monday, 27 may 2013 commencing at 9.30 a.m. l7 xkrh . ... was that project engin eers were aware of...

NOTICE IS GIVEN that the next meeting of the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum will be held in Kutarere Marae, State Highway 2, Kutarere on:

EMBARGOED Until 2 working days before meeting on:

Monday, 27 May 2013

commencing at 9.30 a.m.

Members please note: that a Powhiri/welcome will take place at 9.30 a.m. followed by morning tea prior to commencement of the meeting.

A short field trip of Ruatuna Road has been scheduled at the conclusion of the meeting.

Whakatohea Maori Trust Board

Upokorehe

Mary-Anne Macleod Chief Executive 20 May 2013

A577985

Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum – Terms of Reference

1 Delegated Function

To oversee and monitor the implementation of the Ohiwa Harbour Strategy.

2 Membership

Membership will consist of an appointed councillor from each of the three Councils and appointed representatives of local Iwi as follows:

One representative - Opotiki District Council.

One representative - Whakatane District Council.

One representative - Bay of Plenty Regional Council.

Four appointees (Tangata Whenua) representing Whakatōhea, Upokorehe, Ngāti Awa and Ngāi Tuhoe.

The Forum (made up of the representatives as outlined above) will specifically invite attendance by organisations/groups which they believe will be interested (such as the Department of Conservation, Ministry of Fisheries, Nukuhou Salt Marsh Care Group). The meetings will also be publicly advertised so that members of the wider community can also attend.

3 Standing Orders

The Bay of Plenty Regional Council Standing Orders, October 2010, based on the New Zealand Standard Model will apply to this Joint Committee, except as varied by these Terms of Reference or unless the members of the Joint Committee unanimously agree to vary those standing orders as they apply to the Joint Committee.

4 Chair

The ‘Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum’ elects a Chairperson at its first meeting each Triennium.

5 Frequency of meetings

Meetings will be held every six months or as required.

6 Term of the Committee

The need for and purpose of ‘Ohiwa Harbour Implementation Forum’ will be revisited every three years from the date of the first meeting. The establishment of the ‘Ohiwa Harbour Implementation Forum’ is subject to review 3 - yearly following local authority elections. Subject to the Forum being re-appointed, Councillor and appointed tangata whenua representatives are appointed by the incoming Councils.

7 Specific Responsibilities and Delegated Authority

The ‘Ohiwa Harbour Implementation Forum’:

is the sponsor of the Ohiwa Harbour Strategy;

is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the actions in the Strategy;

has an overall monitoring role in terms of timeframes and deliverables;

of 76

A577985

maintains a general awareness of the issues surrounding the Ohiwa Harbour Catchment; and

is responsible for reporting back to the strategic partners and to the community.

The ‘Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum’ will:

Receive reports (including those prepared by staff of the three Councils) of what has recently been achieved with regards to implementing the Strategy, and outlining what the next targets for implementation could be;

Provide a sounding board for officers to test implementation ideas against;

Provide recommendations that can be reported back to councils; and

Promote links with the Ohiwa Harbour Catchment community.

8 Administering Authority

Bay of Plenty Regional Council is responsible for the administration of the ‘Ohiwa Harbour Implementation Forum’.

Note:

The Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum reports directly to the Operational Monitoring and Regulation Committee.

The ‘Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum’ has no delegated authority for financial expenditure.

The costs of attendance at meetings lie where they fall. The exception to this is that a standard meeting fee will be provided for Iwi representation. The cost of this will be borne by the Bay of Plenty Regional Council. The actions to give effect to the Strategy itself and costs associated with reporting to the Committee are funded from within the budgets of participating councils.

The Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum is a recommending body only, and does not have decision-making powers.

of 76

Public Forum 1. A period of up to 15 minutes shall be set aside near the beginning of the meeting to enable

members of the public to make statements about any matter on the agenda of that meeting which is open to the public, but excluding any matter on which comment could prejudice any specified statutory process the council is required to follow.

2. The time allowed for each speaker will normally be up to 5 minutes but will be up to the discretion of the chair. A maximum of 3 public participants will be allowed per meeting.

3. No statements by public participants to the Council shall be allowed unless a written, electronic or oral application has been received by the Chief Executive (Governance Team) by 12.00 noon of the working day prior to the meeting and the Chair’s approval has subsequently been obtained. The application shall include the following:

name of participant;

organisation represented (if any);

meeting at which they wish to participate; and matter on the agenda to be addressed.

4. Members of the meeting may put questions to any public participants, relevant to the matter being raised through the chair. Any questions must be asked and answered within the time period given to a public participant. The chair shall determine the number of questions.

of 76

Membership

Chairman: To be decided at the meeting

Members: Councillor C Chambers (Whakatane District Council) M Edwards (Whakatohea Maori Trust Board) Councillor S Fisher (Opotiki District Council) M Manuel (Member for Upokorehe) K Merito (Chairman, Te Runanga o Ngati Awa) N Rua (Member for Ngai Tuhoe, Waimana Kaaku) Councillor M Whitaker (Bay of Plenty Regional Council)

Secretary: S Kameta

Recommendations in reports are not to be construed as Council policy until adopted by Council.

Agenda

1 Apologies

2 General Business and Tabled Items

Items not on the agenda for the meeting require a resolution under section 46A of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 stating the reasons why the time was not on the agenda and why is cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.

3 Previous Minutes

3.1 Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum Meeting - 29 October 2012 11

4 Reports

4.1 Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy Implementation update 21

APPENDIX 1 - Combined OHS Actions May 2013 PDF 27

4.2 Monitoring Recreation Activities in the Ōhiwa Harbour 39

APPENDIX 1 - Ohiwa Harbour Strategy Action 10.3.7 Monitoring Recreation Activities 43

4.3 A Review of Signage around the Ōhiwa Harbour 47

APPENDIX 1 - Signage best practice guide 51

PRESENTATION - Review of Signage around Ohiwa Harbour presentation

of 76

4.4 State of the Ōhiwa Harbour and Catchment 57

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT - Environmental Publication 2013_07 - State of the Ohiwa Harbour and Catchment

PRESENTATION - State of the Ohiwa Harbour and Catchment 2013

4.5 Mini-review of the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy 65

4.6 Proposal for a Harbour side Walkway at Ohope 69

APPENDIX 1 - Map showing location of proposed walkway 71

PRESENTATION - Harbour side walkway at Ohope

5 Consideration of General Business

of 76

Previous Minutes

of 76

1

Minutes of the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum Meeting held in the Boardroom, Whakatohea Maori Trust Board, 122 St John Street, Ōpōtiki on Monday, 29 October 2012 commencing at 9.30 a.m.

Ohiwa H arbour Implementation Forum M eeting - 29 October 2012

Present:

Chairman: M Edwards (Member for Whakatohea, Whakatohea Maori Trust

Board)

Members: Councillor S Fisher (Opōtiki District Council), M Manuel, N Rua

(Member for Ngai Tuhoe, Waimana Kaaku), Councillor M Whitaker (Bay of Plenty Regional Council)

In Attendance: Councillor A Iles (Whakatāne District Council), Councillor T Marr

(Bay of Plenty Regional Council), S Stokes (Land Management Manager – Eastern), H MacKenzie (Environmental Data Officer – Ecology), T Senior (Biosecurity Officer), J Noble (Senior Planner), T Briggs (Policy Analyst), M Hall (Operations Manager, Ōpōtiki District Council), F Hennessey (Technical Advisor, Whakatāne District Council),B Palmer (Department of Conservation), S Kameta (Committee Advisor)

External Presenters: K Paul-Burke and J Burke (Marine Research

Consultants), G McGregor (Ministry of Primary Industries)

Apologies: Councillor C Chambers (Whakatāne District Council) and K Merito

(Chairman, Te Runanga o Ngati Awa)

1 Opening Karakia

N Rua

2 General Business and Tabled Items

Resolved

That pursuant to section 46A of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 the following items be considered at this meeting.

2.1 Findings of Mussel and Starfish Research

Refer Tabled Document Number 1. Under Standing Order 2.12.4, members were advised that the above item was a revised report in respect to agenda item 4.5, and had been pre-circulated to members within the required timeframe (refer Tabled Document Number 1). The Committee noted that the item would be considered as item 4.5 in the agenda order paper.

Resolved

of 76

Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum Monday, 29 October 2012

V:\AGManager\Committees\OhiwaHarbourImplementationForum\Minutes\20121029_OHIF29October2012.docx 2

That the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum:

1 Receives and considers the revised agenda item 4.5 (refer Tabled Document Number 1).

Edwards/Fisher CARRIED

3 Previous Meeting Minutes

3.1 Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum Meeting - 26 March 2012

Simon Stokes advised members of the following completed actions arising from the previous minutes: 1. Minute Item 3.1 – A letter of response had been received from the Minister of

Primary Industries and circulated to members including a 2010 report on pipi and cockle abundance. A representative from the Ministry of Primary Industries would be in attendance to address the meeting as referred to in item 4.8 of the agenda.

2. Minute Item 3.2 - a report and presentation on mussel and starfish findings would

be delivered as item 4.5 on the agenda.

Resolved

That the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum:

1 Confirms the minutes of the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum meeting held on 26 March 2012.

Selby/Rua CARRIED

4 Reports

4.1 Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy Implementation Progress

The report updated the Forum on progress of implementation actions within the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy. Simon Stokes reported that the majority of actions had been completed, with the remainder were progressing well. Emphasis was placed on sedimentation management with advice provided on work scheduled along the Nukuhou River over the next three years.

Members were advised that a review of the Strategy was required in 2013. Mr Stokes asked Forum partners for feedback on appropriate timing for a review, taking into consideration the timing of triennial elections in October and Treaty Settlement claims being undertaking by three of the Forum partners. Feedback was provided by a member suggesting that it would be best to raise the matter again with the Forum as soon as practicable following elections.

Advice was provided to members regarding the scheduled upgrade of Wainui Road, which was to commence over the summer season. Mr Stokes advised that this was a key piece of work that would see impacts to the lower Nukuhou area. Advice provided was that project engineers were aware of the environmental affects to the surrounding environment and that options were being explored.

of 76



Mr Stokes acknowledged the commitment and work of Robert Schlotjes and Beverley Hughes, in progressing the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy, which was acknowledged by Forum members.

Resolved

That the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum under its delegated authority:

1 Receives the report, ‘Ōhiwa harbour Strategy Implementation Progress’.

Whitaker/Edwards CARRIED

Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 9.58 am and reconvened 10.21 am.

4.2 Ōhiwa Harbour Monitoring Programme

Refer PowerPoint Presentation (Objective ID A1459433)

Heather MacKenzie provided the report on the monitoring programme for Ōhiwa Harbour and its catchment. Members received advice on the five yearly reporting timeframe and the types of monitoring that would be included to assess the environmental changes and quality over time. Ms MacKenzie anticipated that the first report would be compiled in the coming year with summary information included in communication newsletters.

Mr Stokes noted that the monitoring programme would be comprehensive and asked for the support of Forum partners in allowing access to Council staff for gathering of information around the harbour. A member queried the timeframe for mangrove extent mapping. Advice was provided that aerial photography had been scheduled and would be available soon.

Resolved


1 Receives the report, ‘Ōhiwa Harbour Monitoring Programme’.

Manuel/Fisher CARRIED

4.3 Summary of Ōhiwa Harbour Mangrove Management during the 2011 - 2012 Season

Refer PowerPoint Presentation (Objective ID A1460192).

Tim Senior presented the report that provided a summary of mangrove management activities during the 2011 and 2012 season. A PowerPoint presentation was provided on mangrove removal activity that had been undertaken around Kutarere.

