managerial learning.pdf

Upload: iris-marshall

Post on 04-Jun-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Managerial Learning.pdf

    1/11

  • 8/14/2019 Managerial Learning.pdf

    2/11

    [305 ]

    Richard Teare

    Supporting managerial

    learning in the workplace

    International Journal of

    Contemporary Hospitality

    Management

    9/7 [1997] 304314

    realityofthemiddlemanagersownworld.

    Inordertocaptureownworldrealities,

    McKennaadvocatestheuseofacomplexity

    map.Thecomplexitymapseekstoportray

    apersonalizedviewofrealityforeachpar-

    ticipantattendingtheforumandasnapshot

    ofhowtheirlearningneedsarewovenintoit

    andmightbededucedfromit.Inparticular,

    themaphelpstoidentifysomeoftheper-

    sonalparadigmsandassumptionsthatneed

    tobechallengedinordertostretchthe

    participant.Insodoing,themapprovidesa

    basisforactionbydepictingthereality-

    basedrealplaysthatconfront

    participants,togetherwiththepatternsand

    interrelationshipsonwhichtheyneedtoact

    inordertoleveragepersonaldevelopment

    andbusinessimprovementgainsfromthe

    complexitiesthatsurroundthem.Thisform

    ofcognitivemappingoffersadynamicand

    personalizedmeansofenablingmanagers

    toassesstheircurrentcapabilitiesandlearningneeds.Setinthecontextofa

    generativelearningforum,itprovidesa

    diagnostictoolforself-managedlearning

    anddevelopment.

    Dixon(1995a,1995b)relatesastudyofpriva-

    tizedfirmstotheculturechangeneededto

    releasethepotentialofmiddlemanagers

    workinginnewlyprivatizedorganizations.

    Sheoutlinesherfindingswithreferenceto

    theviewsofmanagersontheneedto:invest

    ineducationandtraining;create,translate

    andsharethenewstrategicvision;estab-

    lishconstructivechannelsforcommunicat-

    ingwithseniormanagers;developincentives

    andrewards;andbreakwithtraditionby

    encouragingmiddlemanagerstoinitiateand

    lead.Dixonobservesthat:Theoverwhelm-

    ingdemandfrommiddlemanagerswasfor

    theorganizationtoinvestineducationforall

    levelsofemployee.Therewasanimplication

    thattheorganizationneededtobecreativein

    thetypeoftrainingandeducationprovided

    asthetraditionalapproacheswerenolonger

    appropriate(Dixon,1995b,p.11).

    Mumford(1994)examinestheproposition

    thatmanagerslearninhindsightbyreview-ingtheexperiencestheyhavehadand,less

    frequently,learnbyidentifyinginadvance

    howtouseopportunitiesforlearningasa

    meansofself-development.Heusesevidence

    TableI

    Managerial learning and work

    Authors Focus Sub-themeShenharandRenier Applies a modular approach to defining managerial work and roles Defining managerial

    (1996) so that managers can assess the complexities of their own jobs and work

    related development needs

    Margerisonand Outlines the eight main types of work in organizations (advising, Preferences and

    McCann(1996b) innovating, promoting, developing, organizing, producing, inspecting, managerial work

    maintaining) and advocates self-profiling or work preferences so as to

    understand and work effectively with others

    Oshagbemi(1995) Discusses the nature and the reality of managerial work and how Managers use of

    managers spend their time their time

    Margerisonand Profiles five key communicat ion skil ls enquiring, diagnosing, Communicat ion

    McCann(1996a) summarizing, proposing and directing. Relates these skills to either a skills and

    problem-centred or solution-centred focus and describes a self - managerial work

    assessment resource for use in personal and team development

    Dixon(1995a, Summarizes a study undertaken in 46 privatized firms concerned with Middle

    1995b) middle managers and their attitudes towards the culture change they management

    had experienced during the privatization process potential and

    development

    Megginson(1994) Considers the challenges posed by helping managers to learn when Planned and

    they are reluctant to take responsibility for the direction of their own emergent

    development or seem unable to learn from their own experiences managerial learning

    Mumford(1994) Investigates how managers learn from experience with reference to Learning from

    a study of 21 directors in 15 UK organizations and proposes four managerial

    approaches (intuit ive, incidental, retrospective and prospective) experience

    Barclay(1996) Emphasizes the value of real world experience in learning about Learning from

    management especially interpersonal skills development, learning experience withabout ones organization and industry and learning how to manage learning logs

    personal development and self-understanding

  • 8/14/2019 Managerial Learning.pdf

    3/11

    [306 ]

    Richard Teare

    Supporting managerial

    learning in the workplace

    International Journal of

    Contemporary Hospitality

    Management

    9/ 7 [1997] 304314

    fromastudyconductedoverathree-month

    periodbypersonalinterview,with21 direc-

    torsfrom15UKorganizationstocharacterize

    fourapproachestolearning.Thepurposeoftheinterviewswastodiscusstherespon-

    dentsexperiencesatworkandwhattheyhad

    learnedfromthemsoastoexplorehowthey

    mightusealternativewaysofanalyzingexpe-

    riencesandultimatelyenhancetheircapac-

    itytolearnatwork.Thefourapproaches

    definedbyMumfordare:

    Theintuitiveapproach learningfrom

    experience,butnotthroughaconscious

    process.Learningordevelopmentalissues

    arerarely,ifever,mentioned,asthis

    approachseesmanagingandgoodbusiness

    prac

    tices

    assynonymous

    wi

    thlea

    rning.

    Theincidentalapproach learningby

    chancefromactivitiesthatpromptthe

    individualtoreflectandreview.Typically,

    thisincludesunusualoccurrencesand

    plannedactivitieswithunanticipatedor

    undesirableoutcomes.

    Theretrospectiveapproach learningfrom

    experiencebyreviewingwhathappened

    andreachingconclusionsaboutit.

    Promptedmainlybymishapsormistakes,

    butthosewhousethisapproacharemore

    inclinedtodrawlessonsfromunexpected

    variances.

    Theprospectiveapproach includesretro-spectivecomponentsandanelementof

    planningtolearnbeforeaneventtakes

    place.Here,futureeventsareseennot

    merelyasthingstobesuccessfullycom-

    pletedbutasopportunitiestolearn.

    Mumfordadds:Individualsusingthis

    approachareexpectantlearnerswiththeir

    antennaeconstantlytunedintothepossi-

    bilityoflearningfromawholevarietyof

    experiences(p.6).

    Theme2:coaching,mentoringandteamdevelopment

    Thelearnersupportprovidedformanagers

    whetheritbeindividualcoachingandmen-

    toringorworkgrouprelated,playsaninte-

    gralroleinworkplacelearning.TableIIlists

    asetofsub-themesthatspans:theroleof

    coachingindevelopingmanagers(including

    theapplicationofsportscoachingtechniques

    toteam-buildinginbusiness);mentoringand

    otherformsoforganizationalsupport;learn-

    ingandteamdevelopment;workgroup

    dynamics;andlearningandcross-functional

    teamdevelopment.

    Phillips(1996)examinesthepossibilities

    forusingcoachingasamanagementtooland

    considersitspartinthemanagement

    process.Heidentifiesanumberofapplica-

    tionsandoutlinestherolesandresponsibili-

    tiesofboththecoachandthosebeing

    coached.Heseesflexibilityasthekeywith

    thecoachactingasanenabler.Bloch(1995)

    relatessoftskillsdevelopmentinthework-placetoenablingemployeestoachievetheir

    potentialandsheusesevidencefromastudy

    toemphasizetheperceivedvalueofinternal

    coachingtoorganizations:Individualswhoaregivenownershipof

    theirowndevelopmentandcareermanage-

    mentareusuallymorehighlymotivated

    thanthosewhosepathsaremappedoutfor

    them.Yetthesurveyfoundthatonlyaround

    one-thirdofthecompaniessurveyedencour-

    agedindividualstotakeresponsibilityfor

    theirowndevelopment.Overhalfsaidthe

    developmentoffuturetopmanagersshould

    bethe

    join

    tresponsibili

    tyofthe

    individual,hisorherlinemanager,andthecompany.

