mobile = location = effect

26
MOBILE = LOCATION = EFFECT

Upload: marnixvangisbergen

Post on 16-Apr-2017

316 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mobile = Location = Effect

MOBILE = LOCATION = EFFECT

Page 3: Mobile = Location = Effect

OFF = ON

Page 4: Mobile = Location = Effect

BRAND ANCHORING

Page 5: Mobile = Location = Effect

SMARTPHONES

Page 6: Mobile = Location = Effect

Advertising

Page 7: Mobile = Location = Effect

ADVERTISING AVOIDANCE MODELADVERTISING ACCEPTANCE MODEL

Page 8: Mobile = Location = Effect

ALL KINDS OF RESEARCH

Why send viral commercials?Reasons: HUMOR & SURPRISENot a reason: SHOCKING & SEX

Page 9: Mobile = Location = Effect

SMARTPHONES

Page 10: Mobile = Location = Effect

ADVERTISERS

20%

OFF!!

Page 11: Mobile = Location = Effect
Page 12: Mobile = Location = Effect
Page 14: Mobile = Location = Effect

Simple SMS based advertisingLittle research: new mobile ads

Attitude towards mobile in generalLittle research: ad intrusiveness &

LBA

Scenario/survey based research

Little user experience research

RESEARCH STATUS QUO

Effectiveness of Location Based Advertising?®

Page 15: Mobile = Location = Effect

Location Based Ads

Ad Intrusiveness

Attitude mobile app

Mobile app use

BuyIntention

Attitude towards ads in general Product involvement Innovativeness

THEORY INTRUSIVENESS + REASONED ACTION + TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL

((li et al, 2002; McCoy, 2008; Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975; Davis 1989)

-

Page 16: Mobile = Location = Effect

Ad content

Trigger area

Product shelf

RESEARCH

Page 17: Mobile = Location = Effect

X

Page 18: Mobile = Location = Effect

Controllable

Manipulable

Measurable

Reproducible

Context & embodiment

Page 19: Mobile = Location = Effect

A simulated 3D supermarket Projected in 4 rear-projection screens

each 3.6 meters wide by 2.6 meters high

Page 20: Mobile = Location = Effect
Page 21: Mobile = Location = Effect

MISFIT26 PARTICIPANTS

FIT: 27 RESPONDENTS70 participants

17-64 years (smartphone)* 17 participants dropped due to unstable bluetooth

connection

PARTICIPANTS

Page 22: Mobile = Location = Effect

PROCEDURE

WelcomeBriefing (assignment)ExperimentQuestionnaire• Intrusiveness, Li et al. 2002 (7 point scale; 5 items; C’s alpha=.841)• Product involvement (adjusted products), Verbeke & Vackier, 2003 (7 point scale; 4

items; alpha=.842)• Attitude toward ads in general, Muehler, 1989 (7 point scale; 3 items; alpha=.841)• Personal Innovativeness, Agarwal & Prasad, 2003 (7 point scale; 3 items; alpha=.845)• Intention to use application, Unni & Harmon, 2007 (7 point scale; 2 items; alpha=.921• Intenion to buy product, Kowatsch & Maas, 2010 (7 point scale; single item scale)• Attitude toward application, Tsang et al, 2004; (7 point scale; single item)• Video recording

Page 23: Mobile = Location = Effect

LBA

Attitude advertising in

general

Intrusiveness Attitude mobile application

Intention to use the application

Intention to buy the product

Innovativeness

Product Involvement

-,286*

,281*

-,376**,393**

,328**

,511**

,279*

R²=,232 R²=,141

R²=,481

R²=,260

* p<0,05 **p<0,001

RESULTS

Less intrusive

A more positive attitude

Increases behavioral intention

LBA

FitMisfit

0

2

4

6

2.45 3.15

Intrusiveness

Page 24: Mobile = Location = Effect

• Study shows that location based communication can reduce marketing resistance

• Not only applicable to marketing but also to other regions (non-profit)

• Development of a new tool to evaluate all kinds of pervasive communication applications

RELEVANCE

Page 25: Mobile = Location = Effect

• Validation studies in a real supermarket• Behavioral measurement (movement log , video

input)• Head tracking with MS Kinect (less obtrusive)• Have a more complete phone app• Ability to interact with products• Creation diversity (app, ads, brands)• Retail diversity• Social context: Avatars

FUTURE WORK

Page 26: Mobile = Location = Effect

Thank you for your [email protected]

Twitter: dr_MarnixWebsite: dvj-insights.com