measuring innovation and smart specialisation – what have we learned? dirk pilat, oecd

18
Measuring Innovation and Smart Specialisation – What have we Learned? Dirk Pilat, OECD

Upload: sibyl-caldwell

Post on 26-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Measuring Innovation and Smart Specialisation – What have we Learned?

Dirk Pilat, OECD

Outline

• What drives innovation performance?o Investment in education and knowledgeo Interactions and knowledge flowso Innovation dynamics

• Looking at outcomes and impacts• Linking innovation to policy• Innovation and smart specialisation• Gaps and a measurement agenda

Large disparities in education across regions …

56 54 53 5149 47 47 46

44 43 42 42 42 41 40 39 38 38 38 37 37 35 34 34 3430 29 29

2622

53

38

29

3537

32

40 38

34

41

3431 32

34 34

20 20

38

2828 29

32

25

18

2927

20 20 19 18

0

10

20

30

40

50

60Je

rusa

lem

Dis

tric

t (I

SR

)

Gre

ate

r Lo

nd

on

(G

BR

)

Dis

tric

t o

f C

olu

mb

ia (

USA

)

Basq

ue C

ou

ntr

y (

ES

P)

Oslo

an

d A

ke

rsh

us

(NO

R)

Au

str

ali

an

Ca

pit

al T

err

ito

ry (

AU

S)

Bru

sse

ls C

ap

ita

l R

egio

n (

BE

L)

He

lsin

ki-

Uu

sim

aa (

FIN

)

Ile

de

Fra

nce

(FR

A)

So

uth

ern

an

d E

ast

ern

(IR

L)

Sto

ckh

olm

(S

WE

)

Ma

ga

lla

ne

s y

An

tárti

ca

(C

HL)

Ca

pit

al

(DN

K)

Zu

rich

(C

HE

)

Ca

pit

al

Re

gio

n (

KO

R)

Pra

gu

e (

CZE

)

Bra

tisla

va

Re

gio

n (

SV

K)

No

rth

Isla

nd

(N

ZL)

Be

rlin

(D

EU

)

Ma

zovia

(P

OL)

Ath

en

s (

GR

C)

We

ste

rn N

eth

erl

an

ds (

NLD

)

Ce

ntr

al H

un

ga

ry (

HU

N)

An

ka

ra (

TU

R)

We

ste

rn S

love

nia

(SV

N)

On

tari

o (

CA

N)

Fe

de

ral

Dis

tric

t (M

EX

)

Vie

nn

a (

AU

T)

Lis

bo

n (

PR

T)

La

zio

(IT

A)

Regional value Country value

%

Top TL2 region within each country with the highest percentage of labour force with tertiary educational attainment compared to their country average, 2012

Source: OECD (2013), Regions at a Glance, http://rag.oecd.org/

.. and also in business investment in R&D

Zu

ric

h

Wy

om

ing

Ga

ng

wo

n R

eg

ion

So

uth

ern

De

nm

ark

Bra

nd

en

bu

rg

Co

rsic

a

Gre

ate

r L

on

do

n

Åla

nd

Ce

ntr

al N

orrla

nd

Sa

lzb

urg

No

rth

ern

No

rw

ay

Me

lill

a

Sa

rd

inia

No

rth

ern

Ne

the

rla

nd

s

Prin

ce

Ed

wa

rd

Isla

nd

Au

str

ali

an

C.T

.

Ma

de

ira

Re

g

-Bru

xe

lle

s

No

rth

we

st

So

uth

ern

Tra

nsd

an

ub

ia

Op

ole

re

gio

n

Ay

n

Ae

ge

an

Isla

nd

s a

nd

Cre

te

Ce

ntr

al S

lov

ak

ia

So

uth

ern

an

d E

aste

rnN

orth

we

ste

rn

Sw

itze

rla

nd

Wa

sh

ing

ton

Ca

pit

al

Re

gio

n (

KR

)

Ca

pit

al

(DK

)

Ba

de

n-W

ürtt

em

be

rg

Mid

i-P

yré

es

Ea

st

of

En

gla

nd

We

ste

rn

Fin

lan

d

So

uth

Sw

ed

en

Sty

ria

Trø

nd

ela

g

Ba

sq

ue

Co

un

try

Pie

dm

on

t

So

uth

ern

Ne

the

rla

nd

s

Qu

eb

ec

We

ste

rn

Au

str

ali

a

Lis

bo

n

Wa

llo

nia

So

uth

ea

st

Ce

ntr

al H

un

ga

ry

Po

dk

arp

acia

Lo

s L

ag

os

Ath

en

s

Bra

tisla

va

Re

gio

n

Bo

rd

er,

Mid

lan

d a

nd

We

ste

rn

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

Sw

itze

rla

nd

Un

ite

d S

ta

te

s

Ko

re

a

De

nm

ark

Ge

rm

an

y

Fra

nce

Un

ite

d K

ing

do

m

Fin

lan

d

Sw

ed

en

Au

str

ia

No

rw

ay

Sp

ain

Ita

ly

Ne

th

erla

nd

s

Ca

na

da

Au

str

ali

a

Po

rtu

ga

l

Be

lgiu

m

Cze

ch

Re

pu

bli

c

Hu

ng

ary

Po

lan

d

Ch

ile

Gre

ece

Slo

va

k R

ep

ub

lic

Ire

lan

d

National value Minimum Maximum

%

Source: OECD (2013), Regions at a Glance, http://rag.oecd.org/

Range of TL2 regional business R&D intensity, 2010

But education is not the same as skills …

Share of young and old adults at the two highest proficiency levels in “problem solving in technology-rich environments”

Source: OECD Survey of Adult Skills, October 2013.

… and R&D is only one element of investment in innovation

Business investment in knowledge-based assets(as % of business sector value added, 2010)

Source: OECD calculations based on INTAN-Invest, Eurostat and multiple national sources.

An innovative economy is also about creative destruction …

7

Role of different firms in employment growth, average over 18 countries, 2001-2011, in %

Source: Criscuolo, Gal and Menon (2014), www.oecd.org/sti/dynemp.htm

… and about collaboration

8

Firms collaborating on innovation activities, by size, 2008-10(as a % of product and/or process innovative firms in each size category)

Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932891321

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

%Large firms SMEs

We have some indicators on innovation outcomes …

Southern-Kanto (JPN) California (USA)

Capital Region (KOR)

Guangdong (CHN)

Kinki (JPN)

Bayern (DEU)

New York(USA)

Texas(USA)

Baden-Württemberg

(DEU)

Washington (USA)

île de France (FRA)

Northern-Kanto, Koshin (JPN)

Toukai (JPN)

Beijing (CHN)

Zuid-Nederland (NLD)

Ontario (CAN)New Jersey (USA)

Illinois (USA)

Stockholm (SWE)

Pennsylvania (USA)

West-Nederland (NLD)

North Carolina (USA)

Nordrhein-Westfalen (DEU)

Florida (USA)

Hovedstaden (DNK)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0

Total patents, 2008-10 Total patents, 1998-2000

Massachusetts (USA)

Biotechnology and nanotechnology patents (normalised region's share)

Maryland (USA)(0.9-3.5)

ICT-related patents (normalised region's share)

Total patents by region

1 000 patents

5 000 patents

50 000 patents

Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932890238

Innovation hotspots in ICT, biotechnology and nanotechnology, 1998-2000 and 2008-10

… but lack a good link to impacts

• Ultimately, innovation is about increasing productivity (and thus economic growth), about new job creation, improved health outcomes, greener growth, etc.

• But the links between investment in innovation and these impacts are complex, often not linear and can take a long time to emerge.

• Some progress is being made:o R&D is now considered an investment in the national accounts, and therefore part

of GDP, enabling a stronger link to economic growth.o A lot of work is going on in countries to better understand impacts of science and

innovation.

Indicators of innovation policy are lacking, with some exceptions …

Implied tax subsidy on R&D expenditures, 2013

Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932891150

… and we need a stronger focus on policy evaluation

• Need an explicit commitment – at a high level - to the importance of evaluation.

• Insist on the development of data and evaluation strategies before programmes begin.

• Choose a evaluation technique appropriate to the programme concerned.

• Insist on full disclosure in evaluation reports.

• Robust governance to ensure evaluation is objective and free of political influence.

• Good mechanisms for policy learning.

Smart specialisation – what is it?

• Focus on a limited number of priority areas for knowledge-based investments, linked to a region's strengths and comparative advantages on the basis of:o More effective spending of public resources.o The creation of synergies between public support mechanisms for R&D and

innovation, industrial promotion and training institutions.o The elimination of fragmentation and duplication of policy interventions.o The identification of the most promising domains for entrepreneurship and growth

through a careful analysis of existing capabilities, assets and competences.o Mechanisms to enable strategic development.o Mapping and benchmarking of clusters.o Evidence-based monitoring and evaluation systems.

Smart specialisation – what is required (1)?

• Need for government interventions on a solid market basis – which implies robust framework conditions, that allow market driven allocation of innovation, capital and labour: only competitive and open markets are amenable to innovation.

• Government needs to listen to market signals when allocating its own budgets for innovation - entrepreneurial discovery – interventions should meet the market test.

• Avoid capture by vested interest – which implies transparency, accountability and evaluation of policies.

• Stand ready to terminate projects that don’t pass the evaluation test.

Smart specialisation – what is required (2)?

• Strong leadership and stakeholders‘ involvement.

• Ensuring mechanisms or structures for new ‘entrepreneurial bottom-up initiatives’ to emerge and to help mobilise the relevant stakeholders.

• Existing quantitative data can provide an overall picture of the situation, but it is limited to past and present specialisation.

• To capture the ‘entrepreneurial knowledge’ embedded in the region (e.g. to identify emerging activities, synergies and complementarities) may require new diagnostic tools.

Finally: A measurement (and analysis) agenda to support policies for innovation

• From education to skills – where are the gaps?

• From R&D to the full range of investments in innovation

• Better understanding the dynamics of an innovative economy – understanding the enormous heterogeneity in an economy, across regions, across firms, across …

• Better indicators of outcomes and impacts – and the link to investment

• Linking policy to performance – better policy indicators, more evaluation

• Complementing quantitative tools with qualitative analysis

For further reading – with all data available on-line

www.oecd.org/sti/scoreboardwww.oecd.org/regional/regions-at-a-glance.htm

18

Follow us on Twitter: @OECDinnovation

Website: www.oecd.org/sti

Newsletter: www.oecd.org/sti/news.htm

Contact: [email protected]

Read more about our work

Thank you!