marinkovic d

Upload: high-as-fuck

Post on 29-Feb-2016

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

dekonstrukcija dirkema

TRANSCRIPT

  • , vol. XXXVIII (2004), no. 4, . 583601

    UDK: 316. 253 : 19. 11. 2004.

    :

    , . . , - . , .

    : , , , , -.

    . , ., , - , . , , . , , , , , - , .

    , . , -, , ,

  • , : ...

    584

    - . - - -. , , - . - , , , , - . , - , : () , - ; .1 , - , . , , , , , , -- , - ; , -.

    . , - -, . -2, - , , .3 , , , , , , , - , . - , , - , . , - , -

    1 E. Dirkem, Elementarni oblici religijskog ivota, Prosveta, Beograd, 1982., str. 390.2 J. M. Lehmann, Deconstructing Durkheim: A post-post Structuralist Critique, Rout-

    ledge, London, 1995. Ova delo je i podeljeno na dva velika dela: Dirkemovu socijalnu onto-logiju i Dirkemovu socijalnu epistemologiju.

    3 D. Tekiner, German Idealist Foundation of Durkheims Sociology and Teleology ofKnowledge, Theory and Science, 2002., vol.1003.001

  • , vol. XXXVIII (2004), no. 4, . 583601

    585

    : - . - - , - . -. , - . , , . , , , - ( ) ( ), . - . , - , - - - . , - , , , , - .

    - -,4 , , .

    ( , , - ), - , . , - , , ( -- ), , /-,

    4 A. W. Gouldner, The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology, Basic Book, 1970., p. 144.

  • , : ...

    586

    , . , - () , - . -, , . - , , - , - , ; - , , - -. - , , , , , , . , -.

    ( ) , . , , , - , . - , - , . , , : ( ) . () : -...5 , () (), . , -; - , - , .

    5 E. C. Cuff, W. W. Sharrock and D. W. Francis, Perspectives in Sociology, Routledge,London and New York, (forth edit.), 1998., p. 81. part one: Durkheim the Radical Reformer, p.61-87.

  • , vol. XXXVIII (2004), no. 4, . 583601

    587

    , -, , . - , - , , - , , , - , , , , . , - , , , - - 6 , , : , - (more fundamental reality) .7 , disco disciplinatus , -, discipulatus ,8 - , , -. , , , - , . , -- , -//. , - - , , : , , .

    , , - , . ,9 -, , . : , , , , -

    6 M. , , , , 1976., II, - ( () -; ), . 237-244.

    7 E. C. Cuff, W. W. Sharrock and D. W. Francis, Perspectives in Sociology, Routledge,London and New York, (forth edit.), 1998., p. 80.

    8 Videti opirnije u: B. Bonjak, Filozofija: uvod u filozofskog miljenje i rijenik,Naprijed, Zagreb, 1985., str. 182.

    9 E. , O , , , 1972.

  • , : ...

    588

    . , . , , ,, , , -, , , , , , -, . , (cibernetic), - (monetary) .10 - : - .11 , , . - - , , ( ) ( ), . , . , , - . , (body politics).12 -, , - , - -.13 , - , , / / -

    10 J. ONeill, The Poverty of Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York, 1996. p.26. () , , .

    11 Ibid., p. 26.12 To korespondira sa Dirkemovom idejom materijalne i moralne gustine.13 M. , : , , , 1997,

    . 155.

  • , vol. XXXVIII (2004), no. 4, . 583601

    589

    -- - . -.

    , - , () - , . , -/, / . , , , ;14 .15

    , - , , /- , /-, /, / , /, -/ , , - , , , . , - - .16 , , , , , - /, /, /-, , .17

    ( ) - . ; - , , ; ,

    14 M. , , , , 1990, . 18.15 Ibid., str. 18 ( . M.)16 J. ONeill, The Poverty of Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York, 1996. p.

    29.17 Ibid., p. 29.

  • , : ...

    590

    , ; - ; , , . , , . - , , , , - 18, . , , , , -, , , - (-- ) , , .

    - , , . - , -, , . , -, - -, .19 , - , , , , , , . , -, .20

    ., , ,

    18 M. , , , , 1976, I, . 37 (. ).

    19 J. ONeill, The Poverty of Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York, 1996, p.38.

    20 E. C. Cuff, W. W. Sharrock and D. W. Francis, Perspectives in Sociology, Routledge,London and New York, (forth edit.), 1998, p. 79.

