metal 3d printing of low-nox fuel injectors with …...•begin the re-design and fabrication of a...

1
Metal 3D Printing of Low-NOx Fuel Injectors with Integrated Temperature Sensors Torres, J., 1,3 Mireles, J., 1,3 Chowdhury, A., 1,2 Wicker, R., 1,3 Choudhuri, A., 1,2 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at El Paso 2 Center for Space Exploration and Technology Research, The University of Texas at El Paso 3 W.M. Keck Center for 3D Innovation, The University of Texas at El Paso Process Characterization: Objective : To utilize additive manufacturing for the fabrication of seamless low-NOx fuel injectors with integrated temperature measurement capabilities. Electron Beam Melting: Results Future Work Methodology & Materials Introduction Powder removal methodologies: Powder removal demonstration : The authors acknowledge the financial support for this work by the DOE - National Energy Technology Laboratory. Award Number:DE-FE0026330. Acknowledgements Student Involvement Evaluate other powder removal methods including process parameter variations. Begin the re-design and fabrication of a Low-NOx fuel injector given design constraints. Takeaways: Process characterization: Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Task 1: Development of design methodologies for EBM Fabrication of test parts for technology evaluation Evaluation of test parts Re-design for AM of Low-NOx fuel injector Alternative designs for sensor integration Task 2: Development of powder removal techniques Powder removal for internal channels Powder removal for internal cavities Process parameter modifications for optimal powder sintering Task 3: Testing of EBM-fabricated fuel injectors Functionality assessment of EBM-fabricated fuel injector Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Letter Feature Factor Tested A Square base Dimensional accuracy B Lateral ridges (+) C Lateral ridges (-) D Descending cylinders (-) E Descending cylinders (+) F Staircase (-) G Staircase (+) H Cylinders (-) I Cylinders (+) J Ramps Surface roughness K Rectangular prisms Linear displacement error L Tensile bar Ultimate tensile strength EBM part fabrication: Test parts fabricated from different machine models a) A2X, b) A3, c) S12 a) b) c) Test parts fabricated for powder removal demonstration, each containing different sized output channels (1mm - 6mm) Measurement setup Process characterization: Features smaller than 2.5 mm become deformed and the fabricated part measured larger than the intended geometry. Features larger than 2.5 mm are very close to the intended geometry. Walls tend to be thicker than the intended geometry, which may be due to surface roughness due to powder size. Powder removal: Powder removal did not progress after 10 minutes of removing powder using the machine’s powder removal station. Ultrasonic powder removal method is currently under further evaluation. 13 13.5 14 14.5 15 15.5 16 16.5 17 17.5 18 1 mm hole 2 mm hole 4 mm hole 6 mm hole Weight (grams) 19mm Cylinder Weight Initial Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 1 mm hole 2mm hole 4 mm hole 6 mm hole Weight (grams) 35mm Cylinder Weight Initial Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 1 mm hole 2 mm hole 4 mm hole 6 mm hole Weight (grams) 25mm Cylinder Weight Initial Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) 0 5 10 15 20 Arcam A2 Arcam A2x Arcam S12 Dimensional deviation (mm) Dimensional Deviation vs. Machine Model 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 D1* D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 Diameter (mm) Cylindrical Boss Diameter Original Arcam A2 Arcam A2x Arcam S12 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7** Diameter (mm) Cylinder Hole Diameter Original Arcam A2 Arcam A2x Arcam S12 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Arcam A2 Arcam A2x Arcam S12 Surface Roughness (Ra) Surface Roughness (45° ramp) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Arcam A2 Arcam A2x Arcam S12 Surface Roughness (Ra) Surface Roughness (10° ramp) 289 289.5 290 290.5 291 291.5 292 292.5 293 293.5 294 294.5 1 mm hole 2 mm hole 4 mm hole 6 mm hole Weight (grams) 45mm Cylinder Weight Initial Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min)

Upload: others

Post on 27-Jun-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Metal 3D Printing of Low-NOx Fuel Injectors with …...•Begin the re-design and fabrication of a Low-NOx fuel injector given design constraints. Takeaways: Process characterization:

Metal 3D Printing of Low-NOx Fuel Injectors with Integrated

Temperature SensorsTorres, J., 1,3 Mireles, J., 1,3 Chowdhury, A., 1,2 Wicker, R.,1,3 Choudhuri, A.,1,2

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at El Paso2 Center for Space Exploration and Technology Research, The University of Texas at El Paso

3 W.M. Keck Center for 3D Innovation, The University of Texas at El Paso

Process Characterization:

Objective:• To utilize additive manufacturing for the fabrication of

seamless low-NOx fuel injectors with integrated

temperature measurement capabilities.

