measuring environmental performance using sgp metrics

26
Measuring Environmental Performance using SGP Metrics by Barry Wenskowicz Pollution Prevention Engineer Narragansett Bay Commission

Upload: gauri

Post on 12-Jan-2016

20 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Measuring Environmental Performance using SGP Metrics. by Barry Wenskowicz Pollution Prevention Engineer Narragansett Bay Commission. Targets of the NSGP. 50% Water Reduction 50% Reduction in Metals Emissions 50% Reduction in F006 Generation 90% Reduction in Organics Usage - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Measuring Environmental Performance

using SGP Metrics

by Barry Wenskowicz

Pollution Prevention Engineer

Narragansett Bay Commission

Page 2: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Targets of the NSGP

• 50% Water Reduction

• 50% Reduction in Metals Emissions

• 50% Reduction in F006 Generation

• 90% Reduction in Organics Usage

• 25% Energy Reduction

• 98% Metals Utilization

• Reduction in Human Exposure

Page 3: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

P2 Assistance & Outreach

• Partnered with local trade organizations to get 20 out of 100 metal finishers to join

• Conducted P2 workshops• Mailed 100 P2 Videos• Positive recognition through Pollution

Prevention Merit Awards • Helped gather data and submit annual

worksheets• Conducted P2 assessments

Page 4: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics
Page 5: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics
Page 6: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics
Page 7: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics
Page 8: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics
Page 9: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Facility 1064 Water Conservation

Page 10: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Facility 1064

Wastewater

1.000.91

0.78

1.050.93

0.62

0.000.200.400.600.801.001.201.401.601.80

1992 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Rel

ease

$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000

$100,000

Co

st

Page 11: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Facility 1294

Facility 1253Water Conservation

Page 12: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Facility 1253

Metals

1.00

0.59 0.56

0.81

0.58

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

1996 1998 1999 2000 2002

Rel

ease

Page 13: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Facility 1294

Wastewater

1.00 1.010.89 0.88

0.78

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

1993 1999 2000 2001 2002

Rel

ease

$0

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

Co

st

Page 14: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Facility 1403 Water Conservation &

F006 Minimization

Page 15: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Facility 1403

Wastewater

1.00

0.670.53 0.60

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

1.25

1.50

1993 2000 2001 2002

Rel

ease

$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000

Co

st

Page 16: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Facility 1092 Water Conservation & Dragout Recovery

Page 17: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Facility 1092

Metals

1.001.47 1.37 1.52 1.68

1.15 1.20

0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50

1992 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Rel

ease

d

Page 18: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Performance Relative to Best In Class

Wat

er

Met

als

F00

6

VO

Cs

Ele

c

Ave

rag

e S

core

Pro

gre

ss

1403 0.54 0.29 1.00 1.43 1.57 0.96 69%1253 2.38 2.70 0.13 0.05 1.07 1.27 67%1401 2.47 6.27 0.08 0.00 1.31 2.03 75%1281 2.45 7.45 0.00 0.00 1.14 2.21 100%1066 2.80 7.33 1.80 0.00 0.50 2.49 65%1294 3.10 6.83 0.26 5.58 0.45 3.24 34%1092 3.81 5.45 0.98 5.55 2.06 3.57 14%

1321 10.52 15.68 1.32 0.00 1.54 5.81 29%1398 13.13 8.99 0.00 7.25 0.94 6.06 60%1169 12.66 19.79 0.00 1.20 0.97 6.92 60%1355 3.53 3.95 25.52 0.00 2.00 7.00 56%1157 5.75 30.03 5.42 0.00 2.00 8.64 55%1156 6.17 44.86 2.54 0.00 1.20 10.96 96%1064 70.84 25.87 0.00 2.05 2.75 20.30 55%

1149 na na na na na na 63%1282 na na na na na na 51%1292 na na na na na na 34%1316 na na na na na na 93%1375 na na na na na na 66%1402 na na na na na na na

Facility ID Number

Page 19: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Environmental Performance and SGP Progress

0%

66

%

93

%

34

%

51

%

63

%

55

%

96

%

55

%

56

%

60

%

60

%

29

%

14

%

34

%

65

%

10

0%

75

%

67

%

69

%

0

5

10

Facility ID

Perfo

rm

an

ce relative to

b

est in

class

Pro

gress T

ow

ard

s G

oal A

ttain

men

t

Page 20: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Facility 1253 Progress

