meeting 5 december 5, 2016
TRANSCRIPT
TONIGHT'S AGENDADinnerWelcome / Agenda for tonightResults from Meeting 4Cost Estimating 101Project Solutions and Probable CostsSequencing ScenariosCommittee Discussion of Project Solutions and Sequencing ScenariosSelection of Project Solutions and Sequencing ScenarioDiscussion of Community SurveyPotential Next Meeting (December 14)
6:00-6:306:30-6:356:35-6:406:40-6:456:45-7:007:00-7:107:10-7:407:40-7:557:55-8:00
MEETING 4 COMMITTEE ACTIVITY RESULTSCONCEPTS - OVERALL
Outdoor Education at all campuses – 54Large areas for multiple classrooms – 50
State of the Art Early Childhood Center – 110Consolidate FDECC & Jefferson into new site – 64
Specialized lab space at all levels – 49Offer Pre-K to all – 61
Spaces for Teachers – 39Exceed space requirements / larger learning environments – 83
State of the Art Fine Arts Facilities – 99Full time staff child care center – 112
MEETING 4 COMMITTEE ACTIVITY RESULTSCONCEPTS - OVERALL
State of the art spaces for teacher collaboration – 97Addressing overcrowded high school – 62
Ninth Grade Center – 37Spaces for specialized / personal learning – 49
Grade Configuration K-5, 6-8, 9-12 – 92Environments for special populations (ADHD etc) – 35
New high school, move MS to SHS, 3 new elementary schools – 77Bigger cafeteria / multi use – 54
Equity across district – 99
MEETING 4 COMMITTEE ACTIVITY RESULTSCONCEPTS - CTE
CTE Education spaces – 66Purpose Built learning spaces for CTE – 22
Guided by workforce needs – 34Community partners – 58
Higher Education partners – 25Real life education – 33
Experiences that lead to jobs - 67
MEETING 4 COMMITTEE ACTIVITY RESULTSCONCEPTS - TECHNOLOGY
More network bandwidth across district / and community – 92Technology Infrastructure – 84
Equity – 51
MEETING 4 COMMITTEE ACTIVITY RESULTSCONCEPTS - ATHLETIC
Athletic programs – 56Fitness – 33
Sports Center for all Sports / Community Complex – 120High School swimming pool – 45
State of the art facilities – 64Practice facilities – 89
MEETING 4 COMMITTEE ACTIVITY RESULTSCONCEPTS - PRESENTED DURING VOTING
Security – 27Traffic flow on campuses – 12
Storm Shelters - 12
MEETING 4 OPTIONS PRESENTED
NEW HIGH SCHOOL FOR 2,100 STUDENTS
PHASED REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING HS
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL FOR 1,000 STUDENTS
NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE WAKEFIELD
WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY RENOVATIONS
CONVERT INTERMEDIATE INTO ELEMENTARY
SORY ELEMENTARY RENOVATIONS
PHASED REPLACEMENT ON SITE
NEBLETT ELEMENTARY RENOVATIONS
CONVERT EXISTING SHS TO MIDDLE SCHOOL
NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE FAIRVIEW
CONVERT DOUGLASS TO NEW PDC
BEARCAT STADIUM RENOVATION ON SITE
CONVERT INTERMEDIATE TO MIDDLE SCHOOL
NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE CRUTCHFIELD
CONVERT DOUGLASS TO ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION
NEW FACILITY AT NEW HIGH SCHOOL LOCATION
LEARNING CENTER DOUGLASS ECC
MOVE DAEP AND EARLY HEAD START TO DILLINGHAM
MOVE LEARNING CENTER TO OLD HIGH SCHOOL
MEETING 4 NON-VIABLE OPTIONS RESULTS
NEW HIGH SCHOOL FOR 2,100 STUDENTS
OPTIONS DELETED ONLY
THROUGH UNANIMOUS
SUPPORT
12
12
5 2
PHASED REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING HS
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL FOR 1,000 STUDENTS
NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE WAKEFIELD
WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY RENOVATIONS
LEARNING CENTER DOUGLASS ECC
CONVERT INTERMEDIATE INTO ELEMENTARY
SORY ELEMENTARY RENOVATIONS
MOVE DAEP AND EARLY HEAD START TO DILLINGHAM
PHASED REPLACEMENT ON SITE
NEBLETT ELEMENTARY RENOVATIONS
MOVE LEARNING CENTER TO OLD HIGH SCHOOL
CONVERT EXISTING SHS TO MIDDLE SCHOOL
NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE FAIRVIEW
CONVERT DOUGLASS TO NEW PDC
BEARCAT STADIUM RENOVATION ON SITE
CONVERT INTERMEDIATE TO MIDDLE SCHOOL
NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE CRUTCHFIELD
CONVERT DOUGLASS TO ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION
NEW FACILITY AT NEW HIGH SCHOOL LOCATION
5 1 1
18
6
IDENTIFIED NEEDSTechnologyProviding better access (infrastructure) and learning opportunities (classroom devices)
CTE spaces, and overall capacityHigh School
Minimize transitions and follow best practices and state recommendations: capacity and quality issues at elementary schools, reuse of intermediate campus
Grade configuration
Planning for capacity for all students, state of the art spaces Pre-K
Quality issues at the middle school and capacity issues at the intermediateMiddle / Intermediate School
Lack of proper game facilities at the stadium, lack of proper practice and game facilities at the high school
Athletics
PROJECT COST ESTIMATING 101Sherman Independent School District
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
