monitoring year 1 martin dairy mitigation site ... services/document...monitoring year 1 annual...
TRANSCRIPT
MONITORING YEAR 1
ANNUAL REPORT
Final
MARTIN DAIRY MITIGATION SITE
Orange County, NC
NCDEQ Contract No. 006831
DMS Project Number 97087
USACE Action ID Number 2016-00874
NCDWR Project Number 2016-0366
Data Collection Period: March - October 2018
Draft Submission Date: November 12, 2018
Final Submission Date: December 10, 2018
PREPARED FOR:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
PREPARED BY:
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jason Lorch
Phone: 919.851.9986
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) implemented a full delivery project at the Martin Dairy
Mitigation Project (Site) for the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS) to restore a total of 2,135 linear feet (LF) of perennial streams in Orange
County, NC. The Site is expected to generate 2,135 stream mitigation units (SMUs). All stream lengths
were measured along the stream centerline for SMU calculations. The Site is located approximately
eight miles northeast of Hillsborough, NC and eight miles south of Caldwell, NC (Figure 1) in the Neuse
River Basin 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020201. The project is located within a DMS targeted
watershed for the Neuse River Basin Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020201030030 and NC Division of
Water Resources (DWR) Subbasin 03-04-01. There are two unnamed tributaries on the Site, Martin Dairy
and UT1 with a drainage area of 526 acres. The Site drains to the Eno River which flows to Falls Lake and
is classified as water supply waters (WS-IV). The 11.155 acre site is protected with a permanent
conservation easement.
The Site is located within the Neuse River Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) as discussed in the 2010
Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) (Breeding, 2010), which highlights the importance of
riparian buffers for stream restoration projects. The Site was an active dairy farm until 2014 when
livestock were removed and the site became utilized for hay production.
The project goals established in the mitigation plan (Wildlands, 2017) were completed with careful
consideration of goals and objectives that were described in the Neuse River RBRP plan. The project
goals established include:
• Reconnect channels with floodplains and riparian wetlands to allow a natural flooding regime;
• Improve the stability of stream channels;
• Restore and enhance native floodplain and streambank vegetation;
• Improve instream habitat; and
• Permanently protect the Site from harmful land uses.
The project will contribute to achieving goals for the watershed discussed in the Neuse River RBRP
(Breeding, 2010) and provide ecological benefits within the Neuse River Basin. While benefits such as
habitat improvement and geomorphic stability are limited to the site; others, such as reduced pollutant
and sediment loading have farther reaching effects. In addition, planned projects downstream of this
site will promote cumulative project benefits within the watershed.
The Site construction and as-built surveys were completed between June 2017 and January 2018.
Monitoring Year 1 (MY1) assessments and site visits were completed between March and October 2018
to assess the conditions of the project. Overall, the Site has met the required vegetation and stream
success criteria for MY1. The overall average stem density for the Site is 491 stems per acre and is
therefore on track to meet the MY3 interim requirement of 320 stems per acre. All restored streams are
stable and functioning as designed. Hydrologic monitoring stations with crest gages and pressure
transducers were installed on the Site to document bankfull events on the restoration reaches. Bankfull
and geomorphically significant events were recorded on each restoration reach during the 2018 annual
monitoring period, therefor partially fulfilling the Monitoring Year 7 hydrology success criteria.
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report ii
MARTIN DAIRY MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................1-1
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................... 1-1
1.2 Monitoring Year 1 Data Assessment .......................................................................................... 1-2
1.2.1 Vegetative Assessment ...................................................................................................... 1-2
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern ............................................................................................. 1-3
1.2.3 Stream Assessment ............................................................................................................ 1-3
1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern ................................................................................................... 1-3
1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment ....................................................................................................... 1-3
1.2.6 Maintenance Plan .............................................................................................................. 1-3
1.3 Monitoring Year 1 Summary ...................................................................................................... 1-3
Section 2: METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................2-1
Section 3: REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................3-1
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 General Figures and Tables
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Project Component/Asset Map
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contact Table
Table 4 Project Information and Attributes
Appendix 2 Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5a-c Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Photographs
Vegetation Photographs
Appendix 3 Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Table
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Tables - Metadata
Table 9 Planted and Total Stem Counts
Appendix 4 Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 10a-b Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11 Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters – Cross-Section)
Table 12a-c Monitoring Data – Stream Reach Data Summary
Cross-Section Plots
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
Appendix 5 Hydrology Summary Data
Table 13 Verification of Bankfull Events
Monthly Rainfall Data
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 1-1
Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Martin Dairy Mitigation Site (Site) is located in central Orange County, approximately eight miles
northeast of Hillsborough, NC and eight miles south of Caldwell, NC off of Schley Rd (Figure 1). The Site
is located in the Neuse River Watershed within the Falls Lake Water Supply Watershed which has been
designated a Nutrient Sensitive Water. The project streams drain to the Eno River and eventually into
the Falls Lake Reservoir. The Site is within Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020201030030 and is located
within the Neuse River Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) (Figure 1) as identified in the 2010 Neuse River
Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) (Breeding, 2010). The Site is in in the Carolina Slate Belt of the
Piedmont Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998). The project watershed consists primarily of agricultural
and wooded land. The drainage area for project site is 526 acres (0.82 square miles).
The project streams consist of Martin Dairy and one unnamed tributary. Stream restoration reaches
included Martin Dairy (Reach 1 & 2) and UT1. Mitigation work within the Site included restoration of
2,135 linear feet (LF) of perennial stream channels. The riparian areas were planted with native
vegetation to improve habitat and protect water quality. The final mitigation plan was submitted and
accepted by the DMS in March 2017(Wildlands, 2017). Construction activities were completed by Land
Mechanic Designs, Inc. in July 2017. Planting and seeding activities were completed by Bruton Natural
Systems, Inc. in December 2017. Baseline monitoring (MY0) was conducted between August 2017 and
January 2017. Annual monitoring will occur for seven years with the close-out anticipated to commence
in 2025 given the success criteria are met. Appendix 1 provides more detailed project activity, history,
contact information, and watershed/site background information for the Site.
The Site is located on two tracts under the ownership of Ted H Martin (PIN 9896-83-0483 & 9896-83-
9111). A conservation easement was recorded on 11.155 acres of the parcel (Deed Book 6218, Pages
270 - 289). The project is expected to provide 2,135 SMU’s by closeout.
A project vicinity map and directions are provided in Figure 1 and project components/assets are
illustrated in Figure 2.
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
Prior to construction activities, the primary degradation at the Site was the clearing of vegetation and
channelization of Martin Dairy and UT1. The channelization involved straightening and deepening of the
stream (as indicated by the amount of dredge spoil in the floodplain). Livestock grazing on the Site
contributed to degradation of the riparian corridor and stream channel. Table 4 in Appendix 1 and
Tables 10a through 10b in Appendix 4 present the pre-restoration conditions in detail.
The project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits within the Neuse River Basin. While
benefits such as habitat improvement and geomorphic stability are limited to the project site, others,
such as reduced pollutant and sediment loading have farther reaching effects. Expected improvements
to water quality and ecological processes are outlined below as project goals and objectives. These
project goals were established and completed with careful consideration of goals and objectives that
were described in the RBRP and to meet the DMS mitigation needs while maximizing the ecological and
water quality uplift within the watershed.
The project goals established in the mitigation plan (Wildlands, 2017) are described in Table 1:
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 1-2
Table 1: Mitigation Goals and Objectives – Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
Goal Objective Expected Outcomes
Reconnect channels with
floodplains and riparian
wetlands to allow a natural
flooding regime.
Reconstruct stream channels
with designed bankfull
dimensions and depth based
on reference reach data.
Remove existing dredge spoil
to reconnect channel with
adjacent wetlands.
Raise water table and hydrate riparian
wetlands. Allow more frequent flood flows
to disperse on the floodplain. Support
geomorphology and higher level functions.
Improve the stability of
stream channels.
Construct stream channels
that will maintain stable cross-
sections, patterns, and profiles
over time.
Reduce sediment inputs from bank erosion.
Reduce shear stress on channel boundary.
Support all stream functions above
hydrology.
Restore and enhance native
floodplain and streambank
vegetation.
Plant native tree and
understory species in riparian
zones and plant native shrub
and herbaceous species on
streambanks.
Reduce sediment inputs from bank erosion
and runoff. Increase nutrient cycling and
storage in floodplain. Provide riparian
habitat. Add a source of LWD and organic
material to stream. Support all stream
functions.
Improve instream habitat.
Install habitat features such as
constructed riffles, lunker logs,
and brush toes into restored
streams. Add woody materials
to channel beds. Construct
pools of varying depth.
