measuring irradiance, temperature and angle of incidence effects on
TRANSCRIPT
Measuringirradiance,temperatureandangleofincidenceeffectsonphotovoltaicmodulesinAuburnHills,Michigan
by
MichaelS.Buday
Apracticumsubmittedinpartialfulfillmentoftherequirements
forthedegreeofMasterofScience/SustainableSystems(NaturalResourcesandEnvironment)
attheUniversityofMichiganAugust2011
Advisors
ProfessorGregoryKeoleian,ChairBillMarion,PrincipalScientistandProjectLeaderofPhotovoltaicResearchNREL
ii
ContentsAbstract...............................................................................................................................iiiAcknowledgments...............................................................................................................ivIntroduction........................................................................................................................1LiteratureReview................................................................................................................3Methods..............................................................................................................................8Results...............................................................................................................................15Conclusion.........................................................................................................................20Glossary.............................................................................................................................22References........................................................................................................................24Appendices........................................................................................................................27
ListofTables
Table1:IEC618531Matrixbasedtextconditions.........................................................................1Table2:Modulesundertest..........................................................................................................14Table3:TrendsinpowerbyPVmaterial.......................................................................................15Table4:Powerat1000W/m2byPVmaterial................................................................................16Table5:ObservationsfittingIEC618531parameters..................................................................19
ListofFigures
Figure1:ImpactsoftemperaturecoefficientsonPVpower...........................................................4Figure2:Solarspectrameasurementsandlinefitfromonedayfromexistingliterature.............5Figure3:CalculatedmismatchfactorforaSimodulefromexistingliterature..............................6Figure4:Systemdiagram.................................................................................................................8Figure5:SampleIVcurve................................................................................................................9Figure6:K12430IVCharacteristicspulsemode..........................................................................10Figure7:Fourwireconnection......................................................................................................10Figure8:KI#7053Switchcardconnectionfor5
iii
AbstractUnitedSolarOvonic(USO)installedaphotovoltaic(PV)moduletestingsystemin
AuburnHills,Michigan(Latitude42.6978,Longitude83.2419)inMarchof2010forthepurposeofevaluatingtheimpactsofirradiance,temperatureandangleofincidence(AOI)effectsonPVmoduleperformance.Weconsideredvarioustestbeddesignsandultimately,constructedasourcemeterbasedcurrentandvoltagemeasurementsystemcoupledwithadataacquisitionsystemrecordingreadingsfromweatherstationinstrumentsthattracksolarirradiance,temperatureandwindspeed.Current,voltageandpowerobservations,correlatedtoourweatherstationdevicereadings,werecollectedfromcommerciallyavailablePVmodulesmanufacturedfrommonocrystallinesilicon(cSi),amorphoussilicon(aSi)andcopperindiumgalliumselenide(CIGS).WeobservedthermalannealinginaSiandtheeffectsoftemperatureoncSiandCIGS.cSimoduletemperaturesabove25Cappeartodiminishpowerbyapproximately0.5%/C.Theresultswereconsistentwithourexpectationsbasedonexistingliterature.Fromthis,weinferthatthetestbediseffectiveatmeasuringmoduleperformance.
Ourresultssupport,butdonotconfirmthehypothesisthataSimodulesdelivermoreenergy(kWhrs)perpeakwatt(Wp)thanotherPVmaterials.ConfirmingthehypothesiswouldrequirebothtestingastatisticallysignificantnumberofPVmodulesandperformingaquantitativeanalysisoftheaccuracyofthetestbed.ThisisimportantbecausePVistypicallysoldona$/Wpbasis.TheWpratingisbasedonamodulesperformanceunderstandardtestconditions(STC)of1000W/m2,1.5airmass(AM)and25Cmoduletemperature.AnewPVratingsystemproposedbytheInternationalElectrotechnicalCommission(IEC)createsaseriesoftestingconditionsbasedonavarietyofweatherconditions.USOsPVmeasurementsystemiscapableofcollectingobservationsfittingmost,butnotallofthesetestconditions.Duetothearraysnorthernlocation,noneofourobservationsfittheIECshightemperatureconditions.
iv
AcknowledgmentsThisprojectwasmadepossiblethroughsponsorshipbyUnitedSolarOvonic
(USO)anditsChairmanSubhenduGuha.Iamverygratefulfortheopportunitythathegaveme.IworkedunderthedirectsupervisionofUSOSeniorResearchScientist,KevinBeernink.Hisguidance,instruction,supportandparticipationwerecriticaltothesuccessoftheproject.IalsoreceivedhelpfrommanyotherUSOemployees,mostnotably,ChrisWorrel,DavidWolf,GregDimaggio,LoganRowe,GingerPietka,KiasYounan,EricAhkashian,BrentBatchelder,MikeOndocsin,TonyTurkin,MikeWalters,andJacobWashington.
JosephdelCueto,BillMarionandDarylMyers,allattheNationalRenewableEnergyLaboratory(NREL)holdararelevelofexpertiseinthisfield.Theirpublications,guidanceandfeedbackwerevitaltothedevelopmentofthisreport.
TimothyDierauf,AdrienneKimberandJohnPrevitalisubmittedpresentationsattheAmericanSolarEnergySocietys2011nationalconferenceandprovidedmewithreferencematerials.Throughtheirwork,theyhavefurtherdemonstratedtheimportanceofthisfieldofresearchinindustry.
SondraAuerbach,JenniferTaylorandDianaWoodworthintheSchoolofNaturalResourcesandEnvironments(SNRE)OfficeofAcademicProgramswelcomedmetotheSNREcommunityandfacilitatedmyeducation.OutsideofSNRE,ProfessorDebraRowe,RobertPratt,DavidLankheetandProfessorIanHiskensweremykeyteachersinthisdiscipline.Thesepeopleallhelpedputmeonthistrack,makingthisreportpossible.
SNREProfessorandCoDirectoroftheCenterforSustainableSystemsGregoryKeoleianwasinstrumentalinapproachingUSOregardinganinternshipandmastersproject.Thetimehehasspentteachingandmeetingwithmeoverthepastthreeyearshasbeeninvaluabletoboththisprojectandmyeducation.Hedevotedasignificantamountoftimetooverseeingthisprojectandcontributingtothecontentandstructureofthisreport.HelaineHunscher,ProgramCoordinatorattheCenterforSustainableSystems,alsoprovidedvitalfeedback.
DonnaandJosephNapolitanogavememyfirstjobinthesolarindustry.TheyhavealwaysencouragedmetolearnandtoapplywhatIlearn.TheSNRE,ErbInstituteandGreatLakesRenewableEnergyAssociationcommunitiesalsoprovidedmewithcollaborativelearningenvironments.
Finally,Iwouldliketothankmyparents,EdnaandGene,fortheirunconditionalsupportandencouragementthroughalengthycareertransition.
