywell Aerospace

Anna (Graham) Morast

Director, Group Quality

Pratt & Whitney, UTC

Alan Partridge

Head of Laboratories

Rolls-Royce

David L. Schutt

Chief Executive Officer

SAE International

Junji Tsuji

Manager of Manufacturing Technology Group of Production Planning Department, Aero-Engine & Space

Operations

IHI Corporation

Jianqiang Xu

Deputy General Manager, Science, Technology, and Quality

C919 Program Chief Quality Officer

COMAC


PRI/Nadcap Organizational Structure

Tactical

Senior quality leaders & managers•

Oversee operation of Nadcap

•Establish & implement policy & procedures

•Task group coordination & development

•Identify, develop and deploy improvement

Board of Directors

Nadcap Management Council (NMC)

Policy


CURRENT Nadcap MANAGEMENT COUNCIL (NMC)•

Latchezar Anguelov

SAFRAN Group

•David Bale

Pratt & Whitney Canada

•Dietmar Becher

Liebherr Aerospace

•Michael Bess

DCMA

•Pascal Blondet

Airbus

•Richard Blyth, Vice Chairperson

Rolls-Royce.

•Katie Bradley

Lockheed Martin

•Christopher Brust

DCMA

•Robert Cashman

Parker Aerospace Group

•David Cianfrini

BAE Systems, Electronic Systems

•Russell Cole

Northrop Grumman

•Jim Diamond

309 Maintenance Wing – Hill AFB

•Harold Finch

Spirit AeroSystems

•Jose Eduardo Freire

Embraer SA

•Hidekazu Furugori

Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation

•John Haddock

BAE Systems – MAS

•Tim Hayes

General Dynamics

•Martha Hogan-Battisti

The Boeing Company

•Scott Iby

Hamilton Sundstrand

•Jason Jolly

Cessna Aircraft Company

•Karen Kim

Sikorsky

•Scott Klavon, Secretary (Non-Voting)

PRI

•Robert Koukol

Honeywell Aerospace

•Ralph Kropp

MTU Aero Engines GmbH

•Eric LeFort

Sonaca

•Howard Jeff Lott, Chairperson

The Boeing Company

•Frank Mariot

Triumph Group

•Scott Maitland

Goodrich (UTAS)

•Steve McGinn

Honeywell

•Robin McGuckin

Bombardier Aerospace

•Marc Montreuil

Héroux Devtek

•Michael Murray

Beechcraft Corporation

•Ana Ottani dos Santos

Embraer SA

•Rick Peterson

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

• Alberto Portal

Airbus Defence and Space

• Fabrizio Quadrini

AgustaWestland

•Mark Rechtsteiner

GE Aviation

• Per Rehndell

GKN Aerospace Sweden AB

• Brad Richwine

Raytheon Company

• Victor Schonberger

IAI

• Lisa Shaw

Eaton Aerospace

• Henry Sikorski

Pratt & Whitney

• Asa Snitchler

Beechcraft Corporation

• David Soong

Pratt & Whitney

• Angela Vitale

Alenia Aermacchi SpA

• George Winchester

Northrop Grumman

• Corwyn Berger

EXOVA, Inc.

• Jim Cummings

Metal Finishing Company

• Andrew March

Hunting Dearborn, Inc.

• David Michaud

Fountain Plating Company

• Tom Newton

Aircraft X-Ray Laboratories

• Michael Schleckman

Voss Industries, Inc.

• Vitorio Stana

Avcorp Industries Inc

• Vern Talmadge

Howmet Thermatech Coatings

• Gary White

Orbit NDT


Tactical

Board of Directors

Nadcap Management Council (NMC)

PRI/Nadcap ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

TechnicalTask Groups

Special Processes

Nondestructive Testing,

Materials Testing,

Heat Treating, Coatings,

Chemical Processing,

Welding, NMSE, Non Metallic Materials Testing , Conventional

Machining, MNI

Systems & Products

Electronics,

Sealants, Elastomer Seals,

AQS (AC7004),

Fluid Distribution Systems &

Composites

Task Groups

Special Processes

Nondestructive Testing,

Materials Testing,

Heat Treating, Coatings,

Chemical Processing,

Welding, NMSE, Non Metallic Materials Testing , Conventional

Machining, MNI

Systems & Products

Electronics,

Sealants, Elastomer Seals,

AQS (AC7004),

Fluid Distribution Systems &

Composites

Technical Experts•

Determine requirements

•Develop documents

•Accept corrective action

•Final decision on accreditation

Supplier Support Committee

(SSC)