Increase and diversify available habitats for
macroinvertebrates, fish, and amphibians
leading to colonization and increase in
biodiversity over time. Add complexity
including LWD to the streams.
Permanently protect the Site
from harmful uses.
Establish conservation
easements on the Site.
Protect Site from encroachment on the
riparian corridor and direct impact to
streams and wetlands. Support all stream
functions.
1.2 Monitoring Year 1 Data Assessment
Site visits were conducted during MY1 to assess the condition of the project. The vegetation and stream
success criteria for the Site follows the approved success criteria presented in the mitigation plan.
1.2.1 Vegetative Assessment
Planted woody vegetation is being monitored in accordance with the guidelines and procedures
developed by the Carolina Vegetation Survey-EEP Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2008). A total of eight
standard 10-meter by 10-meter vegetation plots were established during the baseline monitoring within
the project easement area.
The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival of 210 planted stems per acre at the end of the
seven-year monitoring period (MY7). The interim measure of vegetative success will be the survival of at
least 320 planted stems per acre at the end of year three of the monitoring period (MY3) and at least
260 stems per acre at the end of the fifth year of monitoring (MY5). Planted vegetation must average 10
feet in height at the end of the seventh year of monitoring.
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 1-3
The MY1 vegetative survey was completed in September 2018. The 2018 vegetation monitoring resulted
in an average stem density of 491 stems per acre, which is well above the interim requirement of 320
stems/acre required at MY3 and approximately 18% less than the baseline density recorded (597
stems/acre). There is an average of 12 stems per plot as compared to 14 stems per plot in MY0. All eight
of the plots are on track to meet the success criteria required for MY7.Refer to Appendix 2 for
vegetation plot photographs and the vegetation condition assessment table and Appendix 3 for
vegetation data tables.
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern
No vegetation areas of concern were identified during MY1.
1.2.3 Stream Assessment
Morphological surveys for MY1 were conducted in June 2018. All streams within the Site are stable. In
general, cross-sections at the Site show little to no change in the bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, or
width-to-depth ratio. Bank height ratios fall within the appropriate Rosgen stream type parameters.
Substrate materials indicate the maintenance of coarser materials in the riffle reaches and finer particles
in the pools. Longitudinal profile surveys are not required on the project unless visual inspection
indicates reach wide vertical instability. Refer to Appendix 2 for the visual stability assessment table,
Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) map, and stream photographs. Refer to Appendix 4 for the
morphological data and plots.
After Hurricane Florence, the Site was walked on September 19, 2018. Debris was assessed on the
floodplain but no damage occurred at the Site.
1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern
No stream areas of concern were identified during MY1.
1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment
At the end of the seven-year monitoring period, two or more bankfull events must have occurred in
separate years within the restoration reaches. Also, two geomorphically significant events must be
documented during the monitoring period as well. Bankfull events and multiple geomorphically
significant events were recorded on all restoration reaches during MY1 resulting in partial attainment of
the stream hydrology assessment criteria. Refer to Appendix 5 for hydrologic data.
1.2.6 Maintenance Plan
No maintenance plan is necessary at this time.
1.3 Monitoring Year 1 Summary
All vegetation plots are on track to meet the MY3 interim requirement of 320 planted stems per acre. All
streams within the Site are stable and functioning as designed. Bankfull and geomorphically significant
events have been documented on all stream reaches at the Site, resulting in partial fulfillment of the
hydrologic success criteria.
Summary information and data related to the performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Mitigation Plan documents available on
DMS’s website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from DMS
upon request.
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 2-1
Section 2: METHODOLOGY
Geomorphic data was collected following the standards outlined in The Stream Channel Reference Site:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in the Stream Restoration: A Natural
Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al., 2003). All Integrated Current Condition Mapping was recorded
using a Trimble handheld GPS with sub-meter accuracy and processed using Pathfinder and ArcGIS.
Crest gages and pressure transducers were installed in surveyed riffle cross-sections and monitored
throughout the year. Hydrologic monitoring instrument installation and monitoring methods are in
accordance with the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE, 2003) standards. Vegetation
monitoring protocols followed the Carolina Vegetation Survey-EEP Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2008).
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 3-1
Section 3: REFERENCES
Breeding, R. 2010. Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities 2010. NCEEP, NC
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, C.C., Rawlins, C.L., Potyondy, J.P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide
to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., S.D., Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version
4.2. Retrieved from http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-5.pdf.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. Proceedings of the
Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Center For
Computational Hydroscience and Bioengineering, Oxford Campus, University of Mississippi, Pages
12-22.
United States Army Corps of Engineers. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDENR-DWQ,
USEPA, NCWRC.
United States Geological Survey. 1998. North Carolina Geology.
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/usgs/carolina.htm
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2018. Martin Dairy Mitigation Site Baseline Monitoring Document and As-
Built Baseline Report. DMS, Raleigh, NC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2017. Martin Diary Mitigation Project Mitigation Plan. DMS, Raleigh, NC.
APPENDIX 1. General Figures and Tables
03020201030030
03020201020020
03020201030040
03020201020030
03020201020010
03020201020010Hydrologic Unit Code (14)Project AreaDMS Targeted Local Watersheds
Figure 1. Project Vicinity MapMartin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Orange County, NC¹0 10.5 Miles
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of theNCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site mayrequire traversing areas near or along the easement boundary andtherefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by
authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or theirdesignees/contractors involved in the development, oversight,
and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the termsand timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation or
activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned rolesand activites requires prior coordination with DMS.
Directions:From Raleigh, NC, take I-40 West towards Durham.
Take exit 279B for NC-147 N towards Durham/Downtown. Travel approximately 13 miles and merge onto I-85 S. Travel
approximately 2 miles, take exit 170 for US-70 W.In 0.2 miles turn right onto Pleasant Green Road. Travel 5.8
miles and stay straight through the intersection with St. Mary Road onto Schley Rd. In 0.7 miles, the parking area
is on the left in a powerline R/W 200 feetsouth of Lipscomb Grove Church Road.
Martin Hills Lane
Schley Raod
Figure 2. Project Component/Asset MapMartin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Orange County, NC¹0 200100 Feet
ParcelsConservation EasementInternal EasementPowerline EasementsPowerlinesProject Streams
2017 Aerial Photography
DMS Project No. 97087
BufferNitrogen Nutrient
Offset
Type R RE R RE R RE
Totals 2,135 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Centerline
StationingExisting Footage Approach
Restoration
Footage (LF)*
As-Built Thalweg
Footage (LF)Mitigation Ratio
Credits
(SMU / WMU)
100+13 - 101+38,
101+78 - 107+61503 P1 708 721 1 708
107+61 - 119+71 1,173 P1 1,210 1,258 1 1,210
200+33 - 202+50 138 PII 217 214 1 217
Buffer (acres) Upland (acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
- - - -
- - - -
- -
- - -
- - -
N/A: not applicable
Restoration
Stream Riparian Wetland Non-Riparian Wetland Phosphorous Nutrient Offset
N/A
UT1
Restoration or Restoration Equivalent
PROJECT COMPONENTS
Restoration
STREAMS
Martin Dairy R1
Restoration
Creation -
Restoration 2,135
Enhancement
-
Stream (LF)
Preservation - -
Enhancement II -
-
-
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Martin Dairy R2
Riparian Wetland (acres) Non-Riparian Wetland (acres)Restoration Level
COMPONENT SUMMATION
MITIGATION CREDITS
Reach ID
High Quality Preservation -
*Linear footage calculated along stream centerline.
-
Enhancement I
DMS Project No. 97087
DMS Project No. 97087
Bare Roots
Live Stakes
December 2024
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
August 2017January 2018
December 20192019
2020
2021Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
December 2018
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
2022
Seed Mix Sources
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
919.851.9986
Designer
Angela Allen, PE
Green Resource, LLC
Fremont, NC 27830
Construction Contractor
Planting Contractor
Willow Spring, NC 27592
919.851.9986
Jason Lorch
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Monitoring Performers Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Monitoring, POC
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
Dykes and Sons Nursery and Greenhouse
126 Circle G Lane
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
P.O. Box 1197
Seeding Contractor
July 2017
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area1 June 2017 - July 2017 July 2017
Construction June 2017 - July 2017
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Completion or Scheduled Delivery
Mitigation Plan March 2017 March 2017
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Final Design - Construction Plans March 2017 March 2017
Bare root and live stake plantings for reach/segments December 2017 December 2017
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments1 June 2017 - July 2017 July 2017
September 2018
January 2018
Year 1 MonitoringStream Survey
Vegetation Survey
2020
2019
June 2018
December 2020
December 2021
2022
2021
December 2022
December 20232023
2024
2023Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 MonitoringStream Survey
Vegetation Survey
2024
1Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Willow Spring, NC 27592
126 Circle G Lane
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Applicable? Resolved?
