my predictions for dell in 2014, compiled in may 2013
DESCRIPTION
Before the enterprise behemoth Dell went private in 2013 I used publicly available information on it while still available to make predictions on how it might respond to challenges in the enterprise storage, cloud, and networking market. Information in the slides such as revenue figures, organization structure etc. are already over seven months old. But considering Dell is now a private company, stale information is better than none at all.TRANSCRIPT
Agenda
2
Case & Issue Introduction • Introduction • Dell’s Enterprise Solutions and Services (ESS) • ESS revenue going up but storage revenue down • Competitive pressure on storage
Dell’s response • Storage acquisitions & storage product consolidation • Reorganization • Going private
Future trends • Shareholder/Investor pressure • Revenue pressure on ESS division • Cost reductions • Acquisitions • Reduced R&D • More reorganization
Dell Enterprise Solutions & Services
•High performance rack
•Blade
•Tower servers Servers & Networking
•Compellant
•EqualLogic
•PowerVault
•DX Object Storage Storage
•Transactional
•Outsourcing
•Project based BPO, IT infra, Consulting, Applications
•Support & Deployment of storage, servers, networking
•Infra, Cloud, & Security services
•Applications & BPO
Services
3
Dell performance (All figures in $ ‘000)
4
48,000
50,000
52,000
54,000
56,000
58,000
60,000
62,000
64,000
Jan/10 Jan/11 Jan/12 Jan/13
1,000
3,000
5,000
7,000
9,000
11,000
13,000
15,000
Gross margin Operatingincome
Income beforeincome taxes
Net income
Feb-10
Feb-11
Feb-12
Feb-13
Net Revenue
Business performance – ESS
5
0
2,500
5,000
7,500
10,000
12,500
15,000
17,500
20,000
Servers andnetworking
Storage Services Total revenue Net revenue Operating income
Feb-10
Feb-11
Feb-12
Feb-13
Three changes in Senior Management
6
Leadership team 2012 2013
Chairman and CEO Michael S. Dell
President, Enterprise Solutions Bradley R. Anderson Marius Haas
Vice Chairman and President, EUC Jeffrey W. Clarke
President, Chief Commercial Officer Stephen J. Felice
SVP & CFO Brian T. Gladden
SVP, Strategy and Buss. Dev. David L. Johnson
SVP, HR Steven H. Price
SVP, CMO Karen H. Quintos
President, Services Stephen F. Schuckenbrock Suresh Vaswani
President, Software John A. Swainson
Senior Vice President Lawrence P. Tu
Big changes in ESS leadership
7
President Services, Suresh Vaswani
President Software, John
Swainson
CTO Software, Don Ferguson
President Enterprise
Solutions, Marius Haas
Head of Storage Group, Darren
Thomas
VP, Compellant, Alan Atkinson
VP EqualLogic & NAS Solutions, Pete
Korce VP PowerVault, ?
CTO, Enterprise Solutions, Jai
Menon
VP and GM, ESS, Dario Zamorian
Networking, Tom Bourne
VP, Servers, Forrest Norrod
Retention Addition Removal
Dell’s server side strategy
• Integrate acquired storage, network, & server products – Force10 Networks – EqualLogic – Compellent – AppAssure – Wyse – Quest Software
• Stabilize & increase adoption – Fluid File System (FFS) in blade and rack servers – FFS applications like faster databases, web servers etc. – EqualLogic storage controller blade in ActiveSystems 800
• Push against products like – Exadata, Oracle – UCS, Cisco – CloudSystem, AppSystem, HP – PureFlex, IBM
• Key decision makers in Engineering – Don Ferguson – Jai Menon – Divisional VPs (Refer slide 8)
8
Dell storage strategy – Push unified storage
9
- Improve limits of Dell Fluid File System (FFS) scale-out NAS - Probably still a 32 bit system
- Addresses 1PB currently
- Max 8 node cluster
- Only 8 cores per controller
- RW Snapshots
- Improve FFS adoption on - PowerVault
- EqualLogic
- Compellent
- Big Data
- NAS, File I/O – Images, Audio, Video
- App servers – Windows Storage Server
- Increase DR/Backup adoption
- Discontinue DX Object Storage Platform - Currently OEM Caringo’s CAStor on PowerEdge servers
- Replace with Caringo s/w only solution for x86 platforms