Supplier Support Committee

(SSC)

Administrative

Staff

Administrative

Staff

Policy


• Nadcap Overview

• Organizational Structure of Nadcap

Nadcap Process / eAuditNet

AGENDA


Nadcap PROCEDURE HIERARCHY

AS7003

QUALITY MANUAL

NOP (Nadcap

Operating

Procedure)

NTGOP (Nadcap Task

Group Operating

Procedure)

NIP (Nadcap

Internal Procedure)

Auditor Handbook

Aerospace Standard which documents the

requirements for implementing Nadcap

industry consensus-based accreditation

programs.

Quality policy describing

the quality system of the

organization.

Specific procedures by which Nadcap

operates.

Scope and general operating

procedures for each specific Nadcap

commodity program.

Specific procedures by which PRI /

Nadcap Staff operates.

Roles and responsibilities for

Nadcap Auditors, and clarifications

to facilitate and standardize the

audit process.


• NOP-001: Nadcap Operating Procedure

• NOP-006: Supplier Advisory Process

• NOP-008: Supplier Merit Program

• NOP-011: Audit Failure Process

• NTGOP-001: Nadcap Task Group Operating Procedure

KEY PROCEDURES (In eAuditNet, under Documents > Procedures and Forms)


THE Nadcap AUDIT PROCESS

Accreditation Mandated

by Nadcap Prime

Subscriber

Supplier Requests

Audit

Audit Scheduled

& Auditor Assigned

Audit Performed

– Auditor Submits

Report

Supplier

Review

PRI Technical

Staff Review

Task Group

Review

Certificate Issued

to Supplier

Re-accreditation Process

Subscriber Action

Supplier Action

PRI Action


• PRI/Supplier Schedules the Audit using eAuditNet.com– Nadcap Checklists and Preparation Instructions available – Encouraged to review the Nadcap Customer Support

Initiative (NCSI) presentation on eAuditNet– Perform self-audit

• Auditor Conducts the Audit using the applicable Nadcap checklists (located on eAuditNet)– Daily briefing & a final close out meeting at the end of

the audit

• Auditor Prepares Cover Letter and attaches to audit report (uploaded into eAuditNet)

• Supplier has 21 calendar days to initially respond to any findings (7 calendar days for subsequent responses)

AUDIT PROCESS


EVERY STEP IS MANAGED BY INDUSTRY

AUDIT

CHECKLIST

PROCESS EVALUTION/

IMPROVEMENT

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

AS REQUIRED

AUDIT

RESULTS

AUDIT

CONDUCTED

AUDITOR

QUALIFICATION &

SELECTION

INDUSTRY EXPERTS

MANAGE ALL KEY

STEPS


Nadcap – INDUSTRY WORKING TOGETHER

Audit Criteria (AC):

Document containing checklists or other surveillance tools to be utilized in the course of determining

compliance to established industry standards and prime requirements.

Audit Criteria (AC):

Document containing checklists or other surveillance tools to be utilized in the course of determining

compliance to established industry standards and prime requirements.

Establish Audit Criteria

Nadcap Staff SuppliersTask Groups

(Primes)


RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AUDIT CRITERIA (AC), AUDIT HANDBOOK AND PRIME REQUIREMENTS

Industry

Standards

+

Prime

Requirements

AC7XXX

Audit Criteria

Job Audits

Audit

Handbook


INDUSTRY MANAGED PROGRAM

AUDIT

CHECKLIST

PROCESS EVALUTION/

IMPROVEMENT

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

AS REQUIRED

AUDIT

RESULTS

AUDIT

CONDUCTED

AUDITOR

QUALIFICATION &

SELECTION

INDUSTRY EXPERTS

MANAGE ALL KEY

STEPS


• Core and Technical Requirements are Established by Task Group

• Potential candidates complete a pre-screening questionnaire oneAuditStaff.com

• Interviewed by Task Group

• Testing/Certification (Optional)

• Training Audits

• Review of Training with Report from Lead Auditor

• Approval by Task Group

• Continual Monitoring through Audit Reviews

• Annual PRI/Nadcap Training

AUDIT SELECTION/INTERVIEW/PERFORMANCE


• Highly skilled technical background with average of 30 years experience in the Special process audited