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
N/A N/A
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
30.75
141
217
WS-IV
-
N/A
Supporting Documentation
IV: Degradation and Widening
USACE Nationwide Permit No. 27 and DWQ 401 Water Quality Certification
No. 4087.
N/A
Martin Diary Mitigation Plan; Wildlands determined "no effect" on Orange
County listed endangered species. The USFWS responded on June 3, 2016 and
concurred with NCWRC stating that “the proposed action is not likely to
adversely affect any federally-listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing
under the Act.”
Correspondence from SHPO on June 3, 2016 indicating they were not aware
of any historic resources that would be affected by the project.
N/A
N/A
-
Orange County
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
-
-
UT1Martin Dairy
1,918
526
36.75
Perennial
Slope
-
-Soil Hydric Status
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
03020201
Neuse River
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT WATERSHED SUMMARY INFORMATION
CGIA Land Use Classification
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA)
Piedmont Bottomland Forest
0%
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
Division of Land Quality (Dam Safety)
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Endangered Species Act
Drainage Class
Regulation
Essential Fisheries Habitat
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
Project Name
Project Area (acres)
River Basin
Physiographic Province
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
County
0.4%
526
03020201030030
Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
Project Drainiage Area (acres)
36° 7’ 25.76” N, 79° 0’ 14.26” W
11.155
NCDWR Stream Identification Score
Length of Reach (linear feet) - Post-Restoration
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
03-04-01
Drainage Area (acres)
Evolutionary Trend (Simon's Model) - Pre-Restoration
Parameters
DWR Sub-basin
REACH SUMMARY INFORMATION
59.0% forested, 40.6% cultivated, 0.4% impervious
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Historic Preservation Act
Chewacla loam, Herndon silt loam, Tatum silt loam
Perennial
Underlying Mapped Soils
Morphological Desription (stream type)
FEMA Classification
Native Vegetation Community
N/A
Percent Composition Exotic Invasive Vegetation - Post-Restoration
APPENDIX 2. Visual Assessment Data
Martin Hills Lane
Schley Raod
PP 8
PP 7
PP 6
PP 5
PP 4
PP 9
PP 2
PP 3
PP 1
PP 10
XS 4
XS 1XS 2
XS 3
XS 5XS 6
116+00
112+00
110+00
114+00
118+00120+00
200+00
108+00
100+00
102+00
104+00
106+00
1
3
8
5
7
6
4
2
Figure 3. Intergrated Current Condition Plan ViewMartin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Orange County, NC
0 200100 Feet
Conservation EasementInternal EasementPowerline EasementsPowerlinesAs-Built AlignmentReach BreakAs-Built BankfullStructuresStationingPhoto Point (PP)Cross-Section (XS)BarotrollCrest Gauge
Vegetation Plot Condition - MY1Criteria Met
2017 Aerial Photography
DMS Project No. 97087
Martin Dairy Reach 1
Major Channel
CategoryChannel Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Aggradation 0 0 100%
Degradation 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition Texture/Substrate 8 8 100%
Depth Sufficient 9 9 100%
Length Appropriate 9 9 100%
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)8 8 100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)9 9 100%
1. Scoured/Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion.
0 0 100% n/a n/a n/a
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0 0 100% n/a n/a n/a
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse. 0 0 100% n/a n/a n/a
0 0 100% n/a n/a n/a
1. Overall IntegrityStructures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.5 5 100%
2. Grade ControlGrade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill.5 5 100%
2a. PipingStructures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.5 5 100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed
15%.
5 5 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining
~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
baseflow.
6 6 100%
1Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.
2. Bank
Totals
3. Engineered
Structures1
Table 5a. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Martin Dairy Mitigation Project
1. Bed1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run Units)
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4. Thalweg Position
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
DMS Project No. 97087
Martin Dairy Reach 2
Major Channel
CategoryChannel Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Aggradation 0 0 100%
Degradation 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition Texture/Substrate 13 13 100%
Depth Sufficient 13 13 100%
Length Appropriate 13 13 100%
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)13 13 100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)13 13 100%
1. Scoured/Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion.
0 0 100% n/a n/a n/a
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0 0 100% n/a n/a n/a
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% n/a n/a n/a
0 0 100% n/a n/a n/a
1. Overall IntegrityStructures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.8 8 100%
2. Grade ControlGrade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill.8 8 100%
2a. PipingStructures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.8 8 100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed
15%.
8 8 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining
~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
baseflow.
4 4 100%
1Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.
2. Bank
Totals
3. Engineered
Structures1
Table 5b. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Martin Dairy Mitigation Project
1. Bed1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run Units)
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4. Thalweg Position
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
DMS Project No. 97087
UT1
Major Channel
CategoryChannel Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Aggradation 0 0 100%
Degradation 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition Texture/Substrate 4 4 100%
Depth Sufficient 4 4 100%
Length Appropriate 4 4 100%
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)4 4 100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)4 4 100%
1. Scoured/Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion.
0 0 100% n/a n/a n/a
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0 0 100% n/a n/a n/a
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100% n/a n/a n/a
0 0 100% n/a n/a n/a
1. Overall IntegrityStructures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.1 1 100%
2. Grade ControlGrade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill.1 1 100%
2a. PipingStructures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.1 1 100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed
15%.
1 1 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining
~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
baseflow.
2 2 100%
1Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.
2. Bank
Totals
3. Engineered
Structures1
Table 5c. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Martin Dairy Mitigation Project
1. Bed1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run Units)
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4. Thalweg Position
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Planted Acreage 10.139
Vegetation Category Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
(Ac)
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of Planted
Acreage
Bare Areas Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material 0.1 0 0 0%
Low Stem Density AreasWoody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count
criteria.0.1 0 0 0%
0 0 0%
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or VigorAreas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring
year.0.25 Ac 0 0 0%
0 0.0 0%
Easement Acreage 11.155
Vegetation Category Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
(SF)
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale). 1,000 0 0 0%
Easement Encroachment Areas Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale). none 0 0 0%
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Total
Cumulative Total
STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Martin Dairy Reach 1
PHOTO POINT 1 – looking upstream (6/6/2018) PHOTO POINT 1 – looking downstream (6/6/2018)
PHOTO POINT 2 – looking upstream (6/6/2018) PHOTO POINT 2 – looking downstream (6/6/2018)
PHOTO POINT 3 – looking upstream (6/6/2018) PHOTO POINT 3 – looking downstream (6/6/2018)
STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Martin Dairy Reach 2
PHOTO POINT 4 – looking upstream (6/6/2018) PHOTO POINT 4 – looking downstream (6/6/2018)
PHOTO POINT 5 – looking upstream (6/6/2018) PHOTO POINT 5 – looking downstream (6/6/2018)
PHOTO POINT 6 – looking upstream (6/6/2018) PHOTO POINT 6 – looking downstream (6/6/2018)
PHOTO POINT 7 – looking upstream (6/6/2018) PHOTO POINT 7 – looking downstream (6/6/2018)
