microwave optics adam parry mark curtis sam meek santosh shah acknowledgements: fred, geoff, lise...
TRANSCRIPT
Microwave OpticsAdam Parry
Mark Curtis
Sam Meek
Santosh Shah
Acknowledgements:
Fred, Geoff, Lise and Phil Junior Lab 2002
History of Microwave Optics• WW2 in England Sir John Randall and Dr.
H. A. Boot developed magnetron – Produced microwaves– Used in radar detection
• Percy Spencer tested the magnetron at Raytheon– Noticed that it melted his candy bar– Also tested with popcorn– Designed metal box to contain
microwaves– Radar Range– First home model - $1295
• Magnetron• Oldest, still used in microwave ovens• Accelerates charges in a magnetic field
Klystron•Smaller and lighter than Magnetron•Creates oscillations by bunching electrons
How to Make Microwaves
Gunn Diode•Solid State Microwave Emitter•Drives a cavity using negative resistance
Intensity vs. DistanceShows that the intensity is related to the inverse square of the distance between the transmitter and the receiver
Distance v. Intensity
R2 = 0.9887
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
1/sqrt(Intensity)
Dis
tan
ce (
9 in
ch
tiles)
Reflection
• Angle of incidence equals angle of reflection
MS
Angle of Incidence v. Angle of Reflection
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
280 290 300 310 320 330 340
Angle of Incidence (degrees)
Ang
le o
f Ref
lect
ion
(deg
rees
)
Measuring Wavelengths of Standing Waves• Two methods were used
– A) Transmitter and probe
– B) Transmitter and receiver
• Our data
– Method A:
• Initial probe pos: 46.12cm
• Traversed 10 antinodes
• Final probe pos: 32.02cm = 2*(46.12-32.02)/10 = 2.82cm
– Method B:
• Initial T pos: 20cm
• Initial R pos: 68.15cm
• Traversed 10 minima
• Final R pos: 53.7cm = 2.89cm
Refraction Through a Prism• Used wax lens to collimate beam
• No prism – max = 179o
• Empty prism – max = 177o
• Empty prism absorbs only small amount
• Prism w/ pellets – max = 173o
• Measured angles of prism w/ protractor 1 = 22 +/- 1o
2 = 28 +/- 2o
– Used these to determine n for pellets
• n = 1.25 +/- 0.1
Polarization
• Orientation of E field
• Polarizer blocks components perpendicular to its alignment
• Polarizer reduces intensity of light
PolarizationPolarization
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0 100 200 300 400
Angle of receiver (deg.)
Inte
nsit
y (
mA
) at
30x
Series1
• Microwaves used are vertically polarized• Intensity depends on angle of receiver• Vertical and horizontal slats block parallel
components of electric field
Single Slit InterferenceUsed 7 cm and 13 cm slit widths
This equation assumes that we are near the Fraunhofer (far-field) limit
nd sin
Single Slit Diffraction – 7cmSingle Slit Diffraction - 7 cm
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Angle (degrees)
Inte
nsi
ty
o
o
66.55
4.24
2
1
Not in the Fraunhofer limit, so actual minima are a few degrees off from expected minima
Single Slit Diffraction – 13cm
o
o
4.26
8.12
2
1
Single Slit Diffraction - 13 cm
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Angle (degrees)
Inte
nsity
Double Slit Diffraction• Diffraction pattern due to the interference of waves from a double slit• Intensity decreases with distance y• Minima occur at d sinθ = mλ• Maxima occur at d sinθ = (m + .5) λ
Double Slit Diffraction
Double Slit Interference (d=.09m)
012345
0 20 40 60 80 100
Angle of Reciever (deg.)
Inte
nsi
ty (V
)
MirrorExtension
S
M
• Interferometer – One portion of wave travels in one path, the other in a different path
• Reflector reflects part of the wave, the other part is transmitted straight through.
