mercury in western mountains
DESCRIPTION
Mercury in Western Mountains. Mark Williams, CU-Boulder. Problem Statement. Concern for mercury arose from human health effects caused by mercury ingestion from freshwater and marine fish, in which mercury bioaccumulates - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Mercury in Western Mountains
Mark Williams, CU-Boulder
![Page 2: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Problem Statement• Concern for mercury arose from human health
effects caused by mercury ingestion from freshwater and marine fish, in which mercury bioaccumulates
• Documented bioaccumulation of mercury in fish has occurred in many high elevation lakes in Sweden (Johansson et al., 1995)
• In 1998, five water bodies in Colorado were put on the EPA section 303(d) list for impaired water bodies – Hg content in fish exceeded advisory levels of 0.5mg kg-1
![Page 3: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
MERCURY and BRAIN FOOD
• Mercury is toxic to the developing fetal brain
• Exposure to mercury in the womb can cause learning deficiencies and delay mental development in children
![Page 4: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Mercury in the Environment
• In a recent EPA report to Congress (1994), they pointed to coal fired utilities as the major anthropogenic source of mercury
• It is suggested that deposition of mercury and organochlorines may increase with elevation because of cold condensation and orographic precipitation (grasshopper effect)
• This may be cause for concern in warm mid-latitude climates where water resources fall mainly in the form of snow (70%)
![Page 6: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
MeHg is toxic form
![Page 7: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Forms of Mercury (Hg)
• Elemental (inorganic) mercury– Total mercury– Dissolved mercury (Hg content after filtering)– Less toxic form of mercury
• Methylmercury (MeHg)– Toxic– Produced by bacterial transformations of inorganic Hg
to MeHg– Anoxic conditions appear to increase rate of MeHg
![Page 8: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
NOT A PROBLEM IN THE WEST?
![Page 9: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Mercury Loading in Wetfall
![Page 10: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Mast et al. 2006: ROMO Hg
![Page 11: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Mercury Deposition
• 10 g m-2 yr-1
– Higher than Buffalo Pass MDN for 2001-02– Similar to midwest, NE US with Hg warnings
• Summer deposition 3-4 times > winter
• Basin export about 2 g m-2 yr-1
• Basin accumulation about 80% of wet dep
• MeHg: little export
![Page 12: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Hg export greatest on rising limb
![Page 13: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
•Total Hg concentrations in stream waters track DOC
•Little MeHg export•What does occur is on rising limb
•Loch Vale catchment
![Page 14: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
High correlation between THg and DOC (Loch outlet)
![Page 15: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Summary
• Atmospheric dep of Hg high because of moderate concentrations with high precip
• 80% of atm dep retained in basin– Basins accumulating mercury
– Hg export limited by DOC production
• > 50% of annual Hg export during first 6 weeks of snowmelt from flushing of soils– -Flowpaths important!
