“managed care” introduction to health policy hms fall 2000 nancy turnbull, hsph

42
“Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Upload: jillian-mayne

Post on 14-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

“Managed Care”

Introduction to Health Policy

HMS Fall 2000

Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Page 2: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Ground rules for the class• No idealizing the “unmanaged” health care system• Differentiate among

– Managed care techniques– Managed care organizations (MCOs)– Competition among MCOs (“managed

competition”)• “If you’ve seen one MCO, you’ve seen one MCO”• The plural of anecdote is not data• MCOs did not introduce the profit motive into

medicine• The status quo has many constituencies

Page 3: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

“Problems in health care quality are serious and extensive...Americans bear a great burden of harm because of these problems, a burden that is measured in lost lives, reduced functioning and wasted resources… Collectively, these problems call for urgent action … Quality of care is the problem, not managed care....”

Institute of Medicine, September, 1998

Page 4: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Variation: CABG/1000 (Medicare)

Dartmouth Atlas, 1996

Page 5: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

What is managed care?• “Anything other than an arrangement in which the

insurer pays all bills without questions.”– Mark Pauly

• “A term that has even less specificity than the label ‘low in fat’ in your super creamy dessert.”

– Harold Luft

• “A vague phrase that covers actions that range from the euphemistic to the evangelistic.”

– Daniel Fox

Page 6: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Techniques of managing care• Selective contracting with providers• Financial incentives for providers• Financial incentives for patients• Medical management/quality improvement

techniques– “Gatekeepers” -Organizational culture

– Precertification -Practice guidelines

– Referral authorization -Provider profiling

– Case management -Disease management

– Demand management -Drug formularies

Page 7: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Types of entities that can adopt managed care techniques

• HMOs• Insurance companies• Employers• Unions/welfare plans• Medical management

firms (full-service or specialty)

• Individual providers• Delivery systems• Medicare• Medicaid programs• National health

systems

Page 8: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Common characteristics of managed care organizations

• Combine financing and delivery of care (a “system”)

• Enrolled population (“members”)• Prepaid premium (a “fixed budget”)• Selective “network” of providers• Requirements and/or incentives to use

providers in the network• Focus on prevention and primary care• Medical management and quality improvement

programs

Page 9: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Types of Managed Care Organizations

• Health Maintenance Organization (HMO)

• Preferred Provider Organization (PPO)

• Point of Service (POS) Plan

• Managed Indemnity Plan

• Comprehensive vs. single service– Mental health, prescription drug

Page 10: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

The HMO (Health Maintenance Organization)

• Organized health system responsible for

a. financing

b. delivery

• of comprehensive health services

• with restricted choice of providers

• to an enrolled population

• for a prepaid, fixed fee

Page 11: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

The Original Types of HMOs

• Staff model

• Group model

• Network model

• Independent practice association (IPA) model

• Direct contract model

Page 12: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

The creation of a mixed model MCO: Harvard Pilgrim Health Care

• Harvard Community Health Plan-staff model HMO founded in early 1970s

• Merged with Multigroup, a group model, in 1988

• Merged with Pilgrim, direct contract model HMO, in 1994

• Formed an insurance company in 1995

• Spun off health centers (staff model) to form Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates in 1997

• Acquired Neighborhood Health Plan, network model HMO, in 1998

• Bought half of Health New England, an IPA HMO, in 1998

Page 13: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

The PPO(Preferred Provider Organization)

• An organization that contracts with employers or insurance companies to provide health care from a selected group of providers (“preferred providers”)

• Distinguishing characteristic from an HMO:– Consumers may use non-preferred providers

but must pay more out-of-pocket

Page 14: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Key PPO Characteristics

• Select provider network

• Negotiated rates of payment

• Incentives in benefit structure for consumers to use preferred providers

• (More or less) Utilization management and quality improvement programs

Page 15: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

POS (Point of Service) HMO Plan

• Hybrid HMO product that is similar to a PPO– Member may use non-HMO providers but must

pay higher out-of-pocket costs

• Fastest growing segment of managed care

• Broader choice of provider than HMO

• (Potentially) greater ability to control costs and utilization than a PPO

Page 16: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Managed Indemnity Plan

• Traditional insurance plan that adopts some features of managed care – Most common examples

• Prior authorization of hospital admissions• Catastrophic case management• Specialty utilization management of certain

services (e.g., mental health, pharmacy)• Freedom of choice of providers• More limited ability to control costs

Page 17: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Average annual change in employer

health benefit cost: 1987-1999

-5.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99

% annual change

Page 18: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Employer techniques to control costs

• Increased cost-sharing with employees– Premiums– Deductibles, coinsurance, copayments– Defined contributions not defined benefits

• Benefit cutbacks

• Eligibility reductions

• Managed care plans

Page 19: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

19

US Managed Care Penetration: 1993 vs. 1998

52%

91%

9%

16%

14%

52%

0

0.1

0.20.3

0.40.5

0.60.7

0.8

0.91

Employed Medicare Medicaid

1993

1998

Page 20: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Change in percentage of workers in various types of health plans: US

48

19

7

2723

27

19

31

15

30

20

35

9

3025

36

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Traditional HMO POS PPO

1993199619971998

1993, 1996-19981993, 1996-1998

Page 21: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

21

Growth of products with “choice”• Majority of managed care enrollment is in

PPO and Point of Service products

• Consumers equate “choice” with quality

• MCOs want broadest provider networks for marketing reasons– Managed care plans have diffuse and largely

overlapping provider networks– Most providers do not distinguish among

MCOs in delivering care

Page 22: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Potential strengths of managed care• Containing the increase in health care costs

• Improving quality– Creating more rational systems of care– Improving coordination of care – Enhancing communication among providers– Reducing variation in practice– Improving access– Promoting prevention and wellness

• Enhancing accountability

Page 23: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Potential concerns about managed care

• Impaired continuity of care• Withholding of necessary care• Failure to provide “state of the art” care• Increased administrative costs• Reduced clinical autonomy • Hindering provider advocacy for patients• Promoting competition based on risk

selection and not efficiency of providing care

Page 24: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Managed care is still an experiment

• Limited research on results of managed care

• Results seem to suggest:

– Lower rates of hospitalization

– Less intensive use of some resources

– Clinical quality measures as good, sometimes better (not clear for frail and poor)

– Satisfaction higher for costs, paperwork

– Satisfaction lower for access; lower for the poor and frail elders

– Lower “costs” (at least until last two years)

Page 25: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Past results may not be predictive of future

• Limited number of HMOs studied; mostly staff and group

• Focus on traditional, lock-in products

• Inadequate correction for selection bias

• Comparison usually of HMOs to unmanaged, indemnity plans

• Focus on “does MC work” rather than “what in MC works”

Page 26: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Little evidence that MCOs have achieved sustainable reductions in the rate of increase in

costs• Some scattered victories, but battle continues• Premiums are not costs

– MCO pricing decisions

– Cost-shifting

• By purchasers to covered individuals and by dropping coverage

• Among purchasers

• To families (e.g., home health)

– Benefit differences

– Administrative costs not adequately included

– Risk selection

– Differences in different market segments (e.g., small group, nongroup)

Page 27: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Managed care has not altered most of the causes of rising costs• Technology

• Demographics

• Mix of primary and specialty physicians

• Excess capacity

• Lack of universal coverage

• Culture (“death is optional”)

Page 28: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

The Possibilities of Managed Care

• Manage insurance risk: benefit package design, pricing, marketing

• Manage provider pricing: network formation, contracting

• Manage utilization: utilization review, provider financial incentives, consumer cost-sharing

1. Manage Cost

Page 29: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

The Possibilities of Managed Care

• Develop and implement protocols for prevention and treatment; monitor outcomes

• In-hospital acute case management / “care pathways”

• Disease management across continuum of care; shift resources from acute to chronic, inpatient to community-based sites of care

2. Manage Care

Page 30: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

The Possibilities of Managed Care

• Population-based interventions– Risk assessment

– Outreach

– Intervention

– Monitoring and follow-up

• Shift resources from health sector to non-health sector (education, social services, housing, transportation)

3. Manage Health

Page 31: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH
Page 32: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Why the growing scrutiny and public discontent with managed care?

