Selective Activation of an Isolated Magnetic Skyrmion in a Ferromagnet withMicrowave Electric Fields

Akihito Takeuchi1, a) and Masahito Mochizuki2, 3, b)

1)Department of Physics and Mathematics, Aoyama Gakuin University, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-5258,Japan2)Department of Applied Physics, Waseda University, Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555,Japan3)PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012,Japan

We theoretically reveal that pure eigenmodes of an isolated magnetic skyrmion embedded in a ferromagneticenvironment can be selectively activated using microwave electric fields without exciting gigantic ferromagneticresonances, in contrast to conventional methods using microwave magnetic fields. We also demonstrate thatthis selective activation of a skyrmion can efficiently drive its translational motion in a ferromagnetic nanotrackunder application of an external magnetic field inclined from the normal direction. We find that a mode withcombined breathing and rotational oscillations induces much faster skyrmion propagation than the breathingmode studied previously by Wang et al. [Phys. Rev. B 92, 020403(R) (2015)].

PACS numbers: 76.50.+g,78.20.Ls,78.20.Bh,78.70.Gq

A skyrmion crystal, a hexagonally crystalized stateof magnetic skyrmions1–6, has characteristic resonancemodes at microwave frequencies7–10, which give rise tointriguing physical phenomena11 such as microwave di-rectional dichroism12–15, spin-voltage induction16,17, andspin-current generation18. When a static magnetic fieldHex is applied perpendicular to a thin-plate specimenof the skyrmion-hosting magnet, several types of spin-wave modes emerge depending on the microwave po-larization7. A microwave magnetic field Hω normal to

Hz

Hx

Hex

!

x

yz

D0+"D(t)

~

miz-1 0 1Csi

-0.01 0 0.01-0.700.7

-0.010-0.005-0.002

(a) (b)

(c) (e)(d) (f)24 sites

24 s

ites

!=0° !=30°!=0° !=30°

FIG. 1. (color online). (a) Schematics of a magnetic bi-layer system hosting skyrmions stabilized by the interfacialDzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. (b) External magneticfield Hex where θ is an inclination angle from the normaldirection. (c), (d) Color maps of the normal component ofmagnetizations mz (c) and scalar spin chiralities cs (d) of askyrmion under a perpendicular Hex field. In-plane compo-nents of the magnetizations (mx,my) are displayed by arrows.(e), (f) Those under an inclined Hex field with θ=30◦.

a)Electronic mail: akihito@phys.aoyama.ac.jpb)Electronic mail: masa mochizuki@waseda.jp

the skyrmion plane (Hω⊥) activates the so-called breath-

ing mode in which all the skyrmions constituting theskyrmion crystal uniformly expand and shrink in an os-cillatory manner. On the other hand, the Hω field withinthe skyrmion plane (Hω

‖ ) activates two types of rotation

modes with opposite rotational senses, in which cores ofall the skyrmions circulate uniformly in counterclockwiseand clockwise ways.

In addition to the crystallized form, skyrmions canappear as individual defects in a ferromagnetic state;such skyrmions are also expected to have peculiar col-lective modes19. Isolated skyrmions confined in a nano-ferromagnet are potentially useful for applications20 tomemory devices21, magnonics devices22–24, spin-torqueoscillators25,26, and microwave sensing devices27. Assuch, it is necessary to clarify the microwave-active eigen-modes of a single skyrmion in a ferromagnetic specimen.

In addition, it is important to establish a way to ma-nipulate isolated skyrmions using microwaves for theirdevice application. As the microwave field Hω

⊥ cannotactivate precessions of the magnetizations when the mi-crowave field is applied parallel to them, we can activatepure breathing-type skyrmion oscillations with Hω

⊥ un-der a perpendicular Hex field without exciting the back-ground ferromagnetic state. However, once the Hex fieldis inclined, the microwave magnetic field Hω

⊥ excites hugeferromagnetic resonances, which drown out the weakerskyrmion resonances. Moreover, the microwave energy isabsorbed by the sample when exciting the gigantic fer-romagnetic resonances, which would inevitably result inhigh energy consumption and considerable temperaturerise. Therefore, a technique to selectively activate an iso-lated skyrmion is urgently required.