SGP Company ID: 1253 (Captive) Normalized Data Relative to BY

Year Production Water (gal) CostMetals (lbs) F006 Cost

Energy (kWh) Cost

VOCs (lbs) Water Metals F006 Energy VOCs

1996 17,396 1,757,169 $59,622 16.5 294 $189 1,212,004 $48,962 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001998 11,520 1,104,122 $36,548 6.5 245 $154 954,118 $37,603 11 0.95 0.59 1.26 1.19 0.761999 14,092 1,146,761 $37,009 7.5 294 $180 962,660 $36,989 9 0.81 0.56 1.23 0.98 0.512000 12,524 1,016,835 $33,738 9.6 294 $185 967,725 $38,229 7 0.80 0.81 1.39 1.11 0.442002 12,586 787,373 $25,676 6.9 294 $182 887,637 $34,463 8 0.62 0.58 1.38 1.01 0.50

2002 Change 483,938 5 -81 -10,753 8

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

1996 1998 1999 2000 2002

Page 21: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Reduced Annual Release / Unit of Product

Was

tew

ater

(g

al)

Met

als

(lb

)

F00

6 (d

ry lb

)

VO

Cs

(lb

)

En

erg

y (k

Wh

)

1403 648,713 26 0 -1,171 394,2881253 483,938 5 -81 8 -10,7531401 6,214,492 2 382 0 -241,5071281 1,417,343 92 0 0 580,7101066 -355,007 4 1,688 0 -36,6331294 1,309,810 76 355 -766 798,7531092 -6,957,410 -13 -4,333 -7,842 -2,346,384

1321 -684,349 -237 -844 0 -439,4191398 122,057 3 0 13,681 1,077,2321169 4,855,449 246 0 -971 -988,4201355 320,593 39 -9,293 20,648 -214,0391157 160,537 10 -11,842 90,5911156 2,741,658 263 17,116 -133,1721064 660,792 0 0 10,155 -2,109,219

1149 1,575,245 4 20,266 4,391 2,801,0421282 1,204,841 36 740 0 288,4861292 3,454,650 116 1,112 46 587,6811316 1,648,684 6 449 595,339 4131375 4,036,114 36 37,802 -2,913 421,6921402 112,736 1 0 0

Total 22,970,886 715 53,517 630,605 521,342

Facility ID Number

Page 22: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Reduced Environmental Releases

Collective Change in Annual Releases compared to Base Year

Release or GoalNSGP Target

RISGP Change

Annual Savings

Wastewater 50% 22.46% 22,970,886 gallons $347,825Metals 50% 35.03% 715 pounds $37,425F006 50% 33.99% 53,517 pounds $66,591VOCs 90% 58.87% 630,605 pounds $50,342Energy 25% 8.78% 521,342 kWh $20,772(Metals Utilization) 98% 79.09% na na na(Health & Safety) na 63.89% na na naTotal $522,954

Reduced Annual Release

Page 23: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Savings by Tier2002 RISGP Savings

32%

68%

Tier I

Tier II

Page 24: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Barry WenskowiczNarragansett Bay Commission

(401) 461-8848 [email protected]

Page 25: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Basis for Cost Saving Estimates

Water Supply $2.44Sewer Discharge $1.58Sewer Permit Fee $2.39Fixed Fee $0.35

Chemical WWTS $8.39

Labor $12.72Maintenance $2.03Testing $1.27

Total $31.16Non-Fixed Costs $15.14

Wastewater Treatment Costs ($/1000 gallons):

Page 26: Measuring Environmental Performance  using SGP Metrics

Alternate Units

Electricity $0.0840 ($/kWh) 0.0840 ($/kWh)Natural Gas $0.6184 ($/HCF) 0.0204 ($/kWh)Fuel Oil $0.8888 ($/gallon) 0.0217 ($/kWh)

Average (when 30% of total energy use is electric) $0.040

Energy Cost

F006 Sludge Disposal Cost 375 $/T-PackAverage T-Pack Weight 1,527 poundsCost per pound $0.2456

Basis for Cost Saving Estimates

Dragout loss ($/gallon) $2.11Replace solvent degreasing ($/lb) $0.08