mm session 3 monitoring performance 2012_al_aug13

Upload: alexa-nadia

Post on 02-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    1/34

    CIM PROFESSIONAL DIPLOMA IN

    MARKETING

    MANAGING MARKETING

    Session 3Monitoring Performance

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    2/34

    Learning Outcomes

    By the end of the session, students will be able to:

    Determine innovative and effective methods formeasuring and monitoring marketing

    performance in operations, activities andresource management (1.3)

    Critically analyse monitoring information andrecommend ways in which to improve marketing

    performance (1.4)

    2

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    3/34

    Measurement and monitoring

    This first section of the session reviews the

    basic concepts surrounding measuring

    and monitoring marketing performance

    with a view to improving performance

    3

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    4/34

    4

    A feedback control system

    ProcessInput Output

    MeasureCompareCorrective

    action

    Target/

    budget

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    5/34

    5

    Variance analysis

    Performance

    Variables usedto judge

    operations

    Example

    Standards

    Marketingobjectives

    Marketingplan

    Profits 15% ROI

    Sales per

    unit ofanalysis

    5,000 average

    sales per unit(e.g. customer)

    Consumer

    service

    Complaints and

    warranty service

    per 100 units sold

    Costs perunit of

    analysis

    Sales costs 1,000

    Distribution costs

    1,250

    Product costs

    2,000

    Source: Adapted from Luck and Ferrell (1979)

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    6/34

    6

    1. Strategicrelated to overall performance

    of an organisationshareholder value,

    ROI, branding, eco efficiency

    2. Tacticalshort term measure to improvecustomer satisfaction, loyalty rates and

    promotional effects

    Performance Measures

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    7/34

    7

    Types of control

    Strategic controls

    Effectiveness (doing

    the right thing)

    Efficiency (how wellits done)

    Adaptability

    Annual planningcontrols

    Profit controls

    Brand equity controls

    Tactical performance

    measurement

    Annual budgetingprocedures

    Auditing mechanisms

    Benchmarkingprocedures

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    8/34

    8

    Choosing metrics

    Should be clearly linked to corporate, business or

    marketing objectives

    Focused on measuring the key indicators in a clear way

    so they are easily understood

    Encompass broad and balanced factors and incorporate

    a range of marketing measures

    Be capable of tracking performance reliably over time Cost-effective

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    9/34

    9

    Suitability does it give the information you need?

    Feasibility can it be activated and usedcan it be communicated?

    Acceptability to marketing areas and shareholders,

    e.g. Finance DepartmentResources are you able to do it and is it practical?

    Actionable is it something that can be influenced by your actions,

    e.g. campaign results, or too dependent on external

    factors, e.g. economic conditions?

    Focused are you measuring the most important and critical areas

    Critical Success Factors (CSFs) or

    Key Performance Indicators (KSFs)

    Choosing metricsquestions to ask

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    10/34

    10

    Strategic Control Systems

    Type of analysis Used to control

    Financial analysisRatio analysisVariance analysisCash budgetingCapital budgeting and expenditure

    Elements of profitabilityCosts or revenueCash flowInvestment

    Market/sales analysis- overall consideration of sizeand growth of market segments and corporatemarket shareDemand analysisMarket share or penetrationSales targetsSales budget

    Competitive standingSales effectivenessEfficiency in use of resources for selling

    Physical resource analysis

    Capacity fillYieldProduct inspection

    Plant utilisation

    Materials utilisationQuality

    Human resources analysisWork measurementOutput measurementLabour turnover

    ProductivityWorkforce stability

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    11/34

    11

    Financial and non-financial metrics

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    12/34

    12

    Market size, growth, share, number of

    competitors

    Market share, revenue or gross profit as a %

    of salesCustomer acquisitions / rates

    Customer lifetime value

    Number of new products launched in last 5

    years

    % revenue from new services / productsCompany / brand awareness amongst target

    group

    Perceptions / Image of company /brand

    Market trends

    Return on marketing investment

    Innovation

    Branding / Corporate Identity

    Examples of how we can measureWhat do we want to measure?

