mo action kit

8/4/2019 MO Action Kit

1/12

BCAP

All Missourians deserve safe and energy-efcient buildings.

This Local Energy Code Action Kit provides municipalities and counties

with information and resources to support the adoption of the model energy

codethe 2009 IECCand its enforcement.

For Municipalitiesin Missouri

local energy code

Action Kit


2/122

What DoThey Cover?

Energy codes address wall and ceiling insulation, window and door specications, H

and ventilation equipment efciency, and lighting xtures, among other building featu

Energy codes set the minimum standard for the energy efciency of building

ensure that homes and commercial buildings reduce their energy use, lower utility

and improve occupant comfort.

The International Code Council (ICC) and the American Society of Hea

Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) develop and up

building codes and standards on three-year cycles. The U.S. Department of En

(DOE) reviews them to determine their efciency and cost-effectiveness and m

recommendations for state adoption.

What AreEnergy Codes?

Who CreatesThem?

Basicsenergy codes

The ICC 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) is the current m

energy code. It references ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007 for commercial construc

It is approximately 15 percent more energy efcient than the 2006 IECC.

What is theCurrent Code?

Lighting

Air SeALin

Attic AcceSS

FeneStrAtio

DuctS

thermoStAt

FirepLAce SeALing

inSuLAtio

hVA


3/12

Statuadoptio

Due to its history of strong local government, Missouri does not have a

mandatory statewide energy code, however all local jurisdictions except

class III counties have the right to adopt an energy code. As expected,his system creates a sometimes confusing patchwork of different codes

hroughout the state.

Regardless of the system in place, the bottom line is that many jurisdictions

n Missouri still dont have an energy codemeaning that many residents

do not receive the benets of energy-efcient construction.

Missouri: A Patchwork of Codes

Commercial Energy Code StaResidential Energy Code Status

The National Picture

Energy codes are adopted on the state and local levels. The majority of states have adopt

some version of the model energy code.

no statewide code or precedes 2000IECC or ASHRAE Standard 90.1-1999

meets or exceeds 1998-2003 IECC orASHRAE Standard 90.1-1999 or equivalen

meets or exceeds 2006 IECC or ASHRAEStandard 90.1-2004 or equivalent

meets or exceeds 2009 IECC or ASHRAEStandard 90.1-2007 or equivalent


4/124

Missouri residents spend billions every yearimporting energy frother states and abroad. Energy codes can help the state retain soof these dollars and improve Missouris economy.

Missouricosts and savings for

Amount spent annually on energy in Missouri.

Percentage of primary energy imported from other sta

The rise in the cost of residential electricity, 2004 to 20

$20 billion

95%

22%

EnergyCosts

Energy codes reduce energy use and have the potential to put monback into the hands of Missouri residents and businesses.

Energy savings for each new home.

Annual savings in reduced utility bills per home.

Energy savings in reduced utility bills in ofce building

18-26%

$337-559

10-11%

Energy

Code

Savings

Annual energy savings by 2030.

Btu of energy avoided annually by 2030.

Metric tons of CO2 prevented annually by 2030.3

$318 million

26 trillion

1.4 million

StatewideSavings

By adopting and enforcing the 2009 IECC starting in 2011, Missomunicipalities and counties would signicantly improve the stateconomy and environment now and into the future.


5/12

Save Residents and Businesses Money

Reduce Pollution and Increase Grid Reliability

Protect Against Substandard Construction

Ensure Health and Safety

Help Consumers Make Informed Decisions

Provide Quality and Comfort

Matterwhy do energy code

ts much more cost-effective to build to the model energy code during construction than try to

mprove efciency later through expensive retrots that do not achieve comparable savings. For sense

of scale, consider that in 2008 Missouri received $227.2 million in Weatherization Assistance Program

WAP) funds to improve the energy efciency of low-income housing.4

f they buy a new home in 2011 built to the latest energy code,Missouri homeowners will see net

savings within no more than two years.After breaking even, low utility bills will help them realize

a prot of up to $31 per month.

Making a Cost-Effective Investment

spotlight on:


6/126

Processthe adoption

Tried-and-True Steps for an Efcient and Effective Adoption Proce

The 2012 IECCspotlight o

Carry through with your jurisdictions legislative or regulatory proces

you are holding a public hearing, gather public testimony and support f

stakeholder groups and other regional and state organizations.

Local AdoptionProcess

Form a stakeholder group of knowledgeable professionals to conduct

adoption process. Participants could include code ofcials, energy-efc

design and building professionals, utility and local government representati

community leaders, and environmental and consumer advocates.

StakeholderGroup

Meeting regularly, review the 2009 IECC to understand its requireme

and determine whether they meet your local needs and conditions. So

municipalities and counties choose to strengthen the code through amendme

Local, regional, or national advocates can help support this process if need

Review theCode

Raise awareness of the model energy code and its many far-reach

benets to create buy-in from a number of other involved parties. Des

and building professionals, policymakers, the general public and o

interested groups need to know why adopting an energy code is import

Conduct

Outreach

Set an effective date for the energy code that gives all parties time to ad

to the new requirements. Six months is a reasonable time period.

Enact theCode

The ICC is in the process of nalizing the 2012 IECC, which is expected to be about 15 percent mo

efcient than the 2009 IECC. Preparing now to adopt the 2012 IECC is a great opportunity for eligib

municipalities and counties to provide their citizens with even stronger energy-efcient constructio


7/12

Arnold

Ballwin

Belton

BethanyBoonville

Branson

Camdenton

Cape Girardeau

Carthage

ChillicotheClayton

Columbia

Eldon

El Dorado Springs

Farmington

Florissant

Fulton

Gladstone

Hannibal

HarrisonvilleHazelwood

Higginsville

Highlandville

Joplin

Kansas CityKirksville

Kirkwood

Knob Noster

Lake St. Louis

Loch Lloyd

LebanonLees Summit

Macon

Marshall

Maryville

Mexico

Mountain Grove

Neosho

Nixia

OFallon

Osage BeachOzark

Pacific

Park Hills

Pineville

Platte CityRaytown

Republic

Riverside

Rolla

Sedalia

SikestonSni Valley

Springfield

St. Charles

St. Joseph

St. Louis

St. Peters

Sugar Creek

Troy

Warrensburg

WentzvilleWest Plains

Missoubest practices i

Includesonlyjurisdictionsreportingcode

statustoInternationalCode

C

i l

f J

1 2 0 1 0

I t

t i

l B

i l d i

C

d

( I B C ) i t h

d

l

Adoption Statulocal jurisdictio

Adopt the Latest Model Energy Code

Build Stakeholder Support for Energy Codes

Kansas City incorporates energy codes into its broader sustainability effort:

1) The Environmental Management Commission advises the city on energy/environmental issu

2) The Chamber of Commerces Climate Protection Partnership brings together 180 businesse

and institutions that support energy efciency implementation.

3) The Sustainability Coordinator works regionally to promote energy efciency efforts.

4) The Climate Protection Plan includes energy codes as a policy tool.5) Kansas City joined with ten municipalities and the Mid-America Regional Council to create a

regional energy strategy and promote the adoption of the 2012 IECC.

Columbia created commissions to advise the city council on energy code issues:

1) The Building Construction Codes Commission (BCCC) reviews codes and provides a construct

industry perspective.

2) The Environment and Energy Commission adds input on the benets of energy codes, stimula

public interest, and engages public/private agencies.

The University City Green Practices Committee provides input into energy code adoption efforts.

Jackson County, Lake St. Louis, Marshall, OFallon, and the City of St. Louis have adopted t

2009 IECC. Creve Coeurand Independence are currently in the adoption process.St. Charles County and St. Louis County have adopted the 2009 IRC with amendments.

Adopted the IECC

Adopted the IBC and/or IRCpopulation>100,000 50,000-100,000


8/128

Processthe implementation

Code ofcials and building professionals must learn energy code

requirements and stay up-to-date on code changes. Classroom

training is the most common and feasible method. On-site training is

preferred. There are also a number of resources available for online

training, though ideally this should supplement in-person training.

Code ofcials must work with building professionals to set clear

expectations for energy code compliance. They must be proactive

about discussing code requirements and providing corrections at

every step of the plan review and enforcement process. It is also

important for code ofcials to seamlessly incorporate energy code

enforcement into their established inspection procedures.

Green and above codes achieve even greater energy savings. Options

range from local amendments to national codes and standards. More

efcient construction often requires stronger enforcement, including

efciency testing from third-party organizations. Green and above

codes are also an excellent option for public buildings in jurisdictions

that want to lead by example.

Green and Advanced Codes

Enforcement and Compliance

Training

2009 IECC Climate ZonesMost of Missouri falls under the Climate Zone 4 (yellow) similar to much of

the Upper South. The northern quarter of the state is in the colder Climate

Zone 5 (green), which has stricter insulation requirements.


9/12

Note: This is not an exhaustive list of resources on the web. For additional information on Missouri and best practices

from around the country, please visit: www.bcap-ocean.org

Missoubest practices i

Resourceaddition

Leading by Example

Kansas City

1) City-owned facilities must meet LEED Gold standards; city-funded residential projects must

meet ENERGY STAR qualications.

2) The city tracks utility bills for renovated city-owned facilities. It saves about $2 million annua

Claytons 2006 Municipal Building Standard requires new construction and major renovations of cowned and occupied buildings over 5,000 square feet to earn LEED Silver certication.

Springelds 2008 Green Building Policy requires renovations of city-owned buildings to incorporLEED for Existing Buildings to the greatest extent practical.

Other Best Practices

Columbia Water and Lights Home Performance with ENERGY STAR home renovation programresults in an average energy bill reduction of 29%. They also offer free energy audits to customers

Columbia conducts an open wall inspection for insulation as one of ve required inspections.

Springeld modied the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) to include ENERGY STAR (and similar)

rated homes. Realtors can use this information to market homes and track whether they sell fasteand at a higher price.

OCEAN Missouri Page

Missouri Department of Natural Resources

Building Energy Codes University

Midwest Energy Efciency Alliance (MEEA)

Mid-America Regional Council (MARC)

International Code Council (ICC)

Code College Network

American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)

Code ofcials in Springeld, Kansas City, and Columbia use energy code inspection checklists

The City of St. Louis ties pay raises for code ofcials to ICC certications.

Columbia has developed its own energy checklist for new homes.

Enforcement Practices


10/12


11/12

Why Energy Codes Matter

A two page handout that provides context for the energy code anddiscusses their benets.

Measuring Code Compliance

A two page handout that describes what to expect from forthcomingDOE-mandated energy code compliance efforts.

Further Readinappendix

Didyou knowthat buildings accountforover40percent

of totalenergyusein the United States? Thats more

thaneither thetransportation or industrialsectors.

Why Energy Codes Matter for Missouri

Save Energy, Save Money

InMissouri,home s built tothe currentmodel energycodeuse 18-26percent less

energy thanthe state average,saving their occupants $353-565 peryearin

lowerutilitybills.Thats moneythat goes directlyto consumersand companiespockets.

Andthesesavings addup.If allmunicipalities inMissouriadoptedandenforcedthemodelenergycodestatewide

in2011,thestate would save$318billion annuallyin energycostsby2030.It would also avoid 26trillionBtu of energyuseannuallyby2030.

Protect Occupants

Everyonehasa right to buildingsthat meets nationalstandardsforenergyefficiency.Builders mustcomply

withenergy codes as stringentlyas theycomply with codes for life,health, andsafety.

Make a Cost-Effective Investment

Wouldyourather spenda fewdollars moreona monthlymortgageor spendthousands on aretrofitdown the

line? Itsmuch morecost-effectiveto build to themodel energycodethantrytoimproveefficiencylater

throughexpensive retrofits thatdo notachieve comparablesavings.

Evenwhenyoufactor in theadditionalupfrontcost,whenamortizedover astandardmortgage,Missourihomeownerswill seenet savingswithin thefirst year. From there,they will spend about $30 to $47 less on

utilitybillspermonth!

Help Make Informed Decisions

Knowingthat a buildingis energy-efficient

empowersconsumersand businessestomakeinformed decisions.Beforebuyingor

renting,do your research.Ask thecurrent

occupants whattheypay. If its anew home,ask

thebuilder aboutits energyefficiencyandthen

makethem show you how it meetscode.

Reduce Pollution and Increase

Reliability

Mostbuildings wasteenergy needlessly,which

increasespollution and puts stresson the

grid.Byadoptingenergycodes,Missouriwould

prevent1.4 millionmetric tons of CO2annually by

2030 .

Provide Quality and Comfort

Howdoyouknowif a homeor officeis builtwell?Onewayto measurequalityconstruction isthrough energy

efficiency. Buildings thatmeetor exceedthe modelenergy codes arebuiltwith theoccupants bestinterests in

mind,which carryover toall facets of construction. Energy-efficient buildingsare also morecomfortableand

requirelessheating and cooling.

Coming Down the Road:Achieving90Percent Compliance withthe Energy Code

TheRecoveryActo 2009mandatesthatstatesshowthat theyhaveachieved90percentcompliancewith theenergy codeby 2017.Compliancemeasurementis likelyto dier

romstateto state,aseachwillhaveto collaboratewithlocalcode ocialstofndan idealstrategythatftswiththestatesuniqueneeds,inrastructure,andresourcesavailable.

StateStrategies

Stateswill not have to tackle t he problemo developing a90% compliance strategy by themselves. Te Departmento Energy (DOE) hascreateda dedicatedState Compliance Evaluation Procedureswebsite1 that providesvideos,resources, and web toolsto show statesand local inspectionsdepartments what the compliance measurement

processcould looklike. DOE sta membersare also available to answerquestionsand researchbest practices.

In addition, by the all 2011, DOEwill have completedpilotstudiesin nine statesacross the country to developlocal

strategiesormeasuring compliance. Examplesandlessonslearnedromt hisprogramwill be publishedon the website

notedabove to helpdevelop andinorm strategiesthat willworkin otherstates andlocalities. In addition, sparkedbythe launcho DOEs pilot studieson compliance, several

stateshave startedtheirown measurement andverifcation(M&V) projects using all or part o the DOE pilot

methodology andtoo ls. DOEwill also have inormationandresultson these projectsavailable orinterestedparties.1 http://www.energycodes.gov/arra/compliance_evaluation.stm

KansasCity atnight

Stockton Lake

ProgramStructure

While the state is responsible orreporting compliance

results, the responsibility will all to local governmentsusually theirinspections departmentsto either makeavailable the needed inormation on construction

projectsin progressor to collect data themselveson howdesignersandconstruction proessionalsare designing and

constructing buildings. DOE hassuggestedthat evaluationo design and building practice or eachstate can bestructureda numbero ways: through1st party evaluation

by local inspectionsdepartments, 2ndparty inspection bythe state, orthird-party evaluation by private sectorfrms.Missouris strong home rule tradition may mean that

1st party evaluation is the most likely option, but a fnaldetermination can be made at alater date.

Page 1

1

2

Courtesy o FlickrCreative Commons- smysnbrg

Courtesy o FlickrCreative Commons- danoStL1

2


12/122

References. U.S. Energy Information Administration: http://www.eia.gov/emeu/states/hf.jsp?incle=sep_prices/total/pr_tot_

mo.html&mstate=MISSOURI; Missouri Governors Ofce: http://governor.mo.gov/newsroom/2009/Energy_Efcient_Investment_Act. U.S. Dept. of Energy: http://www.energycodes.gov/publications/techassist/residential/Residential_Missouri.pdf; http://www.eycodes.gov/publications/techassist/commercial/Commercial_Missouri.pdf. The BCAP Energy Codes Calculator. Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Missouri Resources, Winter 2011: www.dnr.mo.gov/magazine/2011-winter.pdf

Funds are made possible through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and the Transform Missouri initiative and administerehe Missouri Department of Natural Resources. This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under ConNumber 136115. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neithe

United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumesegal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process discloseepresents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specic commercial product, process, or sey trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendationavoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necesstate or reect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

Photo Credits (Clockwise from top left)Page 1: Courtesy of Flickr Creative Commons - Credit BitHeadPage 2: Courtesy of Flickr Creative Commons - Credit J. Stephen ConnPage 4: Courtesy of Flickr Creative Commons - Credit Wildlight ImagesPage 7: Map Courtesy of U.S. Census Bureau Census 2000 File Summary 1 Population by Census TractPage 8: Courtesy of Flickr Creative Commons - Credit Kansas Explorer 3128Page 10: Courtesy of Flickr Creative Commons - Credit MoDOTPage 12: Courtesy of Flickr Creative Commons - Credit prettywar-stl

The Missouri Department of Natural Resources

www.dnr.mo.gov

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009www.recovery.gov

The Building Codes Assistance Project

www.bcap-ocean.org

mo action kit

Documents