In this Letter, we first theoretically show that theeigenmodes of an isolated skyrmion embedded in a ferro-magnetic environment can be selectively activated with amicrowave electric field Eω via oscillatory modulation ofthe Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) without ac-

arX

iv:1

810.

0160

6v1

[co

nd-m

at.m

es-h

all]

3 O

ct 2

018

2

tivating ferromagnetic resonances. We then demonstratethat translational motion of the skyrmion can be driventhrough activating its resonance modes using this electrictechnique in an inclined Hex field. The latter part of theresearch was motivated by the recent theoretical workby Wang et al. that demonstrated skyrmion propagationvia activating the breathing mode with a microwave Hω

⊥field28. Our study reveals that skyrmion motion can bedriven not only by the breathing mode but also by otherEω-active modes. Furthermore, we find that a mode withcombined clockwise and breathing oscillations can inducemuch faster propagation of the skyrmion than the previ-ously studied breathing mode. Our findings pave a newway toward efficient manipulation of isolated skyrmionsin nano-devices via the application of microwaves.

We consider a magnetic bilayer system composed of aferromagnetic layer and a heavy-metal layer with strongspin-orbit interactions [see Fig. 1(a)], where the spa-tial inversion symmetry is broken at their interface, andthereby the DMI is active. An inclined magnetic fieldHex = (Hx, 0, Hz) with Hx = Hz tan θ is applied where θis the inclination angle [see Fig. 1(b)]. For 0◦ < θ ≤ 90◦,the Hex field is inclined toward the positive x direction.The DMI favors a rotating alignment of the magneti-zations, which results in the formation of a Neel-typeskyrmion. The skyrmion has a circular symmetry un-der a perpendicular Hex field (θ = 0◦), but has dis-proportionate weight in distributions of the magnetiza-tions and scalar spin chiralities [see Fig. 1(c) and (d)].To describe the magnetism in this magnetic bilayer sys-tem, we employ a classical Heisenberg model on a squarelattice with magnetization vectors mi whose norm m isunity29,30. The Hamiltonian contains the ferromagnetic-exchange interaction, the Zeeman coupling to the mag-netic fields, and the interfacial DMI:

H = −J∑<i,j>

mi ·mj − [Hex + H(t)] ·∑i

mi

+D(t)∑i

[(mi ×mi+x) · y − (mi ×mi+y) · x]. (1)

Here H(t) = (0, 0, Hz(t)) and E(t) = (0, 0, Ez(t)) rep-resent time-dependent magnetic and electric fields ap-plied perpendicular to the sample plane, respectively.We neglect magnetic anisotropies because they do notalter the results qualitatively although stability of theskyrmions and resonant frequencies of the eigenmodesmay be slightly changed. The strength of the interfacialDMI can be tuned by applying a gate electric field normalto the plane via varying the extent of the spatial inversionasymmetry31,32. The DMI coefficient D(t) = D0+∆D(t)has two components, namely, a steady componentD0 anda E(t)-dependent component ∆D(t) = κEz(t) with κ be-ing the coupling constant. We take J=1 for the energyunits and take D0/J=0.27. For the inclined magneticfield, we take Hz=0.057 with θ being a variable. Theunit conversions when J=1 meV are summarized in Ta-ble I.

Exchange int. J = 1 1 meVTime t = 1 0.66 psFrequency f = ω/2π ω = 0.01 2.41 GHzMagnetic field H = 1 8.64 T

TABLE I. Unit conversion table when J=1 meV.

We simulate the magnetization dynamics by numeri-cally solving the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation usingthe fourth-order Runge-Kutta method. The equation isgiven by,

dmi

dt= −γmmi ×Heff

i +αG

mmi ×

dmi

dt. (2)

Here αG(=0.04) and γm are the Gilbert-damping con-stant and the gyrotropic ratio, respectively. The effectivefield Heff

i is calculated as Heffi = −(1/γmh)∂H/∂mi.

