mycotoxins contamination in animal food and feed ... · pdf filemycotoxin contamination of...
TRANSCRIPT
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064
Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438
Volume 4 Issue 5, May 2015
www.ijsr.net Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
Mycotoxins Contamination in Animal Food and
Feed
Ashok K. Shukla
Assistant Prof. Dept. of Microbiology & Biotechnology, Holy Cross Women’s College, Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh, India
Abstract: Many fungi, both field and storage fungi produce metabolites that are poisonous, sometimes fatal, to men and animals.
Production of these mycotoxins depends on species or strain of the fungus and on the ecological conditions for its development, in
particular food source, moisture, temperature, mechanical damage, hot spots, time duration, O2 concentration, CO2 level, nature of
substrate mineral nutrition, chemical treatment, plant stress, invertebrate vectors, fungal inoculums, fungal strain differences and
interaction of different microorganisms. Grains those are spoiled and unfit for human consumption or having poor quality are generally
used for making animal food and feed. There are now over 400 recognized mycotoxins found in feed material and it has been reported
that as much 25% of the world’s cereal grains may be contaminated with mycotoxins. Mycotoxins are toxic, chemically diverse
secondary substances or metabolites produced by wide range of fungi including Aspergillus, Penicillium, Fusarium, Trichothecium,
Claviceps sps. etc. recognition of the symptoms of mycotoxins poisoning in an affected animal can be quite difficult to do confidently
because many of the symptoms of chronic but sub acute cases are the same as those resulting from a wide range of causes. Common
symptoms include: rough coat, poor body condition, low milk yield with poor quality milk components, foot lesions, poor reproductive
performance, an increase incidence of abortion and inconsistent much with mucus tags. In present investigation 8 different compositions
such as khali containing alsi; khali (mustard); chuni(arhar dal); chuni (urad dal), rice, wheat and gram bran mixture; hay and fine rice
chaffs were collected from various storage conditions and animal feed centre and were tested for mycotoxin contamination. Isolation of
associated fungi was made in Czapak Dox Agar, Malt Extract Agar and Potato Dextrose Agar media. More than 53 isolates belonging to
15 different genera were islolated and are : Aspergillus flavus, A. candidus, A. terreus, A. glacus, A. fischeri, A. nidulans, A. niger,
Absisia coryambifera, Alteranaria alternate, Cladosporium sp., Fusarium sp., Humicola sp., Mucor pusillus, Rhizopus sp. and
Trichohecium roseum. Mycotoxin contamination recorded on the basis of the fungi as listed by Jelinek et al (1989). At about 70%
samples were found with positive mycotoxin contamination.
Keywords: Mycotoxins, Animal food and feed, Aspergillus, Penicillium
1. Introduction
Animal feed is any agricultural foodstuff used specifically
to feed domesticated livestock such as cattle, goats, sheep,
horses, chickens and pigs. Cattle feed is a concentrate,
basically comprising cereals and usually by-products of
plants and animal sources and this concentrate is then
mixed with green fodder. Due to high feed cost, mixing of
stale bread, kitchen and bakery wastes in the feed are in
practice. These waste products are usually tainted with
fungus and may be a contributing factor in mycotoxin
production in cattle feed.
“Mycotoxins are those secondary metabolites of fungi
that have the capacity to impair animal health and
productivity (D'Mello and Macdonald, 1998)”. There
are over 100 species of fungi that can infect plants and
produce mycotoxins. Molds can infect dairy cattle,
especially during stressful periods when they are immune
suppressed, causing a disease referred to as a mycosis. The
diverse effects precipitated by these compounds are
conventionally considered under the generic term
"mycotoxicosis", and include distinct syndromes as well as
non-specific conditions. Mycotoxins can be formed on
crops in the field, during harvest, or during storage,
processing, or feeding. Molds are present throughout the
environment. Spore concentrations are high in the soil and
in plant debris, and lie ready to infect the growing plant in
the field.