    Examples of Marketing Activities

    Measurements

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    13/34

    13

    Measuring the Marketing Mix

    Product

    Market share

    Sales

    Sales by segment

    No of new productsWarranty claims

    Repeat purchases

    Place

    Channel costs

    Channel volume

    Channel growth

    Delivery time

    Stock levels

    Price

    Profit margin

    Discount levels

    Price by segment

    Price comparisons

    Promotion

    Cost per contactMedia coverage

    Sales per call

    Awareness levels

    Enquiries generated

    ControlEffectiveness control

    Efficiency control

    Strategic control

    Profitability

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    14/34

    14

    Evaluation Tools & Methods

    Potential tools which can be used formeasurement include; Consumer audit

    Sales information

    Retail audits

    Feedback from reps

    Voucher/coupon returns

    Campaign-specific measures, e.g. website visits or calls

    Response Rates

    Conversion Rates

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    15/34

    15

    Example - Potential Online Measurements

    Activity

    Brand-building

    Whether ad seen

    Number of times seen

    Attitudinal changes

    Awareness levels

    Feelings towards company

    Email

    Number openedClick-throughs

    Undelivered

    Unsubscribes

    Acquisition costs

    Direct Marketing

    Enquiries

    Web site visits

    Purchases

    Average order values

    Acquisition costs

    Internet

    Visitors

    Pages visited

    Pages exited from

    Entry pages

    Successful keywords

    Visitor sources

    Purchases

    Abandoned sales

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    16/34

    16

    Browsers2,000

    Add to Cart1,000

    Purchasers - 400

    One-offs - 300

    Regular Buyers - 90

    Loyals - 10

    50%

    40%

    75%

    22.5%

    2.5%

    The Funnel of Activity - Conversion

    Levels Example

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    17/34

    17

    Consider the following scenarios for the Funnel of

    Activity on the previous slide;

    How many more sales would a 10% increase in browsers

    achieve? (Answer;40, of whom 30 will only ever buy once).

    How many more sales would increasing check-out completionsfrom 40% to 60% achieve? (Answer;200).

    Which is easier and more cost effective to achievemore

    browsers or revisiting the checkout process to complete more

    sales?

    How much more successful would the company be if it

    increased regular buyers to 50% and Loyals to 15% via

    relationship management?

    Conversion Levels Example

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    18/34

    Acquisition Cost and Lifetime Value

    The cost of acquiring customers and the

    relationship to estimated lifetime value is

    a useful measure of marketing success.

    This next section evaluates the processes

    involved

    18

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    19/34

    19

    Assume your product costs 100 and you make 20 profit per sale.

    If a campaign generates 50 sales and cost you 1,000 your Acquisition Cost

    is 20

    If the customer buys once per quarter you will make 80 per year from

    that customer. If they stay with you for 5 years you would make 400 profit

    Is i t a su ccessfu l campaign?

    Would you now consider i t a succ essfu l campaign?

    Key LessonIdentify the maximum allowable Acquisition Cost for your product based on the

    LifeTime Value. This is a more useful measure than overall cost or number of

    sales/responses. Use it to measure campaign success.

    Acquisition Costs

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    20/34

    20

    Uses of Acquisition Cost and

    LifeTime Value

    Compare the success of different direct response

    activities.

    Measure profitability of segments or products.

    Identify if a particular piece of activity is worth continuingwith.

    Decide the allocation of the marketing budget to different

    media, i.e. maximise activity with lowest Acquisition

    Cost.

    Accurately measure your Return on Investment for your

    marketing spend.

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    21/34

    21

    Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

    No of custs. 500 375 281 211

    Sales Value 40,000 30,000 22,480 16,880

    Equiv value 40,000 25,500 19,108 14,348

    Total Sales 40,000 65,500 84,608 98,956

    Equiv LTV 80 131 169 198

    If a customer purchases 4 times per year, with a profit of 20 per sale, the singleyears LTV is 80. Imagine 500 customers, 75% of whom stay with you each year.