• MeHg production (the bad stuff) appears limited
![Page 16: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Paleorecords: Mercury Accumulation in Alpine Lakes,
ColoradoDavid Manthorne, USGS
Mark Williams, CU-Boulder
![Page 17: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
MOUNTAINS ENHANCE MERCURY PROBLEMS
• Snowfall increases with elevation– Mercury deposition may increase with altitude
• Mercury transport associated with carbon– Carbon transport increases during snow melt– Mercury transport from soils to lakes may be
greater than in catchments without snow melt
• Increasing nitrogen deposition– May increase lake productivity– May increase mercury sequestration in lakes
![Page 18: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Study Objectives
1) To compare wet vs. freeze-dried methods2) To evaluate trends in mercury accumulation
in alpine lakes of Colorado3) Place these results in context by comparing
to other sites4) Evaluate other factors that may worsen Hg
accumulation in Colorado lakes:1) Cold-condensation2) Increasing Hg deposition with elevation3) Snow melt4) Increased carbon production from N deposition5) Fires
![Page 19: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Colorado Lakes Cored
Black LakeGreen Lake 4, 5
Pristine Lake
Navajo Lake
![Page 20: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Sulfate/Mercury emissions (1,000/yr SO2)Sulfate deposition
Pristine Lake
Navajo Lake
Black LakeGreen 4,5
Denver
Navajo, San Juan PP
Hayden, Craig
![Page 21: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Lake Sediment Cores - Sample Collection
• Lake sediment cores were collected with gravity corer from each lakes deepest point
• Samples were extruded in the field in .5 to 1cm intervals
• Samples were kept cold until they could be frozen
• Wet and freeze-dried samples were digested and analyzed with CVAFS
![Page 22: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Methods
• Lake sediments were dated with 210Pb activity
• Sediment mass accumulation was calculated as the dry weight per section and years each section represented
• Hg mass flux per section calculated as Hg concentration times sediment accumulation
• Hg flux ratios were calculated as surface Hg flux divided by background Hg flux
![Page 23: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Digestion Comparison - Concentrations
Concentration (ng g-1
)
0 40 80 120 160 200 240
Depth (cm)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Dry Sediment Wet Sediment
Black Lake Concentrations
Concentration (ng g-1)
0 40 80 120 160
Depth (cm)
0
4
8
12
16
20
Dry SedimentWet Sediment
Navajo Lake Concentrations
![Page 24: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Dating sediments
• What we have is the depth where the sediments were collected
• Use lead-210 (210Pb) values to date the various depths of each individual core
• Correlate lead-210 values with sediment depth for each core
• Convert sediment depth in core to age
![Page 25: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Concentration (ngg-1)
0 50 100 150 200 250
Date
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
Black LakePristine LakeGreen Lake 5Green Lake 4Navajo Lake
Hg Concentrations in Sediment
![Page 26: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Accumulation Rate (gm-2y-1)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Date
1800
1840
1880
1920
1960
2000
Black LakePristine LakeGreen Lake 5Green Lake 4Navajo Lake
Sediment Accumulation Rates
![Page 27: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Black Lake Mass Flux
Mass Flux (µgm-2y-1)
0 15 30 45 60
Year
1650
1700
1750
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
1825
Hg Flux Ratio = 4.4
![Page 28: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Green Lake 4 Mass Flux
Mass Flux (µgm-2y-1)
0 15 30 45
Year
1650
1700
1750
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
1821Hg Flux Ratio = 4.0
![Page 29: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Green Lake 5 Mass Flux
Mass Flux (µgm-2y-1)
0 15 30 45
Year
1700
1750
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
1841
Hg Flux Ratio = 3.8
![Page 30: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Pristine Lake Mass Flux
Mass Accumulation (µgm-2y-1)
0 15 30 45
Year
1650
1700
1750
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
1856
1984
Hg Flux Ratio = 3.2
![Page 31: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Navajo Lake Mass Flux
Mass Flux (µgm-2y-1)
0 15 30 45 60 75
Year
1600
1650
1700
1750
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
1856
1968
1988
Hg Flux Ratio = 3.0
![Page 32: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Mass Flux Ratios
• Divide present-day mercury fluxes by pre-industrial mass fluxes
• Pre-industrial defined as prior to 1850– Take average of pre-1850 fluxes
• Present-day harder to say; maybe last ten years?
• Normalizing the percent increase in mercury fluxes against background values
![Page 33: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Flux Ratio Comparisons to Remote Sites
1.3
2.12.0
4.1
0
1
2
3
4
5
Colorado FrontRange
Glacier Bay. AK. Remote Sweden Wonder Lake, AK
Hg Mass Flux Ratio
![Page 34: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
INDUSTRIAL SITE COMPARISON
4.1
7.0
3.53.7
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Colorado FrontRange
Northern Minn. &Wis.