Mycotoxin contamination of forages and cereals
frequently occurs in the field following infection of plants
with particular pathogenic fungi or with symbiotic
endophytes. Contamination may also occur during
processing and storage of harvested products and feed
whenever environmental conditions are appropriate for
spoilage fungi. Moisture content and ambient temperature
are key determinants of fungal colonization and mycotoxin
production. It is conventional to subdivide toxigenic fungi
into "field" (or plant-pathogenic) and "storage" (or
saprophytic/spoilage) organisms. Claviceps,
Neotyphodium, Fusarium and Alternaria are classical
representatives of field fungi while Aspergillus and
Penicillium exemplify storage organisms. Mycotoxigenic
species may be further distinguished on the basis of
geographical prevalence, reflecting specific environmental
requirements for growth and secondary metabolism. Thus,
Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus and A. ochraceus readily
proliferate under warm, humid conditions, while
Penicillium expansum and P. verrucosum are essentially
temperate fungi. Consequently, the Aspergillus
mycotoxins predominate in plant products emanating from
the tropics and other warm regions, while the Penicillium
mycotoxins occur widely in temperate foods, particularly
cereal grains. Fusarium fungi are more ubiquitous, but
even this genus contains toxigenic species that are almost
exclusively associated with cereals from warm countries.
Mycotoxins can be the primary agent causing acute health
or production problems in a dairy herd, but more likely,
mycotoxins are a factor contributing to chronic problems
Paper ID: SUB154163 712
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064
Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438
Volume 4 Issue 5, May 2015
www.ijsr.net Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
including a higher incidence of disease, poor reproductive
performance or suboptimal milk production.
2. Materials and Method
2.1 Sampling: Sample was collected using given
methods (Shukla,2015)
Collection of fodder samples: Various fodder samples
khali(alsi –Linum asitatissimum) , khali(mustard –
Brassica juncea & B.nigra), rice bran (Oryza sativa), wheat
bran(choker Triticum aestivum), chuni containing pulses
powder such as arahar dal (Cajanus cajan), chuni
containing urad dal (Vigna mungo), chuni containing
masoor dal (Lens culinaris) and fine rice chaffs (Oryza
sativa)] were collected from various storage conditions and
animal feed centers with the help of sterilized spatula in
sterilized transparent polythene bags. The bags containing
sample were sealed and brought to the laboratory for
further use.
Sample storage: Collected samples were stored at 4oC in
refrigerator, to provide low temperature, low moisture
content, low relative humidity storage conditions until they
were analysed.
2.2 Analysis: Analysis was done under following:
Isolation of fungi associated with different cattle feeds:
small amount of sample was inoculated on prepoured
plates of Malt Extract Agar medium plates and Czapek’s
Dox Agar medium plates. Antibiotics like penicillin and
streptomycin were added in medium @30 µg/l to prevent
bacterial growth.
Incubation: Inoculated plates were kept in incubator at 28o
C and 45o C for 72 to 96 hrs.
Identification of microorganisms: for identification of
microorganisms fungal smear was prepared and was
observed under research microscope and identification was
done with the help of available literature and monograph.
(Shukla, 1991; Shukla, 2014 d,e)
2.3 Analysis of Mycotoxin: Mycotoxin
contamination in various foods is a major threat to health
of exposed people. Therefore, mycotoxin analysis is an
important subject of many investigations. For the study,
following procedure was followed.
Fungi isolated from feed samples namely Aspergillus
flavus, A. paraciticus, A. fischerii, A. candidus , A.
terreus, A. glacus, A. fischeri, A. nidulans, A. niger, T.
roseum and Fusarium culmorum directly inoculated on
conical flask containing 150 ml Malt Extract broth
medium.
Incubation: Inoculated flasks were kept for incubation in
BOD incubator at temperature of 28o C for 7 days.7 days
later Fungal mat with thick mycelial growth was appeared
in the flask.