IntroductionPhotovoltaic(PV)moduleandarrayperformanceisdifficulttopredictdueto
variationsinweather,airmass(AM),andnonlinearperformancecharacteristicsofvariousmoduletechnologies.Manufacturers,distributorsanddeveloperstypicallysellPVonacostperpeakwatt($/Wp)basis.AmodulesWprating,alsoknownasitsPmax,isbasedonitsperformanceunderStandardTestConditions(STC)consistingof1000W/m2,1.5AMand25Cmoduletemperature.However,theseconditionsrarelyoccursimultaneouslyinnatureandtheperformanceofPVmaterialsvariesovertimeandbygeographiclocationbasedprimarilyondifferencesintemperatureandAM(Marion,Kroposki,Emery,delCueto,Myers,&Osterwald,1999).TheInternationalElectrotechnicalCommission(IEC)hasproposedPVratingstandards(IEC61853)thatincludecharacterizingmoduleperformancebasedonamatrixofvariousweatherconditions,includinghightemperatureconditions(HTC),STC,nominaloperatingcelltemperature(NOCT),lowtemperatureconditions(LTC)andlowirradianceconditions(LIC).ThecriteriafortheseconditionsappearinTable1below.NotethatIEC618531doesnotincludeevaluatingperformanceunderphotovoltaicsforutilityscaleapplicationstestconditions(PVUSAorPTC)of1000W/m2,20Cambienttemperature,windspeedof1meter/secondand1.5AM.
Table1:IEC618531Matrixbasedtextconditions
Abbrev. Description Irradiance(W/m2)Module
Temp.(oC)AmbientTemp.(oC)
WindSpeed(m/sec)
AM
HTC Hightemperatureconditions 1000 75 1.5
STC Standardtestconditions 1000 25 1.5
NOCT Nominaloperatingcelltemperature 800 20 1 1.5
LTC Lowtemperatureconditions 500 15 1.5
LIC Lowirradianceconditions 200 25 1.5
Withitsproposedratingsstandards,theIECseekstoimprovethemethodbywhichPVmoduleperformanceisevaluatedbymeasuringPVpowerunderasetoftestingconditions,insteadofonlySTC.ThestandardsalsoestablishguidelinesforratingPVbasedonenergyyield(watthours)andperformanceratio(PR)(Poissant,Pelland,&Turcotte,2008)(delCueto,2007).
AdvancesininvertertechnologyhavereducedthecostofPVarrayperformancemonitoringsubstantially,tolessthan$1000orto1%10%ofoverallsystemcostfora1
2
20kWgridtiedsystem(EnphaseEnergy,2011)(FroniusUSALLC,2011).ThisiswithinreachofmanyhomeownersinstallingPVsystems.Thesemonitoringsystemsreportonanarraysenergyyield.However,thesesystemsdonotprovidethelevelofinformationacquiredfromperformingafullcurrentvoltage(IV)sweep.Theyalsodonotincludeweatherstations.TheequipmentrequiredtoeffectivelyanalyzetheelectricalcharacteristicsofPVmodulesandarraysaswellastheeffectsofirradianceandmoduletemperaturerangesbetween$10,000and$50,000(notincludingthemodulesthemselves).TobetterunderstandandpredictPVsystemperformance,NRELsPerformanceandEnergyRatingTestbed(PERT)andOutdoorTestingField(OTF)gobeyondperformingbasicenergyyieldandpowerratingmeasurements.ResearchscientistsatNRELdesignedsystemswiththeabilitytoexaminetheelectricalandopticalresponsecharacteristicsofvariousproductionmodulesandprototypesovertime.
MichiganbasedPVmodulemanufacturer,UnitedSolarOvonic(USO)soughttodevelopasystemwithPVmoduletestcapabilitiessimilartoNRELsstandalonetestingsysteminordertoconducttheirowncharacterizationofcompetitorsmodulesandUSOsnextgenerationofproductsonafractionofNRELsbudget.ThesystemwentliveinMarchof2010andcontinuestoperformandrecordregularmeasurements(IVsweeps)on20PVmoduleseverytenminutesduringdaylighthours.Italsorecordsbasicmeteorologicalconditionswitheachsweep,includingplaneofarray(POA)irradiance,ambientandmoduletemperature,andwindspeed.WecollectedandbundledfieldobservationsintothestandardscategoriesrepresentingvariousweatherconditionsinordertoverifythecapabilityofUSOsmeasurementsystemtotestIEC618531.
OncewedesignedandinstalledourPVmoduletestingsystemandbegancollectingdata,wethenhadtheinformationneededtoevaluatemoduleenergyproductionaswellastheelectricalandbasicopticalresponsecharacteristicsofthevariousPVmodulesundertest.Weappliedourtestmethodandfoundresultsconsistentwithourexpectationsbasedonexistingliterature,whichishighlightedinthenextsection.Inthispaper,wereportontherelationshipswefoundbetweenpowerandirradianceaswellasbetweenpowerandmoduletemperaturebasedonobservationstakenfromselectamorphoussilicon(aSi),crystallinesilicon(cSi),andcopperindiumgalliumselenide(CIGS)modulesfromJulythroughDecemberof2010.(ObservationsfromDecember14ththrough20thwereignoredbecausemanyofthemoduleswerecoveredinsnow.)Wewereunabletoobtaincadmiumtelluride(CdTe)modulesduetothemanufacturerstightcontrolofitsdistributionchannel.
Giventhatpoweristheproductofvoltage(V)andcurrent(I),theproposedstandardcallsforevaluatingopencircuitvoltage(Voc)andshortcircuitcurrent(ISC),and
3
fillfactor(FF)againstbothirradianceandmoduletemperature(delCueto,2007).FFindicatesamodulesrelativeefficiency.WedesignedandbuiltasystemcapableofmeasuringalloftheseparametersandothersincludingVmp.(ManyoftheserelationshipsappearinAppendices5through7.)However,themeasurementsystemisnot100%accurate.Thereisalevelofuncertaintyinthedataitgenerates.
LiteratureReviewThirtyyearsago,researchersinthePVfieldacknowledgedtheneedtogo
beyondSTC,suggestingthatmoduleperformancebecharacterizedbycategoriesofweatherconditions(hotsunny,coldsunny,hotcloudy,coldcloudy,andnice)(Marion,Kroposki,Emery,delCueto,Myers,&Osterwald,1999)(Gay,Rumberg,&Wilson,1982).TheIECscurrentproposedstandardseekstoaddressthisneed(delCueto,2007).
ThemainpurposeoftheliteraturereviewwastoexamineexistingresearchinordertoidentifythekeyvariablesaffectingPVpowergenerationandtodeterminehowtomeasurethosevariableseffectively.Existingliteraturewashelpfulinestablishingoursystemarchitecture,indefiningperformancemetricsandinidentifyingareasofopportunityforfurtherlearning.WesoughttodevelopmeasurementandtestingcapabilitiesapproachingthoseofawellfundedgovernmentlaboratoryandsofocusedourresearchonpublicationsfromNRELandSandiaLabs.WealsoreviewedarticlesrelatingtoperformanceanalysisofinstalledPVarraysranginginsizefrom2500kWp.