    Lifetime ValueShowing the

    Benefits of Retention

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    22/34

    22

    Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

    No of custs. 500 300 180 108

    Sales Value 40,000 18,000 7,200 2,160

    Equiv value 40,000 16,200 5,950 1,623

    Total Sales 40,000 56,200 62,150 63,773

    Equiv LTV 80 112 124 127

    This time, the retention rate is only 60%, with customers purchasing only 3times in year 2, twice in year 3 and once in year 4. Notice the decrease in LTV

    Lifetime ValueShowing the

    Benefits of Retention (2)

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    23/34

    23

    Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

    No of custs. 500 400 320 256

    Sales Value 40,000 40,000 32,000 25,600

    Equiv value 40,000 36,000 26,446 19,234

    Total Sales 40,000 76,000 102,446 121,680

    Equiv LTV 80 152 205 243

    Now the retention rate has been increased to 80%, with customers averagepurchase value increasing, making a sale worth 25 profit

    Lifetime ValueShowing the

    Benefits of Retention (3)

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    24/34

    Plans to improve performance

    24

    Cost reduction - use of new technologies for

    internal and external cost savings and service

    improvement

    e.g. Call handling technology for Call Centres

    does this work in terms of customer

    satisfaction though?

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    25/34

    Benchmarking and

    the Balanced Scorecard

    The final section of this session evaluates

    the role that benchmarking can play in

    monitoring and assessing marketing

    performance. It also reviews the ways in

    which the balanced score card approach

    can used as a performance monitoringframework.

    25

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    26/34

    26

    Benchmarking

    A systematic and ongoing process of

    measuring and comparing an

    organisations business processes andachievements against acknowledged

    process leaders or key competitors to

    facilitate improved performance

    Drummond & Ensor

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    27/34

    27

    Benchmarking Process

    Identify key performance measures for each

    business function

    Measure own performance as well as that ofcompetitors

    Identify areas of competitive advantage by

    comparing performance levels

    Design and implement plans to improve own

    performance on key issues

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    28/34

    28

    Disadvantages of Benchmarking

    Implies there is only one best way of doing

    something

    Could be yesterdays solution

    A catching up exercise, i.e. comparing theorganisation to what has already beendone,

    as opposed to identifying what couldbe done

    Assumes the information youre getting is

    accurate

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    29/34

    29

    Importance to customer Elements Actual Performance

    Low Medium High Poor Satisfactory Good

    Order cycle time

    Delivery reliability

    Frequency of delivery

    Documentation quality

    Order completeness

    Technical support

    Company Benchmarkcompetitor

    Benchmarking Example - Service

    Comparison

    Service support

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    30/34

    30

    Benchmarking Technique -

    Comparing with Best of Breed

    Integration

    Price

    Growth Quality

    SalesR&D

    investment

    ROI Capacity

    utilisation

    Management

    Technology

    Manufacturing

    Marketing

    Interpretation:

    Outside the

    circle = better

    than average

    Inside the circle

    = below average

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    31/34

    31

    Comparison Example

    Integration

    Price

    Growth Quality

    SalesR&D

    investment

    ROI Capacity

    utilisation

    Interpretation:

    Outside the

    circle = better

    than average

    Inside the circle

    = below averageXX

    XX

    X

    X

    XX

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    32/34

    32

    Balanced Scorecard

    This concept gives organisations a framework aroundwhich to base their measurement systems.

    It suggests that each measureor Key PerformanceIndicator (KPI) - fits into one of four broad categories.

    Targets are given for each KPI which is then measuredon an ongoing basis.

    The main advantage is that it provides a roundedapproach to developing measures

    The downside is that managers sometimes have tosqueeze measures into a category where it doesnt reallyfit.

    It can also give too much rigidity and bureaucracy, ratherthan the ability to measure whats important.

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    33/34

    33

    Balanced Scorecard

    Financialperspective

    Goal Measure

    Goal Measure

    Internalperspective

    Goal Measure

    Innovation &learning perspective

    How do we lookto stakeholders?

    How do customerssee us?

    How can we continue to

    improve and create value?

    What must weexcel at?

    Customerperspective

    Goal Measure

    Adapted from

    Harvard Business Review

  • 8/10/2019 MM Session 3 Monitoring Performance 2012_AL_Aug13

    34/34

    34

    Critically evaluate the measures of performance used

    by an organisation with which you are familiar. What

    additional information would be useful? What existing

    measurement systems are not as effective as they

    could be, i.e. what information would you like to have

    but dont?