maritime spatial planning – approaches for effectiveness evaluation søren anker pedersen,...
TRANSCRIPT
Maritime spatial planning – approaches for effectiveness evaluation
Søren Anker Pedersen, ETC/Water
1st EEA/EIONET workshop – Maritime 26 Oct 2010 at European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
1. What is Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP)?
2. MSP and fisheries in German offshore waters (The EMPAS project – MSP in practice)
1) What is Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP)?
MSP a tool to: - optimize the human used of the marine ecosystem
- optimize benefits from ecosystem goods and services
The purpose…
Achieve “Good Environmental Status” within the marine ecosystems, while promoting long-term sustainable use of marine resources
- within the framework and “guidance” of EU Maritime Policy
MSP does not lead to a one-time plan.
It is a continuing, iterative process that learns and adapts over time.
Figure from: Guide on MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING – A Step-by-Step Approach toward Ecosystem-based Management
by Charles Ehler and Fanny Douvere, UNESCO, 2009.
The PlanCoast Project2006-2008
Step 1: Assessing the context and establishing a general framework for IMSP
Step 2: Drawing up a guiding visionStep 3: Refining the stocktake and mappingStep 4: Analysis: identifying issues and
problemsStep 5: Developing solutions for the problems
identifiedStep 6: Drawing up a planStep 7: ImplementationStep 8: Evaluation
From WWF BaltSeaPlan project Brochure, 2010
From WWF BaltSeaPlan project Brochure, 2010
From WWF BaltSeaPlan project Brochure, 2010
From WWF BaltSeaPlan project Brochure, 2010
From WWF BaltSeaPlan project Brochure, 2010
2. MSP and fisheries in German offshore waters (The EMPAS project – MSP in practice)
German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN) responsible for:
• selection, • designation, • management ICES advice on fisheries management in N2K sites
Environmentally Sound Fisheries Management in Marine Protected Areas (EMPAS) project 2006-2008
1
2
3
4
12
3
4
5
6
North Sea
Baltic Sea
www.ices.dk/projects/empas.asp
FFH-Annex II Marine Mammals
Harbour porpoise, Harbour Seal, Grey Seal
BD Annex I and migratory bird species
Red-throated Diver, Black-throated Diver, Terns, Common Scoter, Long-tailed duck, etc.
FFH-Annex II Fish Species
Shad, Twaite Shad, Hounting, River Lamprey, Sea Lamprey, Sturgeon
NATURA 2000-protected habitats and species in the North Sea
Habitat-Directive (FFH-Directive) and the Bird Directive (BD)
Benthic commuities
FFH-Habitats Sandbank, Reefs
Sylt Outer Reef
Protected habitat types: "sandbanks" and "reefs"
Borkum ReefGround
Dogger Bank
Natura 2000 sites
1. Mapping of fishing activities and effort;
2. Analysis of impact of fishing activities on habitats and species;
3. Identify conflicts between fishing activities and nature conservation objectives/targets;
4. Develop management options
The EMPAS Project: Targets
For each designated Natura 2000 site in the German EEZ:
Natura 2000 sites and International Fisheries
Example: 2004
Example: All Dutch VMS data 2006
Fock et al., 2007
Example:
Sylt Outer Reef
Example:
Fock et al., 2007
NAME
Dre
dg
e
Bea
m tra
wl
Otte
r traw
l
Dan
ish
se
in
Pe
lag
ic tra
wl
Gill n
et d
em
ers
al
Lo
ng
line
s
Benthic Fauna and Flora A A B B D C CReefs A A B B D C CSandbank C C C C D C C
A = very conflicting (very likely)B = conflicting (likely)C = little conflicting (little likely) D = no conflict (not likely)N = unknown
Potential conflicts between fishing and nature conservation objectives
Impact of bottom trawls on "sandbanks" and "reefs"
Benthic habitats and typical species:
- Destructive effects of bottom contacting gear
Conflict analysis: Fishing activitiesand nature conservation targets
Consultation and cooperation with fishers:
- Fishing track plotters (GPS), sea charts, and personal experiences
- Explain fisheries data and misunderstandings
- Contribute VMS data and fishery information
- Find solutions to conflicts
Fine scale distribution of fishing activities
The EMPAS project results and the future
•From no-change option to partial and full closures for fisheries
•The EMPAS results are starting points to develop a management strategy for Natura 2000 sites
•Final management plans have not yet been developed/implemented
•The revised CFP should harmonize different national approaches/proposals to Natura 2000 management
Maritime Spatial Planning German EEZ North Sea
Berkenhagen et al. (2010)
2020: 12,000 MW
2030: 25,000 MW
Useful information in MSP and trade-off evaluation are:
• cumulative losses (benefit losses)
• costs of displacement of fishing effort to other areas
• habitats affected by the wind farm influence species
• possible benefits:
a) new species attracted by the different habitats,
b) marine aquaculture or
c) the closure leads to increasing catch possibilities outside
• cumulative effects of closing many areas for fishing
(wind farms, military areas, shipping lines, Natura 2000 areas, etc.)
MSP and fisheries in the German EEZ- cumulative losses and benefits
Wind farm approvals case-by-case overlooks the cumulative impact of planned and projected wind farms on fisheries
Better understanding of the impact of wind farms establishments on individual vessels, fishing association and harbour towns in future
Summary
Uniform approach to data collection, harmonization and classification
Coherent ecological information
Coherent information on human activities
Identify scientific principles/methodologies for e.g. assessing multiple pressures, environmental status assessment etc.
Link economic values to ecosystem benefits
Considering economical and social impacts in line with ecological impacts will increase the willingness for seeking a sound and sustainable compromise
Monitoring the conservation status
Monitoring the conservation status
DocHab-04-03/03 rev.3