IrradiancehasthegreatestimpactonPVpower.Beyondirradiance,moduletemperature,angleofincidence(AOI)andAMalsoaffectamodulesoranarrayspowerandproduction(delCueto,2007)(Myers,2009)(King,Kratochvil,&Boyson,1997).Moduletemperatureisinturn,influencedbyambienttemperature,cloudpatternsandwindspeed.ResearchershaveusedsophisticatedtestingandmeasurementdevicesinPVperformancetestingforover30years,yetpredictingmoduleperformanceremainscomplexandforecastersmustacceptarelativelyhighlevelofuncertaintyinpredictingenergyproductionfromaPVarray.Additionally,underrapidlychangingandextremeweatherconditions,inverterramptimesandclippingbothdiminishACpowergeneration(vanCleef,Lippens,&Call,2001).
Researchersusepyranometerstomeasureirradiance,buttherearedifferentclassesofpyranometers.SecondarystandardandfirstclassthermopiletypepyranometersmeasureirradiancethroughouttherangeoffrequenciestowhichPVresponds(3002800nm).Silicondiodepyranometersonlyrespondtoanarrowerrangeoffrequencies(4001100nm),butarestillusedinPVweatherstationsbecausetheyarelessexpensivethanthermopilesandbecausetheyareactuallymoresensitivethan
4
thermopilesintherangeoffrequenciestowhichtheydorespond.Furthermore,siliconbasedPVisalsoprimarilyresponsivewithinthisrange.
MeasuringmoduletemperatureisimportantbecausecSiandotherPVmaterialsproducelesspowerathightemperatures.Figure1(below)indicatestheimpactsofmoduletemperatureonvariousPVmaterials.Estimatingmoduletemperatureisachievedwiththeuseofathermocoupleattachedtothebackofthemodule.However,undermostconditions,themoduletemperatureislikelytobewarmerthanthebackofthemodule.Furthermore,thetemperatureofthemoduleisnotlikelytobeconsistentthroughoutitsentiresurface.Forthesereasons,researchersapplyastandardadjustmenttothebackofthemoduletemperaturereadingtocompensateforthetemperaturedifferencebetweenthebackofthemoduleandsurfaceofthemoduleandtheymayplacemorethanonethermocoupleinseveralspecificpositionsonthebackofamoduleinordertocalculateanaveragetemperature.
Figure1:ImpactsoftemperaturecoefficientsonPVpower
AhighAOIcansignificantlyreducePVpowergeneration.RedaandAndreasprovidedthesolarpositionalgorithm(Reda&Andreas,2008)weusedtofindzenith,declination,andazimuthanglesrequiredtocalculateAOIinordertoplotitagainst%Pmaxandothervariables.
PVperformanceistypicallyreportedtoAM1.5.(ThisvaluewaschosenbecauseitrepresentstheaverageAMatsolarnoonforoptimallytiltedPVarraysatlatitudesinthecontinentalUS.)AM1.5reference(orstandard)referstotherelativepathlengthofthedirectsunlightthroughtheatmosphere.Withthesundirectlyoverhead(zenith)AMis1.0(uncorrected).Withlongerpathlengths,thereismorescatteringandabsorptionofsolarradiationbyatmosphericconstituentssuchaswatervaporandaerosols.Similarto
60%
80%
100%
120%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Relativ
evalueofP
max
(25oC=
100%
)
ModuleTemperature(oC)
CIGS
cSI
aSi
sova
thmIoinst
Fi(K
olarspectruarywithtim
WhenhePVdiffersmoduleoraroannides,MncreasingAMtudybyKenn
igure2:SolaKenny,Ioanni
m(King,Krae,date,and
ntheactualssfromthererayperformullejans,&DM.Figure3(nyetal.
arspectramdes,Mullejan
tochvil,&Bodlocation(Ri
solarspectrueferencedevanceisstateDunlop,2004below)exhib
measuremenns,&Dunlop,
5
oyson,1997iordan&Hu
umdeviatesvice(i.e.,theedasaspect4).Figure2(bitsirradian
tsandlinef,2004)
7),bothAMaulstron,1990
fromAM1.5epyranomettralmismatc(below)illuscedensityb
fitfromone
andatmosp0).
5orthespeter),theimpchfactor(K)stratestheinbywavelengt
dayfromex
hericcondit
ctralresponpactofAMo(Kenny,ncreaseinKthbasedon
xistinglitera
tions
nseofonPV
witha
ature
Figure3:(Kenny,Io
Ocommerc1100nm,onOpticaspectralcsunlightdDelCueto
Equation
wreferencespectralthetestd2003).Threducesuonthedelocation
Calculatedoannides,Mu
Ourworkdidcialphotodio,addinguncalAirMasscorrectionfadividedbytho,&Zaaiman
n1
where isespectrum,responsivitydevicewithheyfoundthuncertaintyetectorempandtimede
mismatchfallejans,&Du
notincludeodepyranomertaintyinto,KeithEmeractorderivehefullspectn,2003).Th
....
thetotalirraisthe
yoftherefermeasuredshhatusingaminspectralcployedandthependent.In
6
actorforaSnlop,2004)
correctingfmeterscannotheresultsry,JosephDdfromapotrumirradianeequationc
adiance,spectralirrarencedetecthortcircuitcmatchedrefecorrectionbuheairmasstheirpaper
6
Simodulefr
forspectralotmeasure.However,ielCueto,andlynomialfitonceasafunccanbewritt
....
isthespadianceofthtor,andcurrentISC(Eerencecelltoutmakesthebasedspect,theyalson
romexisting
mismatchanspectralirrainSpectraldWillemZaaofISCmeasuctionofairmenas:
.
pectralirradihesolarspec
isthespeEmery,DelComeasuretecorrectionralcorrectionotedthata
gliterature
ndtheUSOadianceabovCorrectionsaimanofferuredundernmass(Emery
anceofthectrum,ectralresponCueto,&ZaatotalirradiannequationdeonfactorisbSiismuchm
systemsveBasedanaturaly,
isthensivityofiman,nceependantbothmore
7
sensitivetowatervaporandturbiditythancSi,CIGSandCdTe.AsstatedpreviouslyoursystemdoesnotincludeaCdTemoduleundertestbecauseofthemanufacturerstightlycontrolleddistributionchannel.Instead,wereliedonexistingliteraturetoprovideabasiccomparisontotheresultswefoundforcSi,aSiandCIGSmodules(delCueto,2007).
WealsorecordedwindspeedandambienttemperaturewitheachmodulesIVsweep,eventhoughMyersshowednostrongcorrelationbetweenpowerandeitherwindspeedorambienttemperature(Myers,2009).