Construction CostBuilding Construction 100,000 SF 238$ 23,800,000$
Additions 10,000 SF 268$ 2,680,000$
Storm Shelter 5,500 SF 75$ 412,500$
Major Renovations 10,000 175$ 1,750,000$
Minor Renovations 10,000 75$ 750,000$
Repairs & Remediation 10,000 68$ 680,000$
Demolition 10,000 8$ 80,000$
Abatement 10,000 4$ 40,000$
Program Contingency 5% 1,190,000$
On-Site Contingency 2.5% 595,000$ Off-Site Construction Cost 5% 1,190,000$
Subtotal 33,167,500$
Contingency/AllowanceOwner's Betterment 1.5% 497,513$ Contractor's Contingency 2.0% 663,350$
Subtotal 1,160,863$
Jurisdictional & Professional Fees(Includes costs, fees, tests and studies required to satisfy all governing authorities and codes)
Site Survey
Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)
Due Diligence / Property Evaluation
Geotechnical Engineering
Geothermal Test Well
Architectural/ Engineering - Building TDLR / Architectural Barriers / TAS / ADA
Food Service Consultant
On-site Civil Engineering
Material Testing
HVAC Test and BalanceBuilding Permit
Subtotal 12% 4,119,404$
Fixtures, Furniture & Equipment (FF&E) 10% 3,432,836$
Technology 3.5% 1,160,863$ 43,041,465$
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2016 43,041,465$
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2017 45,924,649$
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2026 61,963,964$
DECEMBER
DECEMBER
NOVEMBER
Description 2016 Unit Cost BASELINE
Generic Campus
December 5, 2016
PROJECT COST ESTIMATING 101Sherman Independent School District
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
Construction CostBuilding Construction 100,000 SF 238$ 23,800,000$
Additions 10,000 SF 268$ 2,680,000$
Storm Shelter 5,500 SF 75$ 412,500$
Major Renovations 10,000 175$ 1,750,000$
Minor Renovations 10,000 75$ 750,000$
Repairs & Remediation 10,000 68$ 680,000$
Demolition 10,000 8$ 80,000$
Abatement 10,000 4$ 40,000$
Program Contingency 5% 1,190,000$
On-Site Contingency 2.5% 595,000$ Off-Site Construction Cost 5% 1,190,000$
Subtotal 33,167,500$
Contingency/AllowanceOwner's Betterment 1.5% 497,513$ Contractor's Contingency 2.0% 663,350$
Subtotal 1,160,863$
Jurisdictional & Professional Fees(Includes costs, fees, tests and studies required to satisfy all governing authorities and codes)
Site Survey
Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)
Due Diligence / Property Evaluation
Geotechnical Engineering
Geothermal Test Well
Architectural/ Engineering - Building TDLR / Architectural Barriers / TAS / ADA
Food Service Consultant
On-site Civil Engineering
Material Testing
HVAC Test and BalanceBuilding Permit
Subtotal 12% 4,119,404$
Fixtures, Furniture & Equipment (FF&E) 10% 3,432,836$
Technology 3.5% 1,160,863$ 43,041,465$
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2016 43,041,465$
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2017 45,924,649$
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2026 61,963,964$
DECEMBER
DECEMBER
NOVEMBER
Description 2016 Unit Cost BASELINE
Generic Campus
December 5, 2016
PROJECT COST ESTIMATING 101
Sherman Independent School District
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
Construction CostBuilding Construction 100,000 SF 238$ 23,800,000$
Additions 10,000 SF 268$ 2,680,000$
Storm Shelter 5,500 SF 75$ 412,500$
Major Renovations 10,000 175$ 1,750,000$
Minor Renovations 10,000 75$ 750,000$
Repairs & Remediation 10,000 68$ 680,000$
Demolition 10,000 8$ 80,000$
Abatement 10,000 4$ 40,000$
Program Contingency 5% 1,190,000$
On-Site Contingency 2.5% 595,000$ Off-Site Construction Cost 5% 1,190,000$
Subtotal 33,167,500$
Contingency/AllowanceOwner's Betterment 1.5% 497,513$ Contractor's Contingency 2.0% 663,350$
Subtotal 1,160,863$
Jurisdictional & Professional Fees(Includes costs, fees, tests and studies required to satisfy all governing authorities and codes)
Site Survey
Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)
Due Diligence / Property Evaluation
Geotechnical Engineering
Geothermal Test Well
Architectural/ Engineering - Building TDLR / Architectural Barriers / TAS / ADA
Food Service Consultant
On-site Civil Engineering
Material Testing
HVAC Test and BalanceBuilding Permit
Subtotal 12% 4,119,404$
Fixtures, Furniture & Equipment (FF&E) 10% 3,432,836$
Technology 3.5% 1,160,863$ 43,041,465$
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2016 43,041,465$
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2017 45,924,649$
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2026 61,963,964$
DECEMBER
DECEMBER
NOVEMBER
Description 2016 Unit Cost BASELINE
Generic Campus
December 5, 2016
PROJECT COST ESTIMATING 101
Sherman Independent School District
OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
Construction CostBuilding Construction 100,000 SF 238$ 23,800,000$
Additions 10,000 SF 268$ 2,680,000$
Storm Shelter 5,500 SF 75$ 412,500$
Major Renovations 10,000 175$ 1,750,000$