Lloyd’s Mirror
Lloyd’s Mirror
• D1= 50 cm
• H1=7.5 cm
• H2= 13.6 cm
= 2.52 cm
2 21 1 2
nd h d
Condition for Maximum:
• D1= 45 cm
• H1=6.5 cm
• H2= 12.3 cm
= 2.36 cm
Trial 1 Trial 2
Fabry-Perot Interferometer• Incident light on a pair of partial reflectors• Electromagnetic waves in phase if:
•In Pasco experiment, alpha(incident angle) was 0.
md cos2
Fabry-Perot Interferometer
• d1 = distance between reflectors for max reading – d1 = 31cm
• d2 = distance between reflectors after 10 minima traversed– d2 = 45.5cm
• lambda = 2*(d2 – d1)/10 = 2.9cm
• Repeated the process– d1 = 39cm
– d2 = 25cm
– lambda = 2.8cm
• Studies interference between two split beams that are brought back together.
Michelson Interferometer
Michelson Interferometer• Split a single wave into two parts• Brought back together to create
interference pattern• A,B – reflectors• C – partial reflector• Path 1: through C – reflects off A
back to C – Receiver• Path 2: Reflects off C to B –
through C – Receiver• Same basic idea as Fabry-Perot
– X1 = A pos for max reading = 46.5cm– X2 = A pos after moving away from
PR 10 minima = 32.5cm– Same equation for lambda is used– Lambda = 2.8cm
S
M
reflectors
Brewster’s Angle• Angle at which wave incident upon dielectric
medium is completely transmitted• Two Cases
– Transverse Electric– Transverse Magnetic
Equipment Setup
TE Case
• Electric Field transverse to boundary
• Using Maxwell’s Equations (1 = 2 =1)
Transverse Electric Case at oblique incidence
sin( )
sin( )
2sin cos
sin( )
r
i
t
i
E
E
E
E
NO BREWSTER’S ANGLE
S polarization
• Electric Field Parallel to Boundary
• Using Maxwell’s Equations (1 = 2 =1)
Transverse Magnetic Case at oblique incidence
P polarization
tan( )
tan( )
2sin cos
sin( )cos( )
r
t
t
t
E
E
E
E
TM Case
Brewster’s Angle (our results)
Brewster's Angle
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Angle (degrees)
Inte
nsi
ty
Horizontal
Vertical
Setting the T and R for vertical polarization, we found the maximum reflection for several angles of incident.We then did the same for the horizontal polarization and plotted I vs. thetaWe were unable to detect Brewster’s Angle in our experiment.
Bragg Diffraction
• Study of Interference patterns of microwave transmissions in a crystal
• Two Experiments– Pasco ( d = 0.4 cm, λ = 2.85 cm)
– Unilab (d = 4 cm, λ = 2.85 cm).
nd sin2
Condition for constructive interference
Bragg Diffraction (Pasco)
Bragg Diffraction [100] Symmetry
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0 10 20 30 40
Grazing Angle (deg.)
Inte
ns
ity
(V
)
Bragg Diffraction(Unilab)• Maxima
Obtained
Unilab Bragg Diffraction
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Angle(Degrees)
Mete
r R
ead
ing
(m
V)
0.45
0.20
2
1
3.46
2.21
2
1
Maxima Predicted
Wax lenses were used to collimate the beam
Frustrated Total Internal Reflection
• Two prisms filled with oil
• Air in between
• Study of transmittance with prism separation
• Presence of second prism “disturbs” total internal reflection.
Transmitter
Detector
Frustrated Total Internal Reflection
Frustrated Total Internal Reflection
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Prism Separation (cm)
Inte
nsi
ty
Optical Activity Analogue • E-field induces current in
springs
• Current is rotated by the curve of the springs
• E-field reemitted at a different polarization
• Red block (right-handed springs) rotates polarization –25o
• Black block (left-handed springs) rotates polarization 25o