Theliteraturealsoprovidedabasisforunderstandingthelevelofuncertaintywecouldexpectfromouranalysis.Thereareseveralsourcesofuncertaintyincludingalackofprecisioninthemeasurementdevicesandrapidlychangingconditions(e.g.,irradiance)duringtestperiods.TheprecisionratingsofourmeasurementdevicesareavailableinAppendix1.Duringoneexperimentconductedin1998,MarionatNRELfoundthatBecauseoferrorsinmeasurementsandenergyratingmethodology,differencesof8%orlessintheenergyratingsoftwoPVmodulesarenotsignificant.IfoneofthemodulesisaSi,differencesof13%orlessintheenergyratingsoftwoPVmodulesarenotsignificant.(Marion,2000)
MethodF
connectiothercom
Figure4:
Tmeter.MmoduleufirstfindicurrentavoltagerxVocxFFpoweran
dsigure4showonsbetweemponentsw
Systemdia
heheartoftMeasuremenundertestwingVOC(wheatsuchaninreadszero(wF,wherethendFFreflect
wsthekeyelnthePVmowithinthetes
gram
thetestbedtsofamodu
whilesensingereI=0).ThetervaltoallowhichoccursproductIscxtsitsrelative
8
lementsoftodulesunderstbed.
disa1kWKeulespowergitsvoltage.softwarethowforapprosatIsc).ThexVocrepreseeefficiency,
8
hemeasurertestandth
eithleyInstruareobtaineThesourceheninstructsoximately80resultisanIentsthemoasshownin
ementsystememeasurem
uments(KI)dbysourcinmetercondsthesource0pointsorsIVcurvewithdulestheorFigure5be
mincludingtmentdevices
model#2430ngcurrenttoductsanIVsmetertoinstepsbeforehPmax=Impxreticalmaximlow.
thesand
0sourceotheweepbyncreasethe
xVmp=Iscmum
9
Figure5:SampleIVcurvewithYaxisA(left)andPowercurvewithYaxisW(right)
NotethattheillustrationaboveshowsastandardfirstquadrantIVcurve,butthatthesysteminfactcarriesoutfourthquadrantsweeps.InadditiontoVocandIsc,thefilealsorecordsPmax(thepointatwhichtheproductofVxIreachesitsmaximumpowervalue),FF[=(VmpxImp)/(VocxIsc)]andatimestamp.ThesysteminitiatesanIVsweepeverytenminuteswhenirradianceisgreaterthan20W/m2(2%offullsun).Thisisnotasfinearesolutionassomeothermonitoringsystems(e.g.,NRELsOTF)whichtakemeasurementseveryminuteorevenmorefrequently.
Alternatedwithitssweeps,thesoftwarecallsforreadingsfromdevicesconnectedtothedataacquisitionsystem,namelyaMaximummodel#41threecupanemometer,typeKthermocouplesattachedtothebackofeachmoduleandtwoambientpoints(shadedandnotshaded),andseveralKippandZonenSPLite2photodiodedetectorpyranometers.WealsoaddedasecondarystandardKippandZonenCMP21thermopileinMarch2011.Aspreviouslystated,alloftheotherfindingsinthisreportarebasedonobservationstakenbetweenJulyandDecember2010.However,thefindingsbasedonCMP21measurementsweretakenbetweenMarchandJuly2011.(ThemeasuredcorrelationbetweenaSPLite2andtheCMP21appearsinAppendix2.)However,theCMP21wascalibratedbythemanufacturerandnotputthroughNRELsmorerigorouscalibrationprocess(Emery,etal.,2005)(DevicePerformance,2006).
PmaxImp
Vmp Voc
Isc
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0 20 40 60 80 100
WA
V
Figure6:
Figure7:
TpulsemocharactemeterfopulsedelonlyhansplittingttheISCofexceededchannelsthemoduonthem
K12430IV
Fourwirec
heKI#2430odewithaforisticsofoururwireconnlayat0.05mdleupto4AthecurrentfmanyPVmd3.2(=4/1.2sallowedtheulesundert
market.
Characteris
connection
iscapableofourwireconrsourcemenection.(Wemilliseconds.A.Wewereabetweentheodules,inclu25safetyfacecircuittoaest,butthis
1
sticspulsem
fsourcingornnection.Figterinpulseesetourpu)However,tabletodoubecardstwoudingsomector).Splittinccommodatwasinsuffic
10
mode
rsensingupgure6(abovemode.Figurlsewidthatthesystemsbletheswitcochannels(Hofthemodungthecurrentetheexpeccientfortest
to+/10Aae)indicatesre7(above)0.0025millisKI#7053swchingcardsH/L).Thiswaulesthatwentbetweenctedmaximutingsomehi
and+/100VthesourceashowsthesisecondsandwitchingcardtolerancetoasimportantwantedtotthecardsHumcurrentfighcurrent
Vdcinandsinksourcedourdscano8Abytbecausetest,H/Lromallofmodules
9
Fi
Fi
#mm
Figureisaphotogr
igure8:KI#7
igure9:KI#7
Other7002switchmainframedimodulesrout
e8showsthraphofone
7053Switch
7053Switch
rkeycompoingmainframirectsthesytedtofixed
eswitchcarofourKI#70
hcardconne
hcardwiths
nentsofthemeandaKI#stemtoseleloadresistor
11
rdconnectio053switchc
ectionfor5>9 Compile,tabulate,andinterpretdata. >>
2010117/2009 8/2009 9/2009 10/2009 2/2010 3/2010 201011/200912/2009 1/2010
14
Wecalculatedenergyyieldsas:
Equation3
,withatimeincrementbetweenmeasurementssetto10minutesduringdaylighthours.
Wethenindexedpowerandenergybyarea(m2)andweestimatedmoduletemperatureasmeasuredbackofmoduletemperatureplus3Cper1000W/m2,basedontheindustrystandard.
InfluencedbydelCuetosrecentstudy,wereportedourresultsinaseriesofgraphsplotting%Pmax,Isc,VocandFFagainstPOAirradiance,aswellas%PmaxagainstAOI,%PmaxandFFagainstmoduletemperature,andFFand%Pmaxovertimeintervals(delCueto,2007).Wealsocalculatedlinearandpolynomiallinefitsfor%Pmaxversusirradiance.Finally,usingtheequationbelow,wecalculatedforpowercorrectionbasedontemperaturecoefficientinordertohelpassesstheimpactofmoduletemperatureandtoestimatetheeffectsofAMandotherfactors:
Equation4
% % withtemperaturecoefficient,
delCuetofilteredoutobservationstakenduringhazyskyconditionsconsistingofprimarilydiffuseradiationinordertoanalyzePVperformanceunderclearskyconditionsordirectradiation(delCueto,2007).Ourworkdidnotincludesignificantfilteringortheapplicationofdatacorrectionfactors,buttheseareareasofpotentialfurtherresearch.Instead,wefocusedonreportingpowergenerationandelectricalcharacteristicsundertherealworldconditionsthatthetestmodulesexperienced.PVmodulesundertestappearinTable2below.
