maximum and minimum.pptx
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
1/17
Maximum and Minimum Values
Prepared by: Miss Rose Anne B. Camacho
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
2/17
An important application of the
derivative is to determine where a function attains its maximum andminimum (extreme) values.
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
3/17
Definition of a Relative Maximum Value
The function f has a relative maximum value at the number c if there exists an openinterval containing c , on which f is defined,such that
for all x in the interval
f(c) f(x)
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
4/17
Figures 1 and 2 show a portion of the
graph of a function having a relativemaximum value at c.
a bc
Figure 1 Figure 2
a bc
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
5/17
Definition of a Relative Minimum Value
The function f has a relative minimum valueat the number c if there exists an openinterval containing c , on which f is defined,such that
for all x in the interval
f(c) f(x)
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
6/17
Figures 3 and 4 show a portion of the
graph of a function having a relativemaximum value at c.
a bc
Figure 3 Figure 4
a bc
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
7/17
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
8/17
ILLUSTRATION 1:
Let f be the function defined by f(x) = x2 4x + 5
f '(x) = 2x 4because f(2) = 0 , f may have a relativeextremum at 2. Because f(2) = 1 and1 < f(x) when either x < 2 or x > 2 . Definitionguarantees that f has a relative minimum valueat 2 .
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
9/17
NOTE that
f(c) can be equal to zero even f does
not have a relative extremum at c.
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
10/17
ILLUSTRATION 2:
Consider the function f defined by f(x) = (x 1) 3 + 2
f '(x) = 3(x 1) 2
because f(1) = 0 , f may have a relativeextremum at 1. However f(1) = 2 and
2 > f(x) when either x < 1 and 2 < f(x) whenx >1 . Neither definition for maximum orMinimum value applies, f does not have a
relative extremum at 1.
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
11/17
NOTE that
A function may have a relative
extremum at a number at which thederivative fails to exist.
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
12/17
ILLUSTRATION 3:
Let f be the function defined by
f(3) = 2 and f(3) = -1 f(3) = dne
because f(3) = 5 and5 > f(x) when either x < 3 and 3 < x . f has a relative maximum at 3.
x3 if 8
3xif 12
x
x x f
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
13/17
ILLUSTRATION 3:
Let f be the function defined by
f(3) = 2 and f(3) = -1 f(3) = dne
because f(3) = 5 and5 > f(x) when either x < 3 and 3 < x . f has a relative maximum at 3.
x3 if 8
3xif 12
x
x x f
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
14/17
NOTE that
It is possible that a function f can be
defined at a number c where f(c)does not exist and yet f may not havea relative extremum there.
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
15/17
ILLUSTRATION 4:
Let f be the function defined by
Furthermore, f(0) does not exist. The function has no relative extrema .
31
x x f
The domain of f is the set of all real numbers 0x if
3
1'
3
2
x x f
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
16/17
In summary.
If a function f is a defined at a number
c, a necessary condition for f to have arelative extremum there is that either f(c) = 0 or f(c) does not exist. But
this condition is not sufficient.
-
8/14/2019 Maximum and Minimum.pptx
17/17
The Calculus 7 by Louis Leithold, pp. 210 212
Reference: