mass spectrometry a key tool for the chemist’s toolbox. the logic is, we always want the molecular...
TRANSCRIPT
Mass Spectrometry
•A key Tool for the chemist’s toolbox.
•The logic is, we always want the molecular weight.
•Second, we can smash out fragments that are intact structurally
•These are easier to solve and relate back to the starting structure
Implication is, we don’t get the sample back; a destructive method
Mass SpectrometryA primary tool for chemists from almost every discipline
Molecular Weights are fundamental to almost every structural question. Molecular weight is not ambiguous. A compound has a unique MW.
Our ability to analyze compounds on this basis, depends completely on being able to generate ions from the compound. Specifically molecular ions*, whose weight is equal to the MW of the compound, are critical.
Once produced, our analysis according to MW depends on differential mobility or acceleration of ions proportionate to the MW.
*We can usefully broaden this definition from [M]+ to embrace [M+H]+, [M-H]-, Chemical Ionization adducts, etc.
What’s in a Mass Spectrum?Io
n A
b un d
a nce
(a s
a %
o f B
a se
pea k
)
Mass, as m/z. Z is the charge, and for doubly charged ions (often seen in macromolecules), masses show up at half their proper value
High mass
Not usually scanned below m/z=32 (Why?)
[M+H]+(CI)Or M•+ (EI)“molecular ion”
Unit mass spacing
Fragment Ions Derived from molecular ion or higher weight fragments
In CI, adduct ions, [M+reagent gas]+
Molecular Ionsgive us the molecular mass
Chemical Ionization
MH+
H+
H+
H+
H+
[M+H]+
Weighs one more than MW
Dislodges an electron
Electron Impact
M-e• -e•
-e•
-e•-e•
-e•
2e-•
M+•
Identifying Molecular Ions•Potential question; Is the largest m/z the molecular ion or is it a prominent fragment from an even heavier molecule?
•Increase sample loading
•In EI, can lower the beam voltage (make the M•+ less energetic, perhaps more long-lived.)
•Logical interval between significant peaks and suspected M•+ . i.e. the loss of 3-14 mass units is unusual, as is loss of 19-25 (except F). Loss of 33, 35, 38 also unusual. However a loss of 15, 18, 31 is good evidence for a molecular ion.
•Switch to CI, vary reagent gas. Positive, negative probes. Check for CI adduct ions. e.g. C2H5
+ , CH5
+, C3H5+
•Find MW by other method
•Prepare derivative
Other compounds present may give ions that deceive us. May be more detectable. MS intensities are problematic
The “Nitrogen Rule”•Molecules containing atoms limited to C,H,O,N,S,X,P of even-numbered molecular weight contain either NO nitrogen or an even number of N
•This is true as well for radicals as well.
• Not true for pre-charged, e.g. quats, (rule inverts) or radical cations.
•In the case of Chemical Ionization, where [M+H]+ is observed, need to subtract 1, then apply nitrogen rule.
•Example, if we know a compound is free of nitrogen and gives an ion at m/z=201, then that peak cannot be the molecular ion.
ElectronImpact and ChemicalIonization
EI
Sometimes too energetic for molecular ion to survive
Rich harvest of fragment ions
“fingerprint” nature of fragment patterns lends itself to database library searches
CI
Stronger, more reliable molecular ions
Fewer fragments
Can choose different reagent gasses and exploit chemistry, giving different fragmentation. e.g. NH3/ND3
Adduct ions give support to identities
Nitrogen rule works but inverted
Can do negative ion Mass Spec
EI
CI
When would you use CI, EI?EI
•When “fingerprint” is needed for Identification by comparison screening in databases
•Trace analysis
•Forensics
•Environmental
•Total unknowns, e.g natural products
•Fragment homology within a series, e.g. of natural products
CI
•When rapid, reliable identification of molecular ion is needed.
•LC-MS
•Following a synthetic chemistry route, tentative impurity ID
•Biological samples, other fragile or sensitive to decomposition; Drug or other metabolite ID
•When reagent gas chemistry is key, e.g. exchange D in for H
•Minimize fragmentation, get most intensity in molecular ion.