Table2:PVModulesundertest
Tech Module Pmax(W)ISC(A)
IMP(A)
VOC(V)
VMP(V)
FillFactor
TempCoeffPwr(%/oC)
Area(m2) Efficiency
cSi STP160S24/Ab1 160 5.0 4.65 43.2 34.4 0.74 0.48 1.2766 12.5%
aSi KanekaGSA060 60 1.19 0.9 92 67 0.55 NA 0.9504 6.3%
CIGS GSEPN33030O 30 2.2 1.7 25 17.5 0.54 0.5 0.3937 7.6%
CIGS SolyndraSL001165 165 2.74 2.37 93.9 69.6 0.64 0.24 1.9656 8.4%
aSi USOPVL68 68 5.1 4.13 23.1 16.5 0.58 0.0021 1.1225 6.1%
R
cVte
PPirir
T
inasttera
ResultsThere
Si,andCIGSVocandFFagemperature,
TheIEmaxwithrespmaxtoirradiarradiance.Tarradiance.
able3:Tren
Alinenallcases(Alinearequattronglinearemperatureangesof%Pm
esultsofourSmodulesreainstPOAir,andFFand
ECproposedpecttotempanceandtheable3(below
ndsinpower
ModuMateri
aSi
CIGS
cSi
earrelationsAppendices5tion,especiarelationshipandairmasmaxreadings
rnumericalaespectively.radiance,%P%Pmaxover
ratingstandperatureandeequationVw)showsthe
rbyPVmate
leial
0.0
shipbetween57a).Apolyallybelow10pbetweenposs)alsoaffecatfullsun(
15
analysesappEachappendPmaxagainsttimeinterva
dardcallsfodirradianceV(POAIrr)=veequations
erial
%
Tren
0.0010Ir
0000004Irr2+
0.000898
npowergenynomialequ000W/m2.Aowerandirrctpowergen1000W/m2)
pearinAppedixconsistsAOI,%Pmaxaals.
rlinearinteaswellasav1xln(POAthatwefou
Pmax
ndline
rr0.0740
+0.0012Irr0.
8Irr0.0138
nerationanduationforCIGAsshowninTradiance,othnerationresu:
endices5throfgraphsplandFFagain
rpolationsopolynomialIrr)+v2toindforfitting
R2
0.98
.0187 0.97
0.99
dirradiancecGSprovidesTable4beloherfactors(ultinginthe
rough7foraotting%Pmanstmodule
ofIsc,Voc,VmpinterpolationterpolateVg%Pmaxto
2
86
74
94
clearlyemerabetterfit
ow,despitet(mostnotabfollowing
aSi,x,Isc,
pandonofVocto
rgesthanthely,
16
Table4:Powerat1000W/m2byPVmaterial
ModuleMaterial
%PmaxatFullSun(+/0.5%)
Mean Low High
aSi 101.1% 90.2% 106.1%
CIGS 78.9% 76.6% 86.0%
cSi 86.2% 79.8% 94.1%
Inaccuratemeasurementdevicesandrapidlychangingconditionsduringtestperiodsalsoimpactresults.
AsindicatedinFigure14below,theaSimoduleclearlydemonstratesasuperiorpowerindextoirradianceperformanceratio.ThiscorrespondstotheequationspresentedinTable3above.
Figure14:PowervsPOAIrradianceforaSi,cSiandCIGSmodules
aSimodulesdeliversuperiorperformanceindexresultsathigherlevelsofirradianceduetoafavorabletemperaturecoefficient.Themanufacturersstate
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
Percen
tageSTC
Pmax
POAIrradiance(W/m2)
aSi
mcSi
cylindricalCIGS
17
temperaturecoefficientsof0.38%/C,0.48%/C,and0.0021%/CfortheirCIGS,cSiandaSimodulesrespectively.
ForaSiandcSi,moduletemperaturestypicallyaverage5060Catfullsun.ForcSi,onecanexpecta5060CmoduletemperaturetoreducePmax12.517.5%[(6025)x0.48%=17.5%]toaPmaxbetween82.587.5%ofSTC.Thisisconsistentwithourresults.
CorrectingfortemperatureonthecSimodule,alinearfitofPmaxcorr=0.00106xPOAIrr0.0582(R2=0.976)yields100.2%Pmaxat1000W/m2.ApolynomialfitofPmaxcorr=0.00000012POAIrr2+0.00118POAIrr0.711yields98.9%Pmaxat1000w/m2.TemperaturecorrectedobservationsandtheircorrespondinglinearandpolynomialfitsappearinFigure15.Thisimpliesthatathighirradianceconditions,whenAMtypicallyrangesbetween1and2,AMdoesnotsignificantlyimpactpowergeneration.However,AMcanexceed10neardawnandduskandhasamuchgreaterinfluenceoverpowerunderthose,butnotalllowirradianceconditions.
Figure15:TemperaturecorrectedPmaxcSi
BecausetheUSOtestbedlackstheabilitytomeasureAMandbecausetheremaybeinaccuraciesinitsmeasurementsofmoduletemperature,ourabilitytomeasureandisolatetemperaturedependenceislimited.However,havingcapturedbothnearbyambientandbackofmoduletemperaturesalongwithpowergeneration,POAirradianceandwindspeed,wewereableobserveperformanceunderavarietyofrealworld
y=0.00106x 0.05823R=0.97634
y=0.00000012x2 +0.00117777x 0.07105246R=0.97727378
20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
%P m
ax
POAIrradiance(W/m2)
Linear(TempCorr) Poly.(TempCorr)
18
conditions.SimilartoMyersfindings,observationsfromourstudy,presentedinAppendix8indicatethatwindspeeddoesnotstronglyimpactpower(Myers,2009).
AlsoasexpectedforaSi,weseeanoscillationinfillfactors(i.e.,efficiency)throughouttheseasonsfromapproximately0.60inmidJulyto0.53inlateDecember(Appendix5c).Intermsofmoduletemperature,FFrangesfrom0.53near0Cto0.60between30and50C(Appendix5h).ThedownwardtrendfromsummertowinteristheresultofanincreasedStaeblerWronskieffectunderlowtemperatureconditionsandthermalannealingduringwarmperiods(Gregg,Blieden,Chang,&Ng,2005).cSiandCIGSmoduleFFs,ontheotherhand,remainsteadierduringthetestperiodat0.70and0.64,respectively(Appendices6and7c).ThemanufacturerslistFFsof0.74,0.64,and0.55forcSi,CIGSandaSi,respectively.