    However,whatactuallyhappensinpractice

    issometimesverydifferent.Asonerespon-

    dentremarked:Responsibilityfordevelop-

    mentismeanttobetripartite,butwespend

    outlivestryingtogetthelinemanager

    involved(pp.20-21).

    Forretetal.(1996)reviewtheissuesinvolved

    inthedevelopmentandimplementationofin-

    companymentoringprogrammes,withrefer-

    encetointerviewswithmanagersinfive

    organizationswhohadestablishedtheirown

    programmes.Scanduraetal.(1996)address

    thequestion:Whydomentorsengageinmentoring?anddiscusstheroleofleader-

    shipinthedevelopmentofleader-supported

    mentoringprocesses.Theyofferanarrayof

    insightsontheprocessofmentoringandthe

    Figure1

    Interrelationships between personal and organizational development

    ability to understand,interpret and respondto the complexitiesand realities of theorganizational situation

    Personal and professional development

    Adding value tothe organization

    Source:adapted from McKenna (1994, p. 9)

  • 8/14/2019 Managerial Learning.pdf

    4/11

    [307 ]

    Richard Teare

    Supporting managerial

    learning in the workplace

    International Journal of

    Contemporary Hospitality

    Management

    9/7 [1997] 304314

    Richard Teare

    Supporting managerial

    learning in the workplace

    International Journal of

    Contemporary Hospitality

    Management

    9/ 7 [1997] 304314

    rangeofrelationshipsthatneedmanagingif

    theprogrammeistoyieldbenefitsformen-

    tors,menteesandtheorganizationasawhole.Clawson(1996)presentsmentoringas

    avaluableformofsocialdevelopmentand

    raisesquestionsabouthowmentoringmight

    beshapedbytheeraofelectroniccommuni-

    cations.Heviewsmentoringasavitalsup-

    portmechanismintheinformationageand

    posesanumberofquestionsformentorsto

    addressintheinformationage:

    Howwillpeoplefindtheirprotgormen-

    torcounterpartsinthenewera?Willthey

    continuetoworkthroughface-to-facemeet-

    ingsorwilltherebeforumssetuponthe

    Internetlikethepersonaladcolumnsinnewspapers?

    Howlongwilltheserelationshipslast?

    (Withe-mailprovidingworldwidesupport,

    thereisnoproximityreasonforbreaking

    themoffwhenthementeeispromotedor

    transferred).

    Howcancompaniestakeadvantageofthenewtechnologiesandthenewinsights

    aboutmentoringtofosterandencourage

    healthy,workingdevelopmentalrelation-

    shipsamongtheiremployees?

    Howwillcross-culturalmentoringwork

    out?Willtherebeearlyexamplestoencour-

    ageandguidesubsequentgenerations?

    Theme3:competences,manageriallearningandthecurriculum

    Theextenttowhichworkplacelearningcan

    beformalizedandevenmeasuredinrelationtospecificoutcomesisconsideredhere.Table

    IIIdepictsanarrayofsub-themesrelatingto:

    theattainmentofcorecompetencesandtheir

    relationshiptoindividualperformance;open

    TableII

    Coaching, mentoring and team development

    Authors Focus Sub-themeBloch(1995) Reports that 14 respondents ( from a survey of 39 firms) c ited The role o f

    internal coaching as a key method used to develop managers; coaching in

    more t han 25 per c ent of t he sample w ere using ex ternal developing

    consultants as mentors managers

    McNutt andWright Observes numerous parallels between sport and business and Applies sport s

