mercury in soils and sediments :
DESCRIPTION
Mercury in Soils and Sediments :. Still River Basin and Long Island Sound Rachel Bronsther and Patrick Welsh. Mercury (Hg). Hg comes in elemental and various organic compounds and complexes (e.g. HgS, HgCl2, MeHg) Exposure to organic Hg, in particular - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Mercury in Soils and Sediments:
Still River Basin and Long Island Sound
Rachel Bronsther and Patrick Welsh
![Page 2: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Mercury (Hg)Hg comes in elemental and various organic compounds and complexes (e.g. HgS, HgCl2, MeHg)
Exposure to organic Hg, in particular methylmercury, has potential adverse effects in humans. Exposure can be from ingestion or inhalation. The nervous system is harmed by the organic compound.
Elemental Hg can become methylated by the environment.
![Page 3: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Low Dose Effects
In children: Neurotoxicity (e.g. problems with fine motor skills, visual-spatial abilities, verbal memory)
In adults (long term, lose dose exposure):weakness, tiredness, headaches, lack of appetite, digestion problems, weight loss, trembling of hands, numbness of
extremities, tingling of lips and tongue, etc.
![Page 4: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Fish ConsumptionEPA has determined that the primary form of human exposure to methylmercury is through fish consumption.
Population at the greatest risk – children who eat orwhose mothers consume a large amount of fish
EPA has determined that a RfD of 0.1 ug MeHg/day is acceptable.
![Page 5: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Mercury in Soils No decisive data seems to exist on what levelsin soil are “safe”.
In CT, up to 20 ppm of Hg in residential areasis acceptable.
(Compared to MA, where legal residential levels are set at 10 ppm.)
No way to determine what percentage of Hg found insoil is in its organic form without testing, as relativeabundances vary.
![Page 7: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Mercury Levels
• Normal modern soil background levels for mercury in the northeast are around 200 to 300 parts per billion– Mostly due to atmospheric deposition
• Sediment samples from the Housatonic River were higher than ‘normal’.
• Sources were traced to the Still River– A north flowing tributary.
![Page 8: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Still RiverFlows through Danbury and Brookfield and into theHousatonic River in New Milford.
It is 22 miles long and has a drainage area of 85square miles.
Its mean flow of 377 ft3/sec.
![Page 9: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Extreme levels
• Along the Still River levels of mercury in sediment were found to be 5-10 ppm with extremes up to100 ppm– 500 times higher than background
• Where is the source?
![Page 10: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Danbury, CT
Former hat-making capital of the world -- 20,000 hats/year were produced in 1800; 1 million hats/year by 1836. Mercury wasused in the felting process.
Located in the Still River Basin.
![Page 11: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Mercury in Hat Making• Mercury nitrate was used in the felting
process• Workers in the Danbury factories often
suffered mercury poisoning– Called “mad hatters”– The origin of the phrase mad as a hatter
• The symptoms of the disease were called the ‘Danbury shakes’– symptoms of chronic mercury exposure
on the nervous system include increased excitability, mental instability, tendency to weep, fine tremors of the hands and feet, and personality changes
![Page 12: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Long Island Sound
![Page 13: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
LIS Cores
• Cores from the LIS were tested for mercury in order to see the migration of mercury from the Danbury source area– North through Still River into Housatonic and
then emptied into LIS• Results showed increased levels of mercury
– Levels were relatively low (400-800 ppb) compared to that of the Still River
![Page 14: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Sample Collection
• Surface Samples• Cores
– Cores are generally sliced every 2cm up to 40 cm in depth– After 40 cm, the core is sliced every 5 cm– The outsides of the core slices are cut off to prevent cross
contamination resulting from smearing the outside• Cubes are formed in this way
• Dried on Styrofoam plates• Crushed and homogenized in plastic bottles
![Page 15: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
DMA (Direct Mercury Analyzer) 80
1. Sediments are placed in open crucibles where they are weighed (Crucibles are non-reactive heat-resistant nickel containers)
2. Pneumatic arm places the crucibles in the quartz combustion furnace Sediments are dried at 300° C for 10 seconds
3. Thermally decomposed at 850° C for 180 seconds, which volatizes Hg, water, carbon dioxide, and organic matter
4. Flowing oxygen carries this gas to a furnace where it is oxidized and halogens, sulfides, and nitrogen oxides are trapped.