  • , vol. XXXVIII (2004), no. 4, . 583601

    591

    , . , , . . - , - . (. C. Cuff) ..21 , , - .22 - , , , - - . , - , - , , - () (epistem), , - (-/). , , (-nomos) , , . - , . , , , . , - .23 , , , / - , , , -, , , , .

    () -/ , , , - , - . , - , -

    21 Ibid., p. 71.22 Ibid., p. 73.23 E. Gidens, Dirkem, XX vek, Beograd, 1996, str. 9 ( . .)

  • , : ...

    592

    / , , . , , , , , ; ; , - ; , , , , .

    , , (, ), , - . , , - 1870-1871. - . , , - .24

    , , . -/ -- , - . , , - . , :

    -, , , , ,, , ( , - , , . . ), , . , (- -, -, . . ), , . , -, -.25

    24 Ibid., str. 9-1025 J. ONeill, The Poverty of Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York, 1996, p.

    38.

  • , vol. XXXVIII (2004), no. 4, . 583601

    593

    ( ) - - - - . (-) pistem , pistem - . -/, / , / . , , , , , . , , , ,, , , , . , () - , . -, , -, , -, . - , - -: /,, , , , - , , . - - () - -. , () (-) , , - - - . : .26 , - (-) - , .

    26 E. Dirkem: Pravila socioloke metode, Savremena kola, Beograd, 1963, str. 104.

  • , : ...

    594

    , . , ,, . , , , - , , . , , , , , - , - .27 - .28 - , -, , -.

    , -- . (- ) ( ) . , , , . :

    , - . : ... , , . , (: ). - , - . , , - -... .29

    , , , , -,

    27 - () : E. Dirkem, Samoubistvo: socioloka studija,BIGZ, Beograd, 1997.

    28 E. Dirkem, Pravila socioloke metode, str. 56 ( . .)29 E. Gidens, Dirkem, XX vek, Beograd, 1996., str. 64.

  • , vol. XXXVIII (2004), no. 4, . 583601

    595

    - . . (Robert van Krieken) . - , , -, -- .30 , , - (), -, - . , - . , , / , . , -- ( - ) , .

    ( . , : -- )31 -. , -- , . ( 32), , - , , , -- , , / ; , . . , ( - ), , , 33, - : , , -

    30 R. van Krieken, Proto-governmentalization and the historical formation of organi-

    zational subjectivity, Economy & Society 25(2) 1996: 195-221 ( ).31 J. M. Lehmann, Deconstructing Durkheim: Post-Post-Structuralist Critique, Rout-

    ledge, London, 1995.32 Mouzelis, N., Sociologijska teorija: to je polo krivo? Dijagnoza i pomo, Jesenski i

    Turk i Hrvatsko socioloko drutvo, Zagreb, 2000.33 Ibid., p. 15.

  • , : ...

    596

    , , . - , , (species . . . ), , , , . - 34 . - , , : -, , .35 : - , ... ... 36, -: - - . , (- ) , - , , .

    ,37 , - , , .38 , , - , - . , , .39 ,- , -- , -

    34 Ibid., p. 15.35 Ibid., p. 19.36 Ibid., p. 19.37 , O , . 111-11438 B. Latour, Pandoras Hope: Essays ond the Reality of Scientific Knowledge, Harvard

    University Press, Cambidge, assachusetts, London, England, 1999. p. 113 . - , - . , -- , . - , , , - . -, , p. 128.

    39 Ibid., p. 115.

  • , vol. XXXVIII (2004), no. 4, . 583601

    597

    . , -, ; ; ; ; ; , -, , - - . , , , , , . -- - . , , ,, . , . .40

    - , , . - : , - , , .41 , .42

    , , , -, - , - , . , , , .43 , - -

    40 J. M. Lehmann, Deconstructing Durkheim: Post-Post-Structuralist Critique,

    Routledge, London, 1995. p. 57.41 Cit. prema: J. M. Lehmann, Deconstructing Durkheim: Post-Post-Structuralist

    Critique, Routledge, London, 1995. p. 62.42 Cit. prema: J. M. Lehmann, Deconstructing Durkheim: Post-Post-Structuralist

    Critique, Routledge, London, 1995. E. Durkheim, The Suicide, p. 252.43 E. Dirkem, Samoubistvo: socioloka studija, BIGZ, Beograd, 1997. str. 186.

