multi-disciplinary team - san diego...1 planning commission workshop april 16 2009april 16, 2009...

36
1 Planning Commission Workshop April 16 2009 April 16, 2009 Multi-Disciplinary Team Lara Gates Barrio Logan Plan Update Project Manager City Staff Planning Consultant – MIG Estrada Land Planning Estrada Land Planning Economics Consultant Economics Research Associates Environmental Consultant – Recon ----------------------- PI annin g Commission Workshop -----------------------

Upload: others

Post on 13-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1

    Planning Commission Workshop

    April 16 2009April 16, 2009

    Multi-Disciplinary Team

    • Lara Gates– Barrio Logan Plan Update Project Manager

    • City Staff• Planning Consultant

    – MIG– Estrada Land Planning– Estrada Land Planning

    • Economics Consultant– Economics Research Associates

    • Environmental Consultant– Recon

    -----------------------PI an n in g Commission Workshop

    -----------------------

  • 2

    Workshop Objectives

    • Background and History• Public Input Process• Existing Conditions and Key Issues• Reports and Studies• Preliminary Draft Land Use Alternatives• Key Policy Considerations

    Background & History

  • 3

    General Plan Policies

    • Village Potential is HighP i I d t i l• Prime Industrial

    • Co-location Issues• Noise• Housing

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

    Adopted Community Plan Land Use Map

  • 8

    Barrio Logan Community Plan

    • Last Updated in 1978• City’s Oldest Community Plan • General Plan Conformance• Incompatible Uses Allowed to Co-locate

    – Industrial/Residential/Commercial

    Past Planning Efforts

    • 1996 Revitalization Action Program

    • 2004 Land Use Study

    • 2005 EHC Vision Study

  • 9

    Current Planning Efforts

    • Caltrans/Port Truck Route Project

    • Bayshore Bikeway

    Current Planning Efforts

    Mercado ApartmentsMercado Apartments

  • 10

    Community and Public Input Process

  • 11

    Barrio Logan Stakeholder Committee• 33-member Committee

    – 25 voting members

    Community Input Process

    25 voting members– 8 ex-officio non-voting members

    • Formed to Represent Entire Community• Convene and Engage Community – April 2008• Open and Public Meetings

    Barrio Logan Stakeholder Committee

    • Monthly Meetings commenced in April 2008

    July 2008 Workshop• July 2008 Workshop• Community Preference Survey• Over 125 Attendees• Open House Style

    Forum

  • 12

    iEft,Ecr TuE ':,112Uli/ilE.:

    '&L I~ I-le~ 't.k Of" •T"~

    I

    • ,, I ~ ,- .. ·}!

  • 13

    Community Survey Results

    • What makes Barrio a special place?p p

    – Culturally rich– Family-oriented– Historic

    G t l ti– Great location

    “It is a racially diverse community full of history and good people that work hard.”

    Community Survey Results

    • Describe some of the issues that impact lit f lif i B i Lyour quality of life in Barrio Logan

    – Incompatible uses and impacts

    – Homelessness– Poor City services,

    trash and litter– Crime and violence

    “The biggest problem is the street people. They make our community dangerous and dirty, especially for the children and elderly people.“

  • 14

    Values

    • Active: Artists spaces, bike path safetyp , p y• Diverse: Latino middle class, Latino culture• Education: All-age opportunities,

    high school, arts• Family-Oriented: Strong, large families• Hard Working: Local businesses, local jobs• Healthy: Eliminate pollution, health services• Safety: Crime, lighting, cleanliness/appearance

    Barrio Logan Stakeholder Committee• January 2009 Multi-Day Charrette

    (110 Attendees)

    c..~ ~ --:.r;;.~ ~'? -$1~ 7'CJI;';. ~y·(~~ ~

    > ~ £,

    t!ltfl-ltJ~ ;;.,."';li9 ~ t:,N-Y~I....,_ _ ___,,::-•' -.c. ,..i.~ .. _, ~ .. P,;;t;n~'" t

