n. scott urquhart, director space-time aquatic resources modeling and analysis program (starmap)
DESCRIPTION
AN ACADEMICIAN’S VIEW OF EPA’s ECOLOGY PROGRAM ESPECIALLY ITS ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (EMAP). N. Scott Urquhart, Director Space-Time Aquatic Resources Modeling and Analysis Program (STARMAP) Department of Statistics Colorado State University. TOPICS FOR TODAY. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 1
AN ACADEMICIAN’S VIEW OF EPA’sAN ACADEMICIAN’S VIEW OF EPA’sECOLOGY PROGRAMECOLOGY PROGRAM
ESPECIALLY ITSESPECIALLY ITSENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND
ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (EMAP)ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (EMAP)
N. Scott Urquhart, DirectorN. Scott Urquhart, DirectorSpace-Time Aquatic Resources Modeling Space-Time Aquatic Resources Modeling
and Analysis Program (STARMAP)and Analysis Program (STARMAP)Department of StatisticsDepartment of StatisticsColorado State UniversityColorado State University
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 2
TOPICS FOR TODAYTOPICS FOR TODAY
Some DisclaimersSome Disclaimers My Experience and PerspectivesMy Experience and Perspectives Ecology and the Clean Water ActEcology and the Clean Water Act Impact of EMAP and Related ActivitiesImpact of EMAP and Related Activities
(Including examples) Academics and EPA-Relevant Academics and EPA-Relevant
ResearchResearch Importance of Well-Focused Importance of Well-Focused
“Requests“Requestsfor Applications” (RFA)for Applications” (RFA)
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 3
SOME DISCLAIMERSSOME DISCLAIMERS
No One Can Speak for All Academics inNo One Can Speak for All Academics inan Area!an Area!
My Funding: A Cooperative AgreementMy Funding: A Cooperative Agreement This talk was developed under the STAR
Research Assistance Agreement CR-829095 awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to Colorado State University. This presentation has not been formally reviewed by EPA. The views expressed here are solely those of presenter and STARMAP, the Program he represents. EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this presentation.
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 4
MY EXPERIENCE and PERSPECTIVESMY EXPERIENCE and PERSPECTIVES
Trained as a Statistician, butTrained as a Statistician, but Have Worked with Ecologists for 45Have Worked with Ecologists for 45
Years Years Relevant Post-Doctoral Experience:Relevant Post-Doctoral Experience:
25 years in Agricultural experimentstations
Wildlife and range science Water quality Beneficial uses of sewage sludge Variety of ecology projects
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 5
MY EXPERIENCE and PERSPECTIVESMY EXPERIENCE and PERSPECTIVES(continued)(continued)
10 years of direct contact with EMAP10 years of direct contact with EMAP From a department of statistics Mainly with aquatic resources
Specifically related to lakes and streams Developed the methodology to
Evaluate the power of EMAP-type designs to detect trend.
Directed STARMAP for nearly 4 YearsDirected STARMAP for nearly 4 Years Developing analysis methodology for
EMAP-type data
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 6
ECOLOGY and the CLEAN WATER ACTECOLOGY and the CLEAN WATER ACT The Clean Water Act (CWA) The Clean Water Act (CWA)
Specifically Mentions Aquatic Life AsSpecifically Mentions Aquatic Life As “… the protection and propagation of a
balanced indigenous population of shellfish, fish and wildlife,
and to allow recreational activities …” Statements like this occur at least Statements like this occur at least
2828times in the CWA sections times in the CWA sections numbered 3xxnumbered 3xx
Ecology covers this class of interests!
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 7
IMPACT OF EMAP IMPACT OF EMAP and and
RELATED ACTIVITIESRELATED ACTIVITIES The Perspectives and Approaches The Perspectives and Approaches
of EMAP Have Had a Major Impact of EMAP Have Had a Major Impact in:in: EPA’s Offices of Water and Air State Water Quality Agencies
See poster!