    (1995) suggests that the methods used by successful sports coaches might coaching

    be used to improve employee performance techniques to

    team-building in

    business

    VealeandWachtel Describes Coca-Cola Foods coaching and mentoring programmes An integrated

    (1996) and relates mentoring to human resource development strategy approach to

    coaching and

    mentoring

    Forret,Turbanand Provides a how to overview on the steps involved in setting-up a A practical guide

    Dougherty(1996) mentoring programme and outlines the benefits of such a programme to mentoring

    for the organization and for the mentees and mentors

    Booth(1996) Contrasts mentoring with typical employee/manager relationships Mentoring and

    and considers the advantages and disadvantages and how gender other forms of

    influences the mentoring process with reference to a case study of organizational

    two supervisory mentoring relationships relations

    BeebyandSimpson Describes a non-prescriptive means of assisting managers to recognize Cognitive mapping

    (1995) and work on change issues. The approach uses a cognitive mapping and learner

    technique to draw on the experiences of managers and to define development

    causal problems and appropriate responses

    Strachan(1996) Reviews the organizational l iterature and ident ifies the ro le of Learning andteamworking in building a learning organization team development

    Kur(1996) Depicts patterns of team behaviour using a series of temperaments. Work group

    Reflects the dynamic qual it ies o f groups of individuals working dynamics and

    separately and interact ing together to achieve ag reed tasks learning

    Proehl(1996) Reviews the effectiveness of cross-functional teams in tackling Cross-functional

    broad-scale organizat ional problems. Ident ifies some of the team development

    difficulties in sustaining cross-functional team effort and considers

    the implications for team development

  • 8/14/2019 Managerial Learning.pdf

    5/11

    [308 ]

    Richard Teare

    Supporting managerial

    learning in the workplace

    International Journal of

    Contemporary Hospitality

    Management

    9/ 7 [1997] 304314

    anddistancelearninginmanagement;self-

    managedlearning;relatingmanagement

    developmenttocurrentandfutureneeds;

    universityandcommunitylearning

    networks;thefutureorientationofMBA

    programmesandrelatingcoursedesigntoorganizationallearning.

    LaneandRobinson(1995)reportonastudy

    undertakenonbehalfoftheManagement

    CharterInitiative(MCI).Thestudysoughtto

    determinethemainareasofdecisiontaking

    andactionwhichareofstrategicimportance

    toorganizationsandneedtobeimplemented

    effectively.

    Theseare:

    Understandingandinfluencingtheenviron-

    ment.Identifyingandevaluatingopportuni-

    tiesandthreatsorobstaclesfortheorgani-

    zationinrelationtoitsinternalandexter-nalenvironments.

    Settingthestrategyandgainingcommit-

    ment.Contributionstodevelopingand

    communicatingthemission,objectives,

    Figure2

    Cyc le of key strategic act ions and decisions

    Evaluating and improving

    Planning and monitoring

    Interpreting the environment

    Devising strategy

    Source:adapted from Lane and Robinson (1995, p. 7)

    TableIII

    Competences, managerial learning and the curriculum

    Authors Focus Sub-themeLaneandRobinson Reviews aspects of the management charter init iative (MCI) and Competences for

    (1995) its aim of establishing standards of good practice for managers in managers

    the UK

    Ashton(1996) Repor ts on how Holiday Inn Worldw ide has implement ed C ore compet enc es

    competency-based human resource strategies which provide a and individual

    direct link between individual performance and business objectives performance

    Davies (1996) Surveys the literature on open and distance learning (includes Open and distance

    flexible, self-paced and resource-based learning) and identifies a learning in

    gap that might be partially filled by a more comprehensive model of management

    open learning in management development

    King (1996) Describes IKEAs self-managed learning programme which is being Self-managed

    used to support its expansion plans and to strengthen its competitive learning

    position

    Kilcourse(1995) Decries the rapid proliferation of business schools and asserts that Relating

    dynamic, continuous change poses new challenges for managers, management

    requiring a different form of manag ement development development to

    current and future

    needs

    Critten(1996) Makes a case for a new kind of partnership between universities and University and