Minor Renovations 10,000 75$ 750,000$
Repairs & Remediation 10,000 68$ 680,000$
Demolition 10,000 8$ 80,000$
Abatement 10,000 4$ 40,000$
Program Contingency 5% 1,190,000$
On-Site Contingency 2.5% 595,000$ Off-Site Construction Cost 5% 1,190,000$
Subtotal 33,167,500$
Contingency/AllowanceOwner's Betterment 1.5% 497,513$ Contractor's Contingency 2.0% 663,350$
Subtotal 1,160,863$
Jurisdictional & Professional Fees(Includes costs, fees, tests and studies required to satisfy all governing authorities and codes)
Site Survey
Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)
Due Diligence / Property Evaluation
Geotechnical Engineering
Geothermal Test Well
Architectural/ Engineering - Building TDLR / Architectural Barriers / TAS / ADA
Food Service Consultant
On-site Civil Engineering
Material Testing
HVAC Test and BalanceBuilding Permit
Subtotal 12% 4,119,404$
Fixtures, Furniture & Equipment (FF&E) 10% 3,432,836$
Technology 3.5% 1,160,863$ 43,041,465$
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2016 43,041,465$
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2017 45,924,649$
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2026 61,963,964$
DECEMBER
DECEMBER
NOVEMBER
Description 2016 Unit Cost BASELINE
Generic Campus
December 5, 2016
OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS
NEW HIGH SCHOOL AT NEW LOCATION
DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $133,337,877
• 2,100 Student Capacity Facility
• State of the art Science and CTE Spaces
• UIL Fine Arts Spaces
• New Competition & Practice Athletic Facilities
OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS
CTE AND CAPACITY ADDITIONS AT SHERMAN HS
DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $35,032,388
• New state of the art CTE Spaces
• New state of the art Science Labs
• New academic classrooms
• Added capacity of 600 students
OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL FOR 1,000 STUDENTS
DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $51,020,509
• 1,000 Student Capacity Facility
• State of the art Science and CTE Spaces
• UIL Fine Arts Spaces
• New Practice Athletic Facilities
OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS
CONVERT EXISTING SHS TO MIDDLE SCHOOL
DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $14,072,487
• Renovated spaces for 1,000 Student Capacity
• State of the art Science and CTE Spaces
• UIL Fine Arts Spaces
• New Practice Athletic Facilities
OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS
DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $23,640,415
• Renovated spaces for 1,000 Student Capacity
• State of the art Science and CTE Spaces
• UIL Fine Arts Spaces
• New Competition & Practice Athletic Facilities
CONVERT INTERMEDIATE TO MIDDLE SCHOOL
OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS
DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $11,515,511
• Renovated spaces for 600 Student Capacity Facility
• Remaining portions of existing facility could be used for other district purposes
CONVERT INTERMEDIATE INTO ELEMENTARY
OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS
DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $26,902,225
• 600 Student Capacity Facility
• Improved site circulation
NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE WAKEFIELD
OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS
DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $27,103,284
NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE FAIRVIEW• 600 Student Capacity Facility
• Improved site circulation
OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS
DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $27,060,386
NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE CRUTCHFIELD• 600 Student Capacity Facility
• Improved site circulation
OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS
DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $17,641,338
• New Stand-Alone Facility
• Improved site circulation
NEW EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER
OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS
DECEMBER 2016 PRICE:$187,999 PER CAMPUS
• Renovated spaces for new toilets
• Facilitates the transition to Pre-K – 5th Grade Configuration
RENOVATIONS AT ELEMENTARIES FOR PRE-K
ELEMENTARY 02
ELEMENTARY 03ELEMENTARY 01
OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS
DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $27,385,620
• Renovation of Home Side with New Press Box and addition of more seating capacity
• New Visitor Side Seating
• New Field House
• Added Parking Capacity
BEARCAT STADIUM RENOVATION ON SITE
OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS
DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $28,043,969
• New UIL Competition Facility
• Shared parking with New High School Location
• New Field House part of the New High School
NEW STADIUM AT NEW HIGH SCHOOL LOCATION