  • 15

    Barrio Logan Stakeholder Committee– Visual & Land Use Preference Survey

    - Ten Land Use Scenarios

  • 16

    1. Diverse Housing Opportunities for Barrio Residents /Diversas oportunidades de vivienda para residentes del Barrio

    2. Strong Neighborhood Economy /

    1. Diverse Housing Opportunities for Barrio Residents /Diversas oportunidades de vivienda para residentes del Barrio

    2. Strong Neighborhood Economy /

    - Adopted Framework Planning Principles

    2. Strong Neighborhood Economy /Economía sólida del vecindario

    3. Compatible Mix of Land Uses / Usos de Suelo Mixto compatibles

    4. Healthy Environment (or Protect Community Health) / Ambiente saludable (o Protección de salud comunitaria)

    5 S f Effi i t St t f P l /

    2. Strong Neighborhood Economy /Economía sólida del vecindario

    3. Compatible Mix of Land Uses / Usos de Suelo Mixto compatibles

    4. Healthy Environment (or Protect Community Health) / Ambiente saludable (o Protección de salud comunitaria)

    5 S f Effi i t St t f P l /5. Safe, Efficient Streets for People /Calles seguras, eficientes para la gente

    6. Respect Historic and Cultural Resources /Respetar recursos históricos y culturales

    7. Community Connections / Relaciones con la comunidad

    5. Safe, Efficient Streets for People /Calles seguras, eficientes para la gente

    6. Respect Historic and Cultural Resources /Respetar recursos históricos y culturales

    7. Community Connections / Relaciones con la comunidad

    Community Input ProcessOther Community Recommendations

    • Barrio Station Preliminary Recommendations

    • Barrio Logan Smart Growth Coalition Recommendations

    EHC Vi i Pl d P titi• EHC Vision Plan and Petition

  • 17

    Existing Conditions/Key Issues

    Incompatible Uses• Area-wide mixture of existing industrial,

    commercial and residential usesF N i d Ai Q lit• Freeway Noise and Air Quality

    • Potential Port-related impacts– Trucks– Terminal Operations

  • 18

    Housing Needs• Lack of Adequate Housing• Affordable Housing• Balanced Communities

    Parks and Open Space• Current 3.73 acres per resident• Consideration of additional park opportunities

    – Boston Avenue R.O.W– Site adjacent to Perkins

    Elementary• Chollas Creek Improvements

  • 19

    Connectivity • Utilization of Complete Streets Concept• Inclusion of Green Streets• Proposed Extension of MLK Promenade• Proposed Extension of MLK Promenade• Consideration of long-range freeway cap from 27th

    Street to 32nd Street

    Economic Prosperity• Provide Jobs for Barrio Residents• Enhance & Expand Maritime-Related Businesses

    C t N B i O t iti f E i ti• Create New Business Opportunities for Existing Residents through New Development

  • 20

    Key Considerations

    Transition Zone Area• Unified Port District Transition Zone Policy

    – Safeguard Environmental HealthProtect & Enhance Businesses– Protect & Enhance Businesses

    – Reduce incompatible land uses and impacts through a mandated separation of uses

  • 21

    International Business & Trade Designation• New General Plan Designation • Potential Transition Zone Designation• Business Park and Light Industrial Permitted• Allows for greater flexibility to generate new

    office and light industrial development

    Co-location• Preparing Study to evaluate proximity of

    incompatible uses• Separation of sensitive receptors from

    industrial uses• Method to create separation• Amortization Schedule

  • 22

    Noise• Sensitive-receptor proximity to noise

    generating areas- Freeways and Harbor Drive• Develop mitigation-measures to reduce

    impacts

    Residential Development

    • Community Desire for Additional Very Low-Income Housing DevelopmentIncome Housing Development

  • 23

    Chollas Creek Improvements• Potential Connection to Eastern Communities• Future Interpretive Area• Community Concerns with Illegal Activities• Noise and Air Quality

    Reports and Studies

  • 24

    Existing Conditions Studies

    • Planning Context• Transportation/Mobility• Historic Survey and Statement• Economic Market Analysis• Park and Recreation Strategy• Noise• Hazardous Materials

    Preliminary/Draft Land Use Scenarios

  • 25

    Common Elements Map

    Draft Alternative A

    I~ ;_~.:J :=".5'~...:=. ::~ - ~,_,!-• - 1,0..,U,o --~1.-....c - _._ :.ii~ - :!°"'~_...i.._ - G;::.._~- !"""!'."'=;;!!""~--::!,~~ -~ -~•- -:._~:- -'!J: -::::::• IIHH~-