Members sought advice on several matters including management of scattered plants and seedlings, impacts from decaying foliage following removal, and possible plans for project expansion. Mr Senior answered with advice that mangrove removal had been concentrated in the more densely populated areas around Kutarere. It was expected

of 76



that appropriate management of sedimentation would have positive effects over time. Mr Senior was not aware of any impacts to the environment from remaining foliage.

In response to possible plans to expand the project, Mr Senior confirmed that working bees on the Ōhiwa side of the harbour were planned to commence in summer, and would alternate with work continuing at Kutarere. A letterbox drop to notify the local harbour community and interested volunteers was planned, with distribution of fact sheets and promotion in the Ōpōtiki News. Mr Senior advised that further expansion beyond that would be dependent on voluntary support from the community.

Resolved


1 Receives the report, ‘Summary of Ōhiwa Harbour Mangrove Management during 2011 – 2012’.

Fisher/Maui CARRIED

4.4 Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy communications update

Tim Senior updated the Forum on progress made with implementing the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy communications plan. A key milestone was the completion and creation of the new Ōhiwa Harbour website, which was hosted on the Regional Council website. A brief presentation on the website was provided with acknowledgments noted to Cheeky Rooster consultants who had provided support on its establishment.

Mr Senior explained that emphasis for the coming year would be focused on continuation of actions in progress, with particular emphasis on developing signage around the harbour for the heritage trail (formerly known as the ‘top sites’ project).

Discussion followed on the new website including advice that had been received from Forum partners and monitoring and reporting of website user frequency. Mr Senior was the primary contact and advised that he would be updating the website on a monthly basis and that any further feedback from Forum partners was welcomed. A suggestion was raised for consideration - to provide an area on the website to post local community stories relating to the harbour.

Resolved


1 Receives the report, ‘Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy communications update’.

Whitaker/Rua CARRIED

4.5 Findings of mussel and starfish research

Refer revised report (Tabled Document Number 1) and PowerPoint Presentation (Objective ID A1464875).

Kura Paul-Burke, Environment Research Consultant delivered a presentation in support of the report on survey findings between 2007 and 2009 on mussel and starfish populations in Ōhiwa Harbour. Advice was provided on the significant decrease in mussel bed populations and the characteristics and movements of a significant starfish

of 76



population. Conclusions of the study showed that starfish populations during winter had slowed, but anticipated that predation would pick up during spring, and with likely depletion of the entire mussel bed population. Ms Paul-Burke noted that further considerations regarding the health of the mussel beds and predation of starfish were unresolved and would require further investigation.

Members discussed and received advice regarding similar issues at Maketu. Advice provided was that the issue in Maketu was unresolved and that the issue was more significant at Ōhiwa, also taking into account deeper depths. Comments mentioned by local elders advised that starfish had not been an historical issue in the harbour. In respect of the rāhui established since 2003, it was noted that assumptions from the research did not see human predation as a factor in the declining mussel populations.

Mr Stokes sought feedback from members on next steps and proposed that further discussion on the study findings and considerations take place with Ms Paul-Burke at the coordinating group level. Members supported this direction to investigate further work being done and develop a method for control. It was noted that this would be subject to available funding. Mr Stokes advised that he would report back to the Forum on the matter.

Resolved


1 Receives the report, ‘Findings of mussel and starfish research in the Ōhiwa Harbour’.

Fisher/Manuel CARRIED

4.6 Update on Coastal Policy in the Bay of Plenty region

Refer PowerPoint Presentation (Objective ID A1462462).

Jo Noble provided the report that updated members on the development of a new Regional Coastal Environment Plan and progress that had been made with Variation 1 of the proposed Regional Policy Statement (RPS), in respect to coastal policy provisions. Ms Noble highlighted matters relating to Ōhiwa Harbour and the timeframes for consulting with tangata whenua and key stakeholders on the draft plan, which was due in February/March 2013. A presentation was provided on coastal policy mapping, with advice on minor boundary adjustments that would be made following aerial mapping becoming available.

Clarification was provided to members on several matters. Advice was provided on provisions within the proposed RPS that was not recommending aquaculture within harbours, but would provide for options for enabling certain types of activity such as small research trials. In response to a query raised regarding the ranking of Ohakana Island under the outstanding natural character criteria, Ms Noble advised modification and presence of buildings had lowered its ranking. A query was raised on petroleum fracking in Ōhiwa Harbour. Advice was provided that the volcanic geology of the region did not lend itself to this activity and that it was highly unlikely.

Resolved


of 76



1 Receives the report, ‘Update on Coastal Policy in the Bay of Plenty region’.

Rua/Maui CARRIED

4.7 The National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management

Toni Briggs presented the report on the Regional Council’s progressive implementation programme for freshwater management, which had been adopted by the Regional Council in the previous week, as a requirement of the National Policy Statement (NPS) for Freshwater Management. Forum members were advised that the implementation programme was required to be fully implemented by 2030 and was essentially a timeline of tasks for the management of water. Ms Briggs noted that the Regional Council had an established water programme, which had been leading in the direction of the NPS.

In respect to Ōhiwa harbour, Ms Briggs explained that the work that was currently being undertaken aligned well with the implementation programme. Some policies, rules and strategies would be introduced to implement the NPS that would support the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy. Ms Briggs advised that a further update would be provided to the Forum on the implementation programme.

A member questioned the 2030 timeline and the impact of future changes at the central government level; concerns which had also been raised by the Regional Council. Ms Briggs advised that while changes from central government would influence the implementation programme, there was not a lot that the Regional Council could do, but to take an adaptive management approach.

Resolved


1 Receives the report, ‘The National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management’.

Whitaker/Fisher CARRIED

4.8 Commercial Licences for Shellfish in Ōhiwa Harbour

Graeme McGregor, Senior Fisheries Analyst in Fisheries Management from the Ministry for Primary Industries (Ministry) was in attendance to advise and receive feedback from the Forum partners in respect of commercial harvesting of shellfish in Ōhiwa Harbour.

Simon Stokes introduced Mr McGregor and provided background of the Forum’s requests to meet with a representative of the Ministry, to discuss their request for a review of commercial harvesting of shellfish in Ōhiwa Harbour. Mr Stokes noted that a letter and report from 2010 on pipi and cockle abundance had been forthcoming from the Ministry and circulated to members. Mr McGregor provided advice on the Ministry’s position, the historical nature of permits and the introduction and consultation undertaken on the quota management system (QMS) prior to its adoption in 2004.

Clarification was sought by members on consultation with Iwi. Mr McGregor advised that consultation with Iwi had occurred in 2005. Key influences which had led to agreement with the QMS were the introduction of provisions of 20 percent allocation of

of 76



commercial fishing for Maori, and a key element based on science research to support catch limits, to adjust if necessary, to ensure the sustainability of the fisheries.

Mr McGregor noted that research was a key element and that the Ministry was funding large scale species surveys to provide a snapshot on the amounts of recreational shellfish catches. This would assist in tracking set allowances in terms of how well species were doing. The Ministry would be working with customary officers on this piece of work.

Members questioned why Ōhiwa Harbour was the only licensed area within the quota management area for harvesting cockle and pipi. An additional comment was raised by a member regarding possible negative reactions within the local Māori community if commercial harvesting continued. Mr McGregor advised that in terms of health requirements other areas had proved to be economically unviable for commercial harvesting, despite marked improvements. McGregor appreciated the community concerns that had been raised and advised of an effective tool for providing a solution in the long-term would be to consider establishment of a mātaitai reserve in specific areas. Further advice was provided on customary liaison officers within the Ministry that would be happy to discuss and assist.

Other comments and discussion were noted regarding engaging local researchers for undertaking survey work. Mr McGregor noted the Ministry contracted this work out and that local tenders were welcome.

The Committee Chair thanked Mr McGregor for his attendance and appreciated the advice and clarification that had been provided. If Forum partners had any further questions, these could be directed through Simon Stokes.

Resolved


1 Receives the report, ‘Commercial Licences for Shellfish in Ōhiwa Harbour’.

Whitaker/Rua CARRIED

5 Closing Mihi and Karakia

Councillor T Marr.

The meeting closed at 12.53 pm.

of 76

Reports

of 76

File Reference:

2.00324

Significance of Decision: Low

Report To: Ohiwa Harbour Implementation Forum

Meeting Date: 27 May 2013

Report From: Simon Stokes, Land Management Manager (Eastern)

Ohiwa Harbour Strategy Implementation update

Executive Summary

The purpose of this report is to update the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum on the implementation progress of actions contained within the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy since the last hui in October 2012.

1 Recommendations


1 Receives the report, Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy Implementation update.

2 Confirms that the decision is within the Bay of Plenty Regional Council’s strategic planning framework (Council’s Ten Year Plan, and planning documents and processes under the Resource Management Act 1991, Biosecurity Act 1993, Land Transport Management Act 2003, Civil Defence and Emergency Management Act 2002, and Local Government Acts 1974 and 2002).

2 Background

This Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy covers the Ōhiwa Harbour and its drainage catchment area.

The Strategy is a non-statutory document that was prepared by Bay of Plenty Regional Council with input from Whakatane District Council, Ōpōtiki District Council, Ngati Awa, Upokorehe, Whakatoheā, and Ngāi Tūhoe. The Strategy was formally approved in June 2008

The Forum meets twice a year and a progress report is presented to the Operations, Monitoring and Regulations Committee once a year. The last report was present to this committee on 29th October 2012. The next hui is due on December 2nd 2013 hosted by Bay of Plenty Regional Council.

of 76


2

Coordination of operational work undertaken by the various partners is overseen by the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy Coordination Group which has both political and staff representation.

3 Introduction

2012-2013 has been another positive and proactive implementation period for the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy. The Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy Coordination Group continues to work well as a partnership with its ability to focus and deliver on ground benefits. This is at a time when many of the partners are very busy with their own Treaty and economic issues and with the local economy still difficult to work within.

One Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum hui and four Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy Coordination Group hui have held in 2012-2013.

The Bay of Plenty Regional Council approved in the 2012-2022 Ten Year Plan a continuing focus on implementing the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy. The Council also renewed its targets for the Ōhiwa Harbour catchment streams and the Nukuhou River which flows into the estuary. To support the strategy’s implementation the 2012-2013 Bay of Plenty Regional Council operational budget including staff charges is $94,344.

4 Strategy Actions Update

A complete list of strategy actions and their status is shown in Appendix 1. There are additional worksheets showing the action status of the four completed supporting action plans and subsets of actions, namely: Sediment and Mangrove Management Plan, Ōhiwa Harbour Communications Plan, Ecological actions and Resource Management actions.

There are 37 actions in the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy. All of them at this stage have been completed and are finished or on-going, or are in progress. This is an increase from 86% to 100%.

Four strategy actions resulted in four additional planning documents which also have actions; the Sediment and Mangrove Management Plan, Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy Communications Plan, Ecological actions and the Resource Management actions. The following is a summary of their progress. Progress has increased to 90% of actions completed which is an increase from 86% last year.

1. 19 actions within the Communications Plan: 17 completed or in progress (89%) – no change since the last hui.

2. 16 actions within the Sediment and Mangrove Management Plan: 16 completed or in progress (100%).

3. 9 actions with the Ecological actions: 6 completed or in progress (66%) and 3 on hold indefinitely.

4. 7 actions within the Resource Management actions: 7 completed or in progress (100%).

