mechanical properties of styrene butadiene rubber
TRANSCRIPT
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF STYRENE BUTADIENE RUBBER WITH
OIL PALM TRUNK FIBER AS FILLER
MOHD HAZIZUL BIN HAMZAH
A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the Degree of
Bachelor of Chemical Engineering
Faculty of Chemical & Natural Resources Engineering
Universiti Malaysia Pahang
DECEMBER 2010
vi
ABSTRACT
Synthetic rubber on the other hand is a rubber which is synthesized chemically.
Styrene-butadiene rubber is one of them. The synthetic rubber gives different properties
from natural rubber in every aspect. The objectives of this research are to investigate the
mechanical properties changes in styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) filled with oil palm
trunks as fillers and to check the differences in properties between the amounts of fillers
used. The purpose of this research is to investigate the properties of styrene butadiene
rubber blending with oil palm trunk fiber as filler. The research is based on experimental
lab research. The contribution of oil palm trunk as a filler in rubber compound will
decrease the burning activities and reducing environmental issues. Many researches have
been done in rubber/natural filler blending in order to improve the properties of rubber
with economically. The methods in this research are divided into three sections; mixing,
molding, and testing. Mixing required two roll mills as a device blending rubber with
filler, accelerator and vulcanizing agent. Molding required hot and cold press molding to
form a sheet of product before testing. Testing required a universal testing machine to test
the tensile properties of the rubber blend. Two chemical used in this swelling test;
kerosene and diesel. The samples were put into two different bottles with kerosene inside
one bottle and diesel inside another bottle. The time taken to complete the test was 24
hours – exactly one day. The result from testing showed that increasing amount of fillers
will actually decrease the tensile strength, increase the tensile modulus and increase
swelling behavior of the rubber blend. As conclusion, most of mechanical properties
decrease with increasing of filler content. As recommendation, increasing the filler
content might give the better result, and giving more information about capability of
styrene butadiene rubber to consume more filler.
vii
ABSTRAK
Getah sintetik di sisi lain adalah getah yang merupakan hasil campuran bahan
kimia. Getah stirena butadiena adalah salah satunya. Getah sintetik memberikan sifat
yang berbeza dari getah asli dalam setiap aspek. Tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk
mengetahui perubahan sifat mekanik dalam getah stirena butadiena (SBR) yang diisi
dengan batang kelapa sawit sebagai suapan dan untuk menyemak perbezaan sifat antara
jumlah suapan digunakan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui sifat-sifat
campuran getah stirena butadiena dengan serat batang kelapa sawit sebagai suapan.
Penelitian ini berdasarkan pada penelitian ujikaji makmal. Sumbangan batang kelapa
sawit sebagai isian dalam campuran getah akan menurunkan kegiatan pembakaran dan
mengurangkan masalah alam sekitar. Banyak kajian telah dilakukan dalam
getah/pencampuran isian asli meningkatkan sifat getah dengan ekonomi. Kaedah dalam
kajian ini dibahagikan kepada tiga bahagian; pencampuran, pencetakan, dan ujian.
Mencampur memerlukan “two roll mill” sebagai campuran getah peranti dengan isian,
pencepat dan agen vulcanizing. Pencetakan memerlukan “hot and cold molding press”
untuk membentuk sehelai produk sebelum ujian. Ujian memerlukan mesin uji universal
untuk menguji sifat tarik dari getah campuran. Dua kimia yang digunakan dalam ujian
pembengkakan ialah minyak tanah dan diesel. Bahan uji dimasukkan ke dalam dua botol
yang berbeza dengan minyak tanah dalam satu botol dan diesel dalam botol lain. Waktu
yang diperlukan untuk menyelesaikan ujian adalah 24 jam - persis satu hari. Hasil dari
ujian menunjukkan bahawa peningkatan jumlah suapan benar-benar akan menurunkan
kekuatan tarik, meningkatkan modulus tarik dan meningkatkan perilaku pembengkakan
getah campuran. Sebagai kesimpulan, sebahagian besar sifat mekanik menurun dengan
peningkatan kadar isian. Sebagai cadangan, meningkatkan kadar isian dapat memberikan
hasil yang lebih baik, dan memberikan maklumat lebih lanjut tentang kemampuan getah
stirena butadiena untuk mengambil lebih banyak isian.
