mse spectral analysis on the madison symmetric torus betsy den hartog jinseok ko kyle caspary daniel...
TRANSCRIPT
MSE Spectral Analysis on the Madison Symmetric
TorusBetsy Den Hartog
Jinseok Ko
Kyle Caspary
Daniel Den Hartog
Darren Craig
MST RFP is a toroidally axisymmetric current carrying plasma with B ~ B, 0.2 ≤ |B| ≤ 0.5 T
Self-generated currents drive plasma to a relaxed state in which toroidal field is reversed at edge
Motional Stark Effect Overview• H beam atoms experience an
electric field: E = vbeam x B
• H emission stark splitting
• Linear at high fields
• Obtain B┴ from line splitting
• components linearly polarized along E
• components circularly polarized
n=3
n=2
= o2(3/2)(eao/hc)|E|
MSE implementation on MST
Diagnostic Neutral BeamE = 46 keVI = 5.5 ADivergence = 18 mradDuration = 20 ms
On-Axis Views•7 views• all looking at magnetic center• shuttered to look at different time points
Mid-Radius views• 4 views• 2 orthogonal polarizations• 2 time points
On-Axis Analysis• Low Fields of MST Present Challenge - E~ 1 MV/m • Stark components not resolved• use polarizer to block most of and pass radiation• Data is fit to the sum of 9 gaussians based on linear
Stark model – relative I’s taken from Mandl
Note +/- asymmetry. This is typical of MST MSE data.
Analysis considerations
• Linear Stark model not adequate at low
fields
• Need a model which includes Zeeman and
spin-orbit terms (ADAS 605)
• Cannot account for +/- asymmetry, non-
equilibrium populations?
On-axis spectral fitting
400 kA
plasma
200 kA
plasma
Old fit New fitB = 0.41 T B = 0.39 T
B = 0.27 T B = 0.26 T
Mid-radius view – a challenge!
• Two orthogonal polarizers
• Now getting usable data showing
broadening on one polarizer view
• Geometry constraints limit ‘contrast’
between 2 views
Mid-radius view
• and radiation patterns mapped onto the plane of the polarizer
• mid-radius patterns depend on pitch angle
• ellipse lies oriented in same direction as linear – limiting ‘contrast’
pi
Mid-radius view – first cut
pi
fit|B| and pitch angle now both free parameters in fit
|B| = 0.42 ± 0.07 T = 40.3° ± 9.4°
Summary
• Incremental improvement in on-axis analysis
utilizing ADAS 605
• Still have not explained +/- asymmetry - ADAS
development underway may yield insight
• Mid-radius view promising to yield |B| and