PHOTO POINT 8 – looking upstream (6/6/2018) PHOTO POINT 8 – looking downstream (6/6/2018)
STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
UT1
PHOTO POINT 9 – looking upstream (6/6/2018) PHOTO POINT 9 – looking downstream (6/6/2018)
PHOTO POINT 10 – looking upstream (6/6/2018) PHOTO POINT 10 – looking downstream (6/6/2018)
VEGETATION PLOT PHOTOGRAPHS
VEG PLOT 1 (09/5/2018) VEG PLOT 2 (09/5/2018)
VEG PLOT 3 (09/5/2018) VEG PLOT 4 (09/5/2018)
VEG PLOT 5 (09/5/2018) VEG PLOT 6 (09/5/2018)
VEG PLOT 7 (09/5/2018) VEG PLOT 8 (09/5/2018)
APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Table
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Plot
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
100%
MY1 Success Criteria Tract Mean
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Tables - Metadata
Martin Dairy Mitigation Project
DMS Project No.97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Report Prepared By Tasha King
Date Prepared 9/25/2018 10:56
Database Name Martin Dairy- cvs-v2.5.0.- MY1.mdb
Database Location F:\Projects\005-02158 Martin Dairy\Monitoring\Monitoring Year 1\Mitigation\Vegetation Assessment
Computer Name CAROLYN-PC
File Size 51679232
Metadata Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Project Planted Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Project Total Stems Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and Spp A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
Project Code 97087
Project Name Martin Dairy
Description Stream Restoration Project
Sampled Plots 8
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------
PROJECT SUMMARY-------------------------------------
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree
Cercis canadensis Red Bud Shrub Tree
Cornus florida Flowering Dogwood Shrub Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Tree 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 2 2 3 3 3
Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Tree 2
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Quercus palustris Pin Oak Tree 2 2 2 5 5 5 3 3 3
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2
Ulmus Elm Tree
13 13 13 12 12 13 14 14 14 12 12 14
5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 7
526 526 526 486 486 526 567 567 567 486 486 567
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1
0.02
1
0.02
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
1
0.02
1
0.02
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Stem count
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
Current Plot Data (MY1 2018)
097087-01-0001 097087-01-0002 097087-01-0003 097087-01-0004
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Betula nigra River Birch Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree
Cercis canadensis Red Bud Shrub Tree
Cornus florida Flowering Dogwood Shrub Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree
Quercus palustris Pin Oak Tree
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree
Ulmus Elm Tree
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems
Species count
Stems per ACRE
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Stem count
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2
8
1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 13
1 1 1 1 1 1
4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 3 3 4
1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
12 12 12 10 10 18 11 11 13 13 13 24
6 6 6 6 6 7 6 6 7 7 7 7
486 486 486 405 405 728 445 445 526 526 526 971
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
097087-01-0006 097087-01-0007
0.02
097087-01-0008
1
0.02
097087-01-0005
Current Plot Data (MY1 2018)
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Betula nigra River Birch Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree
Cercis canadensis Red Bud Shrub Tree
Cornus florida Flowering Dogwood Shrub Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree
Quercus palustris Pin Oak Tree
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree
Ulmus Elm Tree
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteers
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems
Species count
Stems per ACRE
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Stem count
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
16 16 16 17 17 17
8
1 1 1 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2 2
17 17 29 18 18 18
2
7 7 7 19 19 19
24 24 25 25 25 25
16 16 16 20 20 20
14 14 14 14 14 14
1
97 97 121 118 118 118
8 8 11 8 8 8
491 491 612 597 597 597
Annual Means
MY1 (2018) MY0 (2018)
8
0.20
8
0.20
APPENDIX 4. Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Martin Dairy
Parameter Gage
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Bankfull Width (ft) 14.8 18.6 10.7 11.2 18.5 19.4
Floodprone Width (ft) 60 114 49 63 33 75 36 81
Bankfull Mean Depth 1.3 2.1 1.6 1.8 1.3 1.4
Bankfull Max Depth 1.9 2.9 2.1 2.6 1.8 2.1 1.3 1.7 1.4 1.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 25.0 34.6 17.8 19.7 23.9 24.1
Width/Depth Ratio 7.9 13.8 5.8 7.1 13.9 14.2
Entrenchment Ratio 5.5 10.2 2.6 3.4
Bank Height Ratio
D50 (mm)
Riffle Length (ft) 12.0 35.9 16.7 51.0
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0130 0.0120 0.0150 0.0350 0.0060 0.0180 0.0060 0.0190 0.0039 0.0193 0.0166 0.0266
Pool Length (ft) 38.2 77.4 36.1 83.1
Pool Max Depth (ft) 2.5 2.9 1.3 3.3 1.4 3.6 1.4 2.5 1.1 1.9
Pool Spacing (ft) 16 91 22 108 50 105 49 91 60 105 65 113 41 101 55 111
Pool Volume (ft3)
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 15 20 17 28 38 41 36 75 39 81 36 75 39 81
Radius of Curvature (ft) 11 32 7 46 16 87 11 15 27 75 29 81 27 75 29 81
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft) 1.3 3.7 0.5 3.3 1.1 4.7 1.3 1.4 1.8 5.0 1.8 5.0 1.8 5.0 1.8 5.0
Meander Length (ft) 46 74 46 114 66.0 191 46.0 48.0 60 225 65 243 60 225 65 243
Meander Width Ratio 1.7 2.3 1.2 2.0 3.2 4.1 3.4 3.6 2.4 5.0 2.4 5.0 2.4 5.0 2.4 5.0
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W/m2
Drainage Area (SM)
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Q-NFF regression
Q-USGS extrapolation
Q-Mannings
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
(---): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
--- ---
---2.4/8.1/11/15/33/
54/-/-
0.007
3.3
56.0
20.0
---
13.1 10.2
11.6
---
---
2.2-5
---
10.610.6---
---
N/A
Profile
13.2
1.0 1.0
2.2-5
16.2
1.2
50
1.01.2-1.5
0.0072
1.22
1,258
0.49
1.27
---
C4/E4
1,043
0.4%
0.82
0.004
3.2
0.4%
63.0
1,043
---
0.009
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
2.2
41.0
0.38
0.11/1.10/5.0/27.6/
64.0/512.0
3.6 - 4.0 4.9 - 5.4
0.007
0.4%
3.8
---
1.09
---
---
---
C4/E4E4 C4 C4/E4
Additional Reach Parameters
0.82
Martin Dairy
Reach 2
Martin Dairy
Reach 2
AS-BUILT/BASELINEDESIGNPRE-RESTORATION CONDITION
1.0
10.1
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
15.6
16.7
16.1
12.2
14.8
150
13.216.8
13.4
1.1
5.0
---
0.54
C4/E4
0.4%
C4/E4
101-124
---
2.2
60
Pattern
N/A
0.13/1.3/2.6/4.6/7
.7/77/-/-
3
---
14.3
1.4
11.0
1.0
---
---
0.0130
---
---
3.3
---
------
0.54
C4/E4
0.82
0.4%
0.54
C4/E4
0.0046
2.30 1.10 1.25 1.28
---
607
--- --- --- --- 776
607
47.097.0
0.005
--- --- ---
1.05
---
---
---
1.30
---
88.0
--- ---
2.9 - 3.7
Martin Dairy
Reach 1
N/A
15.0
Long Branch Spencer Creek 2 Foust Creek
10.0
14.2
1.5
7.3
REFERENCE REACH DATA
Martin Dairy
Reach 1
2.8
0.4%
N/A
1.49 0.96 1.38
8.6
Martin Dairy
Reach 2
200
2.1
1.2
14.0
1.2
2.4
Martin Dairy
Reach 1
N/A---
---
71
N/A
0.41
121
---SC/0.45/2.8/21.8/
45.0/128.0
<0.063/3/8.8/42/
90/-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
---
0.25
---
---
---
0.009 0.005
0.33
2.6
---
---
0.23
12.8
200
1.1
1.8
14.2
1.4
0.9
DMS Project No. 97087
UT1
Parameter Gage
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Bankfull Width (ft) 9.1 10.4 5.3 10.9 9.3 10.5
Floodprone Width (ft) 25 65 20 64 21 47
Bankfull Mean Depth 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2
Bankfull Max Depth 1.4 1.7 1.5 1.7 0.8 1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2) 10.7 11.3 5.4 12.4 10.3 12.3
Width/Depth Ratio 7.3 10.1 5.2 9.6 8.1 9.3
Entrenchment Ratio 3.2 8.3 1.9 6.1 2.2 5.0
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0
D50 (mm)
Riffle Length (ft) 4 28
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.004 0.047 0.024 0.057 0.006 0.024 0.009 0.016
Pool Length (ft) 4.2 34.9
Pool Max Depth (ft) 2.5 2.6 0.8 2.2 0.4 1.3
Pool Spacing (ft) 34 52 8 82 38 56 30 73
Pool Volume (ft3)
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 9 19 21 93 28 50 15 45 23 66 23 66
Radius of Curvature (ft) 4 13 14 60 19 50 8 47 17 52 17 52
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft) 0.7 2.3 14.0 60.0 2.0 5.3 0.6 3.2 1.8 5.5 1.8 5.5
Meander Length (ft) 35 47 121 171 -- -- -- -- 56 155 56 155
Meander Width Ratio 1.6 3.3 2.3 8.9 3.0 5.3 1.0 3.0 2.4 7.0 2.4 7.0
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W/m2
Drainage Area (SM)
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps) 2.2 2.4 2.2 3.5 4.4 5.2
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Q-NFF regression
Q-USGS extrapolation
Q-Mannings
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft) 0.0039 0.0280