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE
DECLARATION ii
DEDICATION iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT v
ABSTRACT vi
ABSTRAK vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS viii
LIST OF TABLES xi
LIST OF FIGURES xii
LIST OF APPENDICES xiv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xv
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of Study 1
1.2 Problem Statements 2
1.3 Objectives of the Research 3
1.4 Scope of Study 3
1.5 Rationale and Significance 4
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Styrene Butadiene Rubber 5
ix
2.2 Natural Filler 6
2.3 Oil Palm Trunk Fiber 6
2.4 Crosslink 7
2.5 Vulcanization 7
2.6 Mechanical Properties 8
2.6.1 Tensile Strength 8
2.6.2 Tensile Modulus 10
2.6.3 Swelling 12
2.6.4 Elongation 13
2.7 Recycled Elastomer 14
2.8 Carbon Black Filler 16
2.9 Organoclay 19
3 METHODOLOGY
3.1 Chemical and Apparatus 20
3.2 Rubber Formulation 21
3.3 Sieving 22
3.4 Blending 23
3.5 Molding 24
3.6 Tensile Test 25
3.7 Swelling Test 26
3.8 Precaution Steps 27
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
4.1 Result 28
4.1.1 Tensile Test 28
4.1.2 Swelling Test 29
4.2 Discussion 30
4.2.1 Time to Break 30
4.2.2 Tensile Strength 31
4.2.3 Extension at Break 32
x
4.2.4 Stress-Strain Relationship 35
4.2.5 Tensile Modulus 39
4.2.6 Swelling 41
5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Conclusion 44
5.2 Recommendation 45
REFERENCES 46
APPENDICES 49
xi
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE TITLE PAGE
3.1 Part per hundred Rubber Formulations 21
3.2 Ingredient weight value based on 250 grams per sample 22
3.3 Rubber Stages during Blending 23
3.4 Result available for rubber tensile test at Universal Tensile Machine 25
4.1 Result in tensile test 28
4.2 Result in swelling test 29
xii
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE TITLE PAGE
2.1 Oil palm trunk fiber 6
2.2 Tensile strength-rice husk content relationship (A.I. Khalf et al.,
2010) 8
2.3 Tensile strength of natural rubber reinforced with various fillers (N.
Rattanasom et al., 2009) 9
2.4 Tensile strength of rubber-filler content relationship (Hanafi Ismail
et al., 1996) 10
2.5
Tensile modulus of white rice husk ash loading in natural
rubber/linear low density polyethylene blends (Hanafi Ismail et al.,
2000)
11
2.6 Modulus at 100% elongation according to fiber loading (Hanafi
Ismail et al., 1999) 12
2.7 Swelling behavior of recycled rubber powder filler on natural rubber
(Hanafi Ismail et al., 2001) 13
2.8 Elongation at break versus fiber loading in sisal/oil palm hybrid
fiber reinforced natural rubber (Maya Jacob et al., 2003) 14
2.9
Horizontal profile of liquid axial velocity in downcomer for three
The tensile strength of SBR/NBRr with/without ENR-50 (Noriman
et al., 2009)
15
2.10 The tensile modulus of SBR/NBRr with/without ENR-50 (Noriman
et al., 2009) 15
2.11 Swelling behavior of natural rubber filled silica/carbon black (N.
Rattanasom et al., 2007) 16
xiii
2.12 100% modulus in silica content (N. Rattanasom et al., 2007) 17
2.13 Tensile strength of rubber-silica/carbon black relationship (N.
Rattanasom et al., 2007) 17
2.14
Modulus at 100% elongation versus filler content in natural
rubber/carbon black/calcium carbonate (Saowaroj Chuayjuljit et al.,
2002)