How can I tell which (EI or CI) was run?
Adduct ions higher m/z than MH+, ,[M+C2H5]+ ,[M+C3H5]+ [M+NH4]+
Large molecular ion
Relatively few fragment ions
Chemical Ionization
No ions higher m/z than M•+
Smaller M•+ intensity
Rich family of fragment ions
Electron Impact
The “Rule of 13” as an aid to guessing a molecular Formula
Take the Weight of ion, divide by 13
This answer is N, for (CH)N and any numerical remainder is added as H
e.g.; 92
92/13 = 7 with remainder = 1; C7H8 weighs 92. This is our candidate formula
Can evaluate other alternative candidate formulas possessing heteroatoms. For each member of the list below, replace the indicated number of CHs in the above answer
Hetero substitution
CH replacement
Hetero substitution
CH replacement
O CH4 P C2H7
N CH2 S C2H8
O+N C2H6 O+S C4
F CH7 I C10H7
Si C2H4 Cl,Br (use isotopes)
Analyzing Ion Clusters:a way to rule candidate structures
in or outMass spectrometry “sees” all the isotopomers as distinct ions
An ion with all 12C is one mass unit different from an ion with one 13C and the rest 12C
Since the isotope distribution in nature is known* for all the elements (13C is 1.1%), the anticipated range and ratios of ions for a given formula can be predicted and calculated
Follows a binomial expansion: e.g.; for N carbon atoms
(%12C + %13C)N
Clusters of Ions
Spaced by unit mass
Each peak is for the same molecular formula
Different peaks because there are some molecules with 13C, 2H etc.
Especially significant for Cl, Br
m/z
The Nominal mass is m/z of the lowest member of the cluster. This is the isotopomer that has all the C’s as 12C, all protons as 1H, all N’s as 14N, etc.
Isotope Patterns in Ion Clusters
Here are two molecular ions of nearly the same m/z. One of them is “carbon-rich”, and has a larger number of 13C’s
The other, presumably has proportionately, more heteroatoms
C24H50 C12H22O11
Why is this Important?
All 12C
1 13C
C10 C100
1 13C
2 13C
From this, it is clear that for large or macromolecules, there will be practically no population having all 12C or even only 113C
A rule of thumb, made possible by knowing the isotopic abundance is that the number of C in a formula is given by:
N=
€
IntensityM +1[ ]
M[ ]x90.1
Fragmentation
The “Even Electron Rule” dictates that even (non-radical) ions will not fragment to give two radicals (pos• + neutral•) (CI)
Better carbocation wins and predominates (“Stevenson’s Rule”)
[M·]+ A+ + B· (neutral)
or
B+ + A·
EI
CI
[M+H]+ PH+ + N (neutral)
Reading a Mass Spec from the M+• Down (EI)
Fragment Due to loss of… Interpretation
M+• -1 -H• Aldehydes, tert. Alcohols, cyclic amines
M+• -2 Multiple -H• Secondary alcohols
M+• -3 Multiple -H• Primary alcohols
M+• -4 to -13 (doubtful) Consider contaminants
M+• -14 (doubtful) CH2• , N• not good losses
M+• -15 CH3• Available methyl groups, methylesters
M+• -16 O• Peroxides
M+• -17 OH• Alcohols, phenols, RCO2H
M+• -18 H2O alcohols
M+• -19 -F•
M+• -20 -HF
M+• -21 to -25 No peaks expected
M+• -26 HCCH
M+• -27 •HC=CH2 or HCN HCN from pyridine, anilines
M+• -28 CO or CH2=CH2 Check for McLafferty R&R
How Do I go about using Mass Spec Data for Unknowns?
First, get the molecular weight
Identify prime, smaller mass losses like water, etc.
Now stop. Don’t worry about the fragments till you have some candidate structures
Based on NMR, IR get some notions of structure candidates or partial structures, functional groups
Now go back to MS, predict some fragments your structure will give, calculate the molecular weights and check MS
Back and forth with other data, to corroborate or refute a possible structure.