5. The remains go to an amalgamator in a third furnace.1. The amalgamator is made of gold particles that forms a metal alloy with
Hg.2. Non-amalgamated products are carried out taking another 60 seconds3. Amalgamator is heated intensely for 12 seconds and releases Hg vapor to
absorbance cells
![Page 16: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
DMA cont.
1. Two cells (or cuvettes) are aligned with a small collection flask between them where a mercury lamp positioned at the end of the cells emits a single wavelength that is absorbed by Hg0
2. Atomic absorption is measured by the spectrophotometer, which is directly related to the concentration
3. Surface area of the absorbance peak is transmitted to the computer, which calculates the ppb Hg is a function of the enter in weight
![Page 17: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
A new calibration was required at the beginning of the summer, as the machine had experienced some drift.
We calibrated, and recalibrated and recalibrated….finally, we got Calibration “Gold”.
First we tried liquid standards, which did not work.
We ultimately calibrated using NIST and NRCC dry standards.
Calibration
![Page 19: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
StandardsWe’ve been using 5 standards, 3 of which are
distributed by NIST and 2 from the NRC.
The standards include homogenized soil ranging in Hg levels from 90 ppb to 3040 ppb.
![Page 21: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Still River Basin GPS locations:
![Page 22: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
SRs
SR2 sample avg ppb 13 3953.8714 1967.64515 4493.4216 3267.56517 857.19518 3709.919 130517.920 4623.7121 7433.6922 3800.6723 1936.0724 2463.45525 5516.6126 4774.427 4796.0428 5295.37529 1970.41530 2158.7731 6990.00532 12482.7433 5449.6334 6015.1135 3615.64536 54.3537 8972.15538 4518.47
SR1 sample av ppbSR1-176 1637.935SR1-178 2405.095SR1-180 2991.135SR1-181 1817.59SR1-182 2198.647SR1-183 2017.157SR1-185 1777.69SR1-185 5888.093SR1-186 1524.23SR1-187 2136.52SR1-188 1586.398SR1-190 4173.405SR1-190 7040.653SR1-191 2929.038SR1-193 7483.218SR1-194 8104.16SR1-195 1662.988SR1-196 1652.15SR1-197 1079.44SR1-198 4995.47SR1-199 2971.268SR1-200 1568.358SR1-201 1706.583SR1-203 1812.993SR1-204 5952.048SR1-205 2795.603SR1-206 6308.21SR1-207 6789.597SR1-209 1613.27SR1-211 77122.32
![Page 24: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
SR, con’t.Last Friday we took additional Still River samples (SR3), and
by the end of the summer we plan to have both SR2 and SR3 values on the GPS map of the Basin.
![Page 25: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
WLIS75 C1 core
![Page 26: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
ppb vs. depth of WLIS 75C1 core
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
depth (cm)
ppb
Hg
![Page 27: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
% H20 vs depth of WLIS75C1 core
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
depth (cm)
% w
ater
![Page 28: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
calculated dry density vs. depth of WLIS75 C1 core
00.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.6
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
depth (cm)
dry
dens
ity (g
/cm̂
3)
![Page 29: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Hg deposition vs. Depth of WLISC175
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200depth (cm)
Hg
depo
sitio
n
![Page 30: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
PW (Rachel and Pat) and PW (Bess) vs. depth of WLIS75C1 core
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
depth (cm)
Perc
ent W
ater
(%) % water
(Rachel)Bess % water
![Page 31: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Estimating Age of Sample
Age = 2001 – (depth (cm)/.44)
Because rough accumulation rate is 1cm = 2.2 yearsAnd, the inverse of 2.2 is 1/.44
![Page 32: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Around 1950-1970, some sort of dumping took place that caused an unnatural increase of Hg (up to 3 ppm) in this area of LIS. This was also a period of major floods…. Flood deposit???
depth (cm) Age of sample (yr)1 1999
2.5 19953.5 19934.5 19915.5 19896.5 19867.5 19848.9 19819.5 1979
14.5 196819.5 195724.5 194529.5 1934
?
![Page 33: Mercury in Soils and Sediments :](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012321/56814b17550346895db82dcc/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Conclusion:
The old hat factories of Danbury, CT serve as a source of Hg. The source can be traced down through the Still River (very high concentrations; around 5-10 ppm) through the Housatonic (still high) into the Western LIS (400-800 ppb).