18
2.15 Tensile strength and elongation at break of natural
rubber/organoclay nanocomposite (P. L. Teh et al., 2003) 19
3.1 Two rolls mill 23
3.2 25-ton hot and cold molding press 24
3.3 50kN universal testing machine 26
4.1 Graph of time to break (sec) versus filler content (PHR) 30
4.2 Graph of highest tensile strength (MPa) versus filler content (PHR) 31
4.3 Tensile strength versus loading (PHR) of rice husk/ENR (Z. A. M.
Ishak et al., 1994) 32
4.4 Graph of extension (mm) versus filler content (PHR) 33
4.5 Elongation result from various contents of filler (Siti Salina Sarkawi
et al., 2003) 34
4.6 Stress-Strain relationship of 0 parts filler in SBR 35
4.7 Stress-Strain relationship of 15 parts filler in SBR 36
4.8 Stress-Strain relationship of 30 parts filler in SBR 37
4.9 Stress-Strain relationship of 40 parts filler in SBR 38
4.10 Stress-Strain relationship of 50 parts filler in SBR 39
4.11 Graph of tensile modulus (MPa) versus filler content (PHR) 40
4.12 Tensile modulus versus filler loading in oil palm wood flour/natural
rubber blend (Hanafi Ismail et al., 1999) 41
4.13 Graph of swelling (%) versus filler content (PHR) 42
4.14 Effect on swelling index in various filler (P.L. Teh et al., 2004) 43
xiv
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX TITLE PAGE
A Stress-Strain Result 49
B Technical Report 50
xv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
SBR Styrene Butadiene Rubber
NR Natural Rubber
SMR Standard Malaysia Rubber
kN Kilo Newton
mm Millimetre
Sec Second
MPa Mega Pascal
PHR Part per hundred Rubber
CB Carbon Black
ENR Epoxidized Natural Rubber
6-PPD N-(1,3-dimethylbutyl)-N'-phenyl-p-phenylene-diamine)
CBS N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazyl sulphenamide
W Weight
μ Micro
°C Degree Celsius
N/cm2
Newton per Centimetre Square
g/cm3 Gram per Centimetre Cube
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF STUDY
Rubber can be categorizes into two; natural rubber and synthetic rubber. Natural
rubber can be found in the form of latex, which is milky in color. The latex can be found
in typical rubber trees originally from South Africa. Rubber has the ability to undergo
plastic deformation and still can return to its previous form. This ability gives the rubber
advantages to be selected in many manufacturing product such as tire etc.
Synthetic rubber on the other hand is a rubber which is synthesized chemically.
Styrene-butadiene rubber is one of them. The synthetic rubber gives different properties
from natural rubber in every aspect. Styrene-butadiene rubber has low elasticity
properties; it is easy to cut and press compared to Standard Malaysian Rubber (SMR) –
natural rubber type of rubber.
Styrene-butadiene Rubber (SBR) is a polymer which combines copolymer of
styrene and butadiene to form whether 1,2-, cis-1,4-, or trans-1,4-unit components (Sung-
Seen Choi, 2001). Sung-Seen Choi also stated that styrene-butadiene rubber depend on
the component form, 1,2-, cis-1,4-, or trans-1,4-units to produce different microstructure.
Styrene-butadiene rubber is commonly used in tire compounds.
2
Oil palm trunk fiber can be found in oil palm tree that commonly plant in
Malaysia. Oil palm was brought into Malaysia from Botanical Garden, Singapore in 1870
(K. O. Lim et al., 1996). Oil palm trunk fiber can be use as a natural filler to produce
different properties to rubber.
1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENTS
Rubber is a special polymer with high tensile strength and low hardness. Rubber
take place in marketable as a good product such as tire, medical glove, slipper etc.
Different type of products needs different type of tensile strength as well as hardness.
Therefore, to reduce tensile strength and increase hardness, fillers are needed. Findik et
al., (2004) stated that fillers are reinforced into rubber mixture for better performance and
reducing cost.
Oil palm trees are trees with specialty to produce oil – usually to produce cooking
oil. The trees produce yields that decreasing every year, which leads to the tree being
replanted 25 – 30 years later after planting (K. O. Lim et al., 1996). The oil palm trunk
was treated as a waste and usually was burnt at plant location (H. Yamada et al., 2010).
The burning activities will led to environmental issues such as green house effect and
acid rain.
The purpose of this research is to investigate the properties of styrene butadiene
rubber blending with oil palm trunk fiber as filler. This research also carried out in order
to check significant of different parts of oil palm trunk fiber acting as filler used to
styrene butadiene rubber.
3
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCH
There are two objectives that were carried out during this research after
considering the method and raw materials used.
To investigate the mechanical properties changes in styrene butadiene rubber
(SBR) filled with oil palm trunks as fillers.
To check the differences in properties between the amounts of fillers used.