Nominal Mass
Here for example is a list of the compounds in the Merck Index (9th ed) that weigh nominally, 200
Exact mass measurements can easily distinguish
These instruments (and other) can generate exhaustive lists of possible structure formulas near the exact mass value.
molar mass: 157Formula M+1 M+2 MM e/o dbrHN2O8 1.05 1.60 156.9732 e 1.5HN10O 3.75 0.20 157.0337 e 5.5H3N3O7 1.41 1.40 156.9971 o 1H3N11 4.12 0.00 157.0576 o 5H5N4O6 1.78 1.20 157.021 e 0.5H7N5O5 2.14 1.00 157.0448 o 0CHO9 1.45 1.80 156.9619 e 1.5CHN8O2 4.15 0.43 157.0224 e 5.5CH3NO8 1.81 1.60 156.9858 o 1CH3N9O 4.51 0.24 157.0463 o 5CH5N2O7 2.17 1.41 157.0096 e 0.5CH5N10 4.88 0.04 157.0702 e 4.5CH7N3O6 2.54 1.21 157.0335 o 0C2HN6O3 4.55 0.66 157.0111 e 5.5C2H3N7O2 4.91 0.47 157.0350 o 5C2H5O8 2.57 1.61 156.9983 e 0.5C2H5N8O 5.27 0.28 157.0589 e 4.5C2H7NO7 2.93 1.42 157.0222 o 0C2H7N9 5.64 0.09 157.0827 o 4C3HN4O4 4.94 0.89 156.9998 e 5.5C3H3N5O3 5.31 0.70 157.0237 o 5C3H5N6O2 5.67 0.51 157.0476 e 4.5C3H7N7O 6.03 0.33 157.0714 o 4C3H9N8 6.4 0.14 157.0953 e 3.5C4HN2O5 5.34 1.11 156.9885 e 5.5C4H3N3O4 5.70 0.93 157.0124 o 5C4H5N4O3 6.07 0.74 157.0362 e 4.5C4H7N5O2 6.43 0.56 157.0601 o 4C4H9N6O 6.79 0.38 157.0840 e 3.5
C4H11N7 7.16 0.20 157.1078 o 3C5HO6 5.74 1.32 156.9772 e 5.5C5H3NO5 6.10 1.15 157.0011 o 5C5H5N2O4 6.46 0.97 157.025 e 4.5C5H7N3O3 6.83 0.79 157.0488 o 4C5H9N4O2 7.19 0.61 157.0727 e 3.5C5H11N5O 7.55 0.44 157.0965 o 3C5H13N6 7.92 0.26 157.1204 e 2.5C6HN6 8.84 0.33 157.0264 e 9.5C6H5O5 6.86 1.19 157.0136 e 4.5C6H7NO4 7.22 1.02 157.0375 o 4C6H9N2O3 7.59 0.84 157.0614 e 3.5C6H11N3O2 7.95 0.67 157.0852 o 3C6H13N4O 8.31 0.50 157.1091 e 2.5C6H15N5 8.68 0.32 157.1329 o 2C7HN4O 9.23 0.58 157.0151 e 9.5C7H3N5 9.60 0.41 157.0390 o 9C7H9O4 7.98 1.07 157.0501 e 3.5C7H11NO3 8.35 0.90 157.0739 o 3C7H13N2O2 8.71 0.73 157.0978 e 2.5C7H15N3O 9.07 0.56 157.1217 o 2C7H17N4 9.44 0.40 157.1455 e 1.5C8HN2O2 9.63 0.81 157.0038 e 9.5C8H3N3O 9.99 0.65 157.0277 o 9C8H5N4 10.36 0.49 157.0516 e 8.5C8H13O3 9.11 0.96 157.0865 e 2.5C8H15NO2 9.47 0.80 157.1104 o 2C8H17N2O 9.83 0.64 157.1342 e 1.5C8H19N3 10.20 0.47 157.1581 o 1C9HO3 10.03 1.05 156.9925 e 9.5C9H3NO2 10.39 0.89 157.0164 o 9
C9H5N2O 10.75 0.73 157.0403 e 8.5C9H7N3 11.12 0.57 157.0641 o 8C9H17O2 10.23 0.87 157.1229 e 1.5C9H19NO 10.59 0.71 157.1468 o 1C9H21N2 10.96 0.55 157.1706 e 0.5C10H5O2 11.15 0.97 157.029 e 8.5C10H7NO 11.51 0.81 157.0528 o 8C10H9N2 11.88 0.66 157.0767 e 7.5C10H21O 11.35 0.79 157.1593 e 0.5C10H23N 11.72 0.64 157.1832 o 0C11H9O 12.27 0.90 157.0654 e 7.5C11H11N 12.64 0.75 157.0892 o 7C12H13 13.40 0.84 157.1018 e 6.5C13H 14.32 0.97 157.0078 e 13.5
Example, m/z’s for 157
Clearly, some are not realistic!