We first calculate the dynamical electromagnetic andmagnetic susceptibilities χem and χmm:

χem(ω) =

õ0

ε0

∆Mωz

Epulse, χmm(ω) =

∆Mωz

µ0Hpulse. (3)

After applying a short pulse Hz(t) or Ez(t) with dura-tion of ∆t=1 in the units of J/h, we trace time profilesof the net magnetization Mz(t) = (1/N)

∑imzi(t) and

∆Mz(t) = Mz(t) −Mz(0) and obtain the Fourier trans-form ∆Mω

z . Dividing this quantity by an amplitude ofthe pulse Hpulse or Epulse, we obtain these susceptibili-ties. The calculations are performed using a system ofN=160×160 sites with periodic boundary conditions.

Figure 2(a) displays the imaginary parts of the electro-magnetic susceptibilities Imχem(ω) for several values ofθ, which describe the response of the magnetizations tothe Eω field. When θ = 0◦, the spectrum exhibits a sin-gle peak corresponding to the breathing mode activatedby the oscillating DMI under the application of an ACelectric field. When the Hex field is inclined with θ 6= 0◦,two novel modes emerge, one with a higher and one witha lower frequency than the breathing mode. The inten-sities of the novel modes increase, whereas the intensityof the original breathing mode is increasingly suppressedas θ increases.

The imaginary parts of the magnetic susceptibilitiesImχmm(ω) in Fig. 2(b) describe the response of the mag-netizations to the Hω field. We find that only a breath-ing mode (m-Mode 2) appears when the Hex field isperpendicular (θ = 0◦); however, its intensity decreasesas θ increases. Remarkably, a large ferromagnetic reso-nance from the surrouding ferromagnetic magnetizationsemerges under an inclined Hex field, whereas it is totallysilent under the perpendicular Hex field. We also find anovel mode (m-Mode 1) at lower frequencies.

In reality, the skyrmion has another Hω-active mode(m-Mode 3) at higher frequencies, but it is hidden be-hind the gigantic ferromagnetic resonance and thus can-not be seen in the spectra of Imχmm(ω). We can see this

3

0 0.04 0.08

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0

0.01

0.02

0 0.04 0.08 0 0.04 0.08

!=0°

" "

Im#mmIm#em

(arb

. uni

ts)

Im#m

c(a

rb. u

nits

)

0

0.01

0.02

Im#m

m(a

rb. u

nits

)!=30°!=25°

!=15°!=10°

!=20°

!=0°

!=30°!=25°

!=15°!=10°

!=20°

!=0°

!=30°

!=25°

!=15°

!=10°

!=20°

"

(a) (b) (c)

Im#em

Im#mc

e-Mode 1

e-Mode 2

e-Mode 3

m-Mode 3

m-Mode2

m-Mode1

m-Mode 2

m-Mode 1

FMR

$

$=x$=ytotalE"

|| z

Hz

Hx

H!

xy

z

H"|| z

Hx

H!

xy

zHz

FIG. 2. (color online). Imaginary parts of (a) the electromagnetic susceptibility Imχem(ω), (b) the magnetic susceptibilityImχmm(ω), and (c) the chirality susceptibility Imχmc

α (ω) for several values of θ. Here, an inclined magnetic field Hex =(Hz tan θ, 0, Hz) with Hz=0.057 is applied. Three Eω-active modes are labeled as e-Modes 1-3 in (a), whereas the three Hω-active modes are labeled as m-Modes 1-3 in (b) and (c). The extremely intense mode around ω ∼ 0.05 − 0.06 in (b) is theferromagnetic resonance (FMR).

weak response of the skyrmion to the Hω field by fo-cusing on the vector spin chiralities, si =

∑γ mi×mi+γ

(γ = x, y). The calculated imaginary parts of the dynam-ical susceptibilities Imχmc

α (ω) for the α-component of thevector spin chirality Sα = (1/N)

∑i sαi (α = x, y) are

shown in Fig. 2(c). We find that they coincide with thespectra of Imχem(ω) in Fig. 2(a). These results indicatethat the magnetic method using Hω cannot selectivelyactivate the eigenmodes of an isolated skyrmion in theferromagnetic specimen; however, the results show thatthe electrical method using Eω can achieve this. Thiselectrical technique is anticipated to play a crucial rolefor developing future skyrmion-based devices.