4.1 Objectives for 2012-2013

of 76


3

The objectives for 2012-2013 were to complete the remaining five actions in the strategy that had not been implemented, in addition to continuing the on-going actions. Those actions are;

Advocacy on fishing issues

Clarify the status of public land

Enhance the Ōhope spit Harbour Edge walkway

Monitoring recreation activities

Review community suggestions (numbering 22)

4.1.1 Advocacy on fishing issues

Recently funding from the Ministry of Primary Industries via Mai nga Kuri o Wharei ti Tihirau and the Bay of Plenty Regional Council and Te Runanga o Ngāti Awa has been successfully provided for new mussel/starfish survey. Diving the mussel beds is due to start soon on the Ōhope side of Ōhiwa Harbour. A meeting is also planned between Council staff and the local Ministry of Primary Industries representative to discuss further fishing advocacy management. Recently the 0800 POACHER hot line has been added to the website.

Fisheries issues within Ōhiwa Harbour have been an area of slow progress for the strategy partners. There has been a long term focus on the process of developing a moana rohe led by Ngāti Awa followed by the implementation of a maitatai reserve. This approach needs further kōrero between the four iwi partners as to how to progress this approach to fishery issues within the Ōhiwa Harbour.

4.1.2 Clarify the status of public land

Mapping the status of ownership of land parcels adjacent to harbour has been largely completed with a small collection of parcels having their status reviewed by the District Councils. At this early stage though, it is clear that the ownership of land parcels directly adjacent to the harbour is a mixture of private and public land. Assess sites are largely known and there is minimal scope for increasing the amount of access. Since the strategy has been in place there has been no pressure from the community or any user groups to increase access to the harbour.

4.1.3 Enhance the Ōhope spit Harbour Edge walkway

This action has been discussed previously with the Department of Conservation but there has been no progress on creating more of a walkway than what is defined at the Ōhope spit currently.

Ōpōtiki District Council are extending the Ōhiwa based walkway and are going through the consent process and Historic Places Trust assessment currently with the work hopefully to begin in the new financial year.

Another proposal is a walkway in Ōhope which another report from the Rotary Club of Whakatāne.

4.1.4 Monitoring recreation activities

One of the strategy actions is to carry out monitoring of recreation activities. Some progress has been made towards this and is detailed more fully in another report to this Forum.

of 76


4

4.1.5 Review community suggestions

This related to 22 suggestions from members of the community for actions that fell outside the scope of the main themes of the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy around the Ōhiwa harbour.

Eleven of these have been actioned in recent years by the agencies responsible such as enhancing the old pumice pit (on Wainui Rd), carried out by Whakatāne District Council, and providing toilet facilities at Ōhiwa Scenic Reserve, carried out by Ōpōtiki District Council.

Three suggestions are in progress, such as establishing pest eradication programmes on islands. One (control location of fish nets) cannot be carried out as it is the responsibility of the Ministry of primary Industries. One is not necessary (assess coastal erosion works, as there isn’t any known erosion). The remaining six cannot be carried out, either because they are prohibitively expensive, for example providing a tidal swimming facility or for practical reasons, for example better identification of channels is not possible because of the nature of the harbour substrate.

4.2 Existing on-going actions highlights

Of the on-going actions the following are highlights;

Effective mangrove removal led by Te Upokorehe hapū with community support. A summary of what has happened in in the State of Environment update for Ōhiwa Harbour Catchment. It has been a real success story thus far with a lot of manual labour involved.

Signage survey of the Ōhiwa Harbour has been completed by Cheeky Rooster Ltd; a presentation on the findings is occurring at this hui.

A State of Environment report has been completed for the Ōhiwa Harbour and its catchment collating various recorded monitoring data which provides a summary of the current state of our harbour and its catchments.

Extension to protected stream length in Nukuhou River

The length of streams within the Ōhiwa Harbour catchment is 28.8km. 26.9km or 93.7% is currently protected and at this stage no additional meterage has been added this year to increase the protection.

The length of streams within the Nukuhou River catchment and its tributary streams is 146.5km. 120km or 82% is currently protected. 3.3km has been added this year to increase the protection to 84%. There have been no prosecutions this financial year within the catchment.

5 Communications and Engagement

The past year has seen the establishment of the Ōhiwa web page on the Bay of Plenty Regional Council website and it seems to have been a success. Of the 1753 pages on the website, the Ōhiwa page is the 33rd most popular, shown by the number of visits. The community newsletter is now into its eighth quarterly issue and is emailed to over 150 individuals, groups and organisations with some very positive feedback from readers.

of 76


5

6 Objectives for 2013-2014

There are two main objectives for 2013-2014. The first one is to continue implementing the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy to ensure those actions in progress are completed or develop into on-going business.

The second and main objective is linked to implementing the recommendations from the review of our strategy.

7 Summary

Progress of the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy has been purposeful and the value of the strategy can be found in the well-formed relationships of those involved and increasingly collaborative working model that exists within the partners. In less than five year the partners have nearly completed 37 actions and generated several more which have also been completed or formed the basis for more efficient working process.

Three of the partners (Whakatōhea and Upokorehe, and Ngāi Tūhoe) are still involved in Treaty settlement processes with the Crown, which involves the Ōhiwa Harbour. This has not affected the ability of the partnership to keep coordinating the management of the harbour or its catchments.

The Bay of Plenty Regional Council has made progress in implementing the NPS for Freshwater whereby Ōhiwa Harbour and the Nukuhou River could provide a suitable situation to test catchment management through a collaborative approach. This is because of the structure in place with the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy Coordination Group and the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum.

8 Financial Implications

Current Budget

There are no current budget implications.

There are no future budget implications in relation to implementing the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy.

Future Implications

Reviewing the strategy in 2013-2014 may require some refocus of the budget funding.

Simon Stokes Land Management Manager (Eastern)

20 May 2013 Click here to enter text.

of 76

APPENDIX 1

Combined OHS Actions May 2013 PDF

of 76

Theme Action Ref

Action Intent and details Proposed Lead Agency

Proposed Support Agencies

OHS Due Date

Target Due Date

Status Start of year status and First Quarter August 27 Progress report

Second Quarter to December 10 Progress report

Third quarter to Feb 18 Progress report Fourth quarter to April 29 Progress report

Health of the estuary

7.3.1 Managing sedimentation within the catchment.

Evaluate current practice and rule provisions. Ensure best practice in management methods. Forum to review. Advice to roading authorities. Enforcement action if apporpriate.

BOPRC, ODC, WDC

Fed farmers, Forestry, NZTA, Iwi, Roading contractors.

1/07/2009 Jul-10 COMPLETED AND ONGOING See also sediment and mangrove plan actions

Status of earthworks rules to be checked in new Whakatāne District Plan and BOPRC Regional Policy Statement. Forestry guidelines review is underway at BOPRC

Ōhiwa catchment streams total 28.8km. 26.9km protected (93.7%). Nukuhou River and tribs total 146.5km. 118.5km protected (81.9%) Wainui Rd route security first consultation mtg held with engineers, stakeholders and residents. Options ranked. 2nd hui on 17th Dec.

2nd Wainui Rd route security mtg held - options presented with modelling.

Wainui Rd route security upgrade has go ahead, approved by BOPRC. Mitigation of sedimentation and interference with biodiversity will be mitigated. Still need to ensure any earthworks or forestry harvest roading and or havesting is managed well.


7.3.2 Planting on unstable slopes.

Also on riparian margins. Encourage planting, esp. public land. Discourage removal. Target high risk areas.

BOPRC, landowners, ODC, WDC

Iwi, Community groups

Ongoing Jul-13 COMPLETED AND ONGOING See also sediment and mangrove plan actions

On-going action with Land Management staff having set targets.

This is an on-going part of the advisory service but there has been minimla spaced planting on unstable slopes. The only work that has ouccrred has been to put forestry species in place in the Waingarara strean catchment (90ha's).


7.3.3 Nutrient Budgeting Information.

Promote - website and info sheets. BOPRC ODC, WDC, Federated Farmers

1/07/2009 Jul-09 COMPLETED AND ONGOING See also sediment and mangrove plan actions

On-going action which has been re-emphasised to Land Management staff at BOPRC to check.

Nutrient budgeting is reportedly been put in place by the fertiliser companies and reported as such from a regional basis. There have also been field days for dairy farmers in the area on effluent and fertiliser management. Staff do talk to farmers about thier nutrient management but there is more work to be done to focus on diffuse nutrient management issues on farm.


7.3.4 Advice on Shellfish Risks.

Provide public advice (not to gather after heavy rain) and signage.

BOPRC, MoH BOPRC, WDC, ODC, Iwi

1/07/2009 Jul-09 COMPLETED AND ONGOING

On-going. Toi Te Ora put warnings on website. These will be promoted locally by partners.

N/A N/A N/A


7.3.5 Stop Contamination of Urban Storm water.

Raise awareness and provide advice. Car washing recommendations. Stencil drains. Action plans from BOPRC stormwater strategy.

ODC/WDC BOPRC, community

1/07/2009 Jul-09 COMPLETED AND ONGOING See also Comms plan actions

Stencilling promotion on stormwater grates - no action so far. Action added to comms plan.


7.3.6 Management of Mangroves.

Map, monitor, research trends, causes and impacts. Support management plans.

BOPRC ODC, WDC, DOC, Iwi, Care groups

Ongoing Jul-13 COMPLETED AND ONGOING See sediment and mangrove plan actions

4ha mangroves cleared near Kutarere by hapū and Kutarere community. See sediment and mangrove actions.

Annual report sent to Pollution prevention. Factsheet comleted. Plan completed for 2012/3. First season's working bee held at Ōhiwa.

2 more working bees Ōhiwa side. From spit to Reeves Rd extension completed. 1 working bee Kutarere side. Almost reached 1st Kutarere stream. Factsheet being distributed. Email group set up. New mapping in progress.

Another 7 working bees held. Season completed. 10-28 volunteers. Fortnightly email updates sent.

Kaimoana 8.3.1 Advocacy on Fishing Issues.

Enforcement and research of sustainable use. More fisheries officers. Support wardens in compliance. Investigate methods and sustainability. More resources, interest from MPI. Communicate issues to MPI. Joint advocacy.

Iwi, BOPRC, WDC, ODC

MPI Ongoing Jul-13 IN PROGRESS Exchange of letters with MPI. Unsatisfactory outcome. MPI staff not prepared to visit. Starfish issue raised again - unable to cull without rohe moana.

After furthef correspondence with MPI, Graeme McGregor, senior fisheries analyst attended October OHIF to discuss cockle and pipi licences.

Plan to promote in Seaweek in March. Article in Opo News and Beacon. Trying to get funding for Kura Burke to redo mussel/starfish survey. Her 1st survey presented to last OHIF. Upokorehe Kaitiaki active over summer.

Funding from MPI via Mai nga Kuri o Wharei ti Tihirau with top up from BOPRC and Ngāti Awa for new mussel/starfish survey. Diving to start soon. Meeting planned between Tim and Eugene.

Kaimoana 8.3.2 Māhinga Mataitai Status for Ōhiwa Harbour.

Seek this. Consult with community. Increase community understanding.

Iwi partners MPI 1/07/2010 Jul-13 IN PROGRESS High priority. Bev has provided information on process. Iwi to lead.

Ohiwa Harbour Strategy Action Plan ‐ progress tracking report to May 24th 2013

of 76

Theme Action Ref

Action Intent and details Proposed Lead Agency

Proposed Support Agencies

OHS Due Date

Target Due Date

Status Start of year status and First Quarter August 27 Progress report

Second Quarter to December 10 Progress report

Third quarter to Feb 18 Progress report Fourth quarter to April 29 Progress report

Kaitiakitanga 9.3.1 Develop Iwi Planning Document for Ōhiwa Harbour.

Integrated plan. Develop protocols and processes.

Iwi partners BOPRC, ODC, WDC

1/07/2009 Jul-09 COMPLETED Paper has been to OHSCG and OHIF.

Kaitiakitanga 9.3.2 Whakatōhea Review ‘Tawharau o Nga Hapu o Whakatōhea’.