2.4 Procedure for calculation of dried weight of
fungal mycelium
Whatman filter paper number 42 was kept in hot air oven
at 105o C for 24hrs.After 24hrs, the weight of filter paper
was taken using an electronic balance.bFungal mat was
filtered from the medium using sterilized pre weighed
Whatman filter paper and funnel and filterate was
preserved for further use. Filtered mycelium was
compressed for removal of extra liquid. Thereafter, filter
paper containing mycelium was dried in hot air oven and
the dried mycelium mass was weighed using an electronic
balance (Shukla, 2014e).
Dry weight of mycelium= (weight of filter paper
containing mycelium – weight of filter paper)
2.5 Extraction of mycotoxin
The filtrate obtained previously was measured using
measuring cylinder and in equal proportion to it ethyl
acetate was taken. Both the filtrate and ethyl acetate was
taken in a separator funnel and was shaken well upto 30
minutes. Kept for standing for 1 hr and two separate layers
was observed. Using the separator funnel upper layer was
separated and preserved which conatained ethyl acetate
and mycotoxin and lower layer was discarded.
Crude mycotoxin preparation: In waterbath mycotoxin
containing solution was boiled at the boiling point of ethyl
acetate. The solution was reduced up to 1-2 ml. The
obtained solution is the crude mycotoxin. To analyzed the
presence of mycotoxin using thin layer chromatography to
separate the toxins present in the crude mixture previously
obtained.
Firstly, to the TLC plates silica gel mixture (silica gel &
water) was spread like a thin film of approx 5mm
thickness and was air dried. Thus the solid phase was
prepared. (Xie,2009 ; Stahl, 1953 and Shukla 1991)
Crude mycotoxins sample was loaded on the TLC plate
using a capillary tube.
Solvent system for toxin determination contained
chloroform and methanol (95:5 v/w) this solvent was put
into the TLC chamber and then sample loaded TLC plates
were kept into the chamber, so that the mobile phase can
run over solid phase separating out the toxins.
After 2 hrs the plates were taken out of the solvent system
and were air dried.
The air dried plates were observed under the UV chamber
for the presence of toxins. If toxin was present in the
sample then the bands of toxin was observed under the uv
chamber.
3. Results and Discussion
Cattle feed are a complete nutrient diet for cattles having
all the source of nutrients such as protein, carbohydrate
and fats. On the analysis of animal feed sample in culture
Paper ID: SUB154163 713
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064
Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438
Volume 4 Issue 5, May 2015
www.ijsr.net Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
medium a wide variety of fungi were detected. In our
investigation we have taken 8 samples namely [khali(alsi),
khali(mustard), rice bran, wheat bran(chokar), chuni
containing arahar dal, chuni containing urad dal, chuni
containing masoor dal and fine rice chaffs] were tested for
fungal contamination.
Table 1: Occurrence of fungi in various samples of animal food (Shukla, 2015; Shukla, 2014c)
Name of
Microorganisms
Khali
(alsi)
Khali
(musterd)
Chuni (arahar
dal)
Chuni
(urad
dal)
Rice
Bran
Wheat
Bran
Chuni
(masoor
dal)
Fine
rice
chaff
Aspergillus flavus + - + + - + + +
A. candidus - - - - + + + -
A. paraciticus - + + - - + + +
A. fiscerii + - - - - + - -
A. fumigates + + + - + - + +
A. glacus - - - - - + + -
A. nidulans - + + - + + + -
A. terreus - - - + + + + -
F. culmorum - - + - - + + +
R rhizopodiformis + + + + + + - -
R. oryzae + - - - + + + +
Mucor pusillus - + - - - + + -
Alternaria alternate + + - - + + + -
Cladosprium + + + + + - - +
T. roseum - - - - + + + -
H. terricola - - + + + + - +
We found that the common fungi which occurred in the
feed samples were Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus
paraciticus, Aspergillus candidus, Aspergillus fischeri, A.
nidulans, A. glocus, A.terreus, Hmicola sp., Trichothecium
roseum Fusarium culmorum and Rhizopus species. Rice
bran and wheat bran had high fungal contamination
whereas Khali (alsi), Khali mustered & Fine Rice chaff
had only five fungi are appeared and showed lowest fungal
diversity (Table 1).