1.4 SCOPE OF STUDY
The research is based on experimental lab research. Styrene butadiene rubber, oil
palm trunk fiber and other chemicals were ordered through chemical engineering
laboratory. The parts of oil palm trunk fiber that is going to be used are 0 parts, 15 parts,
30 parts, 40 parts and 50 parts. The blending was carried out at typical two rolls mill
located inside chemical engineering laboratory with speed 12 rotations per minute,
maximum temperature of 90 °C and minimum temperature 70°C. The molding process
was done using 25 ton hot and cold molding press located at chemical engineering
laboratory with maximum temperature of 165 °C and minimum temperature 155 °C.
The mechanical properties that being tests are tensile and swelling test. The
tensile test was done using 50 kN universal testing machine located at manufacturing
engineering laboratory. The parameter used in this test are Tensile strain at Break
(Standard) (mm/mm), Load at Break (Standard) (N), Extension at Break (Standard)
(mm), Tensile extension at Break (Standard) (mm), Time at Break (Standard) (sec), and
Modulus (Automatic) (MPa). Swelling test was done in chemical engineering laboratory
with only two chemical test; kerosene and diesel. The diesel that is being used is a typical
diesel that can be bought at petrol station.
4
1.5 RATIONALE AND SIGNIFICANCE
Different type of products needs different type of tensile strength as well as
hardness. Therefore, to reduce tensile strength and increase hardness, fillers are needed.
The compatibility of styrene butadiene rubber with oil palm trunk fiber was test to
determine the properties in them.
The oil palm trees produce yields that decreasing every year, which leads to the
tree being replanted 25 – 30 years later after planting (K. O. Lim et al., 1996). The oil
palm trunk was treated as a waste and usually was burnt at plant location (H. Yamada et
al., 2010). The contribution of oil palm trunk as a filler in rubber compound will decrease
the burning activities and reducing environmental issues.
5
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 STYRENE BUTADIENE RUBBER
Synthetic rubber on the other hand is a rubber which is synthesized chemically.
Styrene-butadiene rubber is one of them. The synthetic rubber gives different properties
from natural rubber in every aspect. Styrene-butadiene rubber has low elasticity
properties; it is easy to cut and press compared to Standard Malaysian Rubber (SMR) –
natural rubber type of rubber.
Styrene-butadiene Rubber (SBR) is a polymer which combines copolymer of
styrene and butadiene to form whether 1,2-, cis-1,4-, or trans-1,4-unit components (Sung-
Seen Choi, 2001). Sung-Seen Choi also stated that styrene-butadiene rubber depend on
the component form, 1,2-, cis-1,4-, or trans-1,4-units to produce different microstructure.
Styrene-butadiene rubber is commonly used in tire compounds.
M.T. Ramesan et al., (2004) reported that blending of natural rubber/styrene
butadiene rubber gives better abrasion resistance properties. This is proven that styrene
butadiene rubber give boost to natural rubber in term of properties and good.
6
2.2 NATURAL FILLER
Many researches have been done in rubber/natural filler blending in order to
improve the properties of rubber with economically. Natural filler that usually being used
in research are rise husk, oil palm fiber and coconut fiber. The differences in properties of
rubber product can be obtained from different filler.
2.3 OIL PALM TRUNK FIBER
Oil palm trunk fiber can be found in oil palm tree that commonly plant in
Malaysia. Oil palm was brought into Malaysia from Botanical Garden, Singapore in 1870
(K. O. Lim et al., 1996). Oil palm trunk fiber can be use as a natural filler to produce
different properties to rubber.
Figure 2.1: Oil palm trunk fiber.
7
RunCang Sun et al., (2001) reported that the oil palm trunk fiber enhance sulphate
pulp properties into fair strength. Oil palm trunk fiber can be potential in increasing
properties of rubber as filler. The cooperation of oil palm trunk fiber and styrene
butadiene rubber might enhance the rubber properties.
2.4 CROSSLINK
Rubber processing is a must to mix rubber and filler into one, solid rubber
product. Vulcanizing agent is a part of crosslink between rubber bonds. Fillers is
reinforced into rubber mixture for better performance and reducing cost (Findik et al.,
2004). Findik et al., (2004) also stated that, sulphur and peroxide are two common
vulcanizing agents that used activation energy which increase the mechanical properties
of rubber product at higher temperature.
2.5 VULCANIZATION
Vulcanization is a process where the rubber matrix is being crosslink with help
from vulcanizing agents. After being vulcanized, the rubber compound became cured;
with no more reaction happen causing the rubber became stable. The curing happens at
high temperature within 150 – 170 °C according to their rubber properties respectively.