Adirondacks, NY Industrial Sweden
Hg Mass Flux Ratios
![Page 35: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Year
1800 1840 1880 1920 1960 2000
% of Surface Mass Flux
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Black LakeGreen Lake 5Green Lake 4
Front Range Lakes – Historical trends
![Page 36: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
MERCURY DEPOSITION INCREASING IN FRONT
RANGE
• Highest rates of mercury accumulation in history are now
• Mercury accumulation will get worse before it gets better
• Front Range lakes and reservoirs at risk
• Brown cloud?
![Page 37: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Year
1800 1840 1880 1920 1960 2000
% of Surface Mass Flux
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
Pristine LakeNavajo Lake
West Side Lakes – Recent Decline?
![Page 38: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
POWER PLANTS ???
• Unclear why max rates have declined since mid-60’s
• Difficult to obtain information on emissions
• Stack heights increased?
• Future trends unclear
![Page 39: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
SOUTHWEST CO: COMPROMISED DATA
• Mining activity comprised data
• USGS snow survey: highest mercury content in SW CO
• Need additional samples
![Page 40: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
NUTRIENT ENRICHMENT PRISTINE LAKE
![Page 41: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
NUTRIENT ENRICHMENT ENHANCES Hg IN LAKES
![Page 42: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
POWER PLANT EMISSIONS
• Mercury sources• Nitrogen sources• Stimulate algal
production in lakes• Enhanced lake
productivity increases mercury sequestration
• More mercury enters the food chain
![Page 43: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Mercury and DOC in StreamwatersMast (unpublished), 2001
![Page 44: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
CARBON and MERCURY
• TOC/DOC increases mercury transport to lakes and reservoirs
• DOC increases production of MMHg
• DOC mobility increases during snow melt
• Alpine areas at risk
![Page 45: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
MERCURY AND WILDFIRES: A SMOKING GUN?
• 95% of mercury stored in biomass volatilized
• 90% as elemental Hg• 10% with aerosols• Biomass burning may
account for 25% of global emissions
• Large increase after wildfires?
![Page 46: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
CABALLO RESERVOIR: NM
• 2,930 ha burned in ’95• THg increased 650%• MMHg up 3,000 %• TOC up 600%• Ratio of MMHg to
THg up 1,000 %• FIRES INCREASE
DELIVERY OF Hg TO RESERVOIRS
![Page 47: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Summary
• Mercury loadings are elevated in alpine lakes geographically distributed throughout Colorado
• Mercury loadings in all 5 lakes are more than 2x current global background
• Mercury loadings in lake sediments are comparable to impacted states such as Minnesota and Wisconsin
![Page 48: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Summary 2
• Mercury accumulation in Front Range lakes is increasing with time
• Mercury accumulation on Western Slope more difficult to evaluate
![Page 49: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Summary 3
• Snow melt runoff increases mercury and DOC transport to lakes
• Nitrogen fertilization from atmospheric deposition increases lake production of DOC
• DOC is coupled with mercury transport to lakes, mercury sequestration in lakes, and production of MMHg
![Page 50: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Summary 4: FIRE
• Increases mercury availability
• Produces DOC
• Produces nutrients: N, P
• Changes hydrologic flowpaths to increase transport of DOC, N, P, and Hg to lakes
• Causes lake eutrophication, enhancing MMHg production and THg sequestration
![Page 51: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Suggested Future Research Objectives
1) More extensive investigation of atmospheric Hg deposition in lake sediment cores and fish bioaccumulation; SW Colorado emphasis
2) Whole lake and basin Hg accumulation rates from multiple sediment cores (Engstrom et al., 1994), compare these values to wet-fall collectors for determination of dry deposition
3) Analysis of spheroidal fly ash particles in sediments to assess power plant input: role of power plants
![Page 52: Mercury in Western Mountains](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070412/56814b17550346895db82de6/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
More suggestions
4) Importance of TOC versus DOC for mercury transport
5) Hg and DOC during snowmelt
6) Hg measurements in burned basins
7) Amount of MMHg vs THg
8) Atmospheric sources of Hg