(---): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
---
7.1
65
1.4
6.3
36
---
5.7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
UT1Agony Acres UT1-
Reach 3
---
REFERENCE REACH DATA DESIGN AS-BUILT/BASELINE
UT1 UT1
13.2
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
PRE-
RESTORATION
UT to Polecat
Creek
UT to Varnals
Creek
1.0
9.4
13.3
9.2
0.70.7
6.7
12.7
Profile
5.1
5.7
1.0
1.8
--- --- 7.4
1.4
--- ---
---
------ ---
2.5 1.8N/A
--- ---
3.92.2
Pattern
N/A
2.0
---
---
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
--- --- --- 0.2
--- --- ---
0.4% --- --- ---
0.22 0.30 0.41 0.41
Additional Reach Parameters
N/A
0.22
C4/E4
0.4%
21.0
0.22
C4/E4
4.7 3.6 2.5
C4/E4 E4 E4E4
--- 25.0 20.3 54.0 24.0
--- --- ---
1.1
213--- ---
------
0.0120 0.0170
1.1
---
0.0103
0.0072
---
1.4 1.2 1.1
186--- 186---
---
N/A
5.7
1.0
---
---
2.1
---
N/A
0.6 0.3
0.07/0.28/7.3/20.1/
37.9/64.0
0.4%
0.0160
0.048/3/5.1/6.7/
8.9/13/-/-
---
213
1.4
--- ---
Martin Dairy Reach 1
Parameter
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2)
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Bank Height Ratio
D50 (mm)
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 12.0 35.9
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0039 0.0193
Pool Length (ft) 38.2 77.4
Pool Max Depth (ft) 1.4 2.5
Pool Spacing (ft) 41 101
Pool Volume (ft3)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 36 75
Radius of Curvature (ft) 27 75
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft) 1.8 5.0
Meander Wave Length (ft) 60 225
Meander Width Ratio 2.4 5.0
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
(---): Data was not provided
C4/E4
776
1.27
0.0046
0.005
SC/0.45/2.8/21.8/
45.0/128.0
SC/0.18/14.6/45.0
68.5/128.0
0% 0%
20.6
MY5 MY6 MY7
1.6
Table 12a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
As-Built/Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4
1.0 1.1
13.1
15.0
13.2
16.9
10.010.1
14.8
0.9
13.2
16.7
1.4
150 150
0.9
DMS Project No. 97087
Dimension and Substrate Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)1 505.8 505.9 505.7 505.9
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 505.8 506.1 505.7 505.8
Bankfull Width (ft) 14.8 15.0 20.0 22.5
Floodprone Width (ft) 150 150 N/A N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.9 0.9 1.5 1.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.4 1.6 3.0 2.7
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 13.2 13.2 29.4 29.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 16.7 16.9 13.6 17.2
Entrenchment Ratio2 10.1 10.0 N/A N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio3 1.0 1.1 N/A N/A
Dimension and Substrate Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)1 501.8 501.8 501.5 501.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 501.8 501.8 501.5 501.4
Bankfull Width (ft) 20.8 21.3 12.8 12.4
Floodprone Width (ft) N/A N/A 200 200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.7 1.6 1.1 1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 3.5 3.5 1.8 1.9
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 34.9 34.9 14.2 14.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 12.4 13.1 11.6 10.9
Entrenchment Ratio2 N/A N/A 15.6 16.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio3 N/A N/A 1.0 1.0
Dimension and Substrate Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)1 504.0 503.9 504.1 504.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 504.0 504.0 504.1 504.1
Bankfull Width (ft) 9.2 9.5 11.5 11.9
Floodprone Width (ft) 65 65 N/A N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.4 1.4 2.0 2.2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 6.3 6.3 11.8 11.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 13.3 14.3 11.3 12.1
Entrenchment Ratio2 7.1 6.8 N/A N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio3 1.0 1.1 N/A N/A
1For MY1 through MY7 bankfull elevation was calculated using the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDMS.
2Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
3Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.
Cross-Section 5 (Riffle) Cross-Section 6 (Pool)
Cross-Section 4 (Riffle)
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
UT1
Martin Dairy Reach 2
Table 11. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross-Section)
Cross-Section 1 (Riffle) Cross-Section 2 (Pool)
Cross-Section 3 (Pool)
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
Martin Dairy Reach 1
Martin Dairy Reach 2
Parameter
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2)
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Bank Height Ratio
D50 (mm)
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 16.7 51.0
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0166 0.0266
Pool Length (ft) 36.1 83.1
Pool Max Depth (ft) 1.1 1.9
Pool Spacing (ft) 55 111
Pool Volume (ft3)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 39 81
Radius of Curvature (ft) 29 81
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft) 1.8 5.0
Meander Wave Length (ft) 65 243
Meander Width Ratio 2.4 5.0
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
(---): Data was not provided
C4/E4
1,258
1.22
0.0072
0.007
0.11/1.10/5.0/27.6/
64.0/512.0
0.55/13.27/24.7/68.5/
104.7/180.0
0% 0%
1.0 1.0
10.2 38.7
15.6 16.1
MY5 MY6 MY7
Table 12b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
As-Built/Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4
12.4
1.1
1.9
14.2
10.9
12.8
1.1
1.8
14.2
11.6
200 200
UT1
Parameter
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2)
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Bank Height Ratio
D50 (mm)
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 4 28
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.009 0.016
Pool Length (ft) 4.2 34.9
Pool Max Depth (ft) 0.4 1.3
Pool Spacing (ft) 30 73
Pool Volume (ft3)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 23 66
Radius of Curvature (ft) 17 52
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft) 1.8 5.5
Meander Wave Length (ft) 56 155
Meander Width Ratio 2.4 7.0
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
(---): Data was not provided
C4/E4
213
1.1
0.07/0.28/7.3/20.1/
37.9/64.0
SC/9.38/21.5/75.9/
128.0/256.0
0% 0%
0.0072
0.0103
13.3 14.3
7.1 6.8
1.0 1.1
7.4 72.1
9.2 9.5
65 65
0.7 0.7
1.4 1.4
6.3 6.3
MY5 MY6 MY7
Table 12c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
As-Built/Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4
Cross-Section 1 Martin Dairy Reach 1
Bankfull Dimensions
13.2 x-section area (ft.sq.)
15.0 width (ft)
0.9 mean depth (ft)
1.6 max depth (ft)
15.3 wetted perimeter (ft)
0.9 hydraulic radius (ft)
16.9 width-depth ratio
150.0 W flood prone area (ft)
10.0 entrenchment ratio
1.1 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Cross-Section Plots
View Downstream
503
505
507
509
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Ele
va
tio
n (
ft)
Width (ft)
102+75 Riffle
MY0 (8/2017) MY1 (6/2018) Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross-Section 2 Martin Dairy Reach 1
Bankfull Dimensions
29.4 x-section area (ft.sq.)
22.5 width (ft)
1.3 mean depth (ft)
2.7 max depth (ft)
23.4 wetted perimeter (ft)
1.3 hydraulic radius (ft)
17.2 width-depth ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Cross-Section Plots
View Downstream
502
504
506
508
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Ele
va
tio
n (
ft)
Width (ft)
103+01 Pool
MY0 (8/2017) MY1 (6/2018) Bankfull
Cross-Section 3 Martin Dairy Reach 2
Bankfull Dimensions
34.9 x-section area (ft.sq.)
21.3 width (ft)
1.6 mean depth (ft)
3.5 max depth (ft)
22.9 wetted perimeter (ft)
1.5 hydraulic radius (ft)
13.1 width-depth ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Cross-Section Plots
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
View Downstream
498
500
502
504
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Ele
va
tio
n (
ft)
Width (ft)
110+46 Pool
MY0 (8/2017) MY1 (6/2018) Bankfull
Cross-Section 4 Martin Dairy Reach 2
Bankfull Dimensions
14.2 x-section area (ft.sq.)
12.4 width (ft)
1.1 mean depth (ft)
1.9 max depth (ft)
13.2 wetted perimeter (ft)
1.1 hydraulic radius (ft)
10.9 width-depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
16.1 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Cross-Section Plots
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
View Downstream
498
500
502
504
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Ele
va
tio
n (
ft)
Width (ft)
110+77 Riffle
MY0 (8/2017) MY1 (6/2018) Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross-Section 5 UT1
Bankfull Dimensions
6.3 x-section area (ft.sq.)
9.5 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.4 max depth (ft)
10.0 wetted perimeter (ft)
0.6 hydraulic radius (ft)
14.3 width-depth ratio
65.0 W flood prone area (ft)
6.8 entrenchment ratio
1.1 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Cross-Section Plots
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
View Downstream
501
503
505
507
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Ele
va
tio
n (
ft)
Width (ft)
201+04 Riffle
MY0 (8/2017) MY1 (6/2018) Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross-Section 6 UT1
Bankfull Dimensions
11.8 x-section area (ft.sq.)