InAppendices5through7b,theupperbandofobservationsupto105AOIrepresentsclearskyconditionswhereasthelowermassofobservationsreflectmeasurementstakenunderovercastconditions.Outliersabovethebandmostlikelyindicatemostlysunnyconditionswithscatteredcloudsenhancingpowerthroughdiffuseirradiancethatenhancesoverallirradiancewithoutobstructingdirectsunlight.Intheseextremecases,totalPOAirradianceexceedsfullsun(POAIRR>1000W/m2).Thisworkdidnotincludeseparatingclearskyobservationsfromcloudyskies,butdelCuetomeasuredaspecificPVmodulesperformanceunderclearskyconditionswithPOAIrradiance=A+Bxcos(AOI)andfound:
A B 1standarddeviation
87.47.8W/m2 1142.520.9W/m2 93.711.2W/m2
HedidthisbyfittingitsphotoresponseasafunctionofAOIintosegments(
19
Table5:UnitedSolarOvonicsTestbedPVPower(W)ObservationsfittingIEC618531parameters
aSI cSi CIGS
HTC*
%Pmax 0.999 0.821 0.709
Avg 60 131.3 117
Min 55.8 124.8 102.1
Max 63.9 139.2 130.8
Obs 17 47 30
STC
%Pmax 0.968 0.921 0.643
Avg 58.1 147.4 106.0
Min 53.1 138.7 86.3
Max 63.2 160.9 127.2
Obs 5 4 91
NOCT
%Pmax 0.766 0.72 0.632
Avg 46.0 115.1 104.3
Min 39.3 104.8 97.1
Max 52.6 132.6 125.7
Obs 95 82 63
LTC
%Pmax 0.408 0.507 0.455
Avg 24.5 71.6 75.0
Min 20.5 63.7 62.4
Max 30.4 81.2 105.7
Obs 24 20 122
LIC
%Pmax 0.185 0.157 0.195
Avg 11.1 25.2 32.2
Min 5.3 14.3 20.7
Max 15.8 35.2 50.2
Obs 191 195 360
*Thecool,humidconditionattheAuburnHills,MichigantestsitedidnotyieldHighTemperatureConditions,sotheseHTCobservationsincluderesultsformoduletemperaturesaslowas60C,ratherthantheIECproposedstandardof75C.
20
ConclusionTheoutdoorPVmoduletestingsystemdevelopedbyUnitedSolarOvonic
dramaticallyincreasedtheorganizationscapabilitiestotesttheperformanceofitscompetitorsanditsownPVmodulesincludingprototypes.USOalsoreliesonSpiresimulators,acceleratedtestingandothermeansoftestingPVinordertobetterunderstandandultimatelyfacilitatetheadvancementofPVtechnology.
TheUSOtestbediseffectiveattestingPVmoduleswithIsc
21
ResearchersanalyzetheconstituentparametersofPVpower,butdevelopersandconsumersunderstandablyonlycareaboutpowergeneration.Themodulesinthisstudyproducedbetween0.76and0.95WperkWhofPOAirradianceperSTCWPmax.TheseresultsappearinAppendix9.
Themodulesundertestproducedbetween51.5and105.1dcWperkWhofPOAirradianceperm2.GiventhatPVmodulesaresoldona$/Wpbasis,efficiencybecomesasecondaryfactorwhenselectingamodule.However,efficiencyquicklycomesbackintoplayassystemdevelopersandbuyersconsiderspaceconstraints(i.e.,roofrent)andbalanceofsystemcosts.1000squaremetersofarraywillrequireapproximatelythesameamountofracking,wire,overcurrentprotection,laborcosts,etc.regardlessofthetechnologyandefficiencyofthemodules.Inthiscase,asystemwithahigherefficiencymodulewillgeneratemoreenergyinthesameamountofspaceasalessefficientpanelandthoughthemoduleswouldhavecostmorebasedontheirSTCratings,modulecostrepresentsonlyafractionoftheoverallsystemcost.ThebalanceofsystemsarelikelytocostapproximatelythesameamountregardlessofthePVmodulematerial.ForthesereasonsPVmoduleefficiencyremainsanimportantfactorforconsideration.
22
Glossary Efficiencywithrespecttoreferenceconditions
Wavelength
A Testmodulearea
aSi AmorphousSilicon
AM AirMass
AOI AngleofIncidence
cSi CrystallineSilicon
CIGS CopperIndiumGaliumSelenide
Energyyield Whrs/Wp
Eref() Referencespectralirradiance
Es() Measuredspectralirradianceofthelightsource
Et Totalirradiance
FF Fillfactor
Imp CurrentatPmax
Isc Testmoduleshortcircuitcurrent
IEC InternationalElectrotechnicalCommission
Inverterramptimes
ACpowerlossesthatoccurduringsuddenfluctuationsinirradiance
Inverterclipping ACpowerlossesthatoccurwhenarraypowerexceedsinvertercapability
IRR Calibratedcurrentofthereferencecellunderthereferenceconditions
ITM Measuredtestcellcurrent
ITR Calibratedcurrentofthetestcellunderthereferenceconditions
IV Currentversusvoltage
K Spectralcorrectionfactor,inverseofM
M Spectralmismatchparameter
Pmax Testmodulemaximumpowerunderreferenceconditions
POA PlaneofArray
St() Measuredspectralresponsivityofthetestmodule
23
Sr() Measuredspectralresponsivityofthereferencemodule
STC StandardTestConditions(1000W/m2,25Cmodtemp,1.5AM)
Vmp TestmodulevoltageatPmax
Voc Testmoduleopencircuitvoltage
24
References
DevicePerformance.(2006,June).MeasurementandCharacterizationNationalCenterforPhotovoltaics.Golden,CO:NationalRenewableEnergyLaboratory.
EnphaseEnergy.(2011).RetrievedJuly15,2011,fromhttp://enphase.com/products/enlighten/
FroniusUSALLC.(2011).RetrievedJuly15,2011,fromhttp://www.fronius.com/cps/rde/xchg/SID523BEC851CC3FCC9/fronius_usa/hs.xsl/2714_1458.htm
KeithleyInstruments.(2011).RetrievedJuly15,2011,fromhttp://www.keithley.com/rpCMSimg/50675.
delCueto,J.A.(2007).PVModuleEnergyRatingsPartII:FeasibilityofUsingthePERTinDerivingPhotovoltaicModuleEnergyRatings.Golden,CO:NationalRenewableEnergyLaboratory.
Dierauf,T.(2011,May20).SunPowerEnergyManagementServicesASESSolar2011.Raleigh,NC.
Emery,K.(2009).UncertaintyAnalysisofCertifiedPhotovoltaicMeasurementsattheNationalRenewableEnergyLaboratory.Golden,CO:NationalRenewableEnergyLaboratory.
Emery,K.A.,Osterwald,C.R.,Cannon,T.W.,Myers,D.R.,Burdick,J.,Glatfelter,T.,etal.(1985).MethodsforMeasuringSolarCellEfficiencyIndependentofReferenceCellorLightSource.18thPhotovoltiacSolarConference(pp.623628).LasVegas,NV:InstituteforElectricalandElectronicEngineers.
Emery,K.,Anderberg,A.,Kiehl,J.,Mack,C.,Moriarty,T.,Rummel,S.,etal.(2005).TrustButVerify:ProcedurestoAchieveAccurateEfficiencyMeasurementsforAllPhotovoltaicTechnologies.31stIEEEPhotovoltaicSpecialistsConferenceandExhibition(pp.15).LakeBuenaVista,FL:InstituteofElectricalandElectronicEngineers.
Emery,K.,DelCueto,J.,&Zaaiman,W.(2003).SpectralCorrectionsBasedonOpticalAirMass.PhotovoltaicSpecialistsConference,2002.ConferenceRecordoftheTwentyNinthIEEE(pp.17251728).NewOrleans,LA:IEEE.
Gay,C.F.,Rumberg,J.E.,&Wilson,J.H.(1982).AMPM:alldaymoduleperformancemeasurements.Proceedings16thIEEEPhotovoltiacSpecialist'Conference(pp.10411046).SanDiego,CA:IEEE.
Gregg,A.,Blieden,R.,Chang,A.,&Ng,H.(2005).PerformanceAnalysisofLargeScale,AmorphousSiliconPhotovoltaicPowerSystems.31stPhotovoltaicSpecialistConferenceandExhibition.LakeBuenaVista,FL:InstituteofElectricalandElectronicsEngineers.
25
Gregg,A.,Parker,T.,&Swenson,R.(2005).A"RealWorld"ExaminationofPVSystemsDesignandPerformance.31stPhotovoltaicSpecialistConferenceandExhibition.LakeBuenaVista,FL:InstituteofElectricalandElectronicsEngineers.
Jansen,K.W.,Kadam,S.B.,&Groelinger,J.F.(2006).TheHighEnergyofAmorphousSiliconModulesinaHotCoastalClimate.21stEuropeanPhotovoltaicSolarEnergyConference,(pp.25352538).Dresden(Germany).
Kenny,R.P.,Dunlop,E.D.,Ossenbrink,H.A.,&Mullejans,H.(2006,December19).APracticalMethodfortheEnergyRatingofcSiPhotovoltaicModulesBasedonStandardTests.ProgressinPhotovoltaics:ResearchandApplications,14:155166.
Kenny,R.P.,Ioannides,A.,Mullejans,H.,&Dunlop,E.D.(2004).Spectraleffectsontheenergyratingofthinfilmmodules.Proceedingsofthe19thEUPVSEC,(pp.24512454).Paris,France.
Kimber,A.(2011,May20).PVSystemCapacityTesting:Methods,ConstraintsandApplications.Raleigh,NC.
King,D.L.,Kratochvil,J.A.,&Boyson,W.E.(1997).MeasuringSolarSpectralandAngleofIncidenceEffectsonPhotovoltaicModulesandSolarIrradianceSensors.26thIEEEPhotovoltaicsSpecialistsConference(pp.16).Anaheim,CA:SandiaNationalLaboratories.
Marion,B.(2000).ValidationofaPhotovoltaicModuleEnergyRatingsProcedureatNREL.NCPVProgramReviewMeeting(pp.8586).Denver,CO:NREL.
Marion,B.,Kroposki,B.,Emery,K.,delCueto,J.,Myers,D.,&Osterwald,C.(1999).ValidationofaPhotovoltaicModuleEnergyRatingsProcedureatNREL.Golden,CO:NationalRenewableEnergyLaboratory.
Myers,D.(2009).EvaluationofthePerformanceofthePVUSARatingMethodolgyAppliedtoDualJunctionPVTechnology.AmericanSolarEnergySocietyAnnualConference(pp.111).Buffalo,NY:NationalRenewableEnergyLaboratory.
Poissant,Y.,Pelland,S.,&Turcotte,D.(2008).ACOMPARISONOFENERGYRATINGMETHODOLOGIESUSINGFIELDTESTMEASUREMENTS.23rdEuropeanPVSolarEnergyConferenceandExhibition(pp.16).Valencia,Spain:CANMETEnergyTechnologyCenter.
Previtali,J.(2011,May20).AnIndependentEngineer'sviewsonPVPerformanceTesting.Raleigh,NC.
Reda,I.,&Andreas,A.(2008).SolarPositionAlgorithmforSolarRadiationApplications.Golden,CO:NationalRenewableEnergyLaboratory.
26
Riordan,C.,&Hulstron,R.(1990).WhatisanAirMass1.5Spectrum?ConferenceRecordoftheTwentyFirstIEEE(pp.10851088).Kissimmee,FL:PhotovoltaicSpecialistsConference.
vanCleef,M.,Lippens,P.,&Call,J.(2001).SuperiorEnergyYieldsofUNISOLARTripleJunctionThinFilmSiliconSolarCellscomparedtoCrystallineSiliconSolarCellsunderRealOutdoorConditionsinWesternEurope.17thEuropeanPhotovoltaicSolarEnergyConferenceandExhibition.Munich(Germany).