Calculated mass distributions
Isotopic Element Massesand Atomic Weights:Lide, D.R., Ed., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics,74th Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton FL,(1993)
Isotope Distribution:Rockwood, A. L., Van Orden, S. L.,Smith, R. D.,Anal. Chem. , 67, 2699, (1995)
•iMass is freeware.•Contact: [email protected]
IMASS for Mac OSXVersion 1.0 (v2A15)© 2000 - 2002, Urs Roethlisberger,
Fragment Ions•The Game is, to rationalize these in terms of the structure
•Identify as many as possible, in terms of the parent structure
•Generally, simply derived from the molecular ion
•Or, in a simple fashion from a significant higher mw fragment.
•Simply, here means, ions don’t fly apart, split out neutrals and then recombine.
•Fragments will make chemical sense
•A good approach is the “rule of 13” to write down a molecular formula for an ion of interest.
•Especially in EI, we only identify major fragments
Chemical Ionization Fragmentation
Loss of neutral molecules, small stable, from MH+
Loss of neutrals from protonated fragments
Subsequent reprotonation after a loss
Typically there is no ring cleavage (needs radical) or two bond scissions.
Depends highly on ion chemistry specifically acid-base (proton affinities)
Some popular cleavages
Cleave at a branch point. Loss of radical or other neutral to provide a more stable cation
Cleave to a heteroatom (capable of supporting positive charge)
Note the use of “half arrow” for one-electron movements. e.g homolytic cleavage
CH3 CH3
CH3CH3
CH3
C+
CH3
CH3.
Obs. in Mass Spec
+
neutral
+
RO
RO
RO
:
:Obs. in Mass Spec
Resonance stabilized
neutral
+
+
Some examples
Primary alcohols, m/z=31 CH2=OH+
Primary amines, m/z=30 CH2=NH2+
Commonly encountered Electron-Impact fragments
N
CH2+
92+ +
91
H
H
H
H
H
+
77
CH2+
43
H
O
+29
McLafferty RearrangementsRadical cations localized on keto-type oxygen give cleavageThe mechanism limits this to EI fragmentationNeeds a H atom on a sp3 carbonKetones, esters, carboxylic acids all give McLafferty products
O+
HR2
R1
• O+
H
•
OH
R1 R2
•••
+ Loss of neutral alkene
The new radical cation is stabilized by resonance
Note the use here, of the “half arrow” to represent “1-electron flow”
Important example of McLafferty R&R
OH
OH
m/z = 60
+•
Seen for primary carboxylic acids
Non-Sequential Losses
CH3
O
CH3
MW=152
M+-CH3CO
M+-CH3
HydrocarbonsWeak [M•]+
Intense CnH2n+1
Good 43 m/z = C3H7 protonated cyclopropane
57 m/z = C4H9+
71 m/z = C5H11
Hydrocarbon chains characterized by successive losses of m/z=14 (clusters)
Cleavage to C=O groups
O
O
O
: .