11.9 width (ft)
1.0 mean depth (ft)
2.2 max depth (ft)
12.8 wetted perimeter (ft)
0.9 hydraulic radius (ft)
12.1 width-depth ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Cross-Section Plots
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
View Downstream
501
503
505
507
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Ele
va
tio
n (
ft)
Width (ft)
201+22 Pool
MY0 (8/2017) MY1 (6/2018) Bankfull
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max Riffle Pool Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 20 20 20 20
Reach SummaryParticle Count
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Martin Dairy Reach 1, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Very fine 0.062 0.125 1 11 12 12 32
Fine 0.125 0.250 6 6 6 38
Medium 0.25 0.50 38
Coarse 0.5 1.0 1 1 2 2 40
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 1 4 5 5 45
SAND
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 45
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 45
Fine 4.0 5.6 45
Fine 5.6 8.0 1 1 1 46
Medium 8.0 11.0 1 1 1 47
Medium 11.0 16.0 2 2 4 4 51
Coarse 16.0 22.6 15 4 19 19 70
Coarse 22.6 32 7 1 8 8 78
Very Coarse 32 45 6 6 6 84
Very Coarse 45 64 10 10 10 94
GRA
VEL
Small 64 90 5 5 5 99
Small 90 128 1 1 1 100
Large 128 180 100
Large 180 256 100
COBB
LE
Small 256 362 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
50 50 100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
,
128.0
Channel materials (mm)
Silt/Clay
0.18
14.6
45.0
68.5
Reachwide
BOULD
ER
Total
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Ind
ivid
ua
l C
lass
Pe
rce
nt
Particle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-01/2018 MY1-06/2018
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Pe
rce
nt
Cu
mu
lati
ve
(%
)
Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-01/2018 MY1-06/2018
Silt/Clay SandGravel
Cobble BoulderBedrock
Martin Dairy Reach 1, Reachwide
Martin Dairy Reach 1, Reachwide
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 2 2 2
Summary
Riffle 100-Count
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Martin Dairy Reach 1, Cross-Section 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Very fine 0.062 0.125 2
Fine 0.125 0.250 2
Medium 0.25 0.50 2
Coarse 0.5 1.0 2
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 5 5 7
SAND
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 7
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 4 4 11
Fine 4.0 5.6 5 5 16
Fine 5.6 8.0 3 3 19
Medium 8.0 11.0 9 9 28
Medium 11.0 16.0 14 14 42
Coarse 16.0 22.6 11 11 53
Coarse 22.6 32 12 12 65
Very Coarse 32 45 14 14 79
Very Coarse 45 64 10 10 89
GRA
VEL
Small 64 90 5 5 94
Small 90 128 5 5 99
Large 128 180 99
Large 180 256 99
COBB
LE
Small 256 362 1 1 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 = 362.0
Channel materials (mm)
5.60
13.27
20.6
53.7
96.6
Cross-Section 1
BOULD
ER
Total
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Ind
ivid
ua
l C
lass
Pe
rce
nt
Particle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-01/2018 MY1-06/2018
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Pe
rce
nt
Cu
mu
lati
ve
(%
)
Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-01/2018 MY1-06/2018
Silt/Clay SandGravel
Cobble BoulderBedrock
Martin Dairy Reach 1, Cross-Section 1
Martin Dairy Reach 1, Cross-Section 1
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max Riffle Pool Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 11 11 11 11
Very fine 0.062 0.125 2 2 2 13
Fine 0.125 0.250 1 1 1 14
Medium 0.25 0.50 1 1 1 15
Coarse 0.5 1.0 7 7 7 22
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 3 8 11 11 33
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 33
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 33
Fine 4.0 5.6 33
Fine 5.6 8.0 33
Medium 8.0 11.0 33
Medium 11.0 16.0 1 3 4 4 37
Coarse 16.0 22.6 3 7 10 10 47
Coarse 22.6 32 11 1 12 12 59
Very Coarse 32 45 6 3 9 9 68
Very Coarse 45 64 9 5 14 14 82
Small 64 90 10 10 10 92
Small 90 128 6 1 7 7 99
Large 128 180 1 1 1 100
Large 180 256 100
Small 256 362 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
50 50 100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
,
180.0
Channel materials (mm)
0.55
13.27
24.7
68.5
104.7
Reachwide
Reach Summary
SAND
GRA
VEL
Particle Count
COBB
LE
BOULD
ER
Total
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Martin Dairy Reach 2, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Ind
ivid
ua
l C
lass
Pe
rce
nt
Particle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-01/2018 MY1-06/2018
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Pe
rce
nt
Cu
mu
lati
ve
(%
)
Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-01/2018 MY1-06/2018
Silt/Clay SandGravel
Cobble BoulderBedrock
Martin Dairy Reach 2, Reachwide
Martin Dairy Reach 2, Reachwide
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 1 1 1
Very fine 0.062 0.125 1
Fine 0.125 0.250 1 1 2
Medium 0.25 0.50 2
Coarse 0.5 1.0 1 1 3
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 9 9 12
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 12
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 12
Fine 4.0 5.6 12
Fine 5.6 8.0 12
Medium 8.0 11.0 2 2 14
Medium 11.0 16.0 5 5 19
Coarse 16.0 22.6 10 10 29
Coarse 22.6 32 11 11 40
Very Coarse 32 45 18 18 58
Very Coarse 45 64 12 12 70
Small 64 90 10 10 80
Small 90 128 11 11 91
Large 128 180 5 5 96
Large 180 256 4 4 100
Small 256 362 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 = 256.0
Channel materials (mm)
12.78
27.32
38.7
102.3
168.1
Cross-Section 4
Summary
SAND
GRA
VEL
Riffle 100-Count
COBB
LE
BOULD
ER
Total
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Martin Dairy Reach 2, Cross-Section 4
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Ind
ivid
ua
l C
lass
Pe
rce
nt
Particle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-01/2018 MY1-06/2018
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Pe
rce
nt
Cu
mu
lati
ve
(%
)
Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-01/2018 MY1-06/2018
Silt/Clay SandGravel
Cobble BoulderBedrock
Martin Dairy Reach 2, Cross-Section 4
Martin Dairy Reach 2, Cross-Section 4
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max Riffle Pool Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 24 24 24 24
Very fine 0.062 0.125 2 2 2 26
Fine 0.125 0.250 26
Medium 0.25 0.50 26
Coarse 0.5 1.0 26
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 26
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 26
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 26
Fine 4.0 5.6 2 2 2 28
Fine 5.6 8.0 2 4 6 6 34
Medium 8.0 11.0 2 2 2 36
Medium 11.0 16.0 2 6 8 8 44
Coarse 16.0 22.6 4 3 7 7 51
Coarse 22.6 32 6 3 9 9 60
Very Coarse 32 45 8 3 11 11 71
Very Coarse 45 64 7 1 8 8 79
Small 64 90 10 10 10 89
Small 90 128 6 6 6 95
Large 128 180 4 4 4 99
Large 180 256 1 1 1 100
Small 256 362 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
50 50 100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
,
256.0
Channel materials (mm)
Silt/Clay
9.38
21.5
75.9
128.0
Reachwide
Reach Summary
SAND
GRA
VEL
Particle Count
COBB
LE
BOULD
ER
Total
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
UT1, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Ind
ivid
ua
l C
lass
Pe
rce
nt
Particle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-01/2018 MY1-06/2018
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Pe
rce
nt
Cu
mu
lati
ve
(%
)
Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-01/2018 MY1-06/2018
Silt/Clay SandGravel
Cobble BoulderBedrock
UT1, Reachwide
UT1, Reachwide
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 0
Very fine 0.062 0.125 0
Fine 0.125 0.250 0
Medium 0.25 0.50 0
Coarse 0.5 1.0 0
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 0
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 0
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 0
Fine 4.0 5.6 0
Fine 5.6 8.0 0
Medium 8.0 11.0 0
Medium 11.0 16.0 0
Coarse 16.0 22.6 4 4 4
Coarse 22.6 32 5 5 9
Very Coarse 32 45 13 13 22
Very Coarse 45 64 21 21 43
Small 64 90 20 20 63
Small 90 128 15 15 78
Large 128 180 13 13 91
Large 180 256 6 6 97
Small 256 362 2 2 99
Small 362 512 1 1 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 = 512.0
Channel materials (mm)
38.45
55.96
72.1
149.8
227.6
Cross-Section 5
Summary
SAND
GRA
VEL
Riffle 100-Count
COBB
LE
BOULD
ER
Total
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
UT1, Cross-Section 5
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Ind
ivid
ua
l C
lass
Pe
rce
nt
Particle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-01/2018 MY1-06/2018
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Pe
rce
nt
Cu
mu
lati
ve
(%
)
Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-01/2018 MY1-06/2018
Silt/Clay SandGravel
Cobble BoulderBedrock
UT1, Cross-Section 5
UT1, Cross-Section 5
APPENDIX 5. Hydrology Summary and Data
Reach
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence Method
6/6/2018 4/15/2018
10/17/2018 9/17/2018*
6/6/2018 4/15/2018
7/6/2018
9/17/2018*
*Hurricane Florence
1 2018 monthly rainfall from USDA Station Durham 11 W
2 30th and 70th percentile rainfall data collected from weather station Chapel Hill 2 W, NC (USDA, 2018).