27
AppendicesAppendix1:MeasurementDeviceDataSheets...............................................................28Appendix2:Comparisonofpyranometerreadings.........................................................32Appendix3:SystemDesign...............................................................................................33Appendix4:ModuleDataSheets.....................................................................................36Appendix5:aSimoduleResults......................................................................................42Appendix6:cSimoduleResults.......................................................................................47
GraphAxis
x ya POAIrrW/m2 %Pmaxb AOI %Pmaxc Date FillFactord POAIrrW/m2 FillFactore POAIrrW/m3 ISCf POAIrrW/m4 VOCg ModuleTempoC %Pmaxh ModuleTempoC FillFactori Date %Pmax
Appendix7:CIGSmoduleResults.....................................................................................52
GraphAxis
x ya POAIrrW/m2 %Pmaxb AOI %Pmaxc Date FillFactord POAIrrW/m2 FillFactore POAIrrW/m3 ISCf POAIrrW/m4 VOCg AmbientTempoC %Pmaxh AmbientTempoC FillFactori Date %Pmax
Appendix8:PowerversuswindspeedcSimodule.........................................................57Appendix9:Conclusions...................................................................................................58
Appendix
x1:Measur
K
rementDevi
ippandZon
2
iceDataShe
nenSPLite2P
28
eets
PhotodiodePyranometter
Kipp
SpecificISOClasResponsZerooff(a)therm(b)tempNonstaNonlineDirectiobeam)TemperTilterroSensitivImpedaLevelacOperatiSpectraTypicalsMaximuExpecteRecomm
andZonen
cationsssificationsetime(95%fsetsmalradiatioperaturechability(changearity(0to1onalerror(up
raturedepenor(at1000Witynceccuracyngtemperatlrange(50%signaloutpuumirradianceddailyuncemendedapp
CMP21Sec
%)
n(200W/m2ange(5K/hrge/year)1000W/m2)pto80owit
ndenceofseW/m2)
ture%points)utforatmospceertaintylications
29
condaryStan
2)r)
)th1000W/m
ensitivity
phericapplic
ndardTherm
CMSe
KeithleeyInstrume
3
ntsModel#
30
#2700DataAAcquisitionSSystem
31
KI2430SourceMeterSpecifications:
VoltsRanges 0.2,2,20,100VBasicVSourceAccuracy 0.02%BasicVMeasureAccuracy 0.015%
1,10,100A1,10,100mA1,3,10A
BasicISourceAccuracy 0.045%BasicIMeasureAccuracy 0.035%
2,20,2002,20,200k2,20,200M
BasicOhmsMeasureAccuracy 0.06%110WDC
1000WPulse
IRanges
OhmsRanges
MaximumPower
32
Appendix2:Comparisonofpyranometerreadings
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400
CMP2
1/SPLite2Irrad
iance
CMP21Irradiance(W/m)
CMP21POAIrr=1.0346xSPLite2POAIrr
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600Irrad
iancefrom
CMP2
1Pyrano
meterat
25deg
tilt(W
/m)
IrradiancefromSPLite2Pyranometerat25degTilt(W/m)
33
Appendix3:SystemDesign
SystemComponentsKeithleyInstruments(KI)SourceMeter#2430KISwitchingMainframe#7002FourKISwitchingModules#70534Achannels(x2=8A)100mH/LchannelballastresistorsKIDMMDataAcquisitionSystem#2700/7700Kipp&ZonenCMP21thermopilepyranometerThreeKipp&ZonenPyranometersSPLite2(flat,15,and27)MaximumAnemometer#41Type(K)Thermocouples(eachmoduleandtwoambient)PCwithGPIBinterfaceVBA.netFixedloadresistors(MinimumPowerRating=Vmp/ImpX1.25)Blockballastednonpenetratingracks
3
System
34
Diagram
Ro
35
ooftopSchematic
Appendixx4:ModuleeDataShee
3
ts
36
37
338
39
440
41
42
Appendix5:aSimoduleResults
y=0.001x 0.0074R=0.9859
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
P max
POAIrradianceW/m2
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
P max
AngleofIncidence
5(a)
5(b)
43
aSimodulefillfactorovertimeandPOAIrradiance
Notethedropinefficiency(fillfactor)duringcoldermonths(above).
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
7/1/2010 8/1/2010 9/1/2010 10/2/2010 11/2/2010 12/3/2010
FillFactor
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400
FillFactor
POAIrradianceW/m2
5(c)
5(d)
44
aSimoduleelectricalcharacteristicscurrent(I)andvoltage(V)versusPOAIrradiance
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Isc
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Voc
POAIrradianceW/m2
5(e)
5(f)
45
aSimodulePowerandEfficiencyversusModuleTemperature
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
P max
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
FillFactor
ModuleTemperatureOC
5(h)
5(g)
46
aSimoduleEnergyyieldsforthreeconcurrentdaysinJuly,SeptandDec2010
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
7/3/2010 7/4/2010 7/5/2010 7/6/2010
Pmax
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
9/21/2010 9/22/2010 9/23/2010 9/24/2010
Pmax
0%
20%
40%
60%
12/24/2010 12/25/2010 12/26/2010 12/27/2010
Pmax
5(i)
47
Appendix6:cSimoduleResults
y=0.000898x 0.013802
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
P max
POAIrradianceW/m2
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
P max
AngleofIncidence
6(a)
6(b)
48
cSImodulefillfactor
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
7/1/2010 8/1/2010 9/1/2010 10/2/2010 11/2/2010 12/3/2010
FillFactor
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400
FillFactor
POAIrradianceW/m2
6(c)
6(d)
49
cSimoduleelectricalcharacteristicscurrent(I)andvoltage(V)versusPOAIrradiance
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Isc
10
20
30
40
50
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Voc
POAIrradianceW/m2
6(e)
6(f)
50
cSimodulePowerandEfficiencyversusModuleTemperature
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
P max
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
FillFactor
ModuleTemperatureOC
6(g)
6(h)
51
cSimoduleEnergyyieldsfromthreeconcurrentdaysinJuly,SeptandDec2010
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
7/3/2010 7/4/2010 7/5/2010 7/6/2010
P max
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
9/21/2010 9/22/2010 9/23/2010 9/24/2010
P max
0%
20%
40%
60%
12/24/2010 12/25/2010 12/26/2010 12/27/2010
P max
6(i)
52
Appendix7:CIGSmoduleResults
y=4E07x2 +0.0012x 0.0187R=0.9744
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
P max
POAIrradianceW/m2
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
P max
AngleofIncidence
7(a)
7(b)
53
CIGSmodulefillfactorovertimeandintensityoflight(POAIrr)
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
7/1/2010 8/1/2010 9/1/2010 10/2/2010 11/2/2010 12/3/2010
FillFactor
0.25
0.35
0.45
0.55
0.65
0.75
0.85
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
FillFactor
POAIrradianceW/m2
7(c)
7(d)
54
CIGSmoduleelectricalcharacteristicscurrent(I)andvoltage(V)versusPOAIrradiance
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Isc
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Voc
POAIrradianceW/m2
7(e)
7(f)
55
CIGSmodulePowerandEfficiencyversusAmbientTemperature
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
10 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
P max
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
10 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
FillFactor
AmbientTemperatureOC
7(g)7(g)
7(h)
56
CIGSmoduleEnergyyieldsfromthreeconcurrentdaysinJuly,SeptandDec2010
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
7/3/2010 7/4/2010 7/5/2010 7/6/2010
P max
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
9/21/2010 9/22/2010 9/23/2010 9/24/2010
P max
0%
20%
40%
60%
12/24/2010 12/25/2010 12/26/2010 12/27/2010
P max
7(i)
57
Appendix8:PowerversuswindspeedcSimodule
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
0 5 10 15
P max
Windspeed(m/sec)
AppendixPe
rcen
tageSTC
Pmax
DCPow
erGen
erated
(W
/m2 )
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
m2 /kW
Whr
x9:Conclus
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0
(W/m
)
0
2
4
6
0.8390.879
r/(IrrkWh
sions
200
aSi
200
90.757
0.951
hr/m2)/ST
5
400
mcSi
400 6
POAIrrad
TCPmax
cSi
CIGS@P
CIGS@T
aSi(1x)
58
600 80
cylindric
600 800
diance(W/
POAIrr
TiltIrr
)
2
00 1000
calCIGS
0 1000
/m2)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120 105
m2
Whr/(Ir
0 1200
1200
.1
73.863.6
rrkWhr/m
60.1
m2)