(Iwi management Plan) Whakatōhea BOPRC, ODC To be determined by Whakatōhea

Jul-13 IN PROGRESS In progress. Whakatōhea to advise of developments.

Draft plan has been completed.

Kaitiakitanga 9.3.3 Identify Ōhiwa Harbour’s Cultural Heritage.

For protection purposes. Ensure appropriate rules in Plans.

Iwi partners BOPRC, ODC, WDC, NZHPT

Ongoing Jul-13 IN PROGRESS See also Comms plan actions

Need to complete the work and it is tied to work in communications plan (Top sites, website)

Upokorehe working towards completing theirs.

Kaitiakitanga 9.3.4 Develop Protocols with Statutory Agencies

To provide processes to integrate kaitiakitanga into resource management processes. Cost sharing.

Iwi parners BOPRC, ODC, WDC

1/07/2010 Jul-10 COMPLETED AND ONGOING See also Resource Management actions

High priority. Work is now underway through several actions in Resource Management Review Actions worksheet

Further recommendations presented by consultant which need to be discussed internally by BOPRC, WDC, ODC.

Still some work to do in this to ensure all of the partners have satisfactory protocols with regards to providing for their kaitiakitanga for the harbour.

Kaitiakitanga 9.3.5 Add Kaitiakitanga into the Community’s View of Harbour Management.

Integrate into resource management. Use wananga, signage, education resources.

Iwi partners, BOPRC, WDC, ODC

DOC, MPI, Community

Ongoing Jul-13 COMPLETED AND ONGOING

This acknowledgement needs to be added to 9.3.1 and endorsed in principle by OHIF. Kaitiakitanga approach for Ōhiwa Harbour should be now applied to implementation of the actions in the strategy

Recreation opportunities

10.3.1 Consider Opportunities to Obtain Harbour Access.

Through landowner agreements, aquisition, exchange, district plan changes, subdivision, RCEP changes.

ODC, WDC. BOPRC, DoC, iwi, landowners, developers

Ongoing Jul-13 IN PROGRESS Needs more emphasis from District councils. Esplanade reserves are set aside with new subdivisions.

This action is being considered further as part of clarifying status of public land exercise.


10.3.2 Clarify the Status of Public Land.

And clarify access over paper roads,marginal strips. Investigate access issues. Need for management controls? Reserve man plans, dist plans.

BOPRC, ODC, WDC

DOC, reserve trustees.

1/07/2009 Jul-13 IN PROGRESS Action is not a priorty until many other actions are dealt with. Requires comprehensive spatial planning map to establish land tenure and contacts.

Mapping status of ownership of land parcels adjacent to harbour largely completed.

Assessment has begun and to be completed before next hui.


10.3.3 Develop Reserves Vision for Ōhiwa Harbour.

Assess long term objectives for reserves and walkways. Future needs and access. Ōhope reserves man plan. Port Ōhope Development Concept plan.

ODC, WDC. BOPRC, DOC, iwi.

1/07/2010 Jul-13 IN PROGRESS Action is not a priorty until many other actions are dealt with. BOPRC Tim Senior to follow up with this.

ODC reserves management plans out for public submission but process currently on hold.


10.3.4 Enhance Ōhope Spit Harbour Edge Walkway.

Enhancement through Man Plan. Track and signage.

WDC DoC, iwi, landowners

1/07/2010 Jul-13 IN PROGRESS WDC to action by June 2013 WDC investigating this. Hugh Lovelock and Rotary have plan to build walkway from wharf to Waterways subdivision.

To be discussed with Hugh further before next hui


10.3.5 Assess Public Camping Facilities.

Investigate current and future demand, protection mechanisms to ensure future availability. Encourage new space if necessary.

WDC, ODC, DOC

Iwi, interest groups, lease holders

1/01/2009 Jan-09 COMPLETED AND ONGOING

Action has completed status but is also open to change depending on District planning reviews.


10.3.6 Investigate development of Regional Parks.

To enhance access to harbour. Links with other reserves. To support low impact recreation.

BOPRC (Land Management)

All partners, landowners

Ongoing Jul-13 IN PROGRESS Action is not a priorty until many other actions are dealt with. Onekawa Te Mawhai in progress.

Onekawa Te Mawhai MoU signed by Upokorehe and BOPRC. Management plan now in development. Basic operational maintenance of site continues.

of 76

Theme Action Ref

OHS Action Comms Plan Sub Action

Project description Proposed Lead Agency

Support Agencies

OHS communications plan due

date

Target Start Date

Target Due Date

Status Start of year status and First Quarter August 27 Progress

report

Second quarter December 10 Progress report

Feb progress April progress


7.3.5 Stop Contamination of Urban Storm water. Linked to action:13.3.2 Comms/Education Plan

Stormwater promotion

Stencilling promotion on stormwater grates

ODC, WDC ODC, WDC, BOPRC

1/07/2009 Aug-08 Aug-09 COMPLETED AND ONGOING

COMPLETED

Kaitiakitanga 9.3.5 Add Kaitiakitanga into the Community’s View of Harbour Management; combined with action 9.3.1 Linked to action 13.3.2 Comms/education plan.

Kaitiakitanga inclusion

Details to be confirmed OHS partners to discuss who would like to take lead.

OHS partners to discuss who would like to support.

1/06/2013 Aug-08 Jun-13 COMPLETED AND ONGOING

COMPLETED

A more informed community

13.3.2 Develop a Communication/Education Plan

Quick Guide to the OHS comms plan

Prepare a one-page overview document so that people can gain an understanding of what the communications plan contains.

BOPRC Contractor 1/03/10 Mar-10 Mar-10 COMPLETED COMPLETED



OHSCG E-contacts list

Develop e-contacts for easy communications with OHSCG reps and others in their organisations.

BOPRC All OHSCG partners.

1/08/10 Jul-10 Sep-10 COMPLETED AND ONGOING

List is continually being updated List regularly updated List regularly updated List regularly updated



Protocol for publications

Prepare protocol concerning process for research and publication of any cultural/ecological information.

BOPRC Contractor 1/10/10 Jul-10 Oct-10 COMPLETED COMPLETED. Email preferred.



OHSCG Rapid response e-contact list and phone tree

Develop and maintain email and phone contact list for all relevant OHSCG contacts. To provide for rapid communications and resolutions between meetings and as issues arise.

BOPRC All OHSCG partners

1/06/11 Jul-10 Jul-11 COMPLETED AND ONGOING

List is continually being updated. OHSCG members to give contacts details for their networks to Tim Senior by email [email protected] or phone on 0800 884 880 (All).

List regularly updated List regularly updated List regularly updated



Stakeholder Research

Informal survey of Ohiwa residents to find out if and how they would like to receive OHS related information.

BOPRC 1/06/11 Jul-10 Jun-11 COMPLETED A list of ‘Top Sites’ has been proposed and outline plan prepared. Pou project has been put on hold.



Community contacts list

Gather contacts for Ohiwa community interested in receiving newsletter.


1/06/11 Jul-10 Jun-11 COMPLETED AND ON GOING

The OHSCG e-newsletter was trialed over the past year but will be discontinued, as the OHSCG Hui Summary and Ōhiwa Community Newsletter are now conveying the same information.

List regularly updated. List regularly updated. List regularly updated. Currently about 150 individuals and groups

Ohiwa Harbour Strategy Communications Plan actions ‐ progress to May 24th 2013

of 76

Theme Action Ref

OHS Action Comms Plan Sub Action


Support Agencies

OHS communications plan due

date

Target Start Date

Target Due Date

Status Start of year status and First Quarter August 27 Progress

report

Second quarter December 10 Progress report




Top sites' project Two sites of significance (cultural/environmental/recreation/landscape) agreed on per year. Develop location based interpretation/signage and publications.


1/06/13 Jul-10 Jun-13 IN PROGRESS 4 issues completed - last in July.



OHSCG E-news Generate 4 e-newsletter/year for OHSCG reps and staff in their organisations.


1/06/15 Jul-10 Jun-15 COMPLETED Three mtgs held during year - last in June. Top sites, monitoring, bird monitoring, care groups, pest control, dotterels, branding discussed.

Minutes summary produced Minutes summary produced Minutes summary produced



Community newsletter

Generate 4 emailable/printable newsletters/year for Ohiwa community.


1/06/15 Jul-11 Jun-15 COMPLETED AND ONGOING

Simon Stokes, Bev Hughes and other OHSCG members will meet with OHS iwi partners. The hui will be an opportunity for the wider hapū and iwi to discuss important Ōhiwa Harbour issues kanohi ki te kanohi

5 issues completed - last in October 2012

Jan issue 6 produced Mar issue 7 produced



OHSCG operational wananga

Three-monthly get together of OHSCG operational staff.

BOPRC All OHSCG partners and community groups/other stakeholders


Xmas 2012 celebration held at ŌhopeNo pressing needs this quarter No pressing needs this quarter No pressing needs this quarter. No point in haing hui if there is no great need.



OHS wananga Annual get together of OHS partner reps and staff to continue to build relationships as well as assess progress and plan for future OHS actions.

BOPRC Iwi 1/06/15 Jul-10 Jun-11 IN PROGRESS No action last year. None held None held None held. But this is perhaps increasing in importance as iwi negotiate/realise settlements and staff change



Ohiwa Harbour celebratory events.

Annual get together of OHS partner reps and staff and community to celebrate work done and appreciation of the harbour.



No action last year. Birds-a-plenty festival supported by staff and small sponsorship by BOPRC



Whanaungatanga Hosted marae stays run by iwi with help as required from OHS agency staff. Focused on Harbour's cultural and natural history. 3-6 monthly.

Iwi Iwi and relvant OHSCG reps as required.

1/06/15 Jul-11 Jun-15 NO PROGRESS No action last year.



Decision-makers wananga

Harbour tour and marae stay for Councillors and managers of statutory orgs. Focused on Harbur's cultural and natural history and resources. One off event.


1/10/13 Jul-11 Oct-13 NO PROGRESS Tim working with Cheeky Rooster. Review and framework prepared. Text prepared and uploaded.

of 76

Theme Action Ref OHS Action Sediment and Mangrove plan Sub Action


Support Agencies

OHS Due Date

Target Start Date

Target Due Date

Status Year start status and First Quarter August 27 Progress report

Year start status and First Quarter August 27

Progress report

Second quarter December 10 Progress Report


7.3.1 Managing sedimentation in the catchment

Forestry operations education

Forestry operations education for large operations and on farm operations, plus promotion

BOPRC all other agencies

30/06/14 Oct-09 Jun-14 COMPLETED AND ONGOING

Consent applied for and granted to 2020 On-going work for BOPRC land management staff.



Forestry consents Forestry consents are applied correctly and monitored, promote the use of forestry operators accreditation scheme


30/06/14 Oct-09 Jun-14 COMPLETED AND ONGOING

Comms plan finalised and implementation begun in November 2011. Presentations given to WDC and Ōhope and Tāneatua community boards.

Comms plan finalised and implementation begun in November 2011. Presentations given to WDC and Ōhope and Tāneatua community boards.

On-going work for BOPRC land management staff.



Land use change Promote the change in land use to forest type vegetation of all LUC Class 7 land as per the erosion risk map


30/06/14 Oct-09 Jun-14 IN PROGRESS On-going work for BOPRC land management staff. Update?

On-going work for BOPRC land management staff. Update?




Riparian fencing Continue fencing stock from remaining 47.3km of waterways in the Ōhiwa and Nukuhou catchments




On-going work for BOPRC land management staff. Ōhiwa catchment streams total 28.8km. 26.9km protected (93.7%). Nukuhou River and tribs total 146 5km 118 5km protected



River and stream bank stabilising works

Continue river and stream bank stabilising works (Jap walnut removal, revegetation) for the major streams - focus on Nukuhou and Matahaka stream




On-going work for BOPRC land management staff. This has been focused on the lower Nukuhou River due to on-going erosion of river banks.



