method comparison against exp. data
DESCRIPTION
A B3LYP Study on the C-H Activation in Propane by Neutral and +1 Charged Platinum Clusters With 2-6 Atoms T. Cameron Shore, Drake Mith , Doug DePrekel, Staci McNall, and Yingbin Ge* Department of Chemistry, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA 98926. +. Prop a ne (C 3 H 8 ). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
A B3LYP Study on the C-H Activation in Propane by Neutral and +1 Charged Platinum Clusters With 2-6 Atoms
T. Cameron Shore, Drake Mith, Doug DePrekel, Staci McNall, and Yingbin Ge*Department of Chemistry, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA 98926
Method comparison against exp. data
Global optimization of Pt clusters (e.g. Pt5)
Ptn + C3H8 → Ptn---C3H8 → H−Ptn−CH(CH3)2
Notes and ReferencesThe following experimental data are used as the benchmark: the electron affinity (EA) of Pt and Pt2 are 205.0 kJ/mol and 183.1 kJ/mol, respectively; the ionization energy (IE) and bond energy (BE) of Pt2 are 864.4 kJ/mol and 303 kJ/mol, respectively; the bond energy of PtH is 332 kJ/mol; the ionization energies of PtC, PtO, and PtO2 are 912 ± 5 kJ/mol, 965 ± 10 kJ/mol, and 1095 ± 5 kJ/mol, respectively; the bond energies of PtC, PtO, and PtO2 are 574 ± 7 kJ/mol, 415 ± 12 kJ/mol, and 426 ± 13 kJ/mol, respectively; the equilibrium bond distances of Pt2, PtH, PtC, and PtO are 2.333 Å, 1.53 Å, 1.679 Å, and 1.727 Å, respectively.
Vajda S, Pellin MJ, Greeley JP, Marshall CL, Curtiss LA, Ballentine GA, Elam JW, Catillon-Mucherie S, Redfern PC, Mehmood F, Zapol P (2009) Subnanometre platinum clusters as highly active and selective catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane. Nat Mater 8:213-216
T.C. Shore, D. Mith, DePrekel, S. McNall, Y. Ge SA (2013) A B3LYP study on the C—H activation in propane by neutral and +1 charged low-energy platinum clusters with 2-6 atoms: A B3LYP study, Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis, in press, 2013
Potential energy surface (Pt5 + C3H8)
Global minima of Pt2-6
Global minima of +1 charged Pt2-6
Computational method• B3LYP density functional theory• 6-31G(d) on C and H• LanL2DZ (f) basis set and LanL2 effective core potential on Pt
Conclusions• Pt2 is less active than larger Pt3-6 clusters.• +1 charged Pt clusters are more active than neutral ones.• Electron pushing surface hinders the catalytic ability of the
supported Pt clusters; electron withdrawing surface is preferred.
Acknowledgements• CWU SEED Grant• CWU College of the Sciences Faculty Development Fund• CWU Department of Chemistry
Removal of a 2nd H produces propene
Pt10 and Pt10+ local minima + C3H8
Introduction
Each label consists of point group, relative energy in kJ/mol, and # of imaginary frequencies if applicable. Energy includes electronic energy and zero-point vibrational energy.
Relative energies are in kJ/mol.M stands for multiplicity.
• Vajda et al. find Pt8-10 clusters are much more active than traditional catalysts towards propane in 4 steps1:
1. Ptn + C3H8 → H−Ptn−CH(CH3)2
2. H−Ptn−CH(CH3)2 → (H)2−Ptn−propene3. (H)2−Ptn−propene + ½ O2 → Ptn−propene + H2O + heat4. Ptn−propene + heat → Ptn+ propene
• We studied the Pt cluster size and charge effects regarding the rate limiting step 1. Global minimum
+
Propane (C3H8) Propene (C3H6)
local minimum
local minimum
Various Ptn structures
global minimum
Global minimum vs. Local minimum
Mean absolute errors of calculated electron affinity, ionization energy, & bond energy
Mean absolute errors of calculated bond distances
B3LYP B3PW91 PBE PW91 MP2
25 26 36 38 91
B3LYP B3W91 PBE PW91 MP2
0.010 0.003 0.011 0.010 0.037
local minimum E
δ
Electron withdrawing surface
e-
Ptn+ + C3H8 → Ptn
+---C3H8 → H−Ptn+ −CH(CH3)2