Based on the susceptibility data, we find that an iso-lated skyrmion in a ferromagnetic specimen has threelow-lying eigenmodes. In Fig. 3, we show simulation re-sults of snapshots for θ = 30◦. It is found that all ofthese modes have the breathing component, i.e., theyshow oscillatory expansion and shrinkage. Among thesethree modes, the higher-frequency mode (ω=0.0664) canbe regarded as a pure breathing mode, whereas the othertwo modes show distinct behaviors. The lower-frequencymode (ω = 0.0453) is accompanied by a clockwise rota-tion of skyrmion in an elliptical orbit oriented horizon-tally against the inclined direction of Hex as shown inFig. 3(a). The moderate-frequency mode (ω = 0.0513)is also accompanied by the clockwise rotation of theskyrmion in an elliptical orbit, but its trajectory is ori-ented vertically against the inclined direction of Hex asshown in Fig. 3(b). The higher-lying pure breathingmode at ω=0.0664 does not show any rotational compo-nent [Fig. 3(c)]. The three Eω-active modes are referred

12

3

4

1

23

4

123 4

x

y

25 sites

25 s

ites t=2030 t=2064 t=2098 t=2132

(a) e-Mode 1: CW + Breathing 1 (!=0.0453)

(b) e-Mode 2: CW + Breathing 2 (!=0.0513)

(c) e-Mode 3: Breathing (!=0.0664)

t=2053 t=2083 t=2112 t=2142

t=2057 t=2081 t=2105 t=2129

-1 1miz

CWrotation

+

rotation

+CW

breathing

breathing

breathing

t - t0

Mz 2"/!

1

2

3 4

FIG. 3. (color online). Simulated snapshots of the magnetiza-tion dynamics for three Eω-active eigenmodes (e-Modes 1-3)of an isolated skyrmion in the ferromagnetic specimen underan inclined Hex field where Hz=0.057 and θ = 30◦.

to as e-Modes 1, 2, and, 3 [see Fig. 2(a) and Fig 3].

Next we numerically investigate the translational mo-tion of a skyrmion driven by the electrically activated res-onance modes under an inclined Hex field [see Fig. 4(a)].Here the inclination angle of Hex is fixed at θ = 30◦.The amplitude of the AC electric field Ez(t) = Eωz sinωtis fixed at κEωz = 0.05D0 = 0.0135. A recent ex-periment for Ta/FeCoB/TaOx reported a huge E-field-induced variation of the interfacial DMI that reaches140% when the applied voltage is 10 V. This observationsupports the experimental feasibility of the 5% modula-

4

-4 -3 -2 -1 0

(!=0.0453)-8

-6

-4

-2

0

0 0.004 0.008 0.012

!=0.0513

!=0.0664

!=0.0453

!=0.0664

!=0.0513

-5

0

-1

1 0 0.04 0.080

0.005

"=30°

y co

ordi

nate

x coordinate

!

0

-1

1

y co

ordi

nate

-4 -3 -2 -1 0-5

0 0.04 0.080

0.01

"=30°

!

E! activation(trajectory)

#Ez!

Dis

plac

emen

t in x

0 0.001 0.002 0.003

-2

0

2

Dis

p. in

y

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

Dis

plac

emen

t in x

-2

0

2

Dis

p. in

y

Hz!