Stock crossings All stock crossings through streams must be altered to culverts or bridges




On-going work for BOPRC land management staff. This work is being supported by the dairy industry as per their Cleans Streams Accord.



Promotion of farm management to reduce sedimentation

Promote the maintenace of suitable pasture cover, fertiliser regimes, and suitable stock types on farmed LUC Class 6 land.







Retirement of indigenous forest

Continue to protect and retire indigenous forest, particularly focused on sites with high ecological values

BOPRC WDC, ODC, Ngāti Awa



On-going work for BOPRC land management staff. Ōhiwa Cove subdivision will protect some indig forest remnants.



Implement farm planning and education

Implement and promote farm planning and sustainable land use education, where necessary


30/06/14 Oct-09 Jun-14 IN PROGRESS On-going work for BOPRC land management staff. On-going but mammoth area to put work into (6,979ha's) advising on forestry and carbon currently to affect land use change. Update?

On-going work for BOPRC land management staff. On-going but mammoth area to put work into (6,979ha's) advising on forestry and carbon currently to affect land use

On-going work for BOPRC land management staff. Ngāti Awa Farm Land management Plan beginning implentation.


7.3.2 Planting on unstable slopes

Soil conservation planting

Promotion of spaced soil conservation planting on LUC Class 6 pasture land






7.3.6 Management of Mangroves

Mangrove Consent Work with Upokorehe to develop mangrove removal consent

BOPRC Upokorehe 30/06/11 Aug-08 Jun-11 COMPLETED On-going work for BOPRC land management staff. Ōhiwa Cove subdivision will protect indig forest remnants. Update?

On-going work for BOPRC land management staff. Ōhiwa Cove subdivision will protect indig forest remnants.

Sediment & Mangrove Management Plan actions ‐ progress to May 24th 20

of 76

Theme Action Ref OHS Action Sediment and Mangrove plan Sub Action


Support Agencies

OHS Due Date

Target Start Date

Target Due Date

Status Year start status and First Quarter August 27 Progress report

Year start status and First Quarter August 27

Progress report

Second quarter December 10 Progress Report



Mangrove removal communications plan

Develop plan for how stakeholders and community will be invovled/communicated with as mangrove removal project progresses

BOPRC Upokorehe 30/06/11 Aug-08 Jun-11 COMPLETED AND ONGOING

On-going work for BOPRC land management staff. Ngāti Awa Fram Land management Plan under implentation. Update?

On-going work for BOPRC land management staff. Ngāti Awa Fram Land management Plan under implentation.

Articles/columns placed in local papers (Early Dec). Factsheet and programme distributed locally.



Fact sheet update Review draft fact sheet and prepare for publication

BOPRC Upokorehe 30/06/12 Jun-11 Jun-12 COMPLETED Draft produced Completed



Upokorehe Training Day

Upokorehe/BOPRC hold training day to practise mangrove removal techniques and ensure all health and safety procedures covered.

Upokorehe BOPRC 30/06/12 Jun-11 Jun-12 COMPLETED Completed Nov 2011 Completed Nov 2011



Community working bees

Promote and hold two community working bees for the purpose of removing mangroves. This work will also provide educational opportunities related to Action 13 'A more informed community'.

Upokorehe BOPRC 30/06/12 Jun-11 Jun-12 IN PROGRESS Mangrove removal is underway. 7 working bees held and 4ha mangroves cleared. Attendees from 10-35. At this stage Upokorehe only involved as management of larger numbers problematic. Methodology now streamlined. Plan for summer 2012 is to alternate Upokorehe and wider community working bees.

Mangrove removal is underway. 7 working bees held and 4ha mangroves cleared. Attendees from 10-35. At this stage Upokorehe only involved as management of larger numbers problematic. Methodology now streamlined. Plan for summer 2012 is to alternate Upokorehe and wider community working bees.

First for 2012/13 held Sat Dec 8. 13 attendees. Completed area from Ōhiwa spit to Loop Rd junction.



Media promotion Prepare and distibute media, in accordance with comms plan, about mangrove removal project and working bees

BOPRC Upokorehe 30/06/12 Jun-11 Jun-12 IN PROGRESS A number of general media items have been distributed and published in various media during 2011/12. More intensive work will be carried out in the spring of 2012. Presentations given to WDC and Ōhope and Tāneatua community boards.

A number of general media items have been distributed and published in various media during 2011/12. More intensive work will be carried out in the spring of 2012. Presentations given to WDC and Ōhope and Tāneatua community boards.

Articles/columns placed in local papers (Early Dec). Factsheet and programme distributed locally.

of 76

Theme Action Ref

Action Sub Action Project description

Proposed Lead

Agency

Support Agencies

Ecological Actions Due

Date

Target Start Date

Target Due Date

Status Start of year status and First Quarter August 27 Progress Report

Second Quarter December 15 Progress Report


Natural areas, plants and animals

12.3.4 Assess Ecological Quality of Ōhiwa Harbour

Threatened plant survey Complete threatened plant survey

BOPRC DOC 30/06/11 Jun-10 Jun-11 COMPLETED AND ONGOING

Survey completed by Wildlands. Ecological monitoring programme in development.

Monitoring programme for threatened plants in development.

Monitoring programmed compled SOOHE report nearing completion.



Register of indigenous vegetation sites

Register of indigenous vegetation sites

BOPRC 30/06/16 Jun-10 Jun-11 IN PROGRESS Ecological monitoring programme in development.

Monitoring programme for indig veg in development.



Survey inanga and white bait populations and habitats

Survey to identify inanga habitats.

BOPRC DOC 30/06/16 Jun-10 Jun-12 IN PROGRESS Methodology being clarified. Ecological monitoring programme in development.

Methodology being clarified. Monitoring programme for fish in development.



Update fauna report from 1980s

Update fauna report from 1980s

BOPRC DOC 30/06/16 Jun-10 Jun-16 IN PROGRESS Marshbird survey completed by volunteers. Ecological monitoring programme in development. Need to decide how to use report findings for further protection

Monitoring programme in development. Shore birds monitored by OSNZ. Also this year caspian terns.



Freshwater invertebrate sampling

Freshwater invertebrate sampling

BOPRC DOC 30/06/16 Jun-10 Jun-12 IN PROGRESS Macroinvertebrate analysis underway



Survey of marine fish abundance in estuary

Survey of marine fish abundance in estuary

BOPRC MPI 30/06/16 Jun-10 Jun-16 ON HOLD MPI reported on shelfish in 2010 but have also indicated that there wont be any marine fish survey soon.



Continue monitoring of specific vegetation types

Continue monitoring of specific vegetation types

BOPRC DOC 30/06/16 Jun-10 Jun-16 ON HOLD Not a priority. Ecological monitoring programme in development.

Not a priority. Ecological monitoring programme in development.



Survey terrestrial invertebrates and reptiles

Survey terrestrial invertebrates and reptiles

BOPRC DOC 30/06/16 Jun-10 Jun-16 ON HOLD Not a priority. Ecological monitoring programme in development.




Survey to assess presence of native bats

Survey to assess presence of native bats

BOPRC 30/06/16 Jun-10 Jun-12 COMPLETED AND ONGOING

Not a priority. Upper catchment surveyed and bats found at 1 site. Ecological monitoring programme in development.


Ohiwa Harbour Strategy Ecological survey actions ‐ progress to May 24th 2013

of 76

General comments/end of financial year summary

Completed May 2011. Survey made recommendations for pest plant control and future survey.

Have added Whakatāne SNA sites. Most vegetation information is based on old surveys (very few surveyed since 1980s)

Salinity sampling completed spring 2010, low flow sampling hampered by heavy rain. Spawning observed autumn 2011 in lower Nukuhou. Spawning in other streams should be looked for autumn 2012.

Marshbird survey completed by volunteers in Jan 2011. Other fauna potentially covered off by other recommendations? Need to decide how to use report findings for further protection.

Part of the science monitoring programme now in place for the harbour.

MoF reported on shelfish in 2010. Need to decide how to go about this.

Mangroves are being monitored right around the region for extent in line with the time frames of the photography acquisition (RDAM) which is currently behind schedule for this last summer.

Upper catchment surveyed and bats found at 1 site.

of 76

Theme Action Ref

Action Sub Action Project description Proposed Lead Agency

Support Agencies

Resource Mgt review due date

Target Start Date

Target Due Date

Status Start of year status and First Quarter August 27 Progress Report

Second Quarter December 10 Progress report



10.3.8 Review Bylaws Relating to Higher Impact Activities

Establish Harbour Wardens' Forum

To help integrate Harbour, Beach Bylaw and Fisheries Wardens to optimise human resources, reduce costs and improve effectiveness of application of bylaws. Could include review of bylaw-related signage, community education, uniforms, safety and warden training.

BOPRC (Tim Senior and Brian Spake)

MPI 30/06/11 1-May-11 30-Jun-11 COMPLETED AND ONGOING

Wardens hui held. No change to status quo. Resource Upokorehe kaitiaki better. Investigate WDC wardens?

Will discuss with Eugene


10.3.8 Review Bylaws Relating to Higher Impact Activities

Propose common harbour bylaws

Ōhiwa Harbour Wardens Forum to develop common bylaws for consideration by councils in bylaw reviews

BOPRC (Tim Senior and Brian Spake)

ODC, WDC and Iwi

30/06/12 30-Jun-11 30-Jun-12 COMPLETED Idea on hold due to lask of need as two TLAs working closely together through District Plan revision processes. WDC draft is closely aligned with ODC. ODC review to begin soon.

Managing development pressures

11.3.2 Review Resource Management Protocols

Continuous improvement of protocols and procedures

Update of protocols/procedures around input into decision-making and information sharing, especially around statutory processes such as consents, to improve their inclusiveness and efficiency.

ODC, WDC, BOPRC

Iwi, DoC 1/10/11 1-Jul-11 31-Dec-11 IN PROGRESS Business case completed. Tim Senior, has an important role in the coordination of OHS action and communications. In order to get additional help for this role, OHSCG is exploring various scenarios including resourcing a post-graduate research position that could simultaneously assist with the work to be done and undertake valuable research for the OHS project. Use OHS action plan and principles to establish terms of reference for the possible role and guidelines for the research (OHSCG). Review research options for OHSCG to consider (Steve B). Contact Paul Kayes from Te Whare Wānanga O Awanuiārangi (Steve B). Meeting with Steve Brightwell postponed because of eruption.

Contractor report suggests better methods of information sharing.

Need to progress


11.3.2 Review Resource Management Protocols

Formalise iwi advisory status

Councils to foster and encourage Iwi Environmental Committees within their rohe to formalise their advisory status.

ODC, WDC, BOPRC

Iwi 30/06/12 1-Jul-11 1-Jul-12 IN PROGRESS Wardens hui said this was not applicable and is for District Councils to develop and enforce


11.3.3 Evaluate Plans to Protect Character and Estuarine Health of Ōhiwa

Establish Ohiwa Harbour Planning Zone Forum

The Ohiwa Harbour Planning Zone Forum would review district plans, regional plans and the regional policy statement to achieve a common vision to lead towards a “Ohiwa Harbour Planning Zone”.

WDC ODC, BOPRC 1/12/11 1-Jul-11 1/12/11 COMPLETED Contractor underway? WDC plan is drafted and out for submission.


12.3.2 Review Monitoring and Enforcement Regimes

Commission a business case for a Ohiwa Harbour Strategy Coordinator

Develop business case to explore establishment of a position to coordinate and/or manage the actions required in the OHS or by the partners to the Strategy.