It is generally found that animal feeds are highly
contaminated with mycotoxins due to poor handling and
poor storage conditions. Identified species of fungi
(Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus paraciticus, Aspergillus
candidus, Aspergillus fischeri, Aspergillus glocus,
Aspergillus ocheracius, Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus
terreus Trichothecium roseum, and Fusarium culmorum)
were further inoculated for mycotoxin production in Malt
extract broth. After 7 days of incubation the dry weight of
fungal mycelium was noted (Table 2).
Table 2: Mycotoxin production by fungi isolated from animal food
S. No Name of
microorgsnism
Wet weight of the mycelium
(gm)
A
Total water content
(gm)
B
Dry mycelium weight
(gm)
(A-B =C)
Mycotoxin
production*
1 A. flavus 1.32 0.960 0.360 +++
2 A. paraciticus 1.21 0.962 0.248 ++
3 A. candidus 1.20 0.964 0.236 +++
4 A. fischeri 1.28 0.961 0.319 -
5 A. glocus 1.23 0.963 0.267 ++
6 A. ocheracius 1.17 0.964 0.206 ++
7 A. nidulans 1.44 0.967 0.473 ++
8 A. terreous 1.28 0.966 0.314 ++
9 F. culmorum 1.14 0.963 0.177 -
10 T. roseum 1.26 0.965 0.295 +
Paper ID: SUB154163 714
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064
Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438
Volume 4 Issue 5, May 2015
www.ijsr.net Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
*indicates the visual intensity of spots on TLC plates such
as +++strong,++moderate, +poor production of mycotoxin
and -indicates no mycotoxins production.
Detection of mycotoxin presence was done with the help
of TLC. Mycotoxin producers gave fluorescent bands
when observed under UV lamp of Wavelength 365nm.
Figure 1: A. flavus & A. paraciticus showing bands of toxin when viewed under UV light
On the basis of visual intensity of bands, the level of
mycotoxin was detected. It was found that A. candidus and
Aspergillus flavus produced the highest level of mycotoxin
and Trichothecium roseum produced the lowest whereas
Fusarium culmorum and Aspergillus fischeri shows no
production. Also it was found that about 70% of the feed
samples were found with positive mycotoxin
contamination. Hence, the amount of contamination level
is high which will cause the adverse effects to animals.
4. Conclusions
Animal feeds are routinely subject to contamination from
diverse sources, including environmental pollution and
activities of insects and microbes. Animal feeds may also
contain endogenous toxins arising principally from
specific primary and secondary substances produced by
fodder plants. Thus, feed toxins include compounds of
both plant and microbial origin. The FAO has estimated
that worldwide about 25% of crops are affected annually
with mycotoxins. Such surveys reveal sufficiently high
occurrences and concentrations of mycotoxins to suggest
that mycotoxins are a constant concern. Every year a
significant percentage of the world's grain and oilseed
crops is contaminated with hazardous mycotoxins such as
aflatoxins. Detection, removal and diversion are
reasonable means for preventing the entry of mycotoxins
into the food chains. The best way of controlling
mycotoxin contamination is by prevention and can be
accomplished by reducing fungal infection in growing
crops through the adoption of suitable cultural practices,
by rapid drying or by the use of suitable preservatives
(Sinha, 1993) If contamination cannot be prevented, a way
to either remove or destroy the toxin will allow
consumption of the commodities with reduced adverse
effect. Mycotoxins can be eliminated or detoxified by
physical, chemical or biological techniques. Many
chemicals including numerous acids, alkalis, aldehydes,
oxidizing agents and several gases have been tested for
their ability to degrade or inactivate aflatoxin and many
other mycotoxins. There is need to adopt effective
strategies for mycotoxin decontamination and mycotoxin
detoxification. The formulation and implementation of
mycotoxins regulatory limits, regular analysis of animal
feed and feed ingredients and employment of proper
mycotoxin decontamination and deactivation strategy will
help to reduce the economic losses to a great extent
(Shukla,2015).
References
[1] Allcroft, R. and R.B.A., Carnaghan. (1962).