• Managed care is not a “voluntary” choice for most people

• No more “safety valve” of unmanaged care• Middle class has shifted debate from coverage and

affordability to allocation • Massive transfer of power from providers to

purchasers• “As the pie shrinks, the table manners deteriorate” • Impingement on autonomy of providers• Complexity and administrative hassle

Page 33: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Why the growing scrutiny and public discontent with managed care? (cont’d)

• Growth of for-profit plans/distrust of “Wall Street”• Some true horror stories (although these existed in

unmanaged care as well)• Managed care introduces a more obviously

“accountable” entity• Managed care doing the “dirty work” of cost

containment and resource allocation• Consumers have not benefited from the cost savings

of managed care

Page 34: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

“Hot” regulatory issues• Access to care

– Any willing provider laws

– Access to emergency treatment/standards to judge what is an “emergency”

– Use of specialists as “gatekeepers”

– Continuity of care following enrollment and provider termination

• Quality of care– Standards for utilization management decisions

– Standards for specific diagnoses/conditions

– Collection and reporting of access and quality information

Page 35: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

An Act to protect patient continuity of careA health plan that requires the designation of a primary care

physician shall notify a member at least 60 days prior to the disenrollment of such member’s PCP and shall permit such member to continue to be covered for covered health services by such physician at least six months after said physician is disenrolled, unless the physician is disenrolled for quality reasons …A member in her third trimester of pregnancy may continue treatment with said provider until after her first postpartum visit…A member who is terminally ill (meaning an illness which is likely, within a reasonable degree of medical certainty to cause death within one year), may continue treatment with said provider until the member’s death.”

Page 36: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Pharmacy Freedom of Choice

“An HMO must contract with any pharmacy willing to accept the terms and conditions of the HMO’s provider contract, including reasonable credentialing criteria, rates of payment, utilization management, and quality assurance requirements.”

Page 37: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Minimum Maternity Length of Stay

Any HMO shall provide coverage of a minimum of 48 hours of inpatient care following a vaginal delivery and a minimum of 96 hours following a cesarean section. Any decisions to shorten these minimum coverages shall be made by the attending physician in consultation with the mother. Coverage in the event of an early discharge shall include necessary home visits, patient education, and any appropriate tests.

Page 38: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

“Hot” regulatory issues (cont’d)

• Due process protections– Grievance and complaint procedures

– Right of appeal to independent entity

– Provider due rights and process

• Access to prescription drugs not on formulary• Ability to sue MCOs for medical malpractice• Provider payment and financial incentives

– prohibition against individual capitation

– mandatory stop-loss protections

– need for risk adjusted payment

Page 39: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

“Hot” regulatory issues (cont’d)• Regulation of providers assuming financial risk

and providers contracting directly with purchasers

• Privacy of of patient medical information • Minimum Medical Loss Ratios/”Care Share”• Disclosure to consumers

– Provider payment methods

– Provider networks

– Medical necessity and medical management criteria

– Quality report cards

Page 40: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

Minimum Medical Loss Ratio

“An HMO must spend at least 90% of annual earned premium on medical expenses. Any HMO failing to meet this standard shall refund to its policyholders any amount by which its medical loss ratio failed to meet this standard, either by actual refunds or by offsets against future premiums.”

Page 41: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

An Act to protect the privacy of mental health information

“No health plan shall require consent by a member to the disclosure of information, other than the patient name, diagnosis and date and type of service, as a condition to receiving mental health and substance abuse benefits….No health plan shall acquire or disclose any communications by a member to a psychotherapist arising out of the diagnosis or treatment of a mental condition without the express and informed written consent of the member, and such informed consent shall include notification of the right not to give such consent.”

Page 42: “Managed Care” Introduction to Health Policy HMS Fall 2000 Nancy Turnbull, HSPH

What should health professionals do to help realize the possibilities of managed care?

Work to change the US financing system– Universal coverage– Sharing the financing burden equitably– Publicly accountable health planning processes– Societal affordability (e.g., budgets)– Controls as close to caregivers as possible– Put savings from managed care into systems to

expand coverage and improve health