BOPRC ODC, WDC, Iwi, DoC

1/12/11 1-May-11 31-Aug-11 COMPLETED Contractor underway? Steve Brigtwell has completed investigation of research options.


12.3.2 Review Monitoring and Enforcement Regimes

Annual monitoring and reporting of enforcement

Develop reporting process and report findings annually to OHSCG.

BOPRC ODC, WDC, BOPRC, Iwi

1/10/11 1-Jul-11 1-Dec-11 IN PROGRESS Discussions about this have bee held with Whakatōhea. Upokorehe hapū management plan completed

Need to do this

Resource Management Review Actions ‐ progress to May 24th 2013

of 76

General comments/end of financial year summary

Wardens hui held. No desire for forum change to status quo. Resource Upokorehe kaitiaki better. Investigate WDC wardens? Monitor effectiveness of wardens and kaitiaki and resource better.

COMPLETED. Wardens hui said this was not applicable and is for District Councils to develop and enforce

Councils to discuss with a view to work on internal processes

Whakatōhea making progress. Upokorehe completed. Tūhoe? Ngāti Awa?

Idea on hold due to lack of need as two TLAs working closely together through District Plan revision processes. WDC draft is closely aligned with ODC. ODC review to begin soon.

Business case completed. Tim Senior, has an important role in the coordination of OHS action and communications. In order to get additional help for this role, OHSCG is exploring various scenarios including resourcing a post-graduate research position that could simultaneously assist with the work to be done and undertake valuable research for the OHS project. Review research options for OHSCG to consider (Steve B). Contact Paul Kayes from Te Whare Wānanga O Awanuiārangi (Steve B). Meeting with Steve Brightwell postponed because of eruption.

Contractor has made recommendations about how to do this.

of 76

File Reference:

2.00478

Significance of Decision: Receives Only - No Decisions




Monitoring Recreation Activities in the Ohiwa Harbour

Executive Summary

The purpose of this report is to update the Ōhiwa harbour implementation forum on recreation use of Ōhiwa Harbour. Recreational use of Ōhiwa Harbour is very common but there are many unknowns about the nature of it and people’s needs. Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy action 10.3.7 recommends that recreation activities are; monitored to assess usage, identify incompatible uses and to assist with demand management. This report summarises our current knowledge of recreation activities and usage, incompatible uses, and the provision of facilities. It also provides detail of upcoming monitoring activity such as carrying out a survey this summer to assess user activities, perceptions and use patterns.

1 Recommendations


1 Receives the report, Monitoring Recreation Activities in the Ōhiwa Harbour.

2 Background

Observation tells us that one of the most important aspects of Ōhiwa Harbour and its environs is that it is well used by visitors and locals alike for a wide range of recreational activities. By far the majority of online visits to the new Ōhiwa webpages have been to the recreation pages (double the visits to any other page). A large section of the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy (OHS) is dedicated to recreation. Action 10.3.7 of the OHS: Monitoring Recreation Activities (see Appendix 1), demands that recreation activities are monitored to:

assess recreational usage

identify incompatible uses including conflict with cultural and ecological values

assist with demand management (such as the need for facilities) None of these three aspects are currently formally monitored and don’t appear to have been in the past. We only have anecdotal information about this use and no firm data. It is not possible to respond to these without firm data.

of 76


2

The OHS suggests several ways of gathering this information, the most significant of which is to carry out surveys. The information gathered may identify the need for further investigation or improved provision or management of activities and facilities.

3 Current usage

There are a number of marine based activities in the harbour, such as fishing, water skiing, jet skiing, yachting, and kayaking. There are rules and bylaws governing many of these activities and overseen by the Harbourmaster. The Harbourmaster and his wardens are largely concerned with boating safety and navigation and do not keep records of people involved in particular activities. More passive recreation on the water includes swimming, again with no records as to how many or where, and fishing and shellfish gathering. While the Ministry of Primary Industries do from time to time monitor pipi and cockle numbers there is no data available about the numbers of people engaged in these activities or where they engage in them. Anecdotal evidence suggests that people engage in a number of land based activities around the harbour, walking, cycling, camping, picnicking, horse riding, bird watching and the like. Some local residents are of the opinion that numbers involved in many of these activities are steadily increasing but no attempt has ever been made to quantify the numbers of people involved. As far as visitors are concerned, there are a number of motels and holiday parks close to the harbour. Some data is sometimes available as some accommodation providers complete monthly returns to Statistics New Zealand. However this information is only provided by some providers, is not compiled annually and is not easily available except as national and regional figures. An example from the Ōhope Beach Holiday Park is that in January 2013 they had a total of 30,663 guest nights with 472 of those being from overseas. Other accommodation is also provided, for example baches and bed and breakfast. No information is gathered about these. Whakatāne District Council have recently carried out a survey of freedom camping. The Port Ōhope area was monitored over a one week period and 4 campers were noted.

4 Level of facilities

As far as marine recreation is concerned, a number of facilities are provided. There is a boat ramp on either side of the harbour, a wharf at Ōhope, all with car parking space and instructional signage. Provision is made for swimming, water skiing and boat mooring. For land based recreation, provision for walking is made at several locations. No specific provision is made for horse riding or biking. Other facilities provided for the public in general are public toilets (at the Ōhope boat ramp, Otao South Reserve and the Ōhiwa boat ramp). Picnic tables and seating is provided at several locations around Ōhope but little elsewhere. Litter bins are also provided around Ōhope but not elsewhere, this being a matter of District council policy. Informational signage is provided in some places by various organisations and individuals. The provision of signage is the subject of a separate report to the Forum.

of 76


3

5 Incompatible and conflicting uses

Again, there are currently no formal records of incompatible or conflicting uses. Some issues which involve the need for segregation of water users, such as jet skiers, water skiers and swimmers have been addressed by navigational rules and these are policed by the Harbourmaster and his wardens. The problem of vehicles on the mudflats has been minimised by Upokorehe harbour wardens. But other problems have been noted by residents, such as dogs in wildlife refuges and horses walking across shellfish beds. During their survey of freedom campers, Whakatāne District Council called out security contractors to deal with 3 instances of freedom camping at Port Ōhope. Ōpōtiki District Council has provided some policing of their vehicles on beaches bylaw at Ōhiwa spit. Apart from these two examples there has not been any co-ordinated attempt to identify incompatible or conflicting uses of the harbour. There is also no obvious pathway for people to report them.

6 Discussion

In summary, we can say that there is a considerable dearth of data about recreational use of the harbour and its surrounds. Apart from some anecdotal evidence, we don’t know much about what people do, how many and where and how they do it. The OHS suggests that monitoring is necessary and this could involve complaint registers, surveys, compliance activities and community feedback. Carrying out a survey of recreational use would be the logical first step. This would include community feedback and may lead to further compliance activities and the provision of complaint registers if shown to be necessary. A carefully designed survey would provide information about recreational activities around the harbour and to:

identify whether further provision of recreational opportunities is necessary (for example do mountain bikers need to be provided for),

identify whether the various facilities provided are sufficient and in the right locations (for example would people appreciate more picnic tables)

identify incompatible and conflicting uses and provide some insights into how these could be addressed

add value to the design of some projects already underway, such as the provision of walkways and a heritage trail.

The information gained would also be of great value to the design of some projects already underway, such as the provision of walkways and a heritage trail. Such a survey would also have synergies with work that’s underway to clearly identify public land around the harbour, the provision of access to the harbour and a review of signage provision and requirements.

of 76


4

7 Survey Proposal

It is proposed that a comprehensive survey be carried out over summer when recreational use is at its highest. The on the ground survey work could be carried out by Bay of Plenty Regional Council summer students and/or partner iwi and hapū members. The harbour wardens who are active over the summer period may also be able to assist. The survey would include interviews of users, user groups, recreation activity providers, camp ground and motel operators, information centres.

The design of the survey is critical to ensure that the data obtained is complete, meaningful, relevant, useful and correctly recorded and analysed. A proposal has to do this work has been obtained by a suitably qualified expert in this field. The proposal includes:

designing an observation sheet for gathering information about usage patterns

designing a survey questionnaire to be used in brief on-the-spot interviews to gather perceptions and self-reported use patterns

training and supervising summer research assistants during data collection

collecting, collating and securely storing the data

designing data entry files and analysing the data collected

writing a report of the findings from observation and interview data and identifying reported incompatible activities

8 The Future

Once this first set of data is gathered, it may be appropriate to consider carrying out similar surveys from time to time in the future, particularly as recreational activity may increase over time and the nature of the activities people engage in and their particular needs may change. It may also be found that some information can easily be gathered annually, for example by the harbour wardens.

Tim Senior Land Management Officer (Eastern) Fiona Hennessey Technical Advisor, Whakatāne District Council for Land Management Manager (Eastern)

On behalf of the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy Coordinating Group


of 76

APPENDIX 1

Ohiwa Harbour Strategy Action 10.3.7 Monitoring

Recreation Activities

of 76

10.3.7 Monitoring Recreation Activities

What Continue regular monitoring of recreation activities to assess usage, to identify incompatible activities, including conflict with cultural and ecological values, and to assist demand management (such as the need for facilities).

Why Monitoring may involve complaint registers, surveys, compliance activities and community feedback. The monitoring will indicate areas and activities that may need further investigation. This may lead to separation, more stringent controls or integrated management. Regular reporting of findings should occur to the relevant local authority.

Bylaws and reserve management plans are all reviewed on a regular basis. For each review statutory authorities will share information on known issues or conflicts.

When Ongoing

Who Environment Bay of Plenty Harbour Master for water based user groups

District Councils for land based user groups

Who else Department of Conservation, user groups, tangata whenua

How Complaints registers

Navigation and Safety Bylaws

Reserve Management plans

Resources Survey costs

of 76

File Reference:

2.00478





A Review of Signage around the Ohiwa Harbour

Executive Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide feedback on a study carried out by Cheeky Rooster Communications examining Ōhiwa Harbour signage. The purpose of this action was to investigate the current state of the signage around the harbour. This will establish if what exists is suitable, is their need for rationalisation, and if so how a change be achieved. This action has strong links ensuring the harbour is managed effectively for recreation and bylaws. A site-led approach to new signage may provide opportunity for greater collaboration, and produce fewer, but more effective, signs. A presentation will be provided by Sarah van der Boom of Cheeky Rooster Communications.

1 Recommendations


1 Receives the report, A Review of Signage around the Ōhiwa Harbour.

2 Background

A photographic survey of Ōhiwa Harbour signage shows that there are approximately 130 signs from at least eight organisations in and around the harbour.

Signage is provided by the following organisations:

Bay of Plenty Regional Council, including navigation and safety

Coast Care

Forest and Bird

Ōpōtiki District Council

Whakatāne District Council

Department of Conservation

Ministry of Primary Industries (Ministry of Fisheries)

of 76


2

Miscellaneous signage from unidentified sources.

Summary of observations

None of the signs are required by law. However, in the case of flouted district council bylaws and navigation and safety rules, it may be more difficult for a Council to pursue prosecution in the absence of signage

Most signs were own-branded, co- or multi –branded; the remainder had no identifying organisation

Most signs used consistent visual themes. In some cases, the visual theme of a given organisation had changed over time (the signage lacked visual consistency)

A small proportion of signs were out-of-date and/or in disrepair

At some sites, multitudes of signs compete for audience attention

A small proportion of signage reflected best practice.

3 Discussion

Signage best practice varies depending on the purpose of the sign. Ōhiwa Harbour signage can be grouped into three main purposes:

1. Providing information for raising general awareness, such as place names or ‘endangered birds nesting here’.

2. Encouraging/discouraging particular behaviours, such as ‘light no fires’, shellfish limits, ‘no camping’, ‘no vehicles’, ‘no dogs’, ‘take a lifejacket’, ‘keep off the dune plants’, etc.