Dell Enterprise & Mid-range Storage (Compellent & EqualLogic)
10
Enterprise – Compellent Mid Range – EqualLogic & DR series
Array Controller Only
Unified Storage Controller
Features Array Controller Only - Virtualization focused
Unified Storage Controller
Features DR backup/recovery
SC8000 FS8600 Volume virtualization
PS-M4110 Blade Array
FS7600/FS7610/FS7500
Asynchronous, file system-level, snapshot-based replication to peer systems
DR4100
SC220 - Disk enclosure
Thin provisioning PS6500/PS6510 iSCSI SAN
Replication DR4000
SC200 - Disk enclosure
Metro Clusters PS6100 iSCSI SAN NDMP Back-Up
Snapshots PS6110 iSCSI SAN Mirrored, battery-backed write cache
No encryption, deduplication
PS4110 iSCSI SAN RAID 5, 6, 10, 50C
Load balanced IO
Dell SME Storage (PowerVault)
MD Series Backup ML/TL Series NAS Unified Storage Controller
MD1200/1220/3060e - Disk Enclosure DL 4000 AppAssure Backup NX3300 NX3600/3610
MD3200 Single, and MD3220 Single - SAS Controllers
DL 4000 CommVault Backup NX3200 NX3500
MD3200i Single, MD3220i Single/Dual, and MD3260i Dual - iSCSI SAS Controllers
LTO-6 Tape Backup
MD3600f Fibre Channel SAN 114X Tape Backup
ML6030 Tape Library
ML6020 Tape Library
ML6010
TL4000
TL2000
124T
11
Dell Expenses
12
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
Selling, general, and administrative Research, development, and engineering Total operating expenses
Feb-10
Feb-11
Feb-12
Feb-13
Revenues & Expenses in Enterprise Solutions
13
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
Servers & N/W
Storage
Services
R&D Expenses
Climbing
Why this matters?
14
• Leveraged Buy Out (LBO) – Take company private on large loan
– Cut costs
– Keep cash flows constant or increase them
– Pay off debt with cash flows and reserve cash
– Exit after five years
– Typical investment return 30%
• Reorganize expenses usually in business units with – Growing or significant R&D
– Declining revenue/income contribution
– For e.g. Dell Enterprise Solutions Business
– Therefore Dell’s Storage Division
• Revert R&D expenditure to historical 1% -1.5% of revenue – Year ended 2012 R&D expense = $1,072 million
– Desired R&D expense in at 1% of 2013 revenue = $600 million (Nowhere close right now)
– 1st Quarter 2013 R&D expense alone = $313 million
– Projected expense for 2013 based on run rate = $1,252 million
– Required reduction in R&D in 2014 to bring it to 1% of revenue = $650 million
– Approximately 50% across the board
Where to expect Dell to reorganize expenses? • Identify divisions with large engineering expense, low profitability
– Compellent & EqualLogic for Large Enterprise & SME
• Identify features to invest in
– iSCSI for Compellent
– Virtualization support for Compellent
– SSD based arrays for both
– Increase Limits of Fluid File System
- 32 bit to 64 bit
- Add more than 1PB capability
- Add more than 8 nodes to cluster, more than 8 cores per controller
- Rewritable Snapshots
- Encryption
- Deduplication
• Cut redundancy in Compellent & EqualLogic
• Reduce Legacy Support Costs
15
Expect Dell to – Identify redundancies
16
Features Compellent EqualLogic
Unified Storage Y Y
Snapshots Y Y
Thin Provisioning Y Y
Virtualization N Y
Unified Controller access protocols NAS, NDMP NAS, iSCSI, NDMP
Array Only Controller access protocols FC, iSCSI iSCSI,
Number of nodes in cluster 8 2
Max Unified capacity 1PB 500TB
MAX CIFS connections 6000 3000
Storage arrays SC8000 PS-Series
Expect Dell to – Merge features, remove prod. line
17
Features Compellent EqualLogic
Unified Storage Y Y
Snapshots Y Y
Thin Provisioning Y Y
Virtualization N (Y) Y
Unified Controller access protocols NAS, NDMP NAS, NDMP
Array Only Controller access protocols FC, iSCSI iSCSI,
Number of nodes in cluster 8, 2 2
Max Unified capacity 1PB, 500TB 500TB
MAX CIFS connections 6000, 3000 3000
Storage arrays SC8000, PS-Series PS-Series
Scalable Y
Rem
ove
Compellent has almost all EqualLogic features
Thank you
18