management of shock in acute trauma setting
DESCRIPTION
Assessment and management of shock in acute trauma setting based on ATLS recommendations .Lecture given in Trauma update at Perintalmanna on19th August 2014.TRANSCRIPT
“TRAUMA - SHOCK”Red flags & Deadlines
Dr.Venugopalan.P.P DA,DNB,MNAMS.MEM -GWU
Director , Emergency Medicine, Aster DM healthcareFounder& Executive Director
Active Network Group of Emergency Life Savers
Definition
An abnormality of circulatory system that results in inadequate organ perfusion and tissue oxygenation
Imbalance between
oxygen delivery & consumption
InadequateCellularOxygenDelivery
AnaerobicMetabolism
InadequateEnergyProduction
MetabolicFailure
LacticAcidProduction
MetabolicAcidosisCELL
DEATH
Ultimate Effects of Anaerobic Metabolism
Two Critical steps in the management
Step one Recognize its presence – Initial diagnosis is
based on clinical appreciation of the presence of inadequate tissue perfusion and oxygenation
No laboratory test diagnoses shock
Step two Identify the probable causes of the shock state.– Hemorrhage (most common cause)– Cardiogenic– Neurogenic– Tension pneumothorax – [Even] Sepsis
• The response to initial treatment couples with the finding during the primary and secondary patient surveys, usually provides sufficient information to determine the cause of the shock state.
Shock does not result from isolated brain injuries.
Response to blood loss
Early circulatory responses to blood loss are compensatory –
Progressive vasoconstriction of cutaneous, muscle, and visceral circulation to preserve blood flow to the kidneys, heart and brain
Earliest clinical signs
• Tachycardia - the earliest measurable circulatory sign of shock
• Increased Diastolic blood pressure • Reduced Pulse Pressure.
Any injured patient who is cool and tachycardic
is in “shock” until proven otherwise
• > 160 - Infants • > 140 -Preschool child • > 120 -School age to puberty• > 100 - Adult
Tachycardia
Shock
How do I locate the bleeding?
Shock
● Physical examination
● Diagnostic adjuncts to primary survey
● Chest X-ray
● Pelvic X-ray
● FAST / DPL
How do I locate the bleeding?
What is the cause of the shock state?
In the vast majority of trauma patients, shock is due to blood loss.
Shock
Interventions
Direct pressure / tourniquet
STOPthe
bleeding!Reduce pelvic volume
Angio-embolization
Splint fractures
Operation
What can I do about it?
Interventions
● Fluid resuscitation● Vascular access?● Type?● Volume?
● Monitor response● Prevent hypothermia!
What can I do about it?
Treatment goals
• Volume restoration• Control hemorrhage• Assess response to the initial therapy
The presence of shock in an injured patient
demands the immediate involvement of a surgeon
Vasopressors are contraindicated for
the treatment of hemorrhagic shock because they worsen tissue perfusion
Estimate fluid and blood losses Based on Patient’s Initial Presentation
Class I Class II Class III Class IV
Blood Loss (mL) Up to 750 750-1500 1500-2000 > 2000
Blood loss (% blood volume) Up to 15 % 15 %-30% 30% - 40 % > 40 %
Pulse rate <100 > 100 >120 >140
Blood pressure Normal Normal Decreased Decreased
Pulse pressure(mm Hg)
Normal or increased Decreased Decreased Decreased
Respiratory rate 14-20 20-30 30-40 > 35
Urine output(mL/hr) >30 20-30 5-15 Negligible
CNS/Mental status Slightly anxious Mildly anxious Anxious confused
Confused, lethargic
Fluid replacement (3:1 rule) Crystalloid Crystalloid Crystalloid and
bloodCrystalloid and blood
Management strategy
• Assess and manage “ABC” • Establish “IV -Oxygen –Monitors” • Insert “2 large bore” cannulae in peripheral
Veins • Infuse “large volume” of warm crystalloids (1
liter) rapidly• Insert NG tube and bladder catheter
Assess the “response” to initial volume therapy
• Response to initial fluid resuscitation is the key to determining subsequent therapy
• Distinguish “Hemodynamically stable” from “Hemodynamically normal”
Response to initial fluid resuscitation
[1000 mL Ringer;s lactate solution in adults, 20 ml/kg Ringer’s lactate bolus in children]
• Rapid response• Transient response• Minimal or No response
Rapid Response Transient response No response
Vital signs Return to normal
Transient improvement, recurrence of ↓ BP and ↑HR
Remain abnormal
Estimated blood loss Minimal(10% - 20%)
Moderate and ongoing(20% - 40%)
Severe (>40%)
Need for more crystalloid Low High High
Need for blood Low Moderate to high Immediate
Blood preparation Type and cross match Type-specific Emergency blood
release
Need for operative intervention Possibly Likely Highly likely
Early presence of surgeon Yes Yes Yes
Failure to respond to crystalloid and blood administration ?
• Blunt myocardial injury• Cardiac tamponade• Tension pneumothorax• Neurogenic shock• Ongoing hemorrhage – Retroperitonial bleed– Internal organ injury
Search Causes
Fluid of choice
• Ringer’s lactate is the initial fluid of choice
• Normal saline is the second choice
• Blood and blood components as required
Special situations
• Age• Athletes• Pregnancy• Medications• Hypothermia• Pacemaker
Beware Unusual presentations
●Hypothermia
●Early coagulopathy
Pitfalls
Pitfalls
Complications of Shock and Shock Management
●Equating BP with cardiac output
●Misleading hemoglobin and hematocrit levels
Pitfalls
Pitfalls
Complications of Shock
Debate !
Permissive Hypotension in Trauma
“One of the most controversial issues in trauma care today is restricting intravenous fluid resuscitation in hypotensive trauma patients who have uncontrolled hemorrhage”
This new approach has the following goals:
• 1) Limiting hemorrhage • 2) Preventing hemodilution • 3) Not disrupting the clotting process.
• Permissive hypotension is still a relatively new concept for treating trauma patients who are hypotensive with uncontrolled hemorrhage.
• There is still no clear, universal recommendation regarding a standardized approach. Research and common sense does allow some initial conclusions to be drawn that definitely favor permissive hypotension.
What is new?
https://www.facebook.com/TheLancetMedicalJournal
• CRASH-2: tranexamic acid and trauma patients• Published March 24, 2011• Executive summary• A new analysis of the 2010 CRASH-2 study shows that
tranexamic acid should be given as early as possible to bleeding trauma patients; if treatment is not given until three hours or later after injury, it is less effective and could even be harmful. In this new analysis, the CRASH-2 investigators analysed subgroups of patients who had received tranexamic acid less than one hour after injury; between one and three hours after injury; or more than three hours after injury.
conclusion
• Trauma shock management is challenge • Protocol based approach is the best way to
solve puzzle• Early surgical involvement is one of the corner
stones
Interesting Web Sites
• www.trauma.org/archives/permhypo.html (Research articles on permissive hypotension)
• www.manuelsweb.com/blood_loss.htm (Allows you to calculate allowable blood loss)
THANK YOU
www.drvenu.net