3. Providing detailed interpretive material, such as information about historic features, endangered birds, tsunami risks, or the Nukuhou Salt Marsh.

The review of signage best practice (see Appendix 1) contributes to a brief best practice guide for purposes 1 and 2 above. Interpretation best practice is more detailed. The Department of Conservation offers a very good guide that could be added to the signage best practice guide for Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy partners.

Key points from the best practice guide include signage content, placement, timing, layout and use of QR codes:

Content

Tailor the key message to the audience and objective of the sign

One simple message per sign with eight elements per message (a word, logo or picture is one element).

Placement

Place signs where the audience is most likely to see them

New Zealand visitors usually turn left into a site and progress left to right.

of 76


3

Timing

Awareness-raising and behaviour-change messages have a short lifespan. NZTA research shows that audiences ‘switch off’ after three months. This may affect choice of materials for seasonal messages.

Layout

Use lower case text, simple fonts and simple contrasting colours

Use of QR codes

A QR code is a block barcode that provides viewers with easy access to detailed and relevant information via a mobile device. This has great potential for detailed interpretation and navigation and safety information.

4 Summary

The Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy Coordination Group has agreed to implement the following recommendations which will aim to improve the effectiveness and use of signs around our harbour: It is the responsibility of each partner organisation to work cooperatively with these recommendations and ensure they are acted upon.

A signage best-practice guide will assist Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy partner organisations with the design and placement of future signs for maximum effect. Key points include signage content, placement, timing, layout and use of QR codes.

Recommendations to be implemented

1. Remove or replace aged or poor-quality signage as quickly as possible.

2. Whenever possible, employ a site-led approach to new signage. This provides opportunity for organisational collaboration to produce fewer, more effective signs.

3. A signage ‘best practice’ guide will help OHS partner organisations with design and placement of future signs.

4. Interpretation best practice is added to the guide.

Tim Senior Land Management Officer (Eastern) Sarah van der Boom Cheeky Rooster Communications (Contractor)

for Land Management Manager (Eastern) On behalf of Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy Coordinating Group


of 76

APPENDIX 1

Signage best practice guide

of 76

Signage guide

This guide contains tips to help you get the most out of your signage.

Signage serves many purposes including raising awareness, encouraging particular behaviours

and/or providing detailed interpretative material. For every sign, it is important to have:

A SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Time bound) objective for the signage

A specific audience/s

Clearly identified ‘must haves’, such as legal requirements

Clear and simple key messages

Clear and simple images.

Sign content

Avoid jargon, clichés and acronyms

Use simple and sensible reasons, e.g. stay away – they bite

Use well recognised words and symbols

Include danger, warning or caution to define the risk from severe to less severe

Incorporate key messages in the title, photographs and/or captions

Use lower case as UPPER CASE IS TIRING TO READ AND IS CONSIDERED SHOUTING.

When the signage objective is to raise awareness or influence behaviour :

Promote only one message per sign

Contain eight elements per sign – a word or graphic is one element

Fewer than 40 characters per sign.

Placement Good signage placement considers the needs and behaviours of the audience, such as:

New Zealand visitors usually turn left and progress left to right

Signs and displays positioned directly in front of readers are more likely to be read

Consider the needs of people with disabilities, children, the colour blind and sight impaired

Text needs to reflect the panel orientation e.g. ‘behind you…’ or ‘you are here’

Allow space for people to pass others viewing displays

Place signs where there are obvious stopping points e.g. half way up a hill with a seat and view

Place signs where readers feel safe and are protected from hazards e.g. cars, cliffs, etc.

Place signs where they can be easily maintained and are least likely to be vandalised.

Signs should be placed at least 50 metres from an intersection.

Timing

Signage is most eye catching when it is new and fresh

Keep the same signage up for at least two months

All messages become stale with time. Research shows that audiences ‘switch off’ to signage in as little as three months.

Many messages are seasonal, so place them only for the relevant time period

Timing may impact on the durability of material required or the removability of some signage.

Repair, replace or remove signs when:

Faded, water damaged or vandalised

of 76

Signage guide

Found to contain inaccurate our outdated information

Not clearly viewable or readable.

Layout, artwork and colours Avoid:

Using artwork that can be confused with official signs, e.g. stop or speed limit signs

Red on green (and vice versa) as this is the most common form of colour blindness (1/20)

Colours that are difficult to read when placed together e.g. red and black

Curly fonts or fonts that slope or lean, and short thick letters

Printing text over an image. It can make the text hard to read

Avoid using squares or combinations of squares.

Use:

Dark writing on light backgrounds or vice versa (high contrast)

Black/yellow has the most impact and black/white or dark blue/white also provide good contrast

Easy to read fonts - tall, thin letters are often easier to read

The rule of thirds. Divide the sign into thirds and use each third for a design element.

Use maps that:

Have the perspective matching the direction the reader is facing

Include important information, but avoid excessive detail

Have realistic symbols

Have text on them (not beside it) rather than using numbers, letters and a legend

Use colour (but remember some people are colour blind)

Avoid contour lines, unless absolutely relevant to and required by your audience.

QR codes A QR code is a block barcode that provides viewers with easy access to detailed and relevant

information via a mobile device (in 2012, over 70% of mobile phone users had smartphones). The QR

code is scanned to open a website link, which delivers detailed information that will not fit on the sign.

When using QR codes:

Mobile coverage is essential!

Link to a mobile-friendly version/section of your website

Place the QR code in an easily accessible position (at ground level)

The minimum size for a QR code is one square inch

Use a URL shortener (a ‘tiny’ URL) before generating the QR code, making it easier to scan

Tell users how why they should scan your QR code

Test the QR code using different apps and devices from a range of angles and distances

Track the use of the QR code by creating a custom campaign URL for Google Analytics.

Sources: The NZTA, DOC, QR codes, Natural Resources Department (Victoria) and American

Trails Organisation.

of 76

PRESENTATION - Review of Signage around Ohiwa

Harbour presentation

of 76

File Reference:

2.00478





State of the Ōhiwa Harbour and Catchment

Executive Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of monitoring results from the monitoring programme used for Ōhiwa Harbour and the Nukuhou River. This will provide a summary status on the state of the Ōhiwa Harbour environment.

1 Recommendations


1 Receives the report, State of the Ōhiwa Harbour and Catchment.

And

2 That the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum endorses this reports recommendations for future monitoring and actions for the Ōhiwa Harbour and its catchment and endorse a collaborative approach by all of the partners to implement the required monitoring and actions.

2 Background

The purpose of this report is to update the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum on the State of the Ōhiwa Harbour and its Catchment.

This State of Ōhiwa Harbour and Catchment report was prepared to address two of the seven themes of the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy (Health of the Harbour and Natural Areas, Plants and Animals). The report gives a update of the current physical and ecological condition of the wider Ōhiwa catchment and harbour as well as trends for some of these parameters over time.

3 State of The Ōhiwa Harbour Catchment

This report brings together monitoring results from a number of different monitoring programmes and studies for the Ōhiwa Harbour and its Catchment. It aims to provide a comprehensive look at the ecological quality of the Ōhiwa Harbour Catchment.

of 76


2

3.1 Land

Land cover changes occurring within Ōhiwa Harbour Catchment have been minor. Complete fencing of the Ōhiwa Harbour margin has been achieved and 80% of major streams and rivers feeding into the harbour have been fenced.

A significant area (12%) of the Catchment has had forestry cleared since 2008, pressure is being placed on areas of that forestry harvested land to be converted to pasture.

3.2 Terrestrial Biodiversity

There are numerous threatened flora and fauna, including marshbirds, bats and kiwi occurring within the catchment. Some plant species recorded were not previously known to occur within the catchment. Increases in the abundance and distributions of native fauna includes Australasian bittern, North Island fernbird, weka, kiwi and variable oyster catcher have been recorded.

Introduced pest plants and animals are controlled in numerous areas within the catchment with a focus on those affecting the indigenous fauna and flora.

3.3 Water

Harbour water quality is monitored at two sites and is rated good when compared to other eastern bay estuaries. However, suspended solid and wastewater related measures are showing increasing trends on the eastern side of the Harbour. Bathing water quality in the Harbour remains as one of the best in the Bay of Plenty.

Freshwater quality results in the Nukuhou River show some improvements (suspended solids and nitrogen) however, we are also seeing an increased temperature trend.

Streams feeding directly into Ōhiwa Harbour contain relatively diverse native freshwater fish populations. However, around 40% of streams have barriers to fish migration. This figure needs to be reduced to improve the potential habitat for native fish species.

Other than Ōhiwa tributary showing improvement, the overall macro-invertebrate stream health has not changed in the Ōhiwa Harbour Catchment. Comparison of the Kutarere, and Wainui and Nukuhou sites to others in the region showed that they had similar macro-invertebrate stream health as other pasture streams.

3.4 Marine and Estuary

Marine sediment results are good with contaminants results well below guideline values. Benthic communities have maintained their species richness and diversity over time. Mussel beds in the Harbour have been reduced with simultaneous starfish population increases.

Mangrove extents were last mapped in 2009. An area of 11.7ha has been cleared of seedlings and outlying plants over the last two years. Current mapping is being carried out and this will help indicate whether the rate of spread is being halted by removal. Sea grass extents are showing no changes over time.

4 Monitoring and action recommendations for the future

of 76


3

Gains have been made within the Ōhiwa Harbour Catchment. With continued improvements to land use options and land management practices there are more gains to be made. It is important maintain the monitoring programme based on marine/benthic, terrestrial biodiversity, water quality, land cover/land use capability, indigenous fish , macro-invertebrates and mangrove and sea grass extents.

Any revision of the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy needs to focus on monitoring activity to ascertain the state of the Ōhiwa Harbour and its Catchment’s environment over time. The following are the specific recommendations listed in the report.

4.1 Land

Continue fencing, retiring and establishing vegetation on riparian margins of water courses within the Catchment. More consideration to be given to the width and re-vegetation of retirement areas to ensure more measurable improvement in water quality and macro invertebrate results in the future.

Increase soil erosion prevention measures on steep/hill country with the highest erosion potential.

Focus on reducing impacts of erosion due to forestry activities through networks, education and consenting processes.

Carry out re-measurement and reporting with analysis of results for sediment cross sections within the Harbour.

Carry out land use and cover change assessment upon release of LCDB4 in July 2014.

4.2 Terrestrial Biodiversity

Establish monitoring programme for indigenous vegetation around the Harbour; further investigation into methods and costs involved in this monitoring is required.

Cary out partial re-measures of marshbird sites in 2015. Halt further habitat loss and reduce predation to ensure survival of these populations long term.

Encourage further benefits from more habitats being protected or managed by Care Groups.

4.3 Water

Carry out the tidal intrusion model, followed by assessing the identified areas for potential whitebait spawning habitat.

Look into the feasibility of further fish surveys on areas identified in Bloxham (2007) and not surveyed as first priority.

Address the issues of fish passage barriers identified and prioritised in Bloxham (2007) to meet Action 12.3.4 of the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy and to also increase the habitat available for native fish species.

of 76


4

4.4 Marine and Estuary

4.4.1 Macrofauna

(1) Green Lipped Mussels and Starfish (partially underway)

More work is required to better understand the ecological cycle between mussels and starfish within the Harbour, along with the potential results of human interference before undertaking work to alter this cycle (Paul-Burke pers. comm.).

1 Identify, measure, and map the distribution, size classes and population density of all mussel beds in the Harbour.

2 Investigate starfish impacts on mussel and mussel beds.

3 Carry out literature review on starfish and green lipped mussel management, methods and results nationally and internationally including information on the natural cycles of mussel and starfish populations.

4.4.2 Mangroves

Complete mapping of mangrove density over 2011 aerial photography and look at trends in growth/retreat rates of mangroves.

4.4.3 Sea grass

Establish monitoring of black swan populations within the Harbour to identify the potential as an influence on future changes in sea grass bed extents. This could be done by using the various care group network available.

5 Recommendation

The following is a recommendation from the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy Coordination Group to the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum to endorse that all partners collaborate to deliver on the above monitoring recommendations for the future. If endorsed these monitoring proposals and actions will be added to the current monitoring programme and form the basis of on-going work under the Strategy and would begin to be implemented in the 2013-2014 year. Recommendation 1 That the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum endorses this reports

recommendations for future monitoring and actions for the Ōhiwa Harbour and its catchment and endorse a collaborative approach by all of the partners to implement the required monitoring and actions.

Heather MacKenzie Environmental Data Officer (Ecology) for Land Management Manager (Eastern)


of 76

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT - Environmental

Publication 2013_07 - State of the Ohiwa Harbour and

Catchment

of 76

PRESENTATION - State of the Ohiwa Harbour and

Catchment 2013

of 76

File Reference:

2.00478

Significance of Decision: Low




Mini-review of the Ohiwa Harbour Strategy

Executive Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek a recommendation from the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum that endorses a mini-review of the actions within the current strategy to be reported back by the next hui.

1 Recommendations

That the Ohiwa Harbour Implementation Forum under its delegated authority:

1 Receives the report, Mini-review of the Ohiwa Harbour Strategy.

2 That the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum endorse a mini-review of the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy actions to be reported back at the next hui.

3 Confirms that the decision is within the Bay of Plenty Regional Council’s strategic planning framework (Council’s Ten Year Plan, and planning documents and processes under the Resource Management Act 1991, Biosecurity Act 1993, Land Transport Management Act 2003, Civil Defence and Emergency Management Act 2002, and Local Government Acts 1974 and 2002).

2 Background

At the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum hui on 29th October 2012 held at the Whakatōhea Māori Trust Board in Ōpōtiki, the partner representatives received a report titled ‘Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Progress’. During a discussion on that report the representatives were advised that a review of the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy was required in 2013. Initial feedback was requested on the necessity of a review and taking into account the timing of the triennial elections in October 2013 and Crown settlement processes. Feedback was provided that it would be best to raise the matter again as soon as it was practicable after the elections.

This report revisits the discussion of a review and provides a perspective which recommends that any major review of our Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy should be preceded by a mini-review which reflects back on the current actions and whether

of 76


2

they have been achieved or not. This would establish whether a major review is necessary.

It should be noted that the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy has no defined expiry date or review date in it.

3 Introduction

The Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy has been operational since August 2008. There are seven partners in the terns of reference who work together and monitor that implementation of the actions contained within the strategy; the partners are Whakatāne District Council, Ōpōtiki District Council, Ngāi Tūhoe, Ngāti Awa, Whakatōhea, Upokorehe and the Bay of Plenty Regional Council.

The Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy covers the Ōhiwa Harbour and the land catchment area that feeds into it.

The Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy was put together by the Bay of Plenty Regional Council on behalf of the many people and organisations that helped develop it and are involved in making it happen. The Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy was approved by Whakatane District Council, Ōpōtiki District Council and the Bay of Plenty Regional Council. A Hearing Committee, comprising representatives of the three councils and tangata whenua heard submissions.

The Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy sets out a vision for the harbour, identifies issues, key community values and aspirations, and recommended actions to achieve those. It is designed to take Ohiwa Harbour and its surrounding catchment from where it is now, to where people want it to be in the future. The Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy contains a combination of a framework to assess future planning and management against and a set of detailed actions.

It promotes integrated resource management by acknowledging that what happens on the land of the catchment can affect the Ohiwa Harbour. It promotes integration of the wide variety of plans, processes and practices used by councils, government departments, iwi, hapu and members of the community so that these are used to build on each other.

It is a non-statutory document. This means it does not contain any rules and cannot require changes to other planning documents. It provides guidance for the management of Ōhiwa Harbour and catchment. It may or may not result in changes to planning documents. This is the discretional responsibility of each individual Council and iwi.

3 Discussion

The following is a discussion on where the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy is at and what an initial action review could achieve.

3.1 Where are we?

A report to this Forum within the agenda, titled “Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy Implementation update” confirms that the actions within the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy have all been progressed since August 2008. Actions have either been completed, remain in progress and or are on-going in nature.

of 76


3

The Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy partners have held four Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy Coordination Group hui and two Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum hui every financial year since 2008. These hui have forged strong engagement and a strong operational relationship between the partners. There is a secure network of staff within each of the partners and within the community who understands the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy and what it is aiming to do.

A sign perhaps of its success has been two facts; firstly the fact that the results are there to see and the gains that have been made with regards to the health of the harbour and in progressing the actions, some of which have been complicated and; secondly that there has been a distinct and noticeable level of commitment and enthusiasm from all of the partner’s in working together for their harbour and its catchment.

However it has been identified that it may be useful to do a review of the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy. It has been in place for five years and generally a timeframe of ten years would be used for reviewing a strategic document such as this. However, as the actions are essentially complete or on-going, it is perhaps timely to consider how the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy is tracking. A mini-review asks the question whether what was set out to be achieved has been achieved. In the context of Ōhiwa Harbour and the relationships that have evolved and strengthened over time, a mini-review would be an opportunity to reflect on how far the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy has come. A mini-review would also establish a basis on which the partners can plan the next three years of support and funding.

3.2 What would the mini-review look like and achieve?

A mini-review would be undertaken using a highly engaged consultative approach. It is suggested that the mini-review would be based on a targeted process that would be particularly focused on key stakeholders, such as the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum partners and closely affiliated agencies and community groups.

There are a range of possible recommendations that might flow from a mini-review process. These include doing nothing, developing a new set of actions or updating some aspects of the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy. A second-generation Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy set of actions could build on the original document, especially around continuity of established relationships, values, key issues, objectives, policies and actions; but it would not change the original intention and focus.

There is an opportunity to:

Re-vitalise the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy and add new policies and actions into the future and; and

Incorporate further development in scientific understanding, especially around the interaction between land use and water degradation and;

Enhance the focus of the relationship between land use, water quality and quantity issue and their impacts on the harbour and;

Continue to develop stronger collaborative leadership for managing Ōhiwa Harbour and its catchment and;

Continue to develop a strong, updated monitoring and review framework, allowing for great adaptive management.

of 76


4

From a Bay of Plenty Regional Council perspective there is also an opportunity to consider incorporating recent freshwater management reform into the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy, especially around the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management. Bay of Plenty Regional Council’s National Policy Statement Implementation programme 2012 outlines a plan to incorporate a number of legislative requirements into freshwater management based on a catchment management approach and using of collaborative processes to support stakeholder involvement. The output of such a process would ultimately be the development of specific and tailored values, objectives, limits and targets. The review may also look at whether there are intermediate steps that might be implemented through the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy before starting a National Policy Statement based process.

5 Summary

It is timely to complete a mini-review of the actions within the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy, particularly as it would give the newly elected Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum a perspective on the previous five years results and ‘what’s new’ on the horizon for our harbour and its catchment.

A major review is not necessary at this point in time as until Crown settlement processes are completed it is unknown as to whether the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy would require a major review. At the same time there is general agreement that the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy should remain in place building on the more effective and efficient approach to managing the Ōhiwa Harbour and its catchment. It must be recognised as a long term process which may cross generations.

The Bay of Plenty Regional Council would lead the mini-review on behalf of all the partners who would all participate. A majority of the cost of the mini-review would be carried by the Bay of Plenty Regional Council.

It is proposed that a ‘mini review’ is carried out and reported back to the Ōhiwa Harbour Implementation Forum at its December 2013 hui.

6 Financial Implications

Current Budget

There are no current budget implications.

Future Implications

There will be an increased need for all partners to participate in the mini-review and this may create a need for extra time to be committed.

Simon Stokes Land Management Manager (Eastern) On behalf of the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy Coordinating Group


of 76

File Reference:

2.00478





Proposal for a Harbour side Walkway at Ohope

Executive Summary

The purpose of this report is to hear a presentation from the Rotary Club of Whakatāne on a proposal to construct a walkway, including boardwalks along the edge of the Ōhiwa Harbour from Waterways Drive to the Ōhope wharf.

1 Recommendations


1 Receives the report, Proposal for a Harbour side walkway at Ōhope.

2 Background

Mr Hugh Lovelock, on behalf of the Rotary Club of Whakatāne, has recently prepared a proposal to construct a walkway, comprised mostly of boardwalk, along the edge of the harbour from Waterways Drive to Ōhope wharf. This is an ambitious proposal that, if it comes to fruition will at least in part fulfil the intent of Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy action 10.3.4, Enhance Ōhope Spit Harbour Edge Walkway.

3 Vision

The project’s vision is to provide the public the opportunity to appreciate the visual tidal moods, plant and wildlife that Ōhiwa Harbour offers, to encourage healthy activity for walkers, bikers and those in wheelchairs and create contemplation sites for mental rest. Connectivity with existing reserves is important to link them and enhance their usefulness as a public amenity.

4 Project Outline

The route of the proposed boardwalk (see Appendix 1) is around 2061 metres. It is envisaged that it will meander from a grassy area on the eastern side of Waterways Drive and, close to the shoreline, connect two un-named district council reserves on Harbour Rd, pass through Otao South Reserve and onto the Ōhope wharf. Ramps across the boardwalk will be made available at intervals where formed access tracks are identified in conjunction with Whakatāne District Council and where

of 76

Proposal for a Harbour side Walkway at Ohope

2

adjacent property owners are able to subsidise or fund them. At intervals extended decking to allow seating, interpretive signage and possibly commemorative plaques.

It is envisaged that the project would be undertaken in four stages, beginning at Waterways drive. The short first stage would allow for any practical hurdles and other issues to be worked through. The design will comply with New Zealand Standard SNZ HB8630:2004, Tracks and Outdoor Visitor Structures. Mike Collins, a retired structural engineer is providing the design work and Richard Boon, a local draughtsman is also assisting and developing cost estimates. Mapping has been carried out by Trig Yates from Bay of Plenty Regional Council. Currently a project steering committee is being set up.

5 Funding

The project will involve some significant costs. There are a number of private funds which have been identified for possible assistance such as Rotary District Designated Funds Rotary International Matching Grant and the Nova Energy Community Support Fund. Local public body funds available may include the Bay of Plenty Regional Council Environmental Enhancement Fund, the Whakatāne District Council Community Fund, the Ōhope Community Board ‘cash in lieu’ account and discretionary fund. National funding agencies include the New Zealand Lotteries Commission, the New Zealand Walking access commission. ‘Optional extras’ such as seating, signage and plaques could also be funded by local businesses and individuals. Donations of cash, materials and/or labour are hoped for from the local community.

6 Partners

The Rotary Club of Whakatāne and the Ōhope Community Board have both expressed support and willingness to be involved with the project. Other stakeholders who will need to be engaged with and involved are the community and landowners adjoining the proposal, Whakatāne District Council, Department of Conservation, Te Runanga o Ngāti Awa, Te Upokorehe, Ngāi Tūhoe, Whakatōhea, Ōpōtiki District Council and the Bay of Plenty Regional Council

Tim Senior Land Management Officer (Eastern) for Land Management Manager (Eastern)

On behalf of the Ōhiwa Harbour Strategy Coordinating Group


of 76

APPENDIX 1

Map showing location of proposed walkway

of 76

monday, 27 may 2013 commencing at 9.30 a.m. l7 xkrh . ... was that project engin eers were aware of...

Documents