Electron Beam Melting:

Results

Future WorkMethodology & Materials

Introduction

Powder removal methodologies:

Powder removal demonstration:

The authors acknowledge the financial support for this work by

the DOE - National Energy Technology Laboratory. Award

Number:DE-FE0026330.

Acknowledgements

Student Involvement

• Evaluate other powder removal methods including process

parameter variations.

• Begin the re-design and fabrication of a Low-NOx fuel injector

given design constraints.

Takeaways:

Process characterization:

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Task 1: Development of design methodologies for EBM

Fabrication of test parts for technology evaluation

Evaluation of test parts

Re-design for AM of Low-NOx fuel injector

Alternative designs for sensor integration

Task 2: Development of powder removal techniques

Powder removal for internal channels

Powder removal for internal cavities

Process parameter modifications for optimal powder sintering

Task 3: Testing of EBM-fabricated fuel injectors

Functionality assessment of EBM-fabricated fuel injector

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

Letter Feature Factor Tested

A Square base

Dimensional accuracy

B Lateral ridges (+)

C Lateral ridges (-)

D Descending cylinders (-)

E Descending cylinders (+)

F Staircase (-)

G Staircase (+)

H Cylinders (-)

I Cylinders (+)

J Ramps Surface roughness

K Rectangular prisms Linear displacement error

L Tensile bar Ultimate tensile strength

EBM part fabrication:

Test parts fabricated

from different

machine models

a) A2X, b) A3, c) S12

a) b)

c)

Test parts fabricated for powder removal

demonstration, each containing different

sized output channels (1mm - 6mm)

Measurement setup

Process characterization:

• Features smaller than 2.5 mm become deformed and the

fabricated part measured larger than the intended geometry.

• Features larger than 2.5 mm are very close to the intended

geometry.

• Walls tend to be thicker than the intended geometry, which may

be due to surface roughness due to powder size.

Powder removal:

• Powder removal did not progress after 10 minutes of removing

powder using the machine’s powder removal station.

• Ultrasonic powder removal method is currently under further

evaluation.

13

13.5

14

14.5

15

15.5

16

16.5

17

17.5

18

1 mm hole 2 mm hole 4 mm hole 6 mm hole

Wei

ght

(gra

ms)

19mm Cylinder

Weight Initial Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min)

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

1 mm hole 2mm hole 4 mm hole 6 mm hole

Wei

ght

(gra

ms)

35mm Cylinder

Weight Initial Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min)

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

1 mm hole 2 mm hole 4 mm hole 6 mm hole

Wei

ght

(gra

ms)

25mm Cylinder

Weight Initial Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min)

0

5

10

15

20

Arcam A2 Arcam A2x Arcam S12

Dim

ensi

on

al d

evia

tio

n (

mm

)

Dimensional Deviation vs. Machine Model

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

D1* D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7

Dia

met

er (

mm

)

Cylindrical Boss Diameter

Original Arcam A2 Arcam A2x Arcam S12

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7**

Dia

met

er (

mm

)

Cylinder Hole Diameter

Original Arcam A2 Arcam A2x Arcam S120

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Arcam A2 Arcam A2x Arcam S12

Surf

ace

Ro

ugh

nes

s (R

a)

Surface Roughness (45° ramp)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Arcam A2 Arcam A2x Arcam S12

Surf

ace

Ro

ugh

nes

s (R

a)

Surface Roughness (10° ramp)

289

289.5

290

290.5

291

291.5

292

292.5

293

293.5

294

294.5

1 mm hole 2 mm hole 4 mm hole 6 mm hole

Wei

ght

(gra

ms)

45mm Cylinder

Weight Initial Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min) Weight (+2 min)