mn-dama feb 2003 1 is healthcare the most complex it industry ? skip valusek quality engineer,...
TRANSCRIPT
MN-DAMA Feb 20031
Is Healthcare the Most Complex IT Industry ?
Skip Valusek Quality Engineer, Director Performance Improvement
Children’s Hospitals & ClinicsMinneapolis/St Paul
The content of this presentation and discussion is solely that of the presenter.
[email protected] 813-5876
MN-DAMA Feb 20032
Exercise: What Makes IT Complex ?
1. Identify three dimensions of complexity
2. Pick the dimension you feel is the most important contributor to IT complexity
MN-DAMA Feb 20033
Complexity Components
• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • •
MN-DAMA Feb 20034
AGENDA
• Very Brief Review of IT Technical Dimensions of Complexity
• Brief discussion of “DSS: A Paradigm Addition”
• Inter-active discussion of business dimensions of complexity
MN-DAMA Feb 20035
Very brief: IT Technical Dimensions
• Interfacing/Networking requirements– Information security requirements– Bandwidth
• Database requirements– Structural fit
• Flat file• Hierarchical ?• Relational?• Object ?
– Standardizing definitions– Identifying acceptable values
• Application requirements– Breadth– Depth– Volatility
MN-DAMA Feb 20036
End-users as a dimension of complexity
• Number
• Types
• Range of End-User: – PC Maturity– Expectations
• Rate of change of all the above
MN-DAMA Feb 20037
Technology change
• Rate
• Impact on transaction processes
• Impact on decision processes
MN-DAMA Feb 20038
Information Management Premise
• The purpose of managing information and knowledge is to improve decision making capability.
• More effective information/knowledge management requires a paradigm
ADDITION for both IT and user communities.
MN-DAMA Feb 20039
Predominant Metaphors Used in Organizations:
• Machine
• Military Command & Control
The new, emerging metaphor of the decision paradigm:• Biological or Living Systems
(complex adaptive systems)
MN-DAMA Feb 200310
Decision-Making
• Decisions commit resources through
judgment and choice processes• There is process in decision-making:
• Opportunity/Problem Detection & Explanation
• Alternative Generation
• Analysis (value & probability judgments)
• Selection among alternatives
• Implementation
• Can we model this process?– Judgments (Value & Likelihood)– Choices
?
MN-DAMA Feb 200311
Decision Categories
• RESEARCH & ANALYSIS• ‘across’
• accounts, customers, patients, • channels, practices• markets, • periods, day of week, time of day
• Unstructured (little or no process) • Find key variables• Collaboration & sharing.• Design & Refine protocols/pathways
RETROSPECTIVE / ANALYTICALTACTICAL & STRATEGIC
DECISIONS
• ‘Quick Look’JUDGMENTS & CHOICES • ‘within’
• a PATIENT: view WHAM• a PROVIDER: rounding list• a DEPARTMENT: staff scheduling• a MARKET: assess event impacts
• Empower employees (within limits)• Semi-structured process• Apply protocols/pathways/guidelines
CONCURRENTCLINICAL & OPERATIONAL
DECISIONS
CURRENT
HISTORY
Demographic
DataWarehouse
“ “
“
“Source”Systems
MN-DAMA Feb 200312
Additional Bridges Required
USER’SDECISIONWORLD
OLAP AnalyticalDecision Processes
CURRENT
HITORYS
Demographic Operational/ClinicalDecision ProcessStoryboards
SYSTEMS/DATASYSTEMS/DATA
Warehouse(Oracle)
Quality Patient Safety
OB database
Complaints MediPac
Eclipsys (Sybase ?)