Groundnut toxicity: Aspergillus flavus toxin
(aflatoxin) in animal products. Vet. Rec. 74:863-864
[2] CAST. Mycotoxins -Risks in plants, animal, and
human systems. 2003. Ames, Iowa, USA
[3] Dhand, N.K., Joshi, D.V. & Jand, S.K. (1998). Fungal
contaminants of dairy feed and their toxigenicity.
Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 68: 1095-1096
[4] D'Mello, J.P.F. (2000). Antinutritional factors and
mycotoxins. In J.P.F. D'Mello, ed. Farm animal
metabolism and nutrition. Wallingford, UK, CAB
International. p. 383-403.
[5] D'Mello, J.P.F. (2001). Mycotoxins in plant products.
In J.P.F. D'Mello, ed. Food safety. Wallingford, UK,
CABI Publishing. (in press)
[6] Hamilton, P.B. (1984). Determining safe levels of
mycotoxins. J. Food Prot. 47:570-575
[7] Shukla, A. K.(1991). Spoilage of wheat and Sorghun
grain produced by thermophilus fungi during storage
Ph.D thesis, Dr. H S Gour Kondriya Vishvidyalaya
Sagar. PP 216-223.
[8] Shukla, A. K., Jain, P. (2009). Aflatoxin
contamination on wheat. Research zone. PP 11-13.
[9] Shukla, A.K. (1991). Spoilage of cereal grains by
thermophilous fungi. Vistas in seed biology, Vol.-1
pp352-365.
[10] Shukla, A.K. and Jain P.C.(1991). Thermophilous
mould flora: A major deteriogenic factor for wheat
grain. Proc. Nat. Sem. On advances in seed science
and tech. Pp 58-59
[11] Shukla, A.K. (2015) Deterioration of quality and
quantity of wheat grains during storage. IJSR, ISSN:
2319-7064, Volume-4, Issue-1, pp1758-1767. (Impact
factor- 4.438)
[12] Shukla, A.K. (2014a) Biodiversity in Aspergillus
nidulans group on the basis of lipases profile. IJSR,
Paper ID: SUB154163 715
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064
Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438
Volume 4 Issue 5, May 2015
www.ijsr.net Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
ISSN: 2319-7064, Volume-3, Issue-6, pp1391-1394.
(Impact factor- 3.358)Paper ID-02014487
[13] Shukla, A.K. (2014b) Degradation of timber wood by
filamentous fungi. IJSR, ISSN: 2319-7064, Volume-
3, Issue-7, pp1091-1094. (Impact factor- 3.358)Paper
ID-020141184
[14] Shukla, A.K.(2014c) Extracellular production of
thermostable endoglucanase by thermophilous fungi.
IJSR, ISSN: 2319-7064, Volume-3, Issue-8, pp 110-
113. (Impact factor- 3.358)Paper ID-020151165
[15] Shukla, A.K. (2014d) Occurrence of keratinophilic
fungi from the soils of Chhattisgarh. IJSR, ISSN:
2319-7064, Volume-3, Issue-9, pp 2041-2044.
(Impact factor- 3.358)Paper ID- SEP14574
[16] Shukla, A.K. (2014e) Occurrence of mycotoxins in
storage fungi. IJSR, ISSN: 2319-7064, Volume-3,
Issue-11, pp 1747-1750. (Impact factor- 3.358)Paper
ID-OCT 14188
[17] Shukla, A.K. & Singh, Annu (2014) Diversity of
forest of Surguja District Chhattisgarh, India. IJSR,
ISSN: 2319-7064, Volume-3, Issue-6, pp1153-1157.
(Impact factor- 3.358)Paper ID-SUB 14653
[18] Stahl, E. (1965) Thin layer chromatography-a
laboratory hand book. Academi press, New York.
[19] Sinha, R.N. (1973) Ecology of storage. Annals de
tecnologie agricole. 22:351-361.
[20] Lacey, J. (1975) Moulding of grain in relation to
mycotoxins formation. International journal of
environmental studies. 8:183-186
Paper ID: SUB154163 716