    their local communities within which organizat ional as wel l as community learning

    individual learning can be recognized, developed and accredited networks

    Carnall(1995) Examines the changes which are likely to occur in MBA programmes The future

    during the coming decade. Predicts that the third generation MBA orientation of

    will place more emphasis on the learning process than its curriculum MBA programmes

    and contentZuber-Skerritt (1995) Explores ideas and issues related to management education and Relating course

    development for the new learning organization and presents an design to

    example of a course design for experienced managers which is organizational

    work-based learning

  • 8/14/2019 Managerial Learning.pdf

    6/11

  • 8/14/2019 Managerial Learning.pdf

    7/11

  • 8/14/2019 Managerial Learning.pdf

    8/11

    [311 ]

    Richard Teare

    Supporting managerial

    learning in the workplace

    International Journal of

    Contemporary Hospitality

    Management

    9/7 [1997] 304314

    traditionalbusinesscurriculum,adynamicsyllabusforwork-basedaction

    learningseekstoaddressspecific,relevant

    questionsfortheorganizationanditsmem-

    bers,ratherthanfollowingaprescribed,

    staticlistoftopics.Adynamiccurriculum

    guidesindividualstodrawfromthebodyof

    knowledgeandanarrayofothersources

    (suchascompanyliteratureandothercon-

    textualizedinformation).Dilworth(1996)sees

    aneedtointerrelateacademicandworkplace

    domainsandarguesthatbyaddressingeither

    domaininrelativeexclusionfromtheother

    riskscreatingaworkplacecontextwhere

    learnersareabletograspreal-worldprob-

    lemsbutlacktheunderlyingacademic

    knowledgetosolvethem.

    Limericketal.(1994)considerthecharac-

    teristicsofanactionlearningorganizationin

    termsofitsbiasforreflection-in-action,for-

    mationoflearningalliances,developmentof

    externalnetworks,multiplerewardsystems,

    thecreationofmeaningfulinformation,indi-

    vidualempowerment,leadershipandvision.

    Theyconcludethattheknowledge-generating

    organizationthatengagesinthesekindsof

    activitiesismorelikelytobeabletosurvive

    inturbulentmarketconditions.McNultyandCanty(1995)foreseethat

    tomorrowsmanagerswillhavebe:simul-

    taneouslyandconsecutivelyspecialistsand

    generalists,teamplayersandself-reliant,able

    tothinkforthemselvesasabusinessofoneandplanaccordingly.Theybelievethatto

    succeed,managerswillhavetocommitthem-

    selvestoalifelonglearningcareer,atthe

    heartofwhichwillbe:knowingonesself

    andknowingwhatonehastoofferinthede-

    jobbedmarketplace.Thisnewemphasis

    demandsdifferentkindsofdevelopment

    programmes:thosewhichemphasizelearn-

    ingnotteaching,actionnottheoryandbusi-

    nessresultsnotclassroomresults.

    WillsandOliver(1996)describehowaction

    learningsfocusoncompany-specificissues

    makesiteasiertoreviewthehardreturn

    oninvestmentfortheenterprise.Theycon-

    cludethattraininganddevelopmentman-

    agerscanandshouldmeasurethevalue

    addedbyevaluatingtheorganizationaland

    financialimpactoftheirownorganizations

    investmentinmanagementeducation.Inso

    doing,theyfeelthatabudgetarilysupport-

    ivecultureismorelikelytoemerge.This

    approachwouldalsohelptohighlightthe

    rangeofsofterpersonalbenefitsderivedby

    individualparticipants.Theseinclude:

    changedbehaviours,growthinconfidence

    andlearningfromfellowmembersofthe

    smallactionlearninggrouporset.PetersandSmith(1996)alsoconsiderwaysofachieving

    thebestreturnonalearninginvestment.