CVMicroMedical
RisKey (AREV)
Cactus (credentialing)
ADAC Lab database
(Fortran)
Ortho Database
Neuro database?OR Navicare
Pxyis
SurgiServerb-trieve
MICC database
CV Lab
Logician (MedicaLogic)(Oracle)
Picker (local)
Medica Claims
DISC
STAR(MUMPS)
Inpatient Pharmacy(STAR)
Radiology(STAR)
STARLab
OutpatientPharmacy
ORYX 6-digit coding
Sungard(Oracle)
Quality IndicatorsHDM(B-trieve)
EXTERNAL SOURCE SYSTEMS
Abaton(Oracle)
Medline
Micromedex(drug info)
MN Hospital Assoc
Allina KnowledgeQuest
USERSUSERS
Pharmacy
Patient Relations
External/RegulatoryRelations
Provider Relations
PayorRelations
Outpatient/Ambulatory
CV
Ortho
Neuro
ORED
OB/Womencare
Radiology Lab
BehavioralHealth
Oncology
Care-effectiveCost
Med Staff
IT MODELSIT MODELS
OLTP TransactionProcess(ERD; DFD)
MN-DAMA Feb 200313
Transition to Decision Support
TODAY
Detection: “What’s Going On?”
FUTURE
Explanation: “Why is it happening?”
“What’s the best action ?”
REPORTING
ANALYSIS
DATA
QUALITY
DATA
QUALITY
ANALYSIS
REPORTING
•Opportunity/Problem Detection & Explanation•Alternative Generation •Analysis (Cost/Benefit judgments) •Selection among alternatives•Implementation
MN-DAMA Feb 200314
Projects & Measures of the Business:
“FINAL”
Internal Measures External Measures
“PILOT” Project
• Start Small & Grow: The Decision Support Paradigm• Healthcare: PDSA Rapid Cycle model for change
MN-DAMA Feb 200315
Managing Evolutionary Design & Development
Time (weeks)
User Requirements Evolution
SystemEvolution
20 36 52 72 88 104 120
Mea
sure
Groupings
Time
Mea
sure
Groupings
Time
Mea
sure
Groupings
Time
Mea
sure
Groupings
Time
Mea
sure
Groupings
Time
Mea
sure
Groupings
Time
MN-DAMA Feb 200316
Managing Evolutionary Design & Development:Obtaining & Sustaining Business Sponsorship
• Instill a sense of urgency (level of pain)
– A critical success factor of organizational change
• Manage expectations
• Provide and retain funding
• Recruit and retain skills
MN-DAMA Feb 200317
AGENDA
• Very Brief Review of IT Technical Dimensions of Complexity
• Brief discussion of “DSS: A Paradigm Addition”
• Inter-active discussion of business dimensions of complexity
MN-DAMA Feb 200318
IT Complexity Framework: Assess Business Processes in Four Categories
FinancialOperationalRegulatoryClinical
FinancialOperationalRegulatoryClinical
FinancialOperationalRegulatoryClinical
FinancialOperationalRegulatoryClinical
Transaction (I-P-O)
Real-Time/Operational
Retrospective/Analytical
Decision (Judgments & Choices)
MN-DAMA Feb 200319
Real-time “Transaction”: Financial Billing complexity
Providers
Physician(s)Practice(s)
Hospital &Staff
“Coding” &Appropriate
bills prepared
Payors
DRGs, CPT
Paymentmade
• Payors contract(s)• Individual
time
Customer(patient)presents
Servicesprovided
Discrepanciesresolved
MN-DAMA Feb 200320
Real-time decision complexity: Safety
• Operational/Clinical– Number of front-line employees with decision
responsibility– Number of judgment and choice processes for each participant– Number of processes requiring communication– Number of potential failure points
MN-DAMA Feb 200321
One sample judgment process: Right “customer” ? Complete record ?
• What are the customer expectations regarding a “complete” knowledge of their relationship ?
• Difficulty creating a complete customer record for accurate customer decisions.
• Who has the master patient record?
MN-DAMA Feb 200322
Real time decision: patient placement/flow
Scheduling & Admissions Forecast
ReferringPhysicians
Consulting & Admitting Physicians
ER
Children’sPhysicianNetwork Physician Referral
Telephone Line
OR
External Events
Nurse Staffing
HousekeepingStaffing
DischargeForecast & Status
Homecare
AncillaryServices
Other HospitalStatus
Sister HospitalStatus
InterpreterServices
BEDS
Infection Control
Short Stay
?
