masroor ikram - khwarizmi science · pdf filemasroor ikram may 13, 2010. pakistan institute of...
TRANSCRIPT
Light: Its Applications in interometery, polarimetry and photodynamic therapy
Masroor IkramMay 13, 2010
Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Light ?• By the end of nineteenth century wave nature of
light was well accepted and there was a slogan that all the problems related to optics have been solved except to prove ether.
• In 1887 well-known Michelson-Morley experiment disprove the concept of ether.
• Earlier black-body radiation and in 1905 the famous paper of photoelectric effect forced scientists to rethink particle nature of light.
• Since then light is considered to has dual nature.
Light is an elephant• An old story tells of three blind men who were
asked to describe an elephant. – One blind man touched the elephant’s tail and
said the elephant was long and thin like a rope.
– The second blind man touched the elephant’s leg and described the elephant as round and hard like a tree trunk.
– The third man felt an ear and said that the elephant was thin and flat, like a huge leaf.
Each man’s description was correct, but didn’t give the complete picture.
• Scientists who study the nature of light are like the blind men in the story. They try to describe light, but their descriptions depend very much on which aspects of light they study.
• Each description of light is merely an approximation to the reality that is light. During the last four centuries, light is sometimes considered as particle and sometimes as wave, now scientists agreed on its dual nature.
Einstein in Optics and Lasers
• Einstein is famous for relativity but his contributions in optics and lasers are also fundamental.
• In 1905, photoelectric effect shaken the basics of the theory of light and Einstein was awarded Nobel prize for it.
• In 1916-17, he published two papers describing the stimulated emission, which was experimentally demonstrated in MASER during 1950s and led the foundations of LASER.
Michelson Interferometer• The Michelson interferometer
is the most common configuration for optical interferometry. The interference pattern produced depends on the path difference between the two beams.
• Michelson & Morley used this interferometer for their famous experiment (1887) in which this interferometer was used to disprove the concept of ether.
Novel Interferometersfor precision angle and axis of rotation measurements
M. Ikram and G. Hussain, Michelson interferometer for precision angle measurements, Appl. Opt. 38(1) 113-120, 1999.
Carousel Interferometer
G. Hussain and M. Ikram, Optimization of linearity by use of a glass plate in carousel interferometers, Opt. Letts. 29(16) 1930-32, 2004.
Angle and Axis of
Rotation MeasurementG. Hussain and M. Ikram, Optical Measurements of Angle and Axis of Rotation, Opt. Lett. 33 (21) 2419-21, 2008.
G. Hussain and M. Ikram, Measurements of Angle and Axis of Rotation in a Carousel Interferometer: A Detailed Analysis, Appl. Opt. 49(6) 1025-1031, 2010.
Vibration Detection with Lasers
A. Hussain, S. K. Ayazuddin, M. Ikram, A. A. Mudassar, A. A. Qureshi, and M. Iqbal, Remote sensing for flow induced vibrations in PARR-1 core assembly, Nucl. Engg. Design 205(3) 323-31, 2001.
Intensity modulation of the laser beam profile due to vibration of the objective is demodulated to give the amplitude and frequency of vibration.
Optical Coherence Tomography
• Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) performs imaging by measuring the echo time delay and magnitude of back reflected or backscattered light using interferometry.
• The most common detection method is based upon a Michelson interferometer with a scanning reference arm.
• In OCT low coherence light source is used, e.g. Ti: Sapphire laser or SLDs
• OCT is capable of high temporal resolution allowing the study of dynamic physiologic features
• Optical measurements can be performed exceedingly fast (<ns).
• OCT provides relatively low spatial resolution because of the physics of light propagation in turbid media
• The penetration range of light in tissue limits the size of the target tissue volume.
• Light intensity is heavily attenuated in tissue and falls off exponentially.
I' = M I
M = 4 x 4 Mueller Matrix
θI
I'
Laser
M
IQUV
Total Intensity
I =
Scatterer, represented by Mueller matrix,
Incident beam
Scattering Angle
ScatteredBeam
Circular Polarization± 45°0°,90° Polarization
Polarization Imaging
detector
sample cell
polarizer
Light source
plane isrotated analyzer
aaplane-polarizedlight
observedrotation
00000
rotate to null
A Simple Polarimeter
To determine the properties of emergingbeam, one multiplies the vectors describingthe incident beam with Mueller matrices. Ingeneral, the interaction of light with opticalelements such as lenses, polarizers, filters,surfaces, scattering media etc, changes thepolarization state of the light, when itdescribed by a four-component vector,[S0,S1,S2,S3], interacting with any optical element or material .
