minority shareholder protection in india
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
1/18
MINORITY SHAREHOLDER
PROTECTION IN INDIASUBMITTED BY :
MANIDEEP 1203017,
MANJULA 1203019,
NAVEEN 1203020,
PRASHANTH 1203026,
SAI KIRAN 1203084
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
2/18
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
3/18
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
4/18
Introduction
A minority shareholder is also a member of the company and he is entitled
to all the rights spelt out in the Companies Act, the Memorandum and the
Articles of Association.
The origin of the rights of minority in Foss Vs Harbottle1 case where the
court held that the minority share holders does not have any right to sue thedirectors.
The administration of the company shall be conducted on the basis of
democratic principle of majority.
There are certain exceptions to this rule for which minority shareholders
can sue successfully as representatives of the corporate interest.
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
5/18
Minority rights
These basic rights with their constituents are mentioned below:
I. Equitable Treatment
II. The right to seek information
III.The right to voice opinion
IV. Disclosure and Transparency
V. The right to seek redress
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
6/18
The corporate governance framework should ensure the equitable treatment
of all shareholders, including minority shareholders. All shareholders
should have the opportunity to obtain effective re- dress for violation of
their rights. The main challenges in ensuring equitable treatment of
minority shareholders include:
1. Ensuring that the Board adopts a shareholders' perspective when making
decisions and ensuring minority shareholders' interests are protected;
2. Improvements to the corporate governance;
3. Concerns of stakeholders at large vs. sharehold ers of the Company;
4. Improving communications and interactions between minority shareholders,Board members and management;
Cotd.
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
7/18
Legislative Measures
I. Protection of minority shareholders:
Company law provides for remedy if the minority shareholders can show
that the company's affairs are being conducted in a manner prejudicial to
the interests of the company or its shareholders to such an extent as to make
it just and equitable to wind it up. Instead of approaching the Court, theycan approach the Company Law Tribunal under section 433of the
companies act of 1956. The Tribunal could also provide for some directors
of the company to be appointed by the Central Government, or by
proportional representation.
II. Special majority: Another safeguard in the company law is the requirement
that certain major decisions have to be approved by a special majority of
75% or 90% of the shareholders by value.
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
8/18
Cotd.
III. Information disclosure and audit: Company law provides for regular
accounting information to be supplied to the shareholders along with a
report by the auditors.
IV. Voting Rights: The approval of at least 10% of the shareholders is required
for the requisition of an extraordinary general meeting for an application tothe Company Law Board (CLT) for relief.
V. Qualified Minority According to section 399 of the Act, a qualified
minority consists of at least one hundred shareholders or one tenth of the
total number of shareholders, whichever is less, or any shareholder(s)
holding one-tenth of the issued share capital of the company fully paid-up.
VI. Company Law Tribunal (CLT): The Indian company law shields
minorities' interest by providing an ad equate platform at CLT to raise
grievances in case of oppression or mismanagement by the majority
shareholders of a company.
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
9/18
Cotd.
VII Minority Representation It is important for Corporations to ensure
that board membership reflects the interest of minority shareholders.
In this regard, the Independent Directors (IDs) have an important
role to play in ensuring minority shareholders' interests are
protected.
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
10/18
Minority protection
Further Steps1. Disclosure of Holding of Majority Shareholders
2.Disclosure of the Control Structure
3. Good Practices for Compliance
4.Financial Institutions as Gate Keepers
5.Debt Holder Vigilance
6.Well Functioning Capital Market
7.International Accounting Standards
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
11/18
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
12/18
Minority share holders protection in M&A
To illustrate, a typical M&A deal involving a public listed company
can structured either as a sale of business or slump sale, a scheme
of arrangement or a takeover.
Although it is not possible to use any scientific metric or parameter
that indicates whether one type of structure is optimal to minority
shareholders as opposed to others, some qualitative assessments
can certainly be attempted, as follows:
1. A business sale is perhaps least effective for minority shareholders,
as a simple majority of shareholders can approve the transaction.
Since the voting requirement is a majority of those present and
voting, it is not even necessary that the controlling shareholders
hold more than 50% shares, or sometimes even anywhere close to
that, in the company to exercise effective control.
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
13/18
Cotd.
2. A scheme of arrangement provides greater protection to minority
shareholders.
3. The most significant right that a takeover provides is the option to minority
shareholders to exit on same terms as controlling shareholders orpromoters. In the Indian context, however, this right may be somewhat
diluted because the acquirer only needs to accept a minimum of 26% shares
from public shareholders. In any event, the takeover regulations are
structured primarily with a view to protecting the interest of minority
shareholder through the exit and other Rights.
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
14/18
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
15/18
With minority shareholders getting a greater say in the important decisions
taken by companies, it is essential for business leaders to ensure cordial
relations with them. If these shareholders lose faith in the leadership of
companies, it might become very difficult for them to execute importantstrategic plans, which in turn may hamper their firmsgrowth.
Here are the few examples :
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
16/18
Maruti Suzuki
The recent opposition put forth by the minority shareholders of Maruti
Suzuki India Ltd to the firms plan to become a distributor of cars
manufactured directly by the Japanese joint venture partner Suzuki Motor
Corp. in India.
The developments of the last few weeks at Maruti Suzuki have had an
impact on the firmsstock price and forced the capital market regulator to
look into the matter at the behest of aggrieved shareholders.
The company eventually decided to put the matter to vote, needing majority
approval from the minority shareholders, and it remains to be seen what is
eventually decided.
The key thing to note here is that it was public pressure that compelled
Maruti Suzuki to take this step even before it becomes mandatory under
Indian securities law to do so.
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
17/18
Essar Energy plc
Essar Energy Plc, the London-listed energy arm of the Essar group.
The Indian conglomerate, promoted by brothers Shashi Ruia and RaviRuia, intends to take Essar Energy private and made an offer of 70 pence
per share to buy out the outstanding shares of the firm in the market.
Though the minority shareholders and independent directors of the firm
feel that the Ruias bid significantly undervalues the company, the latter
have decided to go ahead with the offer.
-
8/12/2019 Minority Shareholder Protection in India
18/18
Conclusion
Thus the minority share holders have a right to participate in the indoor
management of the company.
The minority shareholders has two relives either to apply for winding up of
a company under section 433 or apply under section 397 and 398 of the
companies act of 1956. Under section 397 and 398 is a preventive remedy.
These are intended to avoid winding up of a company and at the same time
to give the remedies to the minority shareholders.