• Unlike ISO or EN 9000 based audits, Nadcap auditors do not make the final decision

• Nadcap auditor goal is to evaluate and report the technical competency and compliance of the supplier

AUDITORS CRITICAL TO Nadcap


SAMPLE OF CURRENT AUDITORS & EXPERIENCE

Process Experience Summary

Aerospace Quality Systems (AQS)

60% ISO Lead Assessors; Average 30 Years Experience

Chemical Processing (CP) 70% Have B.S Degree; 22 % Have MS Degree; 11% Have PHD; Average 35 Years Experience

Coatings (CT) 100% Have B.S Degree; 20% Have MS. Degree; 20% Have PHD; Average 30 Years Experience

Composites (COMP) 100% Have B.S. Engineering; 100% Have MS Engineering; Average 15 Years Experience

Elastomer Seals (SEAL) 50% B.S. Engineering; 30 Years Experience

Fluid Distribution Systems (FLU)

100% Have B.S. Engineering; Average 35 Years Experience

Heat Treating (HT) 80% Have B.S in Metallurgy/Material Science; 30% Have M.S. in Metallurgy/Material Science; Average 33 Years Experience; Certified Quality Engineer/Auditor

Materials Testing Laboratories (MTL)

90% Have B.S Degrees; 50% Have MS Degrees; 20% Have PHD; Certified Quality Engineer/Auditor; Average 35 Years Experience

Nonconventional Machining (NMMT)

80% Have B.S. Engineering; 40% Have MS Engineering; 20% Have PHD Engineering; Average 32 Years Experience

Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

100% are Level III’s for Four (4) Methods; 44% Have Bachelors of Science Degrees; Average 30 years of Experience

Sealants (SLT) 50% Have PHD; Average 30 Years Experience

Surface Enhancement (SE) 80% Have B.S. Engineering; 40% Have MS Engineering; 20% Have PHD Engineering; Average 32 Years Experience

Welding (WLD) 60% Have B.S Degree; 30% Have MS Degree; Average 34 Years Experience



AUDIT

CHECKLIST

PROCESS EVALUTION/

IMPROVEMENT

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

AS REQUIRED

AUDIT

RESULTS

AUDIT

CONDUCTED

AUDITOR

QUALIFICATION &

SELECTION

INDUSTRY EXPERTS

MANAGE ALL KEY

STEPS


1.Quality Systems2.Special Process and Product Specific

Requirements3.Compliance/Job Audits

NDT: 3 Witnessed Compliance Jobs per Method and 3 “Paperwork” Completed Compliance Jobs per MethodHeat Treating: 2 Long Jobs-8 Short JobsMaterials Lab: Witnessing of All Test Methods Chemical Processing: Minimum of 4 Job Audits Coatings: 2-11 Job Audits (Based on Scope)Welding: 2 Job Audits per MethodNonconventional Machining: 2-10 Job AuditsSurface Enhancement: 2-6 Job AuditsComposites: 15-30 Job Audits (Based on Manufacturing Flow)Electronics: Complete 1 Job Audit Conventional Machining: 2-14 Job Audits (Based on Scope)

Nadcap AUDIT CONTENT


Chemical Processing

GENERAL FOCUS AUDIT

Calibration:Calibration:

NDT

Does the supplier define the process employed for the calibration of

inspection, measuring and test equipment type, unique identification,

location, frequency of checks, check method, acceptance criteria and the

action to be taken when results are unsatisfactory?

Heat Treating


TECHNICAL (Nadcap) FOCUS AUDIT

Calibration:Calibration:Are the FPI dryer ovens

calibrated every three

months at multiple points

across the usable range?

Are furnaces used for

heat treating Aluminum parts

surveyed at the

required tolerance and

temperature range?

Is measuring and test

equipment used to control or

monitor the control of a

process (within parameters)

maintained in a calibration

system compliant with

ISO 10012-1?

(I.e. temperature gages,

conductivity meters,

voltmeters, rectifiers)

Chemical Processing

NDTHeat Treating



AUDIT

CHECKLIST

PROCESS EVALUTION/

IMPROVEMENT

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

AS REQUIRED

AUDIT

RESULTS

AUDIT

CONDUCTED

AUDITOR

QUALIFICATION &

SELECTION

INDUSTRY EXPERTS

MANAGE ALL KEY

STEPS


1. Major Nonconformance: The absence of, or systemic breakdown of, the Process

Control and/or Quality Management system. Any non-conformance where the effect impacts or has

the potential to impact the integrity of the product.

