measuring differences in the quality of professional development

18
Measuring Differences in Measuring Differences in the Quality of the Quality of Professional Development Professional Development Michael S. Garet Kwang Suk Yoon American Institutes for Research Andrew C. Porter Vanderbilt University Symposium - Evaluating the Quality of Professional Symposium - Evaluating the Quality of Professional Development: Development: Implications for Districts and States Implications for Districts and States

Upload: tanisha-dickerson

Post on 31-Dec-2015

19 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Symposium - Evaluating the Quality of Professional Development: Implications for Districts and States. Measuring Differences in the Quality of Professional Development. Michael S. Garet Kwang Suk Yoon A merican I nstitutes for R esearch Andrew C. Porter Vanderbilt University. Focus. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

Measuring Differences in Measuring Differences in the Quality of Professional the Quality of Professional

DevelopmentDevelopment

Michael S. Garet

Kwang Suk YoonAmerican Institutes for Research

Andrew C. PorterVanderbilt University

Symposium - Evaluating the Quality of Professional Development: Symposium - Evaluating the Quality of Professional Development: Implications for Districts and StatesImplications for Districts and States

Page 2: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

FocusFocus

How to conceptualize and measure the full set of professional development experiences districts offer and teachers participate in

Page 3: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

Levels of analysisLevels of analysis

District portfolio of Professional Development (PD)

Specific PD activitiesSpecific time-periods during which

PD takes place (months, semesters)Teacher collection of PD experiences

Page 4: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

Levels of analysis (continued)Levels of analysis (continued)

District Portfolio Other PD

A1 A2 A3 A4

tp1 tp1 tp2 tp1 tp1 tp2 tp3tp2

Teacher 1 PD Teacher 2 PD

Page 5: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

Features of PD activitiesFeatures of PD activities

Structural features– Type – Duration (contact hours and span)– Collective participation

Core features– Content focus– Active learning– Coherence

Page 6: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

Design of MSP evaluationDesign of MSP evaluation

4 MSP projects

Within each project, 2 groups of teachers– Treatment group: teachers targeted for MSP

participation– Comparison group: matched teachers or

schools

Page 7: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

Design of MSP evaluation (cont)Design of MSP evaluation (cont)

Data on professional development collected through Professional Development Activity Log (PDAL)– teachers provide 1 log on each activity

each month– data collected for 15 months (July 2003

- October 2004)

Page 8: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

Professional Development Activity Log Professional Development Activity Log (PDAL)(PDAL)

The PDAL is a web-based, self-administered, longitudinal data collection tool for teachers to record their professional development experiences in detail with the assistance of a series of structured prompts

Teachers log on to their password-protected web account and fill out their PDAL at regular intervals

Visit www.PDAL.net for more information

                                                                         

Page 9: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development
Page 10: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

PDAL data structurePDAL data structure(teacher by activity by month)(teacher by activity by month)

Teacher Activity Jul-03 Aug-03 Sep-03 Oct-03 Nov-03 Dec-03 Jan-04 Feb-04 No. of Logs

Mr. Anderson A 1 1 - - - - - - 2

B - - 1 - 1 - 1 - 3

C - - - - 1 - - - 1

Ms. Lopez A 1 1 - - - - - - 2

D - - - - 1 1 1 1 4

Mrs. Kelly E - 1 1 - - - - - 2

Mr. Lee E 1 1 1 - - - - - 3

F - - 1 1 - - - - 2

Mrs. Smith G - - - - 1 - - - 1

No. of logs 3 4 4 1 4 1 2 1 20

Page 11: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

Contact HoursContact Hours(teacher by activity by month)(teacher by activity by month)

Teacher Activity Jul-03 Aug-03 Sep-03 Oct-03 Nov-03 Dec-03 Jan-04 Feb-04

# of contact hours

Mr. Lee E 10 5 5 0 0 0 nd nd 20F 0 0 5 5 0 0 nd nd 10

total 10 5 10 5 0 0 nd nd 30

Page 12: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

% of months with PD (math)% of months with PD (math)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4

Per

cent

of m

onth

s

ComparisonTreatment

Page 13: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

Contact hours by calendar monthContact hours by calendar month

0

10

20

30

40

Hou

rs p

er a

ctiv

ity

per

mon

th

Page 14: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

Contact hours per month (math)Contact hours per month (math)

0

5

10

15

20

25

Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4

Hou

rs p

er m

onth

ComparisonTreatment

Page 15: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

Topic intensity (science)Topic intensity (science)

0

5

10

15

20

25

Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4

Hou

rs p

er t

opic

per

mon

th

ComparisonTreatment

Page 16: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

Next stepsNext steps

1. Exploring teachers’ PD experiences– Is there a relationship between PD

participation and change in instructional practice and achievement? Which teachers receive high-quality PD?

Page 17: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

Next steps (cont.)Next steps (cont.)

2. Using the PDAL to examine specific PD activities and portfolios.– Do MSP activities have the intended

features? Are some activities of particularly high quality?

3. Examining the reliability and validity of the PDAL

Page 18: Measuring Differences in  the Quality of Professional Development

Contact InformationContact Information

Michael S. [email protected]

Kwang Suk [email protected]

Andrew C. [email protected]

Visit us

www.PDAL.net