  • , : ...

    598

    , , . - , . (-) ; -, , , . , , -, , , , , , , , .

    - - - . , - -. , , , -, , . , - () : , .44 ,45 .46

    , , , -, . , ( 47) . , - , -, , ,

    44 J. M. Lehmann, Deconstructing Durkheim: Post-Post-Structuralist Critique,

    Routledge, London, 1995. p. 75.45 Ibid., p. 75.46 Ibid., p. 75.47 Fuko, M., Rijei i stvari: arheologija humanistikih nauka, Nolit, Beograd, 1971.

  • , vol. XXXVIII (2004), no. 4, . 583601

    599

    , - ., , , , , .48

    , - , , , , , - . , - . , : , -, - . , , pistem ; -, - (Karin Knorr-Cetina)49 - (). pistem , - . - .50 - , , . , . , -51, - , .

    48 Ibid., p. 75.49 K. Knorr-Cetina, Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Harvard,

    University Press, 1999.50 J. ONeill, The Poverty of Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York, 1996.

    The Therapeutic Discipnines, pp. 25-43.51 Ibid., p. 26.

  • , : ...

    600

    :Bonjak, B., Filozofija: uvod u filozofskog miljenje i rijenik, Naprijed, Zagreb, 1985.Canguilhem, G., Sur lHistorie de la folie en tant quevenement, Le Debat, november-

    december 1986.Cuff, E. C., W. W. Sharrock and D. W. Francis, Perspectives in Sociology, Routledge,

    London and New York, (forth edit.), 1998.Dirkem, E., Elementarni oblici religijskog ivota, Prosveta, Beograd, 1982., . O , , , 1972.Dirkem, E., Pravila socioloke metode, Savremena kola, Beograd, 1963.Dirkem, E., Samoubistvo: socioloka studija, BIGZ, Beograd, 1997.Fuko, M., Istorija ludila u doba klasicizma, Nolit, Beograd, 1980., M., : , , , 1997., M., , , , 2002., M., , , , 1990.Fuko, M., Rijei i stvari: arheologija humanistikih nauka, Nolit, Beograd, 1971.Gidens, E., Dirkem, XX vek, Beograd, 1996.Gouldner, A. W., The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology, Basic Book, 1970.Knorr-Cetina, K., Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Harvard,

    University Press, 1999.Krieken, R. van., Proto-governmentalization and the historical formation of organizational

    subjectivity, Economy & Society 25(2) 1996.Latour, B., Pandoras Hope: Essays ond the Reality of Scientific Knowledge, Harvard

    University Press, Cambidge, Massachusetts, London, England, 1999.Lehmann, J. M., Deconstructing Durkheim: A post-post Structuralist Critique, Routledge,

    London, 1995.Mouzelis, N., Sociologijska teorija: to je polo krivo? Dijagnoza i pomo, Jesenski i Turk

    i Hrvatsko socioloko drutvo, Zagreb, 2000.ONeill, J., The Poverty of Postmodernism, Routledge, London and New York, 1996.Tekiner, D., German Idealist Foundation of Durkheims Sociology and Teleology of

    Knowledge, Theory and Science, 2002., vol.1003.001Veber, M., Privreda i drutvo, Prosveta, Beograd, 1976.

    Duan Marinkovi S u m m a r yFaculty PhilosophyNovi Sad

    DECONSTRUCTION OF DURKHEIM: MEDICALIZATION OF SOCIALCONTROL AND CLINICALIZATION OF SOCIAL PRACTICE

    In this paper, the author contemplates new interpretations of Durkheim's multi-layered sociology through more or less implicit strategies of medicalization of socialcontrol and clinicalization of social practice that are embedded in Durkheim's work.

    As a result of a comparative analysis between Durkheim and Foucault, the authorcomes to a new standpoint where Durkheim's sociology, through the abovementioned

  • , vol. XXXVIII (2004), no. 4, . 583601

    601

    concepts, has been an instrumental factor in building the scientific identity of sociology.Furthermore, through concepts of medicalization of social control and clinicalization ofsocial practice, sociology was enabled to solicit its rightful place in administration ofmodern therapeutic society. At the same time, these concepts were distinct varieties ofsociological political identity that instated clear demands for building an autonomoussphere of social reality vis--vis economical, political, and other dominant spheres of socialreality at that time.

    Keywords: Durkheim, Foucault, medicalization, clinicalization, deconstruction.