2. Minor Nonconformance: A non-systemic lapse in conformance to the Process

Control and/or Quality Management system.

NCR CLASSIFICATIONS


PRI Staff Review:• Staff Reviews Package for Completeness• Review Audit Report

– Clarification Changes (electronically) - Contact Auditors for Clarification

– Review Supplier Corrective Action– Close-Out or request additional information via Forums

• Audit Report Package is submitted via eAuditNet for Task Group Review

AUDIT REVIEW


Task Group Review:• Task Group decides Procedure for Review

– Sub-group review, entire Task Group Review• Task Group Reviews for Correctness

– Technical Comments, Supplier Responses, Technical Completeness, Auditor Summary Letter, Identify Additional Findings

• Completes Review of Each NCR and dispositions (NCR Status)

• Discuss Results with Task Group within Forums• Task Group Votes on Accreditation via On-Line Balloting

AUDIT REVIEW


Nadcap – INDUSTRY WORKING TOGETHER

Nadcap Staff SuppliersTask Groups

(Primes)

Establish Audit

Criteria

Define Auditor

Requirements

Interview &

Recommend Auditor

Contract Auditor

Plan/Schedule

Audits

Supplier Requests

Perform

Audit

Review &

Accept C/A

Review &

Accept C/A

Submit C/A

Package

Submit C/A

Package

Review C/A

Package

Review C/A

Package

FindingsFindings

Accredit Supplier Accredit Supplier


• Subscribers can use eAuditNet to:– Use ‘Subscriber QML’ to specifically search for your

company’s suppliers– Lookup audit details for a supplier including checklist

details, nonconformance (NCR) details, and Supplier and Task Group NCR responses

– Lookup the current audit status of a supplier – Download or print hard copy checklist(s) – View new or existing Supplier Advisories – View all Nadcap Procedures (NIPs, NOPs, NTGOPs)

• eAuditNet Company Administrator, you can use eAuditNet to:– Create new eAuditNet users for your company – Edit current eAuditNet users for your company – Accept or reject eAuditNet users that select your company

during registration – Set-up company Users to receive weekly e-mails regarding

your QML supplier audits that were submitted (Email Subscription Application)

• If you are a Task Group Member, you can use eAuditNet to:– View and discuss supplier audit NCRs – Ballot on supplier audit and merit recommendations

An eAuditNet Subscriber’s Audit Review Guide and eAuditNet Company

Administrator’s Guide can be downloaded from eAuditNet using Public Documents.

eAUDITNET FOR SUBSCRIBERS – www.eAuditNet.com

http://www.eauditnet.com/



AUDIT

CHECKLIST

PROCESS EVALUTION/

IMPROVEMENT

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

AS REQUIRED

AUDIT

RESULTS

AUDIT

CONDUCTED

AUDITOR

QUALIFICATION &

SELECTION

INDUSTRY EXPERTS

MANAGE ALL KEY

STEPS


TOP 10 PARAGRAPHS SINCE RELEASE OF COMP AC7118 REV A232 AUDITS


NDT TOP PARAGRAPH REFERENCES AC7114 (SAMPLE – 2010)


QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR SUPPLIERS (SSC 2013 SURVEY RESULTS)

2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 20130%

2000%

4000%

6000%

8000%

10000%

2500%

7700% 7600%8300% 8500% 8600%

Quality Increase

An increasing percentage of Nadcap accredited companies report quality improvement in the area(s)

related to their Nadcap accreditation(s).


22-26 June 2015

Montreal, PQ, Canada

On-line registration available at www.p-r-i.org

Reservation information will be posted on thePRI website (www.p-r-i.org) when available.

NEXT Nadcap MEETING

http://www.p-r-i.org/

http://www.pri-network.org/


QUESTIONS

QUESTION TIME

?

nadcap subscriber tutorial jon steffey program manager informatics solutions, research and...

Documents

nadcap subscriber tutorial

definitions nadcap

nadcap europe

nadcap asia

nadcap meetings

nadcap personal code

definitions pri

launch of eauditnet