    .,0.,. , ............. - OUH -- ~~~--'"' - t-=.- - ~- - =-Comncti.~acu;M"flCDfNIIW:S Oll'Ml -..- ,_. - !.:' = ~-=

  • 26

    Draft Alternative B

    Draft Alternative C

  • 27

    Next Steps – 6 Months

    • Preferred Land Use Scenario• Environmental Analysis• Zoning Program• Development of Plan Policies &Development of Plan Policies &

    Recommendations• Facilities Financing Plan

    Comments and feedback

  • 28

    Planning Commission Workshop

    April 16 2009April 16, 2009

    Questions for Discussion

    -----------------------PI an n in g Commission Workshop

    -----------------------

  • 29

    • To what extent shall the community plan preclude residential development from occurring adjacent to Interstate 5?

    • Should a land use scenario consider heavy commercial and/or light industrial designationscommercial and/or light industrial designations south of 26th Street?

    • Should the City use the Air Resources Board recommended 350 foot buffer?

    • Are the proposed uses included in the IBT comparison matrix appropriate for the transition area?

    • Should an amortization schedule be considered?

    • Should residential, parks, open space and institutional uses be considered in areas above 70 db?

    • Should Chollas Creek be considered as a future site for an interpretive area including artwork, trails and a potential park area?

    • Should the plan consider a tunnel under Interstate 5?

  • 30

    • Should the City create policies to set aside a certain percentage of very low income housing units?

    • Should the City consider incentive based development programs such as density bonuses

    d t f f d l t i ht ?and transfer of development rights? • Does the community’s expressed goal to provide

    for affordable-only projects in Barrio Logan implement the City’s Balanced Communities policies?

    • Should the plan’s policies promote the rehabilitation f i ti id ti l t t ?of existing residential structures?

    • Should the area south of the Coronado bridge include a provision that precludes land accumulation from occurring?

    Additional Slides for Questions

  • 31

  • 32

    SA DIEGO GENERAL PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES

    3 9 10

    ~,,Sp~ "'-"•• cn,.,r-"",.,-a Employ l"nl 1M•9rsutod ""'9h-ci,.,.1Jry, J.l..!Stc•,c Dinnen. A.t.!,,!Vllrl C:1-.iin..11M Al"f,9"' l'lleHW0'-1: Rf'-"'!1drvrn,1/ WMl.iibr~ Cf'ntf'n R~.il 1Wo,dabl.,11rid .nnd5'rrs Con:rntJ1•it"""' SU$.l .... n,ib,Lit ,\,-,;thrrn;:

    C.p,tlf'1u,.,;t,c,,; Mur•d·IJ

  • 33

    ., j .... Ao .............. .. -

    BARRIO LOOMI COMl,IUNITY PLAN LAND USE Al. TERNATIVES Eistlmatetl Laml Use Acroar," Calcu1,ulot1s ... U1Jdated: AJJri/ ·r .5 2009 (base cf orr /and use an alvsis from Marcil 2009>

    Alternative A Blocks Acres

    ResidentiaJ,(4-5 :sl□ riesl 0

    Resldentli:11 fJ sto11esl 14

    Residential i1-2 sJ:oriesi 2 Mixed-Use • Residential (4-5 storiesi 6 MiXed-U5e • Resldefllli:tl r3 storlesl 2

    Total RHkle-tltlal 23

    COll'WTllercial 3

    Mi>

  • 34

    I

    '

    A :-..i~ ',

    11 •. ,~,.. ... ~ ....

    ,.. '"e:

  • 35

    ,:=;:::::._ □----

    -----~~--"'L,.,,_, ----....... _,i;,,_ DUDEK

    i:::;'::.":' __ c::., ........ ., .... ,_,,___ .. _, .. -~----•-c;-n1t1;1....,..,. •=.:."":"" .... -·--

    DUDEK

    I - • ..,,. -

    ' .

  • 36

    ,_ __ -~-==,c';.,.n-.c,.......,. --.. ---... -•--

    DUDEK

    --~"-...........

    .................... ___ ,, .. -· .. ~ "-.•'"

    1 .......... L...--~, .. ...,... 'i-✓kMli~ f .. ... w ..... -

    t~ i-f== ·-tl~'-:'lo& I 1n;1a....,_1_""' C: lw«IIIIW.-.......,_,.