    Theysuggestthattheorganizationshould

    identifyitsself-motivated,high-potential

    TableIV

    Work-based action learning

    Authors Focus Sub-themeHarrison(1996) Crit ically examines the concepts of action learning (AL) and the Using action

    learning organization and concludes that AL offers the potential learning in the

    to develop strategic awareness and thinking even in turbulent learning

    environmental conditions organization

    Chan(1994) Relates an act ion learners experience of act ion research and Relat ing act ion

    discusses how AL and action research deliver a balance of knowledge research to

    and action, academic rigour and managerial relevance managerial

    development

    Reeves (1996) Compares two companies use of action learning, one primarily for Action learning

    individual staff development, and a second where action learnings and its impact on

    questioning, problem-solving ethos had pervaded corporate life corporate culture

    Howell(1994) Presents a case study of the International Management Centres Using action

    (IMC) and shows that its graduate managers can operationalize AL learning and

    and action research to bring about organizational, professional and research skills in

    personal development as wel l as product iv it y improvements the workplace

    Mumford(1996) Identifies a gap in the current literature on action learning re: drawing Contributions from

    contributions from set members as distinct from facilitators. Offers the learning set in

    a method that might be used to overcome this bias action learning

    Wills andOliver Report on a four-year impact analysis of act ion learning MBA Measuring return

    (1996) programmes. The findings reveal an array of benefits for employing on investment from

    organizations and show that individual managers gained a variety management

    of soft benefits education

  • 8/14/2019 Managerial Learning.pdf

    9/11

  • 8/14/2019 Managerial Learning.pdf

    10/11

  • 8/14/2019 Managerial Learning.pdf

    11/11

    [314 ]

    Richard Teare

    Supporting managerial

    learning in the workplace

    International Journal of

    Contemporary Hospitality

    Management

    9/ 7 [1997] 304314

    Peters,J.andSmith,P.(1996),Developinghigh

    potentialstaff:anactionlearningapproach,

    TheJournalofWorkplaceLearning,Vol.8

    No.3,pp.6-11.

    Phillips,R.(1996),Coachingforhigherperfor-

    mance,TheJournalofWorkplaceLearning,

    Vol.8 No.4,pp.29-32.

    Pierce,C.,HannonP.andWilson,L.(1995),The

    standardsofcompetenceforseniormanage-

    ment:fieldtestresults,ExecutiveDevelop-

    ment,Vol.8 No.6,pp9-12.

    Proehl,R.A.(1996),Enhancingtheeffectiveness

    ofcross-functionalteams,Leadership&

    OrganizationDevelopmentJournal,Vol.17

    No.5,pp3-10.

    Reeves,T.(1996),Roguelearningonthecompany

    reservation,TheLearningOrganization,Vol.3 No.2,pp20-9.

    Scandura,T.A.,Tejeda,M.J.,Werther,W.B.and

    Lankau,M.J.(1996),Perspectivesonmentor-

    ing,Leadership&OrganizationDevelopment

    Journal,Vol.17 No.3,pp50-6.

    Shenhar,A.J.andRenier,J.(1996),Howtodefine

    management:amodularapproach,Manage-

    mentDevelopmentReview,Vol.9 No.1,

    pp25-31.

    Strachan,P.A.(1996),Managingtransforma-

    tionalchange:thelearningorganizationand

    teamworking,TeamPerformanceManage-

    ment,Vol.2 No.2,pp32-40.

    Veale,D.J.andWachtel,J.M.(1996),Mentoring

    andcoachingaspartofahumanresource

    developmentstrategy:anexampleat

    Coca-Colafoods,Leadership&Organization

    DevelopmentJournal,Vol.17 No.3,

    pp16-20.

    Wills,G.andOliver,C.(1996),MeasuringtheROI

    frommanagementactionlearning,Manage-

    mentDevelopmentReview,Vol.9 No.1,pp17-21.

    Zuber-Skerritt,O.(1995),Developingalearning

    organizationthroughmanagementeducation

    byactionlearning,TheLearningOrganiza-

    tion,Vol.2 No.2,pp36-46.