man 20005 - lec 2(2)

16
Lecture 2 MAN 20005 Theoretical Apparatus of Ethics (Part 2) Updated 3.10

Upload: theacademist

Post on 20-Aug-2015

343 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MAN 20005 - Lec 2(2)

Lecture 2MAN 20005Theoretical

Apparatus of Ethics(Part 2)

Updated 3.10

Page 2: MAN 20005 - Lec 2(2)

• Each day, each person faces a variety of moral decisions. Some moral decisions are small (such as whether to use the last of the milk) Others are larger, such as whether to lie about an affair. Some are extremely large, such as whether one should torture prisoners for information or not.

• Regardless of the size of the moral decision, a person’s ability to make a moral decision in a rational manner depends on his/her ability to engage in moral reasoning.

• Human behavior has consequences for the welfare of others.

Ethical Reasoning

Page 3: MAN 20005 - Lec 2(2)

• Different stages in decision-making in response to an ethical problem

• Different Influences on the processLinda Trevino (1986)Thomas Jones (1986)Hunt and Vitell (1986)Ferrell, Gresham and Fraedrich (1989)

Models of Ethical Decision- Making

Page 4: MAN 20005 - Lec 2(2)

1) Recognizing the moral issue

• Moral reasoning begins with the consideration of a moral or ethical issue.

• An “issue” is the matter currently under dispute

• make an honest effort to understand the situation

• “perceptual difference” may lead to various disagreement.

Ethical Decision Making Process

ExampleIllegal parking may be unethical to some while others may see it to be less significance.

Page 5: MAN 20005 - Lec 2(2)

Examplea) Are there other legal parking bay near by?

b) Suppose there are cars in the house where you parked your car illegally, are you blocking its exit?

c) What does it cost to park your car at the legal parking bay?

d) Who else is going to be affected (the stakeholders)? Consider the consequences, duties, rights, principles and implication on your personal integrity.

Then ask a series of moral questions

Page 6: MAN 20005 - Lec 2(2)

It is unavoidable that one sometime consider the economic

factor. But just because a decision is made on economic

ground does not mean that it does not involve ethical

considerations. Being sensitive to ethical issues is an

important characteristic that needs to be cultivated in

ethically responsible people.

2) Make a moral judgment

3) Establish moral intent

4) Pursue the moral behavior

Page 7: MAN 20005 - Lec 2(2)

1) Age2) Gender3) Previous experience4) Social connection5) Any reward system6) Cultural differences7) Intensity of the issue

concern8) Individual locus of

control

9) Personal value10) Personal integrity11) Language used in

expressing moral issue12) Moral muteness for the

sake of harmony, efficiency and to portray image of power and effectiveness

13) Rationalization of unethical behaviour

Factors that will influence an individual’s ethical decision making

Page 8: MAN 20005 - Lec 2(2)

• Moral reasoning theory by Lawrence Kohlberg

• CMD concerns moral reasoning that develop according to an individual age level, namely level 1, 2 and 3

Cognitive Moral Development (CMD)

Level 1Stage 1 individual is self centeredThe decision about what is right is expressed in term of

punishment or rewardsEg : at the early childhood, a child are self centered. Her

is only willing to share her toy because that is what required by mum.

Page 9: MAN 20005 - Lec 2(2)

Level 2Stage 2 individual views rules as imposed upon

him people do as they’re told

What is morally right is expressed in terms of living up to the roles and the expectation of others, fulfilling duties and obligations

Eg : as a child grow older, the child is to act in accordance to her parent’s instruction

Page 10: MAN 20005 - Lec 2(2)

Level 3Stage 3 individual has gone beyond other’s

expectation and rules

He is able to make decision more autonomously and consistent with principle of justice and rightness.

Most people reaches level 2. Very few adult in the society is able to reach level 3.

Page 11: MAN 20005 - Lec 2(2)

The Milgram Experiment

The research conducted by Stanley Milgram provide an insight into how a normal adult

behave in authority situation.

Most adults will carry out the order of the authority figure even if those orders are

contrary to their personal belief

Page 12: MAN 20005 - Lec 2(2)

• National culture can be defined as “collective mental programming” of a population.

• Patterns of believe differ across nations.

• Individual interpret the world using this pattern.

• An individual operating in a foreign culture does not understand the manner of which people of that nation behave, and this individual will interpret purely in terms of his own culture.

• The result might be misinterpretation or misunderstanding

Individual moral reasoning may differ in different nation

Page 13: MAN 20005 - Lec 2(2)

• Differences occur due to :

a) Individualism / Collectivism social behaviourIndividualism • People in the society think of themselves as

autonomous individuals who are responsible primarily to themselves and their immediate families.

• American are individualist – individual are assessed based on their individual educational and professional achievement

Page 14: MAN 20005 - Lec 2(2)

Collectivism • Collectivism – people in the society emphasize collective

purposes and group harmony

• Asian are collectivist – they value conformity to the group and define themselves in term of their belonging to the group.

• When hiring in a collectivism culture, employer concerns the ability of the individual to work with other workers

• In this culture, hiring of family member or friends are common, but in the perspective of the individualism society, this act may be seen as wrong, unfair or bias selection.

Page 15: MAN 20005 - Lec 2(2)

b)Power distance• Power distance means the extent of which people in the

society accept hierarchical or unequal distribution of power in the society.

• High power distance reflects acceptance of inequality and respect for social status or class boundaries.

• In this culture, employees obey their superior’s instructions merely because they are the boss. Bypassing the boss is seen as unethical and inappropriate.

• Low power distance denotes deemphasize of status and class status.

• Most western countries have low power distance. Bosses are respected for their knowledge instead of his corporate level.

Page 16: MAN 20005 - Lec 2(2)

c) Preference for certainty rules

d) Masculinity or femininity

e) Education level and employment status

f) Cognitive moral development