Table 13. Verification of Bankfull Events
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Monthly Rainfall Data
Crest Gage/
Pressure
Transducer
DMS Project No. 97087
Martin Diary
UT1
DMS Project No. 97087
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
10/17/2018
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-18
Pre
cip
ita
tio
n (
in)
Date
Martin Dairy 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall in 2018 Durham, NC
2018 Rainfall Data 30th Percentile 70th Percentile
MONITORING YEAR 1
ANNUAL REPORT
Final
MARTIN DAIRY BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
Orange County, NC
NCDEQ Contract No. 006831
DMS Project Number 97087
NCDWR Project Number 2016-0366
Data Collection Period: September 2018
Draft Submission Date: November 12, 2018
Final Submission Date: December 10, 2018
PREPARED FOR:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
PREPARED BY:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jason Lorch
Phone: (919) 851-9986
Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report i
MARTIN DAIRY BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 1 Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................2
1.1 Project Summary ........................................................................................................................... 2
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................................ 2
1.3 Monitoring Year 1 Data Assessment ............................................................................................. 2
1.3.1 Vegetative Assessment ......................................................................................................... 3
1.4 Monitoring Year 1 Summary ......................................................................................................... 3
Section 2: METHODOLOGY...............................................................................................................3
Section 3: REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................4
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 General Figures and Tables
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Service Area
Figure 3 Project Component / Asset Map
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contact Table
Table 4 Project Information and Attributes
Table 5 Adjacent Forested Areas Existing Tree and Shrub Species
Table 6 Planted Tree Species
Appendix 2 Visual Assessment Data
Figure 4 Monitoring Plan View
Table 7 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Appendix 3 Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Table
Table 9 CVS Vegetation Tables - Metadata
Table 10 Planted and Total Stem Counts
Appendix 4 Overview Photos
Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 2
Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW
1.1 Project Summary
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) implemented a full delivery project at the Martin Dairy
Mitigation Site (“Site”) for the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS) to restore a total of 2,135 linear feet (LF) of perennial streams in Orange
County, NC. The site included the restoration of two unnamed tributaries (Martin Dairy and UT1). The
project also restored 10.139 acres (441,654.84 ft2) of riparian buffer at the Site, which will provide
379,169 Riparian Buffer Credits. The project Site was planned, designed, and constructed on land
surrounding Martin Dairy and its tributaries. The Site is located approximately eight miles northeast of
Hillsborough, NC and eight miles south of Caldwell, NC (Figure 1) in the Neuse River Basin 8-Digit
Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020201. The project is located within a DMS targeted watershed for the
Neuse River Basin Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020201030030 and NC Division of Water Resources
(DWR) Subbasin 03-04-01. The Site drains to Buckwater Creek, which flows to Falls Lake, which is
classified as water supply waters (WS-IV) and nutrient sensitive waters (NSW). The 11.155 acre site is
protected with a permanent conservation easement.
The project has been planned, designed and constructed per Martin Dairy Mitigation Plan (2017) and
the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (effective November 1, 2015). The
purpose of the riparian buffer restoration is to provide riparian buffer credits to compensate for buffer
impacts within the Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201 and the Falls Lake Watershed. The service area for
the Riparian Buffer Credits is depicted in Figure 2. The mitigation credits generated from this site are
listed in Table 1 and shown in Figure 3.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
Prior to construction activities, the primary degradation on the Site was the original clearing of the Site
and channelization of Martin Dairy and UT1. The channelization involved straightening and deepening of
the stream (as indicated by the amount of dredge spoil in the floodplain). In the past livestock were
grazed on the Site, which contributed to bank sloughing. Table 4 in Appendix 1 presents the pre-
restoration conditions in more detail. The restored riparian buffer areas within the site will aid in
protecting water quality.
The main objective of the project was to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus loading to the Neuse River
tributaries by establishing a forested riparian buffer on land previously used for agricultural purposes.
The riparian buffer will immobilize nutrients, reducing quantities available to downstream aquatic
ecosystems in the Neuse River Basin.
11.115 acres of land were protected with a conservation easement. Out of the 11.155 acres, 10.139
acres were restored for Neuse River buffer credit and 1.017 acres will not generate buffer mitigation
credit. In general, riparian buffer restoration area widths on streams extend out to 200 feet from top of
bank for Neuse River buffer credits. Maps detailing the credit generation are provided in Figure 3.
1.3 Monitoring Year 1 Data Assessment
The final mitigation plan was submitted and accepted by DMS in March 2017. Construction activities
were completed by Land Mechanic Designs, Inc in July 2017. The planting was completed by Bruton
Natural Systems, Inc. in December 2017. The baseline as-built survey for the stream mitigation work was
completed by Turner Land Surveying in August 2017 and for the buffer mitigation component in January
2018. Refer to Appendix 1 for detailed project activity, history, contact information, and watershed/site
background information.
Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 3
Vegetative performance for buffer restoration areas will be in accordance with 15A NCAC
02B .0295(n)(2)(B), and (n)(4) (effective November 1, 2015). To meet success criteria, areas generating
buffer mitigation credits shall include a minimum of four native hardwood tree species or four native
hardwood tree and native shrub species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of stems, and
have a survival of 260 planted stems per acre at the end of the required monitoring period (MY5) (no
interim success criteria required). In order for the monitoring to be terminated, DWR must provide a
written approval of vegetation success of buffer restoration areas generating buffer credit. Annual
monitoring was conducted to assess the condition of the vegetation in September 2018.
1.3.1 Vegetative Assessment
The quantity of monitoring vegetation plots was determined in accordance with the Carolina Vegetative
Sampling
Protocol (CVS Levels I & II) such that at least 2 percent of the Site is encompassed in monitoring plots. A
total of 8 vegetation plots (10 meters by 10 meters) were randomly established between the
conservation easement boundaries and five feet from the top of stream banks. The plot corners have
been marked and are recoverable either through field identification or with the use of a GPS unit.
Reference photographs will be taken at the origin looking diagonally across the plot to the opposite
corner on an annual basis. . Species composition, density, and survival rates will be evaluated on an
annual basis by plot and for the entire site. The extent of invasive species coverage will also be
monitored and controlled as necessary.
The monitoring year 1 (MY1 of 5) vegetative survey was completed in September 2018. The 2018 annual
vegetation monitoring resulted in an average survivability of 491 stems per acre, which is greater than
the final requirement of 320 stems per acre, but approximately 18% less than the baseline density
recorded (597 stems/acre) in January 2018. There was an average of 12 stems per plot compared to 14
stems per plot in MY-0. The site is on track to meet its final success criteria. Please refer to Appendix 3
for vegetation plot criteria attainment data, CVS vegetation plot metadata, and vegetation summary
tables and Appendix 2 for vegetation plot photographs, vegetation condition assessment table, and
monitoring plan view.
1.4 Monitoring Year 1 Summary
Overall, the Site has met the required vegetation success criteria for MY1. All the vegetation plots met
the MY1 success criteria as seen in the monitoring components map. At this time no remedial actions
are proposed.
Summary information/data related to the performance of various project and monitoring elements can
be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Mitigation Plan documents available on
DMS’s website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from DMS
upon request.
Section 2: METHODOLOGY
Planted woody vegetation was monitored in accordance with the guidelines and procedures developed
by the Carolina Vegetation Survey-EEP Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2006). A total of eight standard 10
meter by 10 meter vegetation plots were established within the project easement area.
Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report 4
Section 3: REFERENCES
Breeding, R. 2010. Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities. North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program.
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program. October 2004.
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4.0. Retrieved from
http://www.nceep.net/business/monitoring/veg/datasheets.htm.
Peet, R.K., T.R. Wentworth and P.S. White. 1998. A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm
Schafale, M.P. and Weakley, A.S. 1990. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Third Approximation.
Wildlands Holdings II, LLC (2017). Martin Dairy Mitigation Site. NCDWR, Raleigh NC.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/nutrientbufferbanks
APPENDIX 1. General Figures and Tables
03020201030030
03020201020020
03020201030040
03020201020030
03020201020010
03020201020010Hydrologic Unit Code (14)Project AreaDMS Targeted Local Watersheds
Figure 1. Project Vicinity MapMartin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Orange County, NC¹0 10.5 Miles
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of theNCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site mayrequire traversing areas near or along the easement boundary andtherefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by
authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or theirdesignees/contractors involved in the development, oversight,
and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the termsand timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation or
activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned rolesand activites requires prior coordination with DMS.
Directions:From Raleigh, NC, take I-40 West towards Durham.