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 8
See the PosterEMAP Monitoring Design & Design Team
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 9
IMPACT OF EMAP IMPACT OF EMAP and and
RELATED ACTIVITIESRELATED ACTIVITIES The Perspectives and Approaches of The Perspectives and Approaches of
EMAP Have Had a Major Impact in:EMAP Have Had a Major Impact in: EPA’s Offices of Water and Air State Water Quality Agencies – See poster! National Park Service Forest Service Sub-state authorities, such as the San
Francisco Estuary Institute Near Coastal cooperative efforts Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 10
GLEN CANYON DAM GLEN CANYON DAM IMPOUNDS LAKE POWELLIMPOUNDS LAKE POWELL
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 11
Have Had Major Impacts on the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon
OPERATIONS OF GLEN CANYON DAM
Water flow into the Grand CanyonWater flow into the Grand Canyon Temperature of water entering Grand CanyonTemperature of water entering Grand Canyon Sediment entering the Grand CanyonSediment entering the Grand Canyon In the past, the diurnal variation in flowIn the past, the diurnal variation in flow
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 12
APPLYING EMAP SITE SELECTION IN APPLYING EMAP SITE SELECTION IN THE GRAND CANYON - BACKGROUNDTHE GRAND CANYON - BACKGROUND
Effects of Glen Canyon Dam Effects of Glen Canyon Dam Led to an Adaptive Management Led to an Adaptive Management
Program to moderate these effectsProgram to moderate these effects
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 13
MAKING THE ADAPTIVE MAKING THE ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN WORKMANAGEMENT PLAN WORK
Management Panel is Supported byManagement Panel is Supported by Technical Work Group (TWG) Most needed info supplied by the Grand
Canyon Monitoring and Research Center A USGS organization
Past studies used “hand picked” sites Whole canyon riparian area inferences
needed Peer review panel suggested redesigning
near-river terrestrial studies Using EMAP site selection process NSU invited to assist, and to help lay out
transects
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 14
VIEW DOWN TRANSECT AT MILE 12.3VIEW DOWN TRANSECT AT MILE 12.3
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 15
CLIFF AT MILE CLIFF AT MILE 135.2135.2
(PARTIAL HEIGHT)(PARTIAL HEIGHT)
NO VEGETATION TRANSECT NEEDED HERE!NO VEGETATION TRANSECT NEEDED HERE!
EMAP SITE SELECTION PROTOCOL EMAP SITE SELECTION PROTOCOL ACCOMMODATES THIS, WHEREAS ACCOMMODATES THIS, WHEREAS TRADITIONAL METHODS DON’T.TRADITIONAL METHODS DON’T.
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 16
QUESTION ASKED AT TWG MEETINGQUESTION ASKED AT TWG MEETING Can “Whole Canyon” estimates of Can “Whole Canyon” estimates of
vegetation be obtained from these vegetation be obtained from these results and sampling plan?results and sampling plan?
RESPONSE: YES – with some RESPONSE: YES – with some qualifications:qualifications: For some, but not all, of the responses
evaluated. For the whole Canyon below the 60 kcfs level and by geologic reach More accurate estimates would require quite
a bit of GIS work
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 17
SO WHAT?SO WHAT?
A member of TWG had been A member of TWG had been responsible forresponsible for The environmental impact statement
(EIS) For a high flow release in 1996 He said that at that time the EIS
work group recognized that They needed such an estimate, but Available data would not support such
an estimate.
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 18
IMPACT OF EMAP IMPACT OF EMAP and and
RELATED ACTIVITIESRELATED ACTIVITIES(continued)(continued)
The Perspectives and Approaches of The Perspectives and Approaches of EMAP Have Had a Major Impact in:EMAP Have Had a Major Impact in: … Academic settings
Originally, ecologists vigorously opposed the EMAP approaches because they weren’t the way they were used to doing business.
More recently many ecologists have embraced the kinds of large-area data previously unavailable Example: Zooplankton ecologist
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 19
ACADEMICS ACADEMICS and and
EPA-RELEVANT RESEARCHEPA-RELEVANT RESEARCH EPA is a Mission-Oriented AgencyEPA is a Mission-Oriented Agency
It should support research which advances its missions
Aquatic resources and related landscape matters are a part of that mission (in my view)
There is a great distance between much academic research and EPA’s needs.
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 20
ACADEMICS ACADEMICS and and
PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONPERFORMANCE EVALUATION How Academics are Evaluated?How Academics are Evaluated?
Frequently by their performance in their respective disciplines. Because academics frequently have no
“clientele,” they can’t be evaluated relative to their contributions to their clientele.
Academic research (not applied) often is very important.
Secondary, but increasingly important, is outside $ brought into the institution.
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 21
IMPORTANCE OF WELL-FOCUSED IMPORTANCE OF WELL-FOCUSED “REQUESTS“REQUESTS FOR APPLICATIONS” FOR APPLICATIONS”
How can EPA change academics’How can EPA change academics’ priorities? priorities? By advertising for assistance using well-
focused RFAs Research requirements of an RFA need to reflect
EPA’s needs. Give academics a little room to “do their own thing,”
as a way to encourage them to actively participate Using cooperative agreements
Make sure PIs and directors understand what cooperation means!
Centers can have a valuable role
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 22
CONCLUDING THOUGHTCONCLUDING THOUGHT
The Activities at EPA Identified asThe Activities at EPA Identified as Ecology Have Made Contributions! Ecology Have Made Contributions!
Much Work Remains.Much Work Remains. Where Should EPA’s Research NeedsWhere Should EPA’s Research Needs
be Met? be Met? In the EPA Labs, and In academia, using focused RFAs. Cooperation between these two kinds of
organizations needs to be fostered.
EPA & Ecology 2005 # 23
END OF PLANNED END OF PLANNED PRESENTATIONPRESENTATION
Questions are Welcome.Questions are Welcome.