Popular vulcanizing agents used are sulphur and peroxide.
8
2.6 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
2.6.1 TENSILE STRENGTH
Many researches have been done in order to investigate the mechanical properties
of rubber and natural fillers before. A.I. Khalf et al., (2010) have investigated the effect
of rice husk filler in styrene butadiene rubber with the presence of maleic anhydride. The
tensile strength of rubber sample increase until 25 PHR of filler content, before it start to
decrease at 30 PHR. This is because of the high content of filler that may cause the poor
bonding in rubber matrix causing the tensile strength to drop.
Figure 2.2: Tensile strength-rice husk content relationship (A.I. Khalf et al., 2010).
9
N. Rattanasom et al., (2009) on the other hand have investigated the mechanical
properties of natural rubber reinforced with various fillers. Gum is virgin rubber, C6 is
addition of 6 PHR of clay, CB6 is addition of 6 PHR of carbon black, CB14 is addition of
14 PHR of carbon black, S6 is addition of 6 PHR of silica and S35 is addition of 35 PHR
of silica. Clay in 6 PHR quantity show promising aspect in tensile strength than the other.
Figure 2.3: Tensile strength of natural rubber reinforced with various fillers (N.
Rattanasom et al., 2009).
Hanafi Ismail et al., (1996) also have investigated the mechanical properties of
ENR/oil palm wood flour. The tensile strength of rubber decreases with increasing of
filler content and filler size.
10
Figure 2.4: Tensile strength of rubber-filler content relationship (Hanafi Ismail et al.,
1996)
2.6.2 TENSILE MODULUS
Many researches have been done to determine the tensile modulus of rubber
compound. In order to check the compatibility of rubber composite, the modulus is
defined in the stress-strain relationship. Hanafi Ismail et al., (2000) have determined the
tensile modulus of white rice husk ash loading in natural rubber/linear low density
polyethylene blends with proportional to filler content. The additions of natural filler
basically increase tensile modulus of the rubber compound.
11
Figure 2.5: Tensile modulus of white rice husk ash loading in natural rubber/linear low
density polyethylene blends (Hanafi Ismail et al., 2000).
Hanafi Ismail et al., (1999) have investigated the mechanical properties of rubber
reinforced short oil palm fiber. The tensile modulus for treated rubber compound is much
better than the untreated one. This is because of vulcanization process enhance the rubber
properties causing the tensile modulus to increase more than untreated one.
12
Figure 2.6: Modulus at 100% elongation according to fiber loading (Hanafi Ismail et al.,
1999).
2.6.3 SWELLING
Swelling behavior is the ability of the rubber product to absorb chemical.
Swelling test was done in order to check chemical resistance in rubber sample. Many
researches have been done according to swelling behavior. Hanafi Ismail et al., (2001)
have investigated the swelling behavior of recycled rubber powder filler on natural
rubber. The more filler give more chemical resistance. As the natural rubber was filled,
the rubber became more stable and increase chemical resistance ability and less chemical
can be absorb.
13
Figure 2.7: Swelling behavior of recycled rubber powder filler on natural rubber (Hanafi
Ismail et al., 2001).
2.6.4 ELONGATION
Elongation before break is determined to check the ability of rubber to extend
their length before break. Many researches have been done in order to determine this
property. Maya Jacob et al., (2003) have investigated the mechanical properties of sisal
and oil palm hybrid fiber reinforced with natural rubber. The elongation became shorter
as the filler content increase. This is because of brittleness of rubber sample increase with
increasing of filler loading.
14
Figure 2.8: Elongation at break versus fiber loading in sisal/oil palm hybrid fiber
reinforced natural rubber (Maya Jacob et al., 2003).
2.7 RECYCLED ELASTOMER
Recycling elastomer and converted it to reinforce with rubber proven economical
as the filler is already in the recycled elastomer. Various researches have been done in
order to determine recycled elastomer as filler properties. Noriman et al., (2009) has
investigated the mechanical properties of styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) reinforced with
recycled acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (NBRr) assisted by epoxidized natural rubber
(ENR-50). The tensile strength has increased with decreasing of NBRr composition but
the existence of ENR-50 improved the property.
15
Figure 2.9: The tensile strength of SBR/NBRr with/without ENR-50 (Noriman et al.,
2009).
Figure 2.10: The tensile modulus of SBR/NBRr with/without ENR-50 (Noriman et al.,
2009).