Take exit 279B for NC-147 N towards Durham/Downtown. Travel approximately 13 miles and merge onto I-85 S. Travel
approximately 2 miles, take exit 170 for US-70 W.In 0.2 miles turn right onto Pleasant Green Road. Travel 5.8
miles and stay straight through the intersection with St. Mary Road onto Schley Rd. In 0.7 miles, the parking area
is on the left in a powerline R/W 200 feetsouth of Lipscomb Grove Church Road.
FallsLake
0 105 Miles ¹Figure 2. Service Area
Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018Orange County, NC
_̂Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
Service Area- Riparian BufferCounty Boundaries
Marti
n Dair
y Cree
kUT1
Martin Hills Lane
Schley Raod
2017 Aerial Photography
Conservation EasementInternal EasementPowerline EasementsPowerlinesStreamsBuffer Restoration TOB - 100'Buffer Restoration 100' - 200'
Figure 3. Project Component / Asset MapMartin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Orange County, NC¹0 200100 Feet
DMS Project No. 97087
LocationJurisdictional
StreamsRestoration Type
Reach ID
/Component
Buffer Width
(ft)
Creditable Area
(square feet)
Initial
Credit
Ratio (x:1)
% Full
Credit
Final
Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Riparian
Buffer
Credits
(BMU)
Convertible
to Nutrient
Offset
(Yes or No*)
Nutrient
Offset: N
(lbs)
Nutrient
Offset: P
(lbs)
Martin Dairy 0-100 348,392.88 100% 1.00000 348,392.88 No 0.000 0.000Martin Dairy 101-200 93,261.96 33% 3.00000 30,776.45 No 0.000 0.000
441,654.84 379,169.33 0.000 0.000
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
DMS Project No. 97087
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
MITIGATION CREDITS
Riparian Buffer (15A NCAC 02B.0295)If Converted to
Nutrient Offset
Conservation Easement N/A November 2016
Rural Subject Restoration
Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Activity or Report Date Collection Complete Completion or Scheduled Delivery
1
SUBTOTALS
*Riparian buffer credits are not convertible to nutrient offset because the site was used for hay production and livestock have been removed.
Mitigation Plan March 2017 March 2017
Bare Root Planting N/A December 2017
As-Built & Baseline Monitoring Document January 2018 January 2018
Year 1 Monitoring September 2018 December 2018
Year 2 Monitoring 2019 December 2019
Year 3 Monitoring 2020 December 2020
Year 4 Monitoring 2021 December 2021
Year 5 Monitoring 2022 December 2022
Table 3. Project Contact Table
DMS Project No. 97087
Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
DMS Project No. 97087
Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
Monitoring, POC Jason Lorch
Designer
Angela Allen, PE
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
919.851.9986
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
Nursery Stock Suppliers Dykes and Son Nursery
Monitoring Performers
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude) 36° 7' 25.76"N 79° 0' 14.26"W
Project Area (acres) 11.155
919.851.9986, ext. 107
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
County Orange County
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
03020201030030
PROJECT WATERSHED SUMMARY INFORMATION
Physiographic Province Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province
CGIA Land Use Classification 59.0% forested, 40.6% cultivated, 0.40% impervious
DWR Sub-basin 03-04-01
Project Drainage Area (acres) 526.0
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious 0.4%
River Basin Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03020201
DMS Project No. 97087
Common Name Scientific NameWetland Indicator
Status
Red Maple Acer rubrum FAC
Water Hickory Carya aquatica OBL
Sugarberry Celtis laevigata FACW
Sweet Pepperbush Clethra alnifolia FACW
Swamp Titi Cyrilla racemiflora FACW
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana FAC
Water Ash Fraxinus caroliniana OBL
Deciduous Holly Ilex decidua FACW-
Virginia Sweetspire Itea virginica FACW+
Eastern Red Cedar Juniperus virginiana FACU-
Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua FAC+
Yellow Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera FAC
Water Tupelo Nyssa aquatica OBL
Blackgum Nyssa sylvatica FAC
Loblolly Pine Pinus taeda FAC
American Sycamore Platanus occidentalis FACW-
Willow Oak Quercus phellos FACW-
Red Oak Quercus rubra FACU
Shumard Oak Quercus shumardii FACW-
Black Willow Salix nigra OBL
DMS Project No. 97087
Common Name Scientific Name Number Planted % of Total
River Birch Betula nigra 926 16%
Eastern Redbud Cercis canadensis 58 1%
Flowering Dogwood Comus florida 58 1%
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 1,042 18%
Tulip Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 926 16%
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 1,274 22%
Pin Oak Quercus palustris 811 14%
Willow Oak Quercus phellos 695 12%
Total 5,790 100%
Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Table 5. Adjacent Forested Areas Existing Tree and Shrub Species
Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Table 6. Planted Tree Species
APPENDIX 2. Visual Assessment Data
Marti
n Dair
y Cree
kUT1
Martin Hills Lane
Schley Raod
1
3
8
5
7
6
4
2
2017 Aerial Photography
Conservation EasementInternal EasementPowerline EasementsPowerlinesStreamsBuffer Restoration TOB - 100'Buffer Restoration 100' - 200'Vegetation Plot
Figure 4. Monitoring Plan ViewMartin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Orange County, NC¹0 200100 Feet
Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Planted Acreage 10.139
Vegetation Category Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
(Ac)
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of Planted
Acreage
Bare Areas Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material 0.1 0 0 0%
Low Stem Density AreasWoody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count
criteria.0.1 0 0 0%
0 0 0%
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or VigorAreas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring
year.0.25 Ac 0 0 0%
0 0.0 0%
Easement Acreage 11.155
Vegetation Category Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
(SF)
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale). 1,000 0 0 0%
Easement Encroachment Areas Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale). none 0 0 0%
Table 7. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Total
Cumulative Total
VEGETATION PLOT PHOTOGRAPHS
VEG PLOT 1 (09/5/2018) VEG PLOT 2 (09/5/2018)
VEG PLOT 3 (09/5/2018) VEG PLOT 4 (09/5/2018)
VEG PLOT 5 (09/5/2018) VEG PLOT 6 (09/5/2018)
VEG PLOT 7 (09/5/2018) VEG PLOT 8 (09/5/2018)
APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Table
Martin Dairy Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Plot
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
100%
Met Success Criteria Tract Mean
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Table 9 CVS Vegetation Tables - Metadata
Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Project
DMS Project No.97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Report Prepared By Tasha King
Date Prepared 9/25/2018 10:56
Database Name Martin Dairy- cvs-v2.5.0.- MY1.mdb
Database Location F:\Projects\005-02158 Martin Dairy\Monitoring\Monitoring Year 1\Mitigation\Vegetation Assessment
Computer Name CAROLYN-PC
File Size 51679232
Metadata Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Project Planted Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Project Total Stems Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and Spp A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
Project Code 97087
Project Name Martin Dairy
Description Stream Restoration Project
Sampled Plots 8
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------
PROJECT SUMMARY-------------------------------------
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree
Cercis canadensis Redbud Shrub Tree
Cornus florida Flowering Dogwood Shrub Tree 1 1 1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Tree 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1
Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Tree 2
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4
Quercus palustris Pin Oak Tree 2 2 2 5 5 5 3 3 3 1 1 1
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
Ulmus Elm Tree
13 13 13 12 12 13 14 14 14 12 12 14 12 12 12
5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 7 6 6 6
526 526 526 486 486 526 567 567 567 486 486 567 486 486 486
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1
0.02
1
0.02
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
Current Plot Data (MY1 2018)
Table 10. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
Stem count
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
097087-01-0001 097087-01-0002 097087-01-0003 097087-01-0004 097087-01-0005
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 1 - 2018
Betula nigra River Birch Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Tree
Cercis canadensis Redbud Shrub Tree
Cornus florida Flowering Dogwood Shrub Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree
Quercus palustris Pin Oak Tree
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree
Ulmus Elm Tree
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems
Species count
Stems per ACRE
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Table 10. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Martin Dairy Buffer Mitigation Site
Stem count
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 16 16 16 17 17 17
8 8
1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3
1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 13 17 17 29 18 18 18
2
1 1 1 1 1 1 7 7 7 19 19 19
4 4 4 5 5 5 3 3 4 24 24 25 25 25 25
1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 16 16 16 20 20 20
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 14 14 14 14 14
1 1
10 10 18 11 11 13 13 13 24 97 97 121 118 118 118
6 6 7 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 11 8 8 8
405 405 728 445 445 526 526 526 971 491 491 612 597 597 597
0.02
8
0.20
8
0.20
Annual Means
MY1 (2018) MY0 (2018)
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
Current Plot Data (MY1 2018)
097087-01-0006 097087-01-0007 097087-01-0008
APPENDIX 4. Overview Photos