[Sout] = [Msystem].[Sin]
Mueller Matrix
Curve fits for the calculation of unknown coefficients
Photo-detector
Polarizerat 45o
with E
Analyzerat -45o
with E
Melles GriotM/N 05-LHP-1115mW Max Output
= 632.8 nm
Plate
Lenses fordiverging the
light
Kerr CellL
dTerminalsfor Voltage
Ea Y axis
X axisZ axis
Material characterization with polarized laser light (Kerr Cell )
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Applied Voltage (V)
Norm
alize
d Tr
ansm
ittanc
e
Solid curve is the simulated result of traditional expression for intensitytransmittance where as filled circles is the experimental transmittance forNitrobenzene device
Depolarization of light from nitrobenzene
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
θι = 45o, θο = -45o
Norm
alize
d Tr
ansm
ittan
ce
Applied Voltage (volt)
θι = 45o, θο = 45o
θι = 0ο, θο = 0ο
Curve fit for θι = 0ο, θο = 0ο
θι = 0ο, θο = 90ο
Curve fit for θι = 0ο, θο = 90ο
Estimate of MaxI45,45 Curve fit for MaxI45,45
Estimate of MinI45,45 Curve fit of MinI45,45
S. Firdous, K. Hassan and M. Ikram , Applied Optics 44(7) 1171-77 (2005)
Characterization Of UHMWPE Using Mueller Matrix Polarimetery
• Using standard Mueller Matrix Polarimeter, it is trivial toobtain 16 elements of a Mueller matrix.
• In order to get some physical information from Muellermatrix, the decomposition can provide information ofmaterial parameters.
• In one of the decomposition algorithm (i.e. LU-Chipmandecomposition), Mueller matrix is decomposed intosequence of three matrix factors; a di-attenuator followedby a retarder and a depolarizer.
• The three matrices gives the di-attenuation, polarizance,depolarization and retardence.
• Two individually non-toxic components brought together to cause harmful effects on cells and tissues in the presence of oxygen– Photosensitizing
agent
– Light of specific
wavelength
Process of Photodynamic Therapy
Illustration of the Process
The photosensitiser is given by injection.
After time the photosensitiser concentrates in the tumor.
The photosensitiser is activated by light
The tumor is selectively destroyed
Mechanism
Celular destruction
In Vitro Studies of PDT on HeLa and Hep2c Cell Lines
• HeLa is a cell line of human cervical cancer, from a Mexican female Henrieta Lacks.
• HeLa cells were grown with 5-ALA photosensitizer in the laboratory of National Institute of Health, Islamabad.
• The primary focus of the experimental work was to study he efficacy of ALA mediated photodynamic effects in HeLa cells.
-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
20
40
60
80
100
120%
Viab
ility
ALA Concentration (µg/ml)
50 J/cm2
0 J/cm2
Comparison of Dark Cytotoxic & Phototoxic Effects of different ALA Concentrations in HeLa Cell Line
M. Atif et.al. Laser Physics Letters 6(12) 886-891, December 2009
0 50 100 150 200 250
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
% V
iabi
lity
ALA concentration, µg/ml
85J/cm2
0J/cm2
Comparison of Dark Cytotoxic & Phototoxic Effects of different ALA Concentrations in Hep2c Cell Line
A. Khurshid et.al. accepted in Laser Physics 20(7), pp--, July 2010
Photodynamic Therapy: In Action
Profs. Hasan, Harvard Medical School and Georgakoudi, Tufts University, are observing the skin cancer treatment performed by Dr Rahmat Ullah Khan in NORI.
After 72 hours
After 1 week
After 4 weeks
Aktinic Keratosis
Diagnosis:“Basal cell carcinoma (Nose)” and Actinic Keratosis ( Left Cheek ).
Treatment: Two (02) sessions of PDT given .
Remarks:Gross tumor clearance with good
cosmetic outcome.
Histopathologicalclearance also seen onre-biopsy at 3 monthsfollow up in PIMS dated19-05-08 reported as “Noevidence of malignancyfound”.
34
Before Treatment
After Treatment...72 hours After 4 weeks
AQ , 53 years male , resident of PeshawarDiagnosis:
“Basal Cell Carcinoma ( left eye medial canthus )”
Treatment :Excision Biopsy done
Two sessions of PDT given for positive margins
Remarks:09 months recurrence free period
with good cosmetic outcome.
Histopathological clearance also seen on re-biopsy
at 9 months follow up in Peshawar dated 27-11-08
reported as “No evidence of malignancy found .“
36
Summary of PDT• In vitro studies on HeLa and Hep2c cell line are
carried out and published.
• Clinically 28 biopsy proven skin patients are treated in PAEC Hospitals. One patient of Leishmaniaisis is treated with positive response.
• Follow up shows complete response for majority of the patients and partial response for a few and one has no response.
• Currently we have treated only superficial skin cancers but planned to start for internal cancers using inject able photosensitizer and endoscope.
I am Thankful to:• Prof. Tayyab Hasan, Harvard University, Boston, USA
• Prof. Vanderlei Bagnato, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
• Dr Shamaraz Firdous, NILOP• Dr Rahmat Ullah Khan, PAEC General Hospital• Dr Muhammad Atif, NILOP• Hafeez Ullah, PIEAS• Malik Sajjad Mehmood, PIEAS• Manzoor Ahmad, PIEAS• Ahmat Khurshid, PIEAS• Fakhar-e-Alam, PIEAS• Muhammad Imran, PIEAS• Lubna Noreen, NILOP • Dr Sohail Zaidi, NIH , etc.
For Their Contributions