+
++:
+: :
Obs. in mass spec. Acylium ions are resonance-stabilized
neutral
Prominent for ketones
CH3C=O+ m/z=43
Example
O
O O
M+• -45, loss of ethoxy radical
O+
C+
O
O+
Example
OO
+
M+• -43; also tropylium ion
Cleave to Heteroatoms like O, N
O
R
: .
+•
Heterolytic cleavage
R
O:: .
neutral
+
Observed in Mass Spec provided that a good stabilized carbocation can form
+
Rearrangements and fragmentations to give good Carbocations
CH2+
CH
+ CH2
H C
CH2
CH+
+
Benzylic cation (stabilized including “tropylium” ion m/z=91
Good cleavage to aromatic rings
Example
Bromine pattern
Tropylium ion
Br
Carboxylic acids
H present?; can give McLafferty R&R to alkene plus CH2=C(OH)(OH)•+ at m/z=60
Loss of water, especially in CI
Loss of 44 is loss of CO2
m/z=45 suggests OC–OH+
Amines
N•+ N+
-R•
R
Cyclic amines will lose adjacent H•, form iminium ion
In CI, NH+ can eliminate adjacent alkene, reprotonate
Silyl Ethers
SiO+
•
Loss of CH3• from Si
Loss of R• in cleavage
Loss of •CR3 then CH3• to (CH3)2Si=OH+ m/z=75
Total loss of carbinol to (CH3)3Si+ m/z=73
H transfer in heterosubstituted Anisoles
OCH3
ORLoss of CH2O
Extra H transfer mediated by adjacent heteroatom
H
O+
R
H
H
+•
Nitroaromatics
N+
O•
OO
+
Loss of •N=O
Loss of CO
m/z= 93
(this can form from lots of different origins)
CH+Aromatic!
m/z=65
Good test for aryloxy
Sulfur Compounds
Fortunately there is an [M+2]+ of 4% for the natural abundance of 34S. This is diagnostic for S vs 2x16O
Aliphatic thiols can split out H2S, [M-34]
Alpha cleavage at carbon bearing the sulfur in thiols, thioethers, similar to ethers, etc.
S+
S+R
•
-R•
The “retro Diels-Alder” Cleavage
+
+•
+•
+
+•
Observed!
Observed!
Typically you see both.More stable cation will predominateAlso works for hetero-substituted (e.g. make enol)Both EI (shown) and in Chemical Ionization. (protonated molecular ion, cleave, then reprotonation
Cyclohexenes, with favorable 6-membered transition state. Can include heteroatoms (N,O, driven by keto-enol like stability.
An Example from Terpenoid Chemistry
+
•
+
•
+
12-Oleanene m/z 204
A good example for Retro Diels Alder fragmentation
4-terpineol
MW 154
OH
OHO
mz 86+
+
mz 68
EI Mass Spectrum
+
Double bonds can isomerize
OH
MW=396
m/z136C9H12O+
m/z118136-water
-cleavage following double bond migration
Mass Spectral “shifts”
Note highly conserved regions; series of related compounds
Losses down to ions common in series.
Variation can not influence the fragmentation or introduce new fragmentation, e.g. internal fission not possible for homologs
Using the Information in Ion Clusters--Halogens
CH3Cl
One chlorine
CHCl3
Three chlorines
35Cl
37Cl
CH3Br
One bromine
CHBr3
Three bromines
79Br
81Br
81Br2
81Br1
The paired appearance flags the ions as to the number of halogens
Fragment ions with the same halogen count preserve the pattern
Great Websiteshttp://medlib.med.utah.edu/masspec/elcomp.htmCalculate potential molecular formulas from m/z(neutrals only)
http://www.colby.edu/chemistry/PChem/Fragment.htmlWizard calculates both odd, even electron species based on m/z
The same folks provide a online wizard for calculating ion clusters (isotope patterns) from a suggested formula.http://www.colby.edu/chemistry/NMR/IsoClus.html
http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/Free search of name, formulas