Im$em

H! activation(trajectory)

E! activation(drift velocity)

H! activation(drift velocity)

(c)

Im$mm

(d)

(e)

(f) (g)

(h)

vx (m/s)

-0.2

-0.4

-0.6

-0.8

0

vx (m/s)

-0.2

-0.4

-0.6

-0.8

0

-0.2

0

0.2

vy (m/s)

-0.2

0

0.2 vy (m/s)

36 sites

36 sites

t=0 t=8×103 t=24×103

x

y

e-Mode 1

e-Mode 3

e-Mode 2

e-Mode 3e-Mode 2

e-Mode 1

m-Mode 1

m-Mode 3m-Mode 2

m-Mode 3 + FMR

m-Mode 2

m-Mode 1

~x

y

zHz

Hx

Hex"

(b)

mz-1 0 1

(a)

FIG. 4. (color online). (a) Illustration of skyrmion propa-gation driven by the Eω field through activating a resonantmode of the skyrmion under an inclined Hex field. (b) Simu-lated snapshots of the skyrmion propagation for the Eω-activemode with ω=0.0513 (e-Mode 2). (c)-(e) Trajectories (c) anddrift velocities vx (d) and vy (e) of the propagating skyrmiondriven by the Eω field for three different resonant modes.(f)-(h) Those of the propagating skyrmion driven by the Hω

field. All the simulations were performed with an inclinedHex field where Hz=0.057 and θ = 30◦.

tion assumed here. Figure 4(b) shows simulated snap-shots of the skyrmion motion when the Eω field withω=0.0513 is applied, which indeed displays propagationin the negative x direction.

The trajectories of the propagating skyrmion during atime period from t=0 to t=5000 are shown in Fig. 4(c) forthree different Eω-active modes at ω=0.0453, 0.0513, and0.0664. They were obtained by tracing the center-of-masscoordinate (jx, jy) of the topological-charge distribution:

jγ =∑

i=(ix,iy)

iγcs(ix, iy)/∑

i=(ix,iy)

cs(ix, iy) (4)

with

cs =1

8π[mi · (mi+x ×mi+y) + mi · (mi−x ×mi−y)] .

(5)We find that the direction and velocity of the motion

vary depending on the skyrmion resonance mode. Forall the modes, the skyrmion moves mainly in the nega-tive x direction. However, the trajectories for e-Modes2 and 3 are slightly slanted toward the negative y direc-tion; meanwhile, the trajectory for e-Mode 1 is perfectlyparallel to the x axis. Interestingly, despite the slantedtrajectory for e-Mode 2, its traveling distance along thex axis is identical to that of the trajectory for e-Mode 1,which is directed perfectly along the x axis. It can alsobe seen that the directions of the skyrmion movement fore-Modes 2 and 3 are the same, even though their trav-eling distances are different. The traveling distance fore-Mode 3 is much shorter than that for e-Mode 2 becauseof the smaller intensity of the latter mode, as can be seenin the inset of Fig. 4(c).

In Fig. 4(d) and (e), we plot the velocities v=(vx, vy)of the skyrmion for three different Eω-active modes (seethe right vertical axes) as functions of the strength of thetime-dependent DMI, i.e., κEωz . The values are calcu-lated from the simulated displacements of the skyrmionin the x and y directions for a time period from t=2000to t=10000 (see the left vertical axes) by assuming J= 1meV and a=5 A with a being the lattice constant. It canbe seen that the velocities are proportional to the squareof κEωz , and they are on the order of 10−1 m/s. In fact,the traveling speed of the skyrmions achieved using thistechnique turns out to be relatively slow compared withthe speed achieved in techniques based on electric-currentinjection33–40. However, the present technique has an ad-vantage: it is free from the Joule heating, and thus theenergy consumption and the temperature rise could besignificantly suppressed.

We finally study the skyrmion motion driven by ACmagnetic fields Hω under an inclined Hex field withHz=0.057 and θ = 30◦. The Hω is applied perpendicularto the skyrmion plane, which is given by Hω

z sinωt withHωz = 0.05Hz = 0.00285. The simulated trajectories

and velocities v=(vx, vy) are shown in Fig. 4(f) and (g),respectively. We find that the trajectories are again ori-ented almost in the negative x direction; however, for theferromagnetic resonance mode with ω=0.0664 the trajec-tory is slanted toward the positive y direction, which con-trasts with the case of the Eω-active mode. Noticeably,the higher-frequency mode with ω=0.0664 has a muchfaster propagation of the skyrmion than the other twomodes. However, the usage of this mode is not ener-getically efficient because this mode is not an eigenmodeof the isolated skyrmion but a very intense resonance ofthe vast ferromagnetic magnetizations, which necessarilyleads to large energy consumption and considerable riseof device temperatures.

In summary, we have theoretically found that reso-nance modes of an isolated sykrmion in a ferromagnet can

5

be activated by application of AC electric fields throughoscillatory variation of the interfacial DMI. The advan-tage of this method compared with conventional methodsusing AC magnetic fields is that we can selectively exciteskyrmions without activating gigantic ferromagnetic res-onances; this results in a significant suppression of bothenergy consumption and temperature rise. Our result re-vealed that among the three Eω-active modes, the modewith combined clockwise and breathing oscillations in-duces much faster skyrmion propagation than the pre-viously studied breathing mode. Our findings will pavea new way toward the efficient manipulation of isolatedskyrmions and thus will be useful for future skyrmion-based devices.

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (GrantNo. 17H02924), Waseda University Grant for Special Re-search Projects (Project Nos. 2017S-101, 2018K-257),and JST PRESTO (Grant No. JPMJPR132A).

1A. N. Bogdanov and D.A. Yablonskii, Sov. Phys. JETP 68, 101(1989).

2A. Bogdanov and A. Hubert, J. Mag. Mag. Mat. 138, 255 (1994).3S. Muhlbauer, B. Binz, F. Jonietz, C. Pfleiderer, A. Rosch, A.Neubauer, R. Georgii, and P. Boni, Science 323, 915 (2009).

4X. Z. Yu, Y. Onose, N. Kanazawa, J. H. Park, J. H. Han, Y.Matsui, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Nature 465, 901 (2010).

5N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Nat. Nanotech. 8, 899 (2013).6S. Seki and M. Mochizuki, “Skyrmions in Magnetic Materials”(Springer Briefs in Physics).

7M. Mochizuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 017601 (2012).8O. Petrova and O. Tchernyshyov, Phys. Rev. B 84, 214433(2011).

9T. Schwarze, J. Waizner, M. Garst, A. Bauer, I. Stasinopoulos,H. Berger, C. Pfleiderer, and D. Grundler, Nat. Mater. 14, 478(2015).

10M. Garst, J. Waizner, and D. Grundler, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.50, 293002 (2017).

11M. Mochizuki and S. Seki, J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 27, 503001(2015).

12M. Mochizuki, and S. Seki, Phys. Rev. B 87, 134403 (2013).13Y. Okamura, F. Kagawa, M. Mochizuki, M. Kubota, S. Seki, S.

Ishiwata, M. Kawasaki, Y. Onose, Y. Tokura, Nat. Commun. 4,2391 (2013).

14M. Mochizuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 197203 (2015).15Y. Okamura, F. Kagawa, S. Seki, M. Kubota, M. Kawasaki, and

Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 197202 (2015).16J. Ohe and Y. Shimada, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 242403 (2013).17Y. Shimada and J. Ohe, Phys. Rev. B 91, 174437 (2015).18D. Hirobe, Y. Shiomi, Y. Shimada, J. Ohe, and E. Saitoh, J.

Appl. Phys. 117 053904 (2015).

19S.-Z. Lin, C. D. Batista, and A. Saxena, Phys. Rev. B 89, 024415(2014).

20G. Finocchio, F. Buttner, R. Tomasello, M. Carpentieri, and M.Klaui, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49, 423001 (2016).