Family Needs
Historical Forecast
Isolation Beds
SUPPLYDEMAND
ER
MN-DAMA Feb 200323
Real-time decision: Financial
• EMTALA doesn’t allow financial considerations to enter the initial real-time decision process. Those who “present” to the ER must be assessed regardless of ability to pay.
• Forces the problem to the retrospective domain
MN-DAMA Feb 200324
Real-time decision complexity: Satisfaction
• What are “customer” dis-satisfiers?– Parking– Food– Delays in treatment; waiting time– Double rooms– Staffing– Communication– Poor transitions– Inability to reach consulting physician– Who’s in charge?
MN-DAMA Feb 200325
Retrospective Decision: Dimensions for analysis
Patient DRG orAPR ICD-9
CP
T-4P
ractice &P
rovider
Employer
Plans/
Payors
Fac
ility
Dep
artm
ent/
Uni
t
Date/TimeDay
Example attributes of importance:
• Age appropriate
• Culturally appropriate (44 languages/cultures)
LOS
ChargesPatientDays
Census
MedicationUsage
BloodUsage
Delays
Accuity/Severity
Case Mix
ClinicalOutcomes
MN-DAMA Feb 200326
Measurement of Quality/Evaluation of Success
• Balanced Scorecard Components– Safety – Access– Finance– Experience
• Stakeholders– Patients– Families– Physicians– Nurses– Ancillary Services– Payers– Regulators
MN-DAMA Feb 200327
Retrospective Analysis: Transaction
• Safety– Labeling of specimens– Labeling of medications– Waiting time
• Access– Length of stay– Time to turn a room– Waiting time
• Experience– Billing – Waiting time
MN-DAMA Feb 200328
Difficulty properly attributing provider/servicer
• Team of service vs individual• Practices (“coverage”)• Roles
– PCP– Attending– Procedure– Consult– Resident– Team services
MN-DAMA Feb 200329
Retrospective Analysis: Relationships
Children’sServices
& Provider Network
CommunityEfforts &
Action Groups
LocalState
NationalGovernments
Schools
Families
PhysicianGroups
LocalState
Public Health
Managed CarePayers
Hospitals
Community-basedadvocacy groups
Social ServiceProvidersMHHP,
NACHRI, AAP,
MCHP, CDF
Clinics
Employers
MN-DAMA Feb 200330
Regulatory/Compliance/Accreditation (Number of regulators & Information intensity)
HOSPITALS
Administrators OfficeHCFA
Health Care FInancingAdministration
Federal CircuitCourts
Supreme Court
Congress
PRRB
DepartmentalAppeals
OIG
MIPS
State Survey &Survey
Certification
Regional Offices Intermediaries Carriers PRO's
DMERC
Regional HomeHealth Intermediaries
JCAHO
State HealthBoards
StateMedicaid
HHS/NIOSH
HHS/HRSA
StateLicensure
FDA
DOT
OSHA
Labor/JusticeADA
DOL/Employment
NRC
DOJ
State Medical Boards
OPO'S
State & LocalGovernments
SEC IRS EPA FTC FCC FBI
HIPAA
Leapfrog
CDC NCQACARF
EMTALA
CLAS
HHS/OCR
HHS/OMH
MN-DAMA Feb 200331
Rate of content knowledge creationImpact on real-time and retrospective decisions
• Clinical guidelines• CPOE
• Clinical guidelines• CPOE
Transaction (I-P-O)
Real-Time/Operational
Retrospective/Analytical
Decision (Judgments & Choices)
MN-DAMA Feb 200332
Review of Healthcare Complexity: Change Process
Transaction(I-P-O)
Decision Intensity
(Judgments & Choices)
Ability to achieveagreement(across & withinstakeholdergroups)
Real-Time/Operational
Retrospective/Analytical