21A. Fert, V. Cros, and J. Sampaio, Nat. Nanotech. 8, 152 (2013).22F. Ma, Y. Zhou, H. B. Braun, and W. S. Lew, Nano Lett. 15,

4029 (2015).23K.-W. Moon, B. S. Chun, W. Kim, and C. Hwang, Phys. Rev.

Applied 6, 064027 (2016).24M. Mruczkiewicz, P. Gruszecki, M. Zelent, and M. Krawczyk,

Phys. Rev. B 93, 174429 (2016).25R. H. Liu, W. L. Lim, and S. Urazhdin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114,

137201 (2015).26S. Zhang, J. Wang, Q. Zheng, Q. Zhu, X. Liu, S. Chen, C. Jin,

Q. Liu, C. Jia, and D. Xue, New J. Phys. 17, 023061 (2015).27G. Finocchio, M. Ricci, R. Tomasello, A. Giordano, M. Lanuzza,

V. Puliafito, P. Burrascano, B. Azzerboni, and M. Carpentieri,Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 262401 (2015).

28W. Wang, M. Beg, B. Zhang, W. Kuch, and H. Fangohr, Phys.Rev. B 92, 020403(R) (2015).

29P. Bak, and M. H. Jensen, J. Phys. C 13, L881 (1980).30S. D. Yi, S. Onoda, N. Nagaosa, and J. H. Han, Phys. Rev. B80, 054416 (2009).

31K. Nawaoka, S. Miwa, Y. Shiota, N. Mizuochi, and Y. Suzuki,Appl. Phys. Express 8, 063004 (2015).

32T. Srivastava, M. Schott, R. Juge, V. Krizakova, M. Belmegue-nai, Y. Roussigne, A. Bernand-Mantel, L. Ranno, S. Pizzini, S.-M. Cherif, A. Stashkevich, S. Auffret, O. Boulle, G. Gaudin, M.Chshiev, C. Baraduc, and H. Bea, arXiv:1804.09955.

33F. Jonietz, S. Muhlbauer, C. Pfleiderer, A. Neubauer, W.Munzer, A. Bauer, T. Adams, R. Georgii, P. Boni, R. A. Duine,K. Everschor, M. Garst, and A. Rosch, Science 330, 1648 (2010).

34X. Z. Yu, N. Kanazawa, W.Z. Zhang, T. Nagai, T. Hara, K.Kimoto, Y. Matsui, Y. Onose, and Y. Tokura, Nat. Commun. 3,988 (2012).

35J. Iwasaki, M. Mochizuki, and N. Nagaosa, Nat. Commun. 4,1463 (2013).

36J. Iwasaki, M. Mochizuki, and N. Nagaosa, Nat. Nanotech. 8,742 (2013).

37F. Buttner, C. Moutafis, M. Schneider, B. Kruger, C. M.Gunther, J. Geilhufe, C. v. Korff Schmising, J. Mohanty, B. Pfau,S. Schaffert, A. Bisig, M. Foerster, T. Schulz, C. A. F. Vaz, J.H. Franken, H. J. M. Swagten, M. Klaui, and S. Eisebitt, Nat.Phys. 11, 225 (2015).

38S. Woo, K. Litzius, B. Kruger, M.-Y. Im, L. Caretta, K. Richter,M. Mann,A. Krone, R. M. Reeve, M. Weigand, P. Agrawal, I.Lemesh, M.-A. Mawass, P. Fischer, M. Klaui, and G. S. D. Beach,Nat. Mater. 15, 501 (2016).

39G. Yu, P. Upadhyaya, Q. Shao, H. Wu, G. Yin, X. Li, C. He, W.Jiang, X. Han, P. K. Amiri, and K. L. Wang, Nano Lett. 17, 261(2017).

40W. Jiang, X. Zhang, G. Yu, W. Zhang, X. Wang, M. B.Jungfleisch, J. E. Pearson, X. Cheng, O. Heinonen, K. L. Wang,Y. Zhou, A. Hoffmann, and S. G. E